We are not trapped and we are still on course provided we don’t join people that will panic sell and release their holding to them for a token that would have fetched them so much more in future, if we can keep holding our coin and desist a little bit from short term trading, because that is one of the easiest way they get to investors.

If you are a very long-term investor, they will have no way to easily come in to your space and for short term traders, I wouldn’t say you should stop, just be very careful when selling, try as much as possible to watch their movement before making your own move, just play along with them too.

I just see using PayPal as an additional fees burden placed on one because PayPal also charges certain percentage per transaction to make use of their services, in the case of paying for goods, receiver could decide to bear the cost or the sender, but in this case, the sender will have to bear the burden, you will see pay for exchanges fee on that transaction too and if you are to trade with the money, you still pay additional trading fee again, aren’t these a little bit too high when one is not sure of the profit you can get on that transaction, except such transaction is juts for payment and not for investment, the sender can decide to overlook the charges.

Must be a wise advice, sometime it is good to give them the benefits of doubt by testing them with our small assets because if we all keep away for them, how are we going to know how functional and solid they are, and we should stop pushing others to this, waiting for other to do the assignment for us, why can’t we be the hero and take the lead, then we can give the rest feedback for their further investigation.

These exchanges are nothing without the users, so how will they function properly if we don’t go into their arena. I just hope that some of these exchanges will start rewarding those who stood by them from the beginning because it takes lots of courage to do so.

If they had wanted to, they would have done so, not many people want to cash out to leave the market permanently, they will only desire to cash out so they can buy more at dip, but because of FUD, they will continue holding because at the time they decide to cash out, anything might happen that would even make the price of BTC shoot up by 2x which will be too expensive to buy then.

Aside that, we also consider the ratio of people who bought t $3000, to $4000 and some even just bought at $4900, if we look at the recent spike, the investors that made this price shut so high came in when market was $4200, so the percentage of $3000 holders might not be enough to really pull the market down. There are so many investors by the door step even waiting for a little price crash and would rush in at any slight opportunity.

But, I would say trade a new coin but never have you invested in it for a long term purpose.

New coins are even the sweetest and fastest way to make money, every coin that enters an exchange newly seriously has the chances of getting pumped within few weeks, once you can invest in them before the pump, you will be lucky to make huge profit after the pump once you can catch it, though not the safest means but still the surest means of making quick money.

At the same time, when it comes to investing as long term, it is sure not the best way to get engaged in new coins except the project is a very good one that the investor can really vouch for.

I truly don’t know too, there is this project that I participated in then called AFCASH of Africunia Bank, I was surprised too that they didn’t ask us to do KYC from the beginning until after ICO has ended and they were about distributing tokens which was even for hunters.

I really don’t see sense in any of these policy, this is why we are not moving forward because of too many competition in this crypto investment, once one project hears that the others are doing something, they all tend to do the same without first checking if it is necessary or not. Why we are then in a decentralized system, if they still do all these things found n a centralized system.

Altcoins even have the tendency of given more than 100%, I don’t know of the altcoins we have as of now, but the altcoins that I know which I held some before the last bull run of 2017/2018 had their value even shoot up as high as 1500% at some poin.

So, altcoins are what you can invest with little capital and become a millionaire through it like you said, but we still have to invest in very good altcoins that have the chance of increasing that way with good products, otherwise, we will end up wasting our time with these shitcoins believing they will rise.

Mere scammers, don’t tell me the wickedness of this world has thought you lessons so hard that you have become heartless, is it because you don’t see these investors cry ? Maybe then, you will realized the extent of damage they do cause to some of these investors that has already fallen victim of scam.

Stealing is stealing and if caught, they should be put to death, it is just so unfortunate that they system is a decentralized one that creates anonymity, so it will be difficult to go after them, even if one wants to use whitepaper in going after them, one will end up killing innocent people because the faces we see on whitepapers are not the real face of these scammers.

When it comes to gambling, things do not work just according to the LUCK. This should be understood and I think that you still can play and come up with your own good strategies in the dice game. Half of the game depends on your ability to win and not on luck so if you are really interested in winning the gambling. This further depends on how many strategies can you make of the few common tricks in the market.

Dice must be a simplest way of entertainment thing for both gamblers and for gambling houses and I am damn sure that it was not innovated for profit making. It is purely an entertainment thing, and trying out it for profit making definitely will lead to big disappointments over the times.

The gambling responsibility sounds a bit hilarious because of the uncertainty in gambling which is a factor that cannot be exempted. But, I believe that gambling is not something that makes you a looser but an opportunist that is always fruitful in the rest of life.

I am part of sports gambling and I have made more than I have lost which means I am not a loser. So, this is very important to understand that you can make money if you are optimistic and agreed to learn. Keep trying where we have lost is completely meaning less but we should innovate where we could recover our losses and this is the reason I switched over to sports betting and I am not a future's failure anymore  .

You have a good point because many times people just think it’s only those who gamble for money that gamble without discipline but the reality is anyone can actually gamble irresponsibly. In short it is possible that the highest numbers of gamblers who play without discipline are the so called gamblers that play for fun. Too much of fun can also lead to addiction, or why do we drug and sexual addiction. They all happen out of fun.

Addiction works with time. Those that spend too much time playing the game will someday become addicted so it’s better for every player to play moderately. Let’s always have it at the back of the mind that spending too much time on a casino site is wrong. Set alarm on how many hours we wish to spend each day.

Yes, they do still things need to be improved. I have been reading a lot of complaints about how the gambling sites are not users friendly. Know you costumer has been an issue lately and though it is a form of anti money laundering regulation and is required to ensure transparency, it is not user friendly because many people around just do not find it secure to share their information.

Moreover, after transparency and user friendly there are certain gambling websites that are designed to make you lose no mater how hard you play. Is it possible to deal with it on the go with your mobile ? I guess, gambling from your desktop or laptop with full set up may help to fight against that kind of rigged houses rather than just trying on mobile on the go.

Big players turn other players into what they need and the other players just become what is needed according to teams needs and just go with it.

I remember clearly it happened twice with Lebron for example, Lebron made Chris Bosh into a role player whereas he was a all around star at Raptors however dude turned into a shooter/rebounder with Lebron. Same happened with Kevin Love, dude was a star at wolves and was loved but when he moved to Cavs he became a shooter/rebounder because that's what Lebron needs.

When you play with Westbrook and you are a great player like Bosh/Love and in this case PG, you do not try to do what you can do at max but you just try to do whats needed from the team, PG just scores when needed and defends very well, that is whats asked from him and that is what he does, do you think he can't rebound more ? Dude is grabbing 8.2 rebounds on top of Westbrooks triple doubles but when he sees Westbrook he just runs because he knows Westbrook will pass to him if he is open and he plays that way.

Hell even Steven Adams who has been leading the league in offensive rebounds for many years now grabs less rebounds on defensive end just so Westbrook can get it. This is not "stat padding" it is just their system and that is all they can do at this point, maybe with a coaching change it will be different but with Billy Donovan and his system Westbrook will continue to get triple doubles forever.

Thanks for reminding me of what April stands for in cryptocurrency, I almost forgot that it was about the time I introduced a friend to crypto which was my first time of convincing someone to invest, then I think it was just about $1200, so if Bitcoin is to follow same trend, I think it is high time we start accumulating more because this is just the beginning of the bull run, it automatically means that this year will continue to be green all through.

But, taking a look at coinmarketcap, most of the altcoins that are growing along with BTC are mostly the top 30 coins, does it mean that other coins are just shitcoins or it is not yet their own time?

Who would see fire and deep his hand in it, virtually every investors prefer more of IEO projects, the reason why we have not seen it shown all over the net is that much is because investing in IEO has some financial conditions too that needs to be met by investors which virtually not everyone will be able to meet it

Because, I understand that part of Binance condition is that the investor must put in minimum amount of$1600 and I guess this is one of the reason why most of these IEO gets sold out on time, although IEO will not be without its own risk too but not as much as the one of ICO which is scam.

Well said mate, I am of the opinion too that no matter how courageous you may think you are, if an investor do not choose his or her battle well, they will end up making the greatest mistake of their life.

The most important thing is the strategy one applies to an investment and also the purpose of an investment, I don’t think long term investors need courage to make decision of when to remove their investment because time will automatically tell about that but they only need the courage to take the risk of investing, while trader needs courage for both and at the same time, requires their knowledge and strategy to succeed.

Team work is what really makes an ICO successful but if the OP is so much curious about the initiator, maybe he should do his further research to look out for the team leader and probably he might be the originator, but what we should be more concerned about is the project itself and its object, and also the thing involved in such project be it external body or internal body.

If the project has a very good working product and very sound and already successful intelligent team in place, then we have no fear of falling into the wrong project or being a victim of scam.

Lucky you, I did same thing although I think I did more of gambling with mine, do I say gambling or intuition, I didn’t really make use of technical analysis before setting my trade again believing it will touch the $5000. I think I sold $6725 and stopped monitoring the price movement till it suddenly jumped on me to check my trade, luckily it coincided with the exact time BTC got to $5025, which I closed my trade immediately, shortly after I did, the price dropped below $4900, so I am still looking for the best spot to buy back again and I do hope I don’t get locked out, though I only sold certain portion of my BTC and not all.

Monitoring the graphs each time while we have invested our money into it is mostly what everyone follows. Also i don't feel that even selling the coins when it is just a little above the price we buy as it would not actually give us that profit excluding the fees we would lose into trading with them.

We should always be patient in our whole trading career and try to avoid greed as it would really end up giving pretty less or no profits. Stop-loss is a must for each transaction we handle because it really proves very useful for avoiding major loss. If you be careless and neglect after buying than surely you may end up with no profits so it is always better to stop-loss.

Our point is very valid logically, but system wise it will give the company more stress doing so because most purchases done requires participant to register on the website of the project and in programming, they have to instruct the site to request for a details which part of it is KYC/AML and they use this same form for everyone making use of the site, whether bounty hunter or investor.

If they are to start separating bounty hunters, fine, programmers can do it by leaving an option for the person to choose either if he is an investor or hunter, what If someone who wants to use the system to launder money comes in to register as a hunter? That would have defeated the objective of the KYC.