AaN2diaPAUwruWpdAY9pfXgCMVsfzjtru8 Thanks a lot ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) !
|
|
|
Govt intervention in the US ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . BTC businesses will move to free countries like China and Russia ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) .
|
|
|
If you think someone trolling, that ignore thingy is the best option ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) .
|
|
|
What other measure would you guys suggest to meet existing legal requirements? Trying to convince lawmakers that bitcoin should be anonymously traded is an absolute non-starter. If that is the foundation's opinion then bitcoin may be declared illegal and the tracking of coins will move to law enforcement. So, what are our other options?
I'm living in the EU. Why should I meet with any US legal requirements? What you guys planning to give up next?
|
|
|
This is quite a bad precedence. I think the EUcrats will catch on with the idea quickly as well. BTW tainting and listing addresses is an awesome tool for most governments. (I guess the less democratic govts will be the more happy with this, as their opposition can get BTC funds but will not be able to spend it easily and "anonymously" any longer.) Tainting could be a great opportunity for big corporations and patent trolls too for suppressing crowd funded/opensource competing products. With a little patent trolling and then tainting all BTC funds as means of intellectual property breach (therefore making it unspendable e.g. in the US) can knock down any such efforts. But maybe this is just my own paranoia ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) .
|
|
|
I think none of the devs making intentionally dead coins.
|
|
|
Connected to USD and BTC...
Mostly to BTC. So when the BTC go up the LTC should rise in turn, isn't it ? When BTC goes up, LTC goes down. Yes, as it's connected to USD as well at first goes down when BTC goes up, and later it goes up a bit as the USD/LTC pair working as resistance ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) .
|
|
|
Yes I have some. I think there is a good potential in PPC (and XPM as well) in the future.
|
|
|
No pre-announce = scram
visit ineedabrain.com ...
|
|
|
It s ok for me, tested in vm, no more process nothing. it's a false positive, like all new coin. what's your av?
+1 no problem. Cool name, smoke weed every day.
|
|
|
He have sent the btc, no problem anymore
|
|
|
I think yes, people trust btc now, and are not panic selling like before.
|
|
|
I was trying to move my funds BTC to another wallet from mcxNOW account. The message i get was: Error sending transaction on network. Your account however has been debited the amount requested. Contact admin to get the transaction manually sent.
Has anyone else had same problems? The account is now empty and the BTC are nowhere to be seen. I contacted them via email, but no response. I'm getting really nervous.
Yes exact same thing. It's just Sat morning where where realsolid(Admin) is located. So it may be awhile before we hear anything. me too ...do you have news about your btc?
|
|
|
Wanting profit does not make profit. Basically, you're saying alts are just a way to get more bitcoins. I certainly agree, as no alt has (at least for now) other compelling reasons to own them. However Litecoin has been gradually losing its position as the altcoin of choice, and I don't think it will stop. If I wanted to get more bitcoins, I'd certainly look elsewhere.
Alts made profit already and I guess the surviving alts will make more profit in the future. As bitcoin mining getting more and more centralized and BTC itself less and less affordable for many, I think alts will attract more and more attention. Basically yes. Perhaps you can find some idealists who made/supporting an alt for fun, or as a solution for a real or an imagined problem with bitcoin, but these devs/supporters are the minority. At this moment there are no replacement for Litecoin. Maybe NVC could be the only one but it had a questionable start. The other established alts aren't very popular at all. Maybe NTX or eMunie can be a replacement in the future but there are couple of white patches on the map regarding these coins. Anyway, replacing LTC will take time and I believe people who invested a lot into it don't want to loose all of these investments.
|
|
|
I think Litecoin will recover.
You and a lot of posters in this subforum, it seems. But none of them cared to say why. - there are a big bunch of big(ish) holders in the wild and they want to see some good profit from their holdings ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . - there are an even bigger bunch of late comers who want to catch up with BTC and LTC/other alts are many affordable ways to grab some.
|
|
|
Does anybody see flaws or disadvantages in such design?
Sounds like a magic. Is there any other currency that promises instant transactions? Yes. Ripple XRP.
|
|
|
I'm afraid it isn't so ridiculous. I can imagine a BTC bubble big enough tho reach or surpass gold prices. Just take a look at the predictions about 2014 BTC prices in the speculation topics. $1000 actually isn't to far from the current gold prices. BTW I'd be more than happy to dump my bitcoins for some real shiny 1oz gold coins on a 1:1 exchange rate.
|
|
|
A short ferry tale about miners, tailors and investors. Some 150 years ago there was a bloke John Smith who was mining gold somewhere on the Wild West. He was working hard but finally he made a nice sum of money and later bought a farm somewhere else. There was an other bloke with a small family business who made ugly but sturdy trousers for the miners. Let's call him Levi Strauss. There was two other blokes who run express mail and banking services for the miners and tailors, so basically they were investors. Let call these blokes Henry Wells and William Fargo. ...and now let's think about the question who made the most money out of this entire gold thingy. Was that the miner? Or the tailor? Or maybe the two investors ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ?
|
|
|
I'm not sure I get the advantage (for the person asking for a loan) to provide collateral. If you are providing equal or higher than the loan amount in collateral, why don't you just sell the collateral and use that to fund the loan yourself? That seems to be a lot simpler on your end because you won't need to worry about paying anyone back.
Can someone explain the advantages or how it works to me?
Let's say you have a well built portfolio on BitFunder just two days before the next dividend payment. Suddenly you need more funds for gambling on MtGox. Would you be happy to sell some or all of your shares? Probably not. So asking for a loan and using your portfolio as a collateral could be a good option (if your gains on Gox and your dividends together worth more than the interest).
|
|
|
|