Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 09:16:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
321  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 14, 2013, 12:05:34 AM
There was no "december 31st" date and there was no "mining protection plan". Just a 400+ GH/s miner promised in October at well under 1 W/GH/s

True.

Check out the original announcement for example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270384.msg2894615#msg2894615
Or the original ToS: http://pastebin.com/EfS9vmRf
322  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 12, 2013, 11:28:07 PM
The problem w/ HF was never the hardware, they seem to have some talented engineers.  The problem was the sleazy and dishonest way they went about selling off stock they knew they couldn't deliver upon.

^ this

I'm happy to see this product come together and I have no doubt it will be high quality so congrats to HF for that. At the same time FU HF for playing dirty marketing games with what could have been your most loyal customer-base. One BFL is more than enough.
323  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 11, 2013, 10:29:51 PM
I personally am planning on stripping my machines and putting them in cases of my own design.  If I could get my order as parts a week earlier (by not shipping Canada and then back to the US)... that would be just fine with me.

Exactly. The only thing that matters is the modules. The rest is just cowbell.
324  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 11, 2013, 09:40:13 PM
Anybody know if the HF miner firmware can be updated by the user after delivery?

Clearly HF is rushing to get the BJ out of the door before X-mas so the initial firmware might be sub-optimal.

anything else would be bullshit

of course you can update the fw. hell i could even update the fw of my dvd-player if i would like.

Well, the BFL miners are very hard to flash. You need an Atmel AVR Dragon to do the job. So I'm looking for a software based flash solution.
325  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 11, 2013, 09:34:26 PM
Anybody know if the HF miner firmware can be updated by the user after delivery?

Clearly HF is rushing to get the BJ out of the door before X-mas so the initial firmware might be sub-optimal.
326  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 11, 2013, 09:22:18 PM
https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/410880058056638464

Quote
GN chip bringup - Some small tweaks to the chip power supply and we reach 105GH per die! Silicon proven good. Next step, all 4 dies running.

That sounds promising.
327  Economy / Speculation / Re: $100 coming next week on: December 07, 2013, 09:21:51 PM
I've you have been around for a while you might have noticed that the bottom of each crash is higher than the peak of the previous bubble. So below $300 is unlikely.

Also it makes more sense to use a log scale when buying/selling bitcoin.

http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#tgMzbgEzm1g10zm2g25zi1gRSIzl
328  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: December 05, 2013, 04:16:19 PM
How will the recent Chinese regulations on Bitcoin affect AM?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1s5hzl/my_human_translation_of_the_china_regulation/
329  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 05, 2013, 04:27:05 AM
I'm not sure where the " <0.5W/GH/s underclocked" claim came from.

It came from Simon himself:

Chip Specs
 - 28nm custom ASIC
 - Power Consumption: significantly less than 1.0 W/GH at nominal clock speed
 - Designed to be underclocked for greater efficiency – better than 0.5 W/GH*
 - Designed to be overclocked for greater performance  - better than 500GH/s**

* Real silicon power consumption may vary from simulation results by plus or minus 20%
** May require improved power supplies in the chassis
330  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: December 04, 2013, 09:52:32 PM
@HashFast - 4 Dec 13 - 2:32PM ET
GN chip bringup - Power consumption: 0.14ua/MHz at 0.77volts at low speeds. That's 0.56W/GH/s. More tests happening now.

These twitter updates are great. Whoever at HF is doing these, thank you.

0.56W/GH/s does not sound very encouraging since they were advertising <0.5W/GH/s underclocked. Not sure at what speed they are testing at but it looks like consumption is +10% of what they were shooting for?
331  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAMMER: CoinJar.io / Zhou Tong - Deletes My Coinjar Account & Balance on: December 04, 2013, 06:05:23 AM
legit for now. will scam your money later.

^this.

Phase 1: Build a good service
Phase 2: Build trust
Phase 3: Zhou Tonged.
332  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 30, 2013, 07:43:09 PM
Also: http://bitcoinexaminer.org/chinese-journalist-reveals-the-secrets-of-asicminers-mining-facility/
333  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 28, 2013, 05:20:52 PM
Anyone also notice that in the video, Simon Barber walk like he is physically handicapped.
He made a good impression on me. He looks like to be the most honest of them.

Yes, I met Simon at a Bitcoin Meetup back in May. He is a honest and stand up guy. Definitely more the techie type. He is not out to screw you over, he really wants to develop the best mining ASIC available. His association with HF was the leading factor for me to pre-order with them.

Someone with deep pockets needs make a example out of this company.
We need to do that ourselves. What's the problem in sharing some money for a lawyer? I'm ready to put 10k$ in myself (i'm sorry to keep repeating that).

This is actually not that easy.

After my refund request was rejected I have contacted 2 attorneys that cover consumer law (http://wblawpartners.com/ and http://ohellaw.com/), however both have given me a notice of nonengagement so far citing "lack of experience in the subject matter". Likely because of the Bitcoin aspect.

I might reach out to a few others in the future. Note that I'm not out to sue HF, merely to get a full refund in BTC as I am a day 1 customer covered by the original ToS. If I find an attorney that specializes in consumer litigation that is willing to take this case the most likely way forward is that they will draft a Letter of Demand. That would put the ball back in HashFast's court.

Because I only have one unit on order I'm not as motivated as some of you to see this all the way through. On the other hand I do think that we need to counterbalance the actions of HashFast as currently it is a one-sided affair where the customers consistently gets the short end of the stick. I've been through a couple of similar cases before, most notably BFL and Bitcoinica. Doing nothing will get you royally screwed, but legal action is not as easy as it sounds.

The best outcome would be that HF ships a.s.a.p (Dec 16) and takes steps to compensate customers for their own failures, for example by shipping the MPP units with the original order.

334  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 28, 2013, 04:48:46 PM
If AM is not merge-mining NMC yet - now would be a good time to start as NMC is currently valued over $13 on BTC-e.

As margins get smaller, let's not leave money on the table.
335  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Name something you've actually BOUGHT with bitcoin on: November 28, 2013, 07:27:58 AM
  • Amazon.com Gift cards (Gyft)
  • Chocolate (Buyers Best Friend)
  • Sushi (Blue Ocean Sushi)
  • Gold & Silver (Amagi Metals)
  • Steam games (Humble Bundle)
  • ASIC Mining Hardware (BFL, AM, HF)
  • Stickers, Cards, T-shirts
  • Shares (AM)
  • Casascius Physical Coins
  • AltCoins (NMC, LTC, PPC)
  • Fiat (USD/EUR)
336  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: November 27, 2013, 08:37:13 PM
Pretty happy with the dividends considering AM is still running on Gen1. FC clearly has a solid long term plan he is working towards so I'm staying long.
337  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 26, 2013, 06:30:32 AM
The ambient temperature warranty clause is largely a non-issue since there is no way for HF to verify this.

It does however illustrate the kind of thinking going on at HF.
338  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 26, 2013, 04:59:01 AM
To my understanding ToS might change but the one applies to buyer is the ToS when buyer made the purchase.

If buyer has to follow the updated ToS, and buyer disagree then in my opinion buyer should have right to get refunds.

This is why HF added the following:

Quote
ENTIRE AGREEMENT; SEVERABILITY. These Terms, together with the order confirmation(s) sent from Hashfast to Buyer, are the entire agreement between Buyer and Hashfast with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all prior oral and written understandings, communications, or agreements between Buyer and Hashfast. No agreement is made between Buyer and any Affiliate.  Hashfast may revise, update, or otherwise amend these Terms but posting such amended Terms on its website or otherwise providing such amended Terms (e.g. by email), and such amended Terms will govern Buyer’s purchases if accepted by Buyer in any of the ways specified in Section 1.

I'm not sure when this was added exactly, but for sure it was not present in the original early August ToS.
339  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 26, 2013, 03:32:19 AM
anybody have a copy of the tos pre October 29th my order was placed back in late August

August 9: http://pastebin.com/EfS9vmRf

side-by-side of Aug & Sept ToS: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299193.msg3212178#msg3212178

Related: http://4x.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMining/comments/1r8pkf/just_got_an_update_from_hashfast_on_expected_and/

Edit: For shits & giggles I also did a quick diff on the MPP page:



The only thing they removed is: "We want our customers to succeed."

Edit2: Other changes in the new terms are regarding warranty:

Quote
Hashfast shall have no obligations for breach of warranty if the alleged defect or non-conformance is found to have occurred as a result of operation in an ambient temperature other than 5-22 degrees Celsius (40-72 degrees  Fahrenheit)

Better not mine during summertime!

http://www.diffnow.com/?report=9luib
340  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 26, 2013, 03:00:53 AM
I highly recommend HF customers to make frequent snapshots of the ToS page using archive.org:

Save a snapshot: http://web.archive.org/save/https://hashfast.com/checkout/terms-of-sale/

Browse snapshots: http://web.archive.org/web/20131029014048*/https://hashfast.com/checkout/terms-of-sale/
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!