How about this. If a thread has x number of deleted posts, then change the post sequence to latest first. I think you would rather want to punish the individual as opposed to the thread itself. The reason being, this could be abused when involving project/website competition, leading to people trying to spam post/delete on threads to shut them down. IMO, the first option (preventing newbies from bumping the thread) would be best. It should still mark it as unread (similar to when someone edits a post in a thread but it's not bumped) so that discussions can be had. |
|
|
|
However asking for 0.02BTC to "defend" people with red tags is impossible, as i doubt that people here who are pretty much anonymous to a certain point, can be made to remove their tags. That to me personally is scamming. Perhaps a more apt analogy is if I were to offer a service to unban others: to try and make a case for them, for a fee. It's essentially the same thing: if I don't offer refunds and I can't be expected to consistently resolve the problem (especially considering the customer demographic is more than often in the wrong) then that's pretty much a scam attempt. |
|
|
|
It was locked for security purpose I think, what do you mean about SIGNED MESSAGE?
Thank you If you've posted a bitcoin address at any point on the forum (via PM messages or otherwise) then you should be able to sign it if you own the private keys. shorena's thread shows you how to do so and you must do the following: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0 |
|
|
|
I want to get paid for spending my time on defending people, who are you to dictate your own terms for my business? What if I were to propose an escrow service? Terms: You must pay a fee of 95% or 2 BTC, whichever is higher. There is no refund if I send it to a wrong address, which I may do so 50% of the time. Also, if you do not PM me every single day after you request my services, I will back out of any deal and the fees will be kept.
Unfair terms can be attacked. |
|
|
|
But, i just wanted to let you know my side of the story....
I joined bitcointalk on Dec 3, 2017 after I learned about signature campaigns. Not off to a great start. I am into the bitcoin / blockchain space Dec 2015 and have paid a lot of attention to the activities in the space.. If you have experience in crypto then you should be making instructive posts, not these one-liner bullshit replies that I've already outlined in this thread. Anyone can spout general knowledge about crypto, like what you see in Bitcoin Discussion and Economics. Why wouldn't you actually use that knowledge actively rather than spam post literally every minute? Option 1. I can continue to post some comments and revisit this post 3 months later, and show you the quality of my post and the contribution to bitcontalk.. If you like my work for next 3 months, then are you in a position to remove the negative trust ? You should be doing this anyway. Negative trust shouldn't prevent you from creating/entering constructive discussions. |
|
|
|
i don't know what i need to do and how i proof i use only one account , The evidence stacked against you is so strong that it would be astronomically improbable that you are innocent. It would be unfortunate if you were, but realistically there's no reasonable doubt here. Same Facebook name. Sending tokens to an address within 5 hours of each other (never mind a day or longer). How is anybody supposed to think, "these are two separate people"? |
|
|
|
|
If there was no private message then the thread was deleted. You should stop posting in meaningless threads that are prone to being deleted. After 10 pages of redundancy I don't think any new replies will be useful.
|
|
|
|
if Timelord is not on DT anymore, you are making his tags on me to appear by default? aren't you spitting to the faces of people who removed him from DT? IIRC he was never on DT. And even if he was on DT, during the past couple months I know that Timelord certainly was not on DT.
Also, just because I did not respond to a series of exchanges back then doesn't mean I don't have the right to do so now. I'm sorry I can't go back in time and tag you a month earlier. |
|
|
|
@Flying Hellfish, actmyname was aware of the situation before What situation? The post that I referenced was taken from Timelord's feedback. the quote is merely to point out his awareness of situation about the matter, ? he didn't tag me then but now after I have spoken against his bosses, he has tagged me. I'm sorry to drag you into this man. After you have spoken against my "bosses"? Who's the boss of me? Also, don't forget... correlation is not causation.  |
|
|
|
|
Stop creating duplicate threads. This is getting ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
I am not here for signature campaigns (as I have never worn a paid signature) Hello Darkstar_
I understand the campaign is currently full but I would like to ask if you would consider me for a spot if one opens up in the near future. I also said before, there is no shame in joining a campaign and get some Bitcoin while you are posting a few times a day anyway. but you and global mod coming after me like this. adding somebody to DT2 list with such timings is rather a bit too obvious. there is too much conflict of interest. all I know is that, this is not the way of earning money. not for me. Requesting to join ChipMixer is probably exactly what someone who doesn't post purely for money does. There's no minimum number of posts which exercises freedom. If you were in the position where you may have been considered a viable applicant for the campaign, wouldn't you do so? (IIRC this was after the moderator promotion)
And where the fuck is the conflict of interest? Why didn't you tag me then? why did you wait until now? you were aware of the situation but you didn't tag me, why? I fail to understand: a) the relevance of the quote in relation to this situation b) why time plays any factor in feedback - I should be allowed to send feedback at any time, right? There's no time limit. |
|
|
|
Right on time. Once more. actmyname has tagged me for no valid reason. DT has become a joke for these people. Did you read the reference? when ever I asked for money to remove any red tags I have left on people? Did you read the reference? I'm going to tag these cheaters and ask for $50 for tag removal on the trust feedback |
|
|
|
achiyaakter13 it is not my account
please help me remove my red trust Would you care to refute the evidence to prove your innocence? What exactly was the intention of you sending tokens to 0x0d73a509AE4d0980aaEc3cc5ACbF208131Ad8276? It seems unlikely that within 5 hours, both users sent tokens to another address. But to put the nail in the coffin, if you want to refute the following, then you might be innocent: ...Both participant transfer token to = 0x0d73a509AE4d0980aaEc3cc5ACbF208131Ad8276
Both account use by same person. They transfer their token to same account. I believe this is enough proof for take action.
What proof?  - Two users sent their token to the same address... this proves nothing. Maybe some guy on a discord was buying tokens from people... and these two guys sent him tokens in exchange for something else. - The two accounts signed up to that campaign 9 days apart - The token transfers were 5 hours apart Do you have anything else linking these accounts? Both accounts using the same ETH address to receive? or the same Twitter/Facebook/Telegram? If not, you don't really have proof of anything. Lucky for you... with a little digging we can see that: realusinvestment: has posted their name as "Md. Monir Hossain" here: https://archive.is/uzQ2f#selection-485.8-485.25 and uses Telegram account for that name here: https://archive.is/Rwphv#selection-987.20-987.35
achiyaakter13: has used the facebook for "Monir Hossain" here: http://archive.is/YGyyJ#selection-535.0-537.1Also... realusinvestment sent a nominal amount of ETH to achiyaakter13 account a while back here: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x576758773ea4acab3edc050a83ae8558237d0a2c88e1faaefeeba2cc4e11e210In any case, I see that The Pharmacist has already tagged these guys... I think it's unlikely that you will be able to, though |
|
|
|
Why do you continue to deflect? DarkDays is doing something different. In your case, you are posting consecutively. In fact, on the previous page, you had literally five replies in a row. Like I said, edit them together and delete the consecutive posts.
Also kind of weird when you refer people to a scam site. Your words, not mine. (Stake and Onehash are also on the list) |
|
|
|
|
Account sale -> Report as hacked -> Easy scam, especially with the new email resets.
|
|
|
|
|
The difference in time between posts won't prove innocence. The topics can be pre-loaded and especially with such vague and general replies, you could both think and type them up within a minute.
The correlation between your and Satry's PM's is way too high for it to be a coincidence, especially considering the time between them.
|
|
|
|
Can you provide a link please? I did a quick search but none were titled anything like "Main Betking thread" and none had any activity newer than Sept of last year so those must not be it. The search on here sucks. I've literally been posting it. This is the link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2150057.0Perhaps the horizontal rule must have distracted you from the top part. |
|
|
|
Where is the official site thread? This is the only one I've ever seen, I must have missed that announcement. Usually projects transaction the ANN thread to a main thread. Please provide a link. No need to keep 2 threads alive for the same project. You must have overlooked my earlier reply. This thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2150057.0
It's in the Gambling section. Again, it's a more suitable board for the content. |
|
|
|
I was referring to Betking updates. They are listed on the official site thread rather than the ANN thread. I feel like this has diminishing returns as the Tokens section gets spammed like crazy and you would target a better demographic in the Gambling section instead. What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
