why would you promote a scam like Steemit on your profile?
I'm still open minded about Steemit. Sometimes I think it is a sophisticated Ponzi, and sometimes I think it is an interesting idea to create a coin based on the 'proof of brain' concept. I'm reluctant to put any money into it, but I'm aware that it does need people to invest in the platform. I am prepared to support it with some of my content, even if this doesn't give me any financial returns, it does give me some exposure. Steemit is proof of pussy, without one you'll get nothing. also where is the brain you are talking about? all I have seen in here from you are usual whining about long posts. long and used cunts, etc. exposure comes from this forum, not steemit where you have to beg for attention every day on their chat rooms. here at least people beg for merits which is kind of a contribution to the community because garbage posters wouldn't get any merits and we need to ask for merits from sources to prevent garbage posters from ranking. On steemit you would have to beg just to get some money, and they wouldn't give a fuck about your brain if you don't have some steem coin on your account. at least here you can get some merits even if you are not a paid member like a copper member. |
|
|
|
|
How did you get this account? give us enough evidence to find that account seller.
Why did you merit OgNasty? he just told you to stop mentioning his name here, don't you know he is a competitor?
Did you send merits to OgNasty to later say that Lauda didn't remove your red tag because of that merit transaction?
|
|
|
|
He recently did that with the Politics & Society admin picking thread. Not admin, mod picking. and here is the result locking a thread stating there is another one similar to that but never providing a link to the same topic. or this one is providing a link but there are no similarities between the two topics. how about this one? isn't this a discrimination? your own topic( as legendster's own topic started by legendster) is still open which ironically is about Godless cunts and their opinions. it is indeed no wonder we are infested with bounty garbage posters. What if it could be a paid gig? Each time you report something that is legitimately BS, you get paid a small amout of btc. Kinda like a faucet.
But not everyone can do this, maybe a select group of people who are not biased against signature renting but do not have paid signature spots themselves. Would you like to get paid by reporting garbage posts with one of your alts which has no signature? you don't even want others to get anything even if it is just in your imagination. your suggestion is not going to favour everybody equally, just a select group. facking lol. Last time I proposed to give some merits for reporting e.g. 20 copypasters, the answer was spammers would register new accounts to copypaste and they will report them just to gain the merit... For now let us see what will happen to somebody who has reported more than 200 posts accurately in hopes of red tag removal for apparent merit trading, let us see if mods give a fuck or not.
EDIT: in red above and the following: @Flying Hellfish, I know that you are not going to be fired as a mod, I'm just trying to criticize you constructively. also you should know that I have no dignity, so calling me a lying troll is meaningless for me. |
|
|
|
IF you niggas came round my hood acting like you owned the place you would get slapped. Bunch of fat computer nerds on a power trip because they have some of these virtual merits.
Would you also slap runaway girls to take them to your hood without them fighting back? I've been here over a month, I've been reading a lot about alt currencies that can possibly do things better than bitcoin. This is one of the most toxic forums I've been a part of. I see constant harrassment and bullying from high ranked members.
Haven't you left already? Once a wise man said: Simply stated, you have to adhere to the rules and policies of the forums, not the other way around. Bitcointalk does not have to cater to you. Being here is a privilege, not a right.
Bull shit. your wise man is in ICO business. I wouldn't listen to whatever he has to say. why would you expect people to leave? people should try to change the rules and policies if they think they have something better to offer. Merit is life.
Merit ruins lives.
Merit ruins wives.
Merit is a vagina like Bitcoin then? vagina means money, Bitcoin means money, merit means money for many. and all of them taste good. (nonstop lol). Nigga mind your own shit. Go back to your hood and suck your mamas tits. You wasted your time here. Why are you staying here if you don't like it? Ignore this one. @mdayonliner, even your role model is polite here, that should mean something for you. OP is complaining about no brainers like you. You are one of those useless cunts Contact with nullius, he is tasting a few in his zone every day. Get a life!!! Go back to you mamas, you broken tap recorder. I hope you are not following my advice, it was a joke. when TMAN talks like that, we don't expect anything less from him, but when you start talking like that, you haven't earned your place yet to talk like that. please don't treat people like that. everybody has the right to be here. |
|
|
|
I guess this should be posted in the Meta section and not in trading discussion. Then it ll be noticed and hopefully action will be taken. Wrong. forum does not moderate alt account and merit transactions of random members. even if there are evidences of merit sources abusing their source sMerits, you should report them in here, reputation forum. Admins already monitor merit sources, if you have solid proof of many abusive cases regarding merit, try to post them in reputation. this is just a single case involving 2 low rank members. Now let us imagine something, even if they sold merits, what would be different? that one member could join any bounty campaign and earn a few more tokens. he could do the same with lower rank accounts. DT2 members should spend their time thinking about solutions to make more money for the forum. Because we need more moderators. |
|
|
|
It's not like Israel planned to do any actual fighting Because they are pussies, they don't have any balls to fight us. Israel would have to make sure they can get us to fight and stay in the fight to the end (and win.) They have their nuclear weapons and their 'Samson option' If nuclear weapons are on the table, we could bring ours on the table in days. can you fight to the end with 80 Million people? some of these nut-cases are capable of. We are capable of destroying Israel. it is time for the jews to go. |
|
|
|
|
Aren't you a merit source? why would you promote a scam like Steemit on your profile?
|
|
|
|
Bump. I'd say merit sources should only merit copper members. not to merit a garbage post of a copper member but there should be something to stop every single forum member to register as many accounts as they can and start participating in bounty campaigns. Something has to be done. I would like to ask merit sources to read every post in a thread before meriting somebody for a post in there. for example: this merit was my own stupidity, I was upset about Don Hillary, I didn't merit his post, instead I merited a similar post. You guys don't need me to show you where to spend your merits, I will keep showing you regardless. because I don't have any dignity. EDIT: hint: have you tried to use some of your sMerits in Serious discussion? |
|
|
|
I got into trouble a few months ago and opened a reputation thread to clarify the situation. One of the users Digaran suggested to me to find 200 attempts of forum rules abuse and then again ask for the withdrawal of the red trust. Did you report at least 200 garbage and off topic posts on Bitcoin discussion section? did you PM hilariousandco to ask for a reconsideration on your negative trust? why did you leave positive trust for The Pharmacist without any reference? why do you have positive trust for a trade without any reference? I wouldn't remove the red tag from you if I were him. Each report takes me about 5-10 seconds. If you don't just search for them, it's not much extra work to report them when you see them. Each report alone would take you 5-10 seconds to click on the report and write a word and then click on send. what about the time you are spending on reading the posts? The idiot from the video can't even write bitcointalk right and calls it a "form"
Maybe he means it's his income form...  Like a 1099 form for misc income in the US!!   Is prostitution one of those 1099 forms of income in the US? lol. |
|
|
|
|
According to research, only street beggars(and prostitutes) frequent the streets and dream about the projects. lol. if you want to see what is Deja vu, read the posts on Bitcointalk forum. I blame you for my insanity.
|
|
|
|
|
OP, have you asked merit sources to review your posts? if they refused to merit your posts, start a thread with your posts as reference and then name merit sources who refused to merit you. theymos doesn't have the time to check if sources are distributing their source sMerits all the time.
Asking for merits from sources is not begging, it is a contribution.
|
|
|
|
Diagaran got me going on this one, asking what could be done to see trust relationships visually. I hadn't given much though to Trust before personally, although I do look at the figures if they stand out in the User Profile. The Trust.txt file that is made public by themos, and contains the equivalent to our Hierarchical View of Trust, visible here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full (takes a few minutes to build the complete list). There is no other information such as feedback or comments in the file, so the derived information is rather simple, but graphical. Note that only forum users with trust or distrust are included in the file, and thus in the provided tool. You can play around with the data using the following this link: https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=18-81RQhVtoKDv4Oifar4qxQaqx0FzeEdrT7I9uFCSince I have no Trust/Distrust information associated to my profile, I've taken the liberty of using Theymos' as the example profile for my screenshots. 1. Examples:The output is something like this: a) Who I distrust:Shows who I distrust (equivalent to users crossed out in the Forum Profile Hierarchical View of Trust). As an example, here's theymos' distrusted network:  b) Who I trust:Shows who I trust (equivalent to users not crossed out in the Forum Profile Hierarchical View of Trust). As an example, here's theymos' trusted network:  c) Who distrusts Me:Shows who I'm distrusted by. As an example, these are the profiles that distrust theymos:  d) Who Trusts Me:Shows who I'm trusted by. As an example, these are the profiles that trust theymos:  2. UseThe google product has three Tabs: 2.1. Data: We don't need to do anything with this Tab. It's the loaded trust.txt file after processing it an converting an Untrusted Relation to 1 and a Trusted Relation to a 2. 2.2 Who I trust / Distrust: This tells us who I trust or distrust, but we need to filter by my username and whether I want to see Untrusted Relationships(1) or Trust Relationships (2). To do this: - Click the Filter dropdown box - Select UserFromName value (a filter should be now visible on the left side of the screen) - On the filter you can now type your user name (i.e. theymos) - Select TrustType value (a filter should be now visible on the left side of the screen) - On the filter you can now type the range: 1 to 1 to see Untrusted Relationships. 2 to 2 to see Trusted Relationships. If you forget to apply this filter, you will see both trusted and untrusted relation mixed up, and although Trusted Nodes are larger in size than Untrusted Nodes, it’s a bit confusing to have both sets on screen simultaneously. - Press Find: - Filter should be applied and the image limited to the selected user, viewing his trusted or distrusted network. - You can adjust the image size and move it around. - There’s an irritating thing (that seems to be a bug) that often happens: Not all nodes are shown by default, so you need to increase the nodes in the box above the image (I normally just retype the upper limit of nodes shown by the node box). - If you want to filter by another user, it's best to delete the filter (using the cross) and restart again (otherwise it adds both users to the query). 2.3 Who Trusts Me/ Distrusts Me: This tells us which Networks we are in, either because we are trusted or distrusted. To do this: - Exactly the same as above, but filter by UserToName + TrustType. You can also see the exact data where the chart derives from by clicking on the three dots above the image and dragging it down. Note This is a similar product in terms of usage to Our very own sMerit Network Picture (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3395255.0)I'm truly sorry man, I guess others now would have to show their appreciation by meriting you. because I'm no longer a source, one of the main reasons for my resignation was having 0 source merits for a few days and another reason was my own inability to behave properly. I figured that I should stop embarrassing myself over 100 sMerits in 120 days. Anyways, I'll add this topic's link in my merit review thread to help merit sources finding merit worthy posts. and thank you very much. BTW, I quoted the whole OP to have for future reference. lol. |
|
|
|
<...>
I'm a buyer of your products, will pay you with merits.
Now there’s a new use for sMerits – the purchase or usage of products and goods. It’s not Merit Trade you’re talking about in the sense we’re often using on the Forum, where Merit is the actual merchandise sold in the back alleys of Telegram and the deepweb like some prohibited substance. Instead, you elevate the concept of sMerit to a utility token within the Forum ecosystem. I think I’m getting a bit carried away here .. Lol, now that you have tried to interpret my post positively. I will stay away from meriting you for a while. I guess meriting you for what you have done was enough, I only said that to incentivize other devs to follow your example and create something other than generic and biased opinions. I think that I'm also getting a lot carried away after becoming a lonely source, I've been arrogant. there is really nothing especial about me.
How could we do the same with trust instead of merits? I want to see trust relations as well. what do you need to make that happen? |
|
|
|
|
Facking lol. look at that mom_dad. they all are randomly generated real names from a person generator site. altcoin sections really need more moderators.
Make this man a mod. he would erase 500,000 accounts and would derank Bitcointalk.org back to 10,000,000 top sites.
Are you on a power journey TP? who is going to manually verify so many accounts one by one? should it be you alone? you'd have the final say on their ban and red tags? you should find their campaign manager and inform them of this cheating, if they are fine paying these cheaters, you should let the forum to decide about the spam, forum admins could warn their team and ban them from having a thread in this forum if they are not taking care of the problem.
Naming and shaming them is not fair, if I did named and shamed a few examples before, it was not to make such behaviour acceptable to do to other people, it was a warning to such account farmers with the same post-activity counts.
You are not in any position to pick on forum members like this, problem has to be fixed by changing the policies. if there is no change in the policies, don't force your own policies on people.
Just a suggestion from a lowlife forum member.
|
|
|
|
OP. for fuck sake, explain this one to me. what is this usual bounty reporting doing here? he doesn't even have 1 follower. lol. |
|
|
|
|
How about the oldcunt.com your queen?
|
|
|
|
Snip You should only remove their tags if they are not banned by the admin by then, let them each to report a minimum of 200 garbage posts with an accuracy higher than %80 and then remove their tags. we'll keep an eye on them after that, if they keep doing the same thing, you could tag them again. Other people could think: You could be tagging these people to have a market for your own farmed accounts. it would make it easier for you to sell your clean accounts if these garbage posters are red tagged. Having them to help the forum by reporting could benefit only the forum. leaving the decision to you could benefit the forum, however you could make it to benefit yourself more than the forum. My tongue likes no English. sir TP. |
|
|
|
If you are red tagged for spamming, garbage posting, report a minimum 200 posts to earn your trust back.
Says who ? Or don't. instead register more accounts to do more damage and post more garbage. ask moderators to see which one they would prefer. having a tagged shit poster moaning all the time with multiple accounts or having them spending their time on reporting garbage posts? Which one you would prefer? do you want to see a tagged member posting garbage with newbie accounts or having them to help the forum to get their tags removed? |
|
|
|
War on Iran would certainly affect the price of oil and that, in turn, could function as the catalyst that would cause the rapid meltdown of the fraudulent US dollar, and culminate with USA losing its dominant position as the ruling state in the world. In a surprise of all surprises, Israel could then replace USA as the new ruling state in the world, while controlling the new electronic money-system of the world that would then totally replace paper-money.
We are waiting for years to get rid of the cancer. using nukes on Iran is not an option, whatever they do, we will retaliate and bomb all the jews. USA can't do shit about it, because we would nuke them if they attack us too. I'm waiting to have american girls for a test jump, like they test jumped arab girls. lol. this is on you guys, you made me a lonely virgin ruthless terrorist. I'll make sure not to nuke any city where theymos lives, I'm saving him for last. he has to watch everything first. he broke our lives with merit Note, bolded parts are jokes. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
