Hello, welcome profoot
|
|
|
I might try it later on (when I get some spare time)
|
|
|
I still saw some loans still get through. But those scammers must be persistent always creating new accounts. Props to the guys who always detects them.
Yes, at a higher rate than coinlenders.com
|
|
|
You registered 2 days ago and ask a loan? You need to prove what you say, and show that you can pay back....
|
|
|
inputs.io is fine, never had any issue so far
|
|
|
Lol, good luck mining, but I don't really see how it could be a "hobby" or funny ...
|
|
|
I will try to play with my iPhone in the bath, see you cya
|
|
|
Why do you think that nakowa is cheating? Or the game is rigged?
|
|
|
Assume you're doing this 24/7, how long would it take to get 1 bitcoin?
Probably less than a month, if you do it full time or have good captcha solving bot Probably a couple of months. It is not profitable at all ...
|
|
|
We should rename it Just-Nakowa.com
nakowa-dice.com But I heard that he created an other gambling website. (do not remember the name though)
|
|
|
You mean that the loser will send 0.01 btc to the winner of the game?
|
|
|
Received my coins. Thank you Seal.
|
|
|
Hello, welcome nuffsaid420
|
|
|
Neither would I. In fact, I can name a few people on this thread who you shouldn't do business with...doesn't take a genius to figure out who I'm talking about, though. Why are you posting here? Why are you posting that? Is a 13 years old kid trustworthy? Oh wait, I saw it, you want to make 2k posts this month, without spamming, so you post everywhere
|
|
|
This is why I made this thread. Someone came to me and asked I remove positive trust from a person because they left unjustified negative feedback. I thought it was fine because the person who neg-repped did not enter an amount risked amount, which I didn't think caused the "on-forum" trust rating to change to that. He pointed out I was wrong.
In many ways, trust gives people all the power of a moderator in commerce (except to literally censor the person), but with none of the responsibility. I mean - with someone like TF or John who've accumulated so much trust, there's around a 0% chance of revoking their positive trust rating in the default list. I don't dislike the system, though - I just think it'd be nice if they could "moderate" without having to give that big red might-as-well-be-a-scammer tag - basically just give people more options in moderating. Alternately, something like a "tag" system for negative feedback could be interesting. When leaving feedback, there could be a box for up to x short tags. If the person leaving feedback is trusted by the person browsing the forum, those tags would appear in the on-forum trust panel.
I think that trust ratings should at least be moderated, and it would be possible to get removed obviously abusive ratings
|
|
|
If you need higher server control and you don't need much resources, VPS does the job.
I don't need that at all
|
|
|
I am sorry but I will be difficult to get a loan
|
|
|
|