The cables that get shipped together with mobile phones and are part of the package allow you to charge your phone and also to transfer data to/from it. So, they aren't usually charge-only type of cables. The power-only cables don't have the necessary pins to transfer data, and that's the type of cable that Coinkite sells. Your phone's cable most probably does. Someone paranoid about their security would prefer a cable that doesn't have data transfer pins.   

That's good. If it works with 3rd-party apps and especially desktop devices, it means you are not dependent on the Shildbach wallet to stay operational.

The sat/vByte data should be visible during the transaction creation process. I see no reason to not have it. Newbies and those not interested in entering the fee rates manually can be given a choice to select between high, medium, and slow confirmation times if they want. More advanced users surely want to know how much they are paying, especially considering how bad some wallets are in automatically selecting the fees.

I don't have a Trezor hardware wallet, but if they are anything like Ledger, a user shouldn't even be able to see their private keys on the device or the native app. If you want to work with a specific private key, you would have to import your seed into the Ian Coleman BIP-39 site and get the data from there. But this is not recommended and significantly lowers the security of your seed.

33 - Pmalek

Thanks!

46 - Pmalek

27 - Pmalek
Thanks

That's right. Players can get banned or limited for it. And that's ok as long as the player actually did that. But you never provided one single example of a late bet from this person. Still, you took his money and made him look guilty and decided to play with words about who said what. The one example you posted, you failed miserably because according to the data that Poika5 found on a 3rd-party site, it was a legit bet placed 8-9 mins before the end of the match. 

Who knows how many other players were and maybe still are treated in the same way, but they simply give up and don't scream as loud as Laki did. Maybe the $2k he withdrew is money confiscated from other innocent players in the period since this thread was started.

Get your shit together. You will have much more success long-term running a legit operation than being scammy.   

You like to take as much from our money as possible, and we like to take as much from the casino's bank as well. That's just normal. Considering that there are many more casinos, both online (fiat and crypto) and physical, it's fair to say that you and your colleagues are much more successful in taking our money than we are in taking yours. If you want to make a difference, give the players greater odds to win long-term.

See above.

Engleska 2. liga je po svojoj kvaliteti bolja od mnogih 1. liga u Evropi. A profesionalni nogomet se igra i u 3. i u 4. ligi. U tim nižim engleskim ligama još postoje neke vrijednosti koje su davno zaboravljene od ovih profesionalnih kurvi. Ah šta mi bi, htio sam reć fudbalera i super zvijezda. Privrženost svom klubu i želja da sa svojima pobjeđuješ i osvajaš je stvar prošlosti.

I didn't notice any errors. I mentioned two days ago in my previous reply that I followed the markets and the events as they were happening for a basketball match from Bulgaria. With 3 mins left in the last quarter, it was still possible to bet. But when the clock came close to 2 mins left, all the markets were closed and betting was no longer possible.

That's great news. I would personally take my business elsewhere if something like that happened to me. The bigger odds aren't worth it if nasty things like what you just experienced can happen again in the future. We also have Poika5 with an accusation against the casino whose case I will try to take a look at when I can.

Sportsbet.io has a good sportsbook. Instant deposits, bet boosters, promotions, the occasional free bets, and various betting competitions for the Bitcointalk community that you can take a look at in Games & Rounds.

Regarding the flags. I think the newbie flag (the first one you opened) should remain. It serves as a warning to everyone about what can happen at Trustdice.
You can remove support for the second one (Type 2 - violation of an agreement) if you have forgiven the injustice and financial damage done to you. You are the victim, so it's your decision. If you have forgiven the act, you need to remove support for the flag. If the victim is satisfied with the outcome, those who support the flag should according to my understanding be as well because we weren't personally affected.

The only other (alleged) victim we know of is Poika5. But since I am personally not familiar with what happened between him and the casino and would need to independently check his case and claims, I feel it's wrong and biased of me to keep supporting the flag. However, he could and still should. Or he can create his own flag just like you and see if he will get enough support for it.

For and against open-source?

Open-source is generally better than closed-source, but not necessarily more secure. Open-source allows those who know what they are doing to inspect the codebase. If you can't do that yourself, you can have some comfort in the fact that someone else probably has. This is the case with popular open-source projects. But if we are talking about an unknown and unpopular open-source project, you can't really know who has taken the time to look at the code.

Open-source is a window that you can look through and see what is inside. There are no blinds preventing you to look.   
Closed-source is a window with blinds and you can't see anything inside.

Illegal, immoral, wrong, and dubious activities can take place in both types of apartments. Those that have no blinds on the windows and those that do. When there are no obstacles blocking the vision, it is much easier to see what is happening, right? But you still need to recognize the activities to understand something wrong is happening. In other words, you need to understand how a piece of code works to understand what is not supposed to be there or how it's supposed to look. If you see a pile of white powder through the window with no blinds and you think it's powdered sugar, what good does it do that the windows have no blinds when the wrong set of eyes are looking in? What good does it do if you don't realize the code has a backdoor when you can't understand it.

Open-source allows you to verify the content (good or bad).
Closed-source doesn't allow you to verify anything. It can be good or bad, but you will never know and you are stuck trusting what the developers tell you. 

To avoid any confusion, are you talking about the PIN code that unlocks the physical device or the password to the Trezor Suite software? But whatever the case, these two pieces of data aren't essential and even if you forget them, you can still access and spend your crypto by setting everything up from the start.

If you forget your Trezor PIN code, you can reset the device to factory settings, import your seed, and set up a new PIN. The seed + any connected passphrases are essential. Nothing else is.

The device is called a COLDCARD, not a Cold Card.
The homepage explains many things you need to know about this hardware wallet and contains links to other sources if you want to keep reading. If you want to buy this particular hw, you can use the promo code "CKBTC" to get a 5% discount if you pay with bitcoin. There might be other promo codes but this one pops up on the official site.

Judging by https://store.coinkite.com/store/coldcard, the USB cable is not part of the package if you purchase the 1st option that just includes the COLDCARD Mk4 for $147. I find that very weird to be honest. I guess you have to buy it separately. They do have a Power-Only USB-C Cable for $17.
I suggest you contact the support and ask them what the precise content of the shipped package is.

I am not sure what you were looking at, but the D'CENT Biometric Wallet is there in the OP. The D'CENT Card Wallet is also mentioned.

Anyways, that collection isn't being updated by Ratimov. If you are interested in the topic of hardware wallets, you can bookmark the translated version started by FatFork in our Croatian local board: [VELIKA LISTA] Hardverski novčanici (80+) That one is regularly updated. Even without an automatic translator, you should be able to understand the content in the table.

There are plenty of good posts and threads on this board that can teach you how to protect yourself in the crypto world and what mistakes not to make. But if the damage is already done, which is the case with you, no one here or anywhere else can change what has happened and revert the transactions involving the stolen coins. But you can get help to make better choices in the future and prevent things like this from happening again.

That doesn't help me when it comes to spam emails. It could be useful for labelling the domains that send the official newsletters, but I can't possibly know where the spam could originate from and make a label for that. 

No, not really. What difference would it make to the results if two or three people were involved in the experiment and shared the email addresses? Or maybe it's a thing of trust? If two people said there were no spam messages or there were spam messages, it's more believable than if just one person claims it.

Thanks cygan! Gvardiol was great for most of the tournament. Excellent if we take into consideration that the lad is only 20 years old. If he stays injury-free, he will have a great career in front of him. It's incredible that our country that was founded in 1991 with the breakup of Yugoslavia already has 3 medals on the biggest of football stages in its young history. 

Too bad that you decided to gift your friend a hardware wallet as a present a few weeks after Black Friday. Had you come here a bit earlier, you could have taken advantage of a 30% discount on the good-old Trezor One and got if for around €50. The Ledger Nano S is no longer sold by Ledger on their officially shop. You might still find this device with some resellers though. If that's what you want, you can check this source for more information about their reseller network.   

Maybe the option wasn't there back when you tested it out. Maybe they added it later or you forgot to activate the advanced options.

That's kind of weird. Why would they allow you to extend an imported seed with a passphrase but not allow the same thing with one natively created through their own wallet? Have you tried generating a new Blue Wallet native seed, delete the wallet, and then recover that same wallet from seed with advanced options enabled to get to the part where they allow you to add a passphrase? I guess when you do that, you can keep using the new addresses from the passphrase-protected wallet from that point on. It would be worth trying it out.

Aren't there two wallets that are called Freewallet, where the one is an awful scam while the other is relatively unknown?

Passphrases can be added in Blue Wallet if you activate advanced mode in the settings. It's explained somewhat here.
Blue Wallet also has a Plausible Deniability feature where you can set up a fake wallet. In case of a $5 wrench attack, you can unlock that fake wallet with your secondary password and not reveal the main one.