I do not think that ICOs will disappear or they will not be held. ICOs can be conducted in parallel with STO and IEO, and this is unlikely to interfere, on the contrary it will provide an opportunity to raise more funds. As for the fact that it is better to conduct an ICO, STO or IEO, I believe that the best option is when the project launches its ICO and in addition to IEO. I'm not very sure about the STO account, since all the STOs that I came across all ended badly, that is, they didnt collect anything.
|
|
|
Of course, in 2017, the growth of the crypto market gave a big breakthrough to almost all projects that conducted their ICOs. This of course does not mean that all of them were successful and they had an excellent product or service, just people actively carried their money and bought everything in a row. Now we see the opposite. The market has sunk and fundraising activity has fallen. If now there would again be a growth in altcoins in the market, then this would definitely have a positive effect and many projects would again show excellent results.
|
|
|
Im certainly not an expert, but I have been on the cryptocurrency market for 3 years and I can say that I have not yet seen that cryptocurrencies are massively used. Perhaps blockchain is more suitable for this definition, since the technology itself is actively used and developed. As for cryptocurrencies, there can be massive use only after official recognition around the world.
|
|
|
What the author wrote is very similar to the truth. I often ask myself such a question, well, have all the admins and developers not so professionals that they dont understand the obvious things for the development of the project and its cryptocurrency? Of course, they understand everything and, apparently, their goal is only to make money. Perhaps this does not apply to all 100% of projects, but most of them probably work according to this scheme. I agree that it is very difficult now to choose a really worthwhile project and to do it every day is getting harder and harder.
|
|
|
Of course, ETH has potential and I hope that by the end of 2019 we will see an ETH price higher than now. I also want to note that right now we are seeing the growth of ETH and other altcoins, and BTC is standing still. With high probability, this may be the beginning of the altcoin season. As for ETH, he is also now showing good growth dynamics and will be hoping that the growth of ETH will continue.
|
|
|
I believe that we, the crypto community, should really think about the future of cryptocurrencies. The question that in the future cryptocurrencies may depreciate is indeed very important. I see that all the cryptocurrencies that currently exist and those that will appear soon are all startups and, based on their usefulness and usefulness, new cryptocurrencies may appear in the future, which will take the place of the existing ones. For example, we have bitcoin, which is the first of its kind and the progenitor of all cryptocurrencies. Perhaps it is needed in order to create a crypto industry, and then a new, better cryptocurrency will come in its place. In any case, we all need to be more careful and monitor the development of the crypto market.
|
|
|
I think it's worth talking about the developers of bad coins. The fact is why the appearance of bad coins and scam projects? The thing is that they understand that they almost never talk about them and no one will know who these developers are and how many bad coins they have already created. Based on this, they feel impunity and do their bad deeds. But if you start talking more about them more often, then there is a high probability that no one will come to them and will not buy their bad coins.
|
|
|
In my practice, there were also moments when, instead of selling a crypto asset and getting thousands of dollars, I expected it to grow further, but there was no growth, and my possible thousands of dollars turned into several tens of dollars. I believe that all this is a payment for gaining some experience that will definitely help us in the future. However, it is very unfortunate that the money was not received, they would be very helpful in our lives.
|
|
|
Thanks for the interesting opinion from Peter Brandt. I agree that the altcoin market is now sinking and many are waiting for another flight to the moon. However, with regard to the fact that 99% of altcoins can be forgotten after 5 years, this is the logic. Since the crypto market itself is developing, and with its development new projects, new cryptocurrencies appear, it can be assumed that some of them are a test to create something useful and necessary, which means there are chances for new more promising altcoins to appear. Everything will depend on which of the altcoins will become more needed and demanded by the community, then it will definitely exist and will continue to exist.
|
|
|
Of course, you should not consider all innovations to be reliable and safe, but it is worth noting that it is innovations that make our life easier, more convenient and more interesting. As for innovation in artificial intelligence, there is both a positive and a negative part. The positive is that there are already many AI-based projects and it helps a lot in the field of human activity. But there is also a minus, because scammers or criminals will also want to use AI for their own purposes. But we need to develop, which means the use of innovation in our lives is a must.
|
|
|
It is worth noting that the same Facebook did not immediately receive recognition and became one of the largest social networks, it took years. As for the social networks on the blockchain, their appearance certainly attracted the attention of a part of the community, but not as large as there are not many people in the crypto sphere. However, it turns out that every year new people come to the crypto industry and the crypto community grows, which means that sooner or later social networks on blockchain will get more users and will probably become leaders in this direction.
|
|
|
I believe that IEO will not succeed as long as we would like. The fact is that there are a number of reasons that impede the successful development of IEO. It is not surprising, but some exchanges that offer to conduct IEO with them are scammers and you can easily lose your money with them. There is still a moment with the promotion of trade transactions, this is when the trading bot works and winds up the volumes and price, and in the end they simply lure investors to buy a crypto asset, which they then can not sell for the same price. In general, the situation with IEO is not so rosy as we would like, and this will lead to a very fast loss of demand.
|
|
|
Of course, a 40% discount on tokens for early investors is a too big discount, and it is precisely this that most often gives early investors the opportunity to lower the price of the token when they enter the exchange. It is very sad that they attribute this to the participants of the bounty, they say that they lower the price. But alas, everything is to blame for the big discounts for early investors and funds. If I see such discounts in the project, I try not to participate in it.
|
|
|
Indeed, very often the total amount of earnings differs significantly from the indicators in the conditions and tables. All this is due to the fact that admins do not support the price of their tokens. I often heard from some admins that they are not interested in the price of their token, but only in their product. As a result, the product has not been completed yet and the price of the token has fallen. Of course, there are projects that support the price of their cryptocurrency, but there are very few such projects.
|
|
|
|