I didn't fill their KYC so we can say goodbye to those coins.  I don't believe any of it for one second. If they were real, one single user with more than 2 posts would have reported having received their funds. Instead what we have is some real forum members DID submit their information and then got ignored by Livecoin. On 13 Feb 2021 My Application was rejected from Livecoin due to not find my video and said for resend application. Actually after upload my video,I've forget to share and due to the reason they (Livecoin) not found my video.On 14 Feb 2021 I've sended new created documents and video. but now they(Livecoin) not reply. Yesterday I've re-send the same documents (14 Feb 2014 created documents) but still not reply. I've big fear for losing my big funds and wide work time(almost 3 years).If I get any reply, I'll share here...
Some of the one-posters have received transactions for the same amount twice: The receiving address received 171 USDT from what is apparently Livecoin's wallet. Some don't even post the transaction at all. Look at this fool: Not a single user with any reputation or post history whatsoever has reported receiving a refund. This is definitely a last ditch KYC scam, I don't know why they are attempting to perpetrate it well past the expiration date they had already assigned it. |
|
|
|
Meanwhile, DASH is at its highest high since May 2018. Sure. We just got passed by ETC. Nice effort  One project's success isn't indicative of another project's failure. Or rather, "People need to understand that comparison isn't motivation." - Richard Feynman |
|
|
|
Bro. You've been banging your head against the wall over this "problem" incessantly, making up one terrible analogy after another for years, when the problem itself has never existed in the first place. Meanwhile, DASH is at its highest high since May 2018. The market has indeed spoken and it says there is a place for DASH in the ongoing crypto revolution. Coulda/Woulda/Shoulda... all meaningless in the face of What Is. Take the hint by now that the devs have considered your proposal to be... non-actionable. |
|
|
|
If a juror is sleeping, the burden is on the defense to bring this up in court as soon as it is noticed. If the junior is sleeping while testimony favorable to the defense is being given, it may be grounds for a mistrial, but it is up to the defense to bring this up. If they were sleeping today, it may be beneficial for the defense as you described the day as bad for the defense.
Sleeping during trial by a juror is apparently fairly common and this may be an attempt to get off the jury/get out of jury duty. The juror may be having second thoughts about their ability to be impartial after hearing some of the testimony and realizing just how weak a case the prosecution has.
This is 100% speculation. What exactly do you think I am speculating about? Be specific. OK, let's break it down. You started each sentence in the first paragraph with the word "If". So you're already assuming certain conditions are present in order to make a point. In your second paragraph you use the word "may" in both sentences -- again, you don't know if these things are true or not. You didn't actually supply any evidence whatsoever, which is why your post is 100% speculation. Also, it's not entirely honest to post in the same thread using two different accounts. Because you insist one of them is not yours, it appears as if you are attempting to bolster credibility for your previously espoused viewpoints by introducing a different account that shares them. If it were hilariousandco and hilariousetc posting in the same thread, I wouldn't mind so much.
I really don't know how the trial will turn out, but I am for due process. Trying to put myself in the shoes of the jurors, just for the exercise: on one hand, you don't want to sentence a man to prison if it turns out he didn't actually do anything wrong; on the other hand, you don't want to cause riots by letting a guilty man off scott-free. How do you handle the gray area between technically legal and common sense? Maybe he'll get some kind of mid-level sentence. Who knows. One interesting tidbit I heard on the Adam Carolla podcast (see, if I was truly a big lib I wouldn't have listened to his show for the last decade) was that Mark Geragos, a LA trial lawyer, claimed that the defense must have thought they did a good job as they motioned to sequester the jury, three days ago. According to Geragos, if the defense thought they were losing, they would have motioned for acquittal. https://www.newsnationnow.com/banfield/attorney-mark-geragos-discusses-the-defenses-opening-in-day-12-of-chauvin-trial/Well, two days later, guess what happened? The defense motioned for acquittal, and it was denied, obviously. https://kstp.com/news/defense-continues-presenting-case-april-14-2021-derek-chauvin-trial/6074716/Not sure what changed between now and then but something tells me you won't catch Geragos doing a 180 here. |
|
|
|
|
Fine. I have removed the negative and will wait for more conclusive evidence from the recent accuser.
Not that it's impossible to completely doctor every aspect of a screenshot. I'm going more by common sense at this point. Why would two different users present screenshots with the same BTC address? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
People who get scammed on Telegram because of something they read here, before they even created an account here... not a lot that can be done to help them. In the meanwhile, it's only fair to hold off on tagging your account until better evidence is provided.
|
|
|
|
I don't get it... The Alien Worlds game is based on the WAX blockchain, and there is a WAX-based token called TLM that you earn from the game... OK. After doing a little bit of research I see the game runs on 3 blockchains: ETH, BSC and WAX. Which explains the 10x increase in the price of my Alien Worlds NFTs I bought when I wanted to learn how to play the game. Its a decent premise and obviously the earnings potential is there, but ultimately I forgot about it. That is, until I saw the two items I had paid $5 in WAX a piece for were now worth $50 each. I sold those shits immediately. Wish I would have held on to my TLM though. I had a few thousand. They were worth well less than a penny when I sold them, and apparently they are now worth 60 cents a pop. Jesus H. Missed being rich again, this time by a few chin hairs. You can see the price is roughly the same on the WAX market: https://wax.alcor.exchange/trade/tlm-alien.worlds_wax-eosio.tokenHere's the hour day candle chart for WAXP/TLM; in all my years of crypto I've never seen anything like it:  I need to go for a walk. |
|
|
|
I've removed quite a few negative and neutral feedbacks lately in an attempt to try and spread more positivity and limit negativity. Unfortunately, I've already had to add one back for a user who immediately began harassing me after I removed a feedback rating for them threatening to physically harm me. Sometimes being the bigger person doesn't pay.
Again, you clearly have no idea what "being the bigger person" means. Just so I’m clear, you think helpless newbies trying to sell plots of land on the moon deserve negative feedback to protect the community from them, but someone harassing others for years, knowingly spreading lies, and threatening to cause physical harm doesn’t? So being the bigger man to you means harassing harmless newbies and letting terrorists run free? I think maybe you don’t know what being a man means. harrassing = nope, nobody's harassing harmless noobies here harmless = nope, the newbie isn't harmless, he's trying to run a scam terrorists = really? you're going to call your critics "terrorists" and then tell me I don't know "what being a man" means? You chimed in to this thread about what a big man you were moments after leaving somebody a retributive negative trust... just seems intellectually incongruous. |
|
|
|
I had a feeling colires was a scammer trying to earn merits to build cred. Because this is all based on screenshots, its hard to prove for sure it was colires that indeed scammed you (though I strongly believe he did at this point). All those screenshots point to telegram account Remi Guile, and I haven't seen any proof of that account being linked to colires. However, I do share your suspicion. He's involved in the shady business of AWS account sales, an unscrupulous activity at best. I have. I also linked the scammer's Kraken address (1MyQ2Cd4Eoqm2467276ZjgU5YYuCRR7arZ) to an older accusation against colires:   I don't think this is some well coordinated sabotage attempt by a rival scammer. I'm pretty sure colires is an alt account of Vareole or another long-time forum scammer, and its time for a tag. Wonder if they think burning the account was worth it... who knows what kind of idionomics go through scammers heads. |
|
|
|
I've removed quite a few negative and neutral feedbacks lately in an attempt to try and spread more positivity and limit negativity. Unfortunately, I've already had to add one back for a user who immediately began harassing me after I removed a feedback rating for them threatening to physically harm me. Sometimes being the bigger person doesn't pay.
Again, you clearly have no idea what "being the bigger person" means. I tried to explain it to you a couple of times already: Being the bigger man entails ignoring somebody instead of leaving them a tit-for-tat rating. I didn't actually want to post here but I thought it was a bit too funny that you were still saying this. |
|
|
|
The scammer requested you send the funds to a Kraken address. If I were you I would contact Kraken, tell them what happened, and give them this address: 1MyQ2Cd4Eoqm2467276ZjgU5YYuCRR7arZ as that is one of their deposit addresses. They have also sent coins to another exchange but I can't figure out which one it is; this is a wallet that belongs to it: 3672cngCaXMJHjwRjS34GBY1jgBNjNhZ4k At least he wasn't pretending to also be SebastianJu... but I mean, why bother if you can scam somebody anyway. Tough lesson learned. I had a feeling colires was a scammer trying to earn merits to build cred. Because this is all based on screenshots, its hard to prove for sure it was colires that indeed scammed you (though I strongly believe he did at this point). Did you exchange PMs on the forum before you contacted colires on Telegram, or no? |
|
|
|
Tolerance for plagiarism is a deterrent against constructive contributions by people who are capable of making them; it is poison to the lifesblood of any site that derives its value from “user-generated content”. I am currently left to draw my own inferences. In prior discussions, I have seen it said that the administration avoids letting the plagiarism rule be used as a weapon in personal disputes; and in another thread, some idiot is accusing me of that. As a precaution, I must therefore ask what the reaction would be if I were to make a report as follows: Proof that NFT technology will succeed: I see WOers slinging the exact same FUD against NFTs as has always been used against Bitcoin. Let’s see just how much this technology will totally take over the world: - “It’s a Ponzi.” ✔
- “The scarcity is artificial. Anyone can make perfect copies of it.” ✔
- “Drug dealers will use it to launder money.” ✔
- “Those fools will be burned when it is shut down by regulators (SEC, et al.).”2 ✔
I anticipate that as I keep reading WO posts about NFTs, I will be adding to this list... What's struck me as a touch ironic is that bitcoiners are criticizing NFTs for the exact same reasons nocoiners criticize bitcoin:
"Anybody can make one." ✓
"It's a bubble and a fad that will never catch on." ✓
"It's a highly illiquid market, or else it's all wash trading." ✓
"Its only used by money launderers and criminals." ✓
What am I forgetting?
If the hypothetical Newbie were to cry the cliché, “We had the same thoughts!”, then—well, if that were to be accepted, then this thread should be locked as a waste of time. Anyone can use that excuse. Many do. In the future, not-so-hypothetical Newbies may take the handling of my complaint as a precedent. As is clear from the above, I would have reported any user for this; and my report was motivated by my dislike for being ripped off. If anyone assumes that I made report because nutildah did it, such is a reflection of that person’s thought process—not mine. It only adds insult to injury that I have a long-running dispute with the other user, who must wish to avoid acknowledging me for a post that he evidently saw and imitated. Let's look at it logically so we can help you understand why I'm not banned: Only 2 of the 4 items are at all similar. ✓ The 2 items that are similar are worded very differently. ✓ None of the rest of the post is plagiarism in any way. ✓ Also, it's not that I re-arranged your post to avoid plagiarism, I never saw your post to begin with, and you're a bit loonie tunes to continue on in your fantasy where people can't independently form ideas similar to your own. And yes, I took you off ignore because I knew you were posting about me. You just can't let it go when you are wrong, which is unfortunate, and it's part of the reason why nobody takes you seriously. I guess you were sad I ignored you in your earlier post where you tagged me, so you felt like you had to try harder. Well, congrats, you win again, for the infinity time in a row. |
|
|
|
I may have made fun of your verbosity here and there but I don't believe I've come across any of the following from you: - Convoluted unenforceable rules on how other users should behave.
Perhaps you've never witnessed JJG explain the art of Down Cost Averaging to an unsuspecting newbie passerby in the WO. Sounds great to me, where do I sign up? Well, he talks about it weekly, but peeps won't notice it if they don't bother to muster up the concentration necessary to hone in on whatever TF he is currently rambling about. All you have to do is reply to JJG and ask him about his DCA strategy, and if you're lucky you'll receive a reply that looks something like this:  |
|
|
|
|
I'd need to know the basis for calling them alts. If it was something that happened and ended in 2017, I would just leave it be. You'd want to be awfully sure that your evidence is correct before going after a Legendary (or two) for something that happened (or didn't even actually happen) four years ago.
|
|
|
|
Apologies for bombing into this thread, but I'm taking the opportunity to address a specific person who I absolutely know will be reading it, simply due to its subject line.
1. I AM NOT SATOSHI.
2. I get annoyed when I am stalked. I get FURIOUS when my friends are stalked. "You wouldn't like me when I'm angry."
3. That cell phone had absolutely nothing interesting on it. I may not have Satoshi's level of OpSec, but I don't put anything interesting on cell phones. Ever.
4. There is nothing involving me or anyone close to me that you can do to get Satoshi's keys. Leave them alone.
5. There's a God Damned Pandemic on and you should have feckin' stayed home. Leave before they shut down air travel, or you'll be stranded here.
Any chance you'll ever reactivate your dead cryptos project? The video you're talking isn't available but if the source of this is Wikipedia, I think isn't legit because according to my former professor in college dont put your trust on that site because it eaay to publish some information on that page without any verification whether its true or not
You can read the draft of the article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Eric_SchiermeyerIMHO, no way this guy is Satoshi. I think people underestimate the level of commitment involved in learning cryptography and developing the skills of a coder competent and focused enough to implement something like Bitcoin... Would make much more sense if cryptography was in the wheelhouse of the developer. |
|
|
|
People forgot that you cannot just create value from nothing, and earning interest and staking for more gains but what do you get out of it! People need to ask these questions seriously.
I agree entirely. When it comes to NFTs, assuredly some of them are overvalued and pretty much all of them are driven by hype. Rather than a complete bubble burst it seems as if there was a period of air-letting, and now we're resuming back upward, with ETH near or at all-time highs for the 3rd day in a row. I would hope the NFT market grows less rapidly and encounters some stability. It makes NFTs difficult to price if their underlying currency is constantly changing in value. The world's 21 most popular metropolitan cities are now on blockchain: Metheropolis!
If its not a witty take on cities with thriving methamphetamine cultures then I'm not interested. |
|
|
|
Primed and ready for new All Time Highs and the run to 70k and beyond.   |
|
|
|
I jumped into Alice thinking it would be the next big thing in NFT and that was a bad decision. I took 50% loss on my investment and sold at loss. After that I'm reluctant to look at NFT's while some of my other investment are yielding good profit. One of my friend introduced me with Sand (Sandbox) last night and I need to do some more research on it before investing. If anyone has any better options please suggest.
I would beware any of the Defi coins. Alice is giving almost 1000% APY on the Binance Smart Chain yield farms, which means they are giving 10% almost every month,,, so you bet people are dumping now to get in cheap so they can rake the profits a few months later when they have 50% more coins and the coin goes back to normal price. Beware tokens with yield farms! I find this to be excellent advice as for the most part DeFi produces nothing of value. It's inhabited by a generation new to crypto and that doesn't remember the Hyper Proof of Stake and Masternode fads from 2014-2018. DeFi is a similar concept repackaged under a benevolent name. Really, all you need to do to decentralize your own finances is buy Bitcoin and Ethereum, or at least have knowledge of how they work, and you're set. |
|
|
|
|
So how do you guys feel about NFTs now? Has the bubble burst and we are rebounding, or does the bubble still have plenty of air? It would seem that uber-confidence in Ethereum (thanks to Mark Cuban?) is propelling a lot of NFT-driven projects back upward. Glad to see this baby's got life in her yet.
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have received 50% of my payment in USDT from livecoin. I am a real person and their verification process is legit . My usdt wallet address where I received the payment is 0xab61de6703059406cce6539a11125b160ba85c4d
People need to stop this hate about livecoin being fake. If you want your money back, just follow their steps and they will send what you had originally deposited.
Thanks
What the fuck are you talking about? Livecoin said they stopped taking documents for their KYC scam customer refund process on March 16. So what "steps" are you talking about, you lying piece of shit?  You should go back to your job emptying the piss buckets of infirm babushkas, there's an infinite more amount of honor in that than what you are currently doing, which is bringing great shame upon your family. Get the fuck off this forum you disgraced loser. |
|
|
|
Wait a sec....in one of those threads it was stated that one of the requirements to get that 50% back that all those posts are claiming was that you had to make a post here saying exactly that--that you'd gotten the refund. I still think those posts are nonsense spam, and I don't believe there really was a hack, but there certainly was an explanation for why those posts exist (and there is, I suppose, the tiniest of possibilities that it could be true).
I've looked into the ETH transactions and it's all fake. They will send the same amount of USDT two or three times, and each time a new account will say "look, I just received my refund." They don't always post the transaction ID but when they do the transaction looks fake AF. They stopped accepting KYC materials for "refunds" last month, don't understand what the purpose of Livecoin wanting to make it look like they refunded customers is. Not a single member with a post history said they got their refund. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
