Is suchmoon insisting *all* users on the forum attribute *all* images they use and equally DT distrusting *all* users of the Forum when they don't?

Did you wait for the transaction (to open a channel with the other side) to confirm *before* you tried to send funds to that person?   And, was the channel opened directly with that other side, or through a third party?  What LN wallets are you both using?

Am broadcasting ...

Will retry every few hours for a while and post update of where I have posted it to as I go.

---

---

*edit

• https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ - Error validating transaction: Transaction with hash 7da3515aa3a7492b9e99ef95b7a3e7bbaf500c474de68b3dc4c756d18729abdd already exists..
  
• https://coinb.in/#broadcast - non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit) (code 64)
• https://btc.com/tools/tx/publish - There was an error pushing your transaction to network! Did you sign your transaction? Is this double spend? Have you already sent this transaction?  (Which could be that node is seeing the first TX...)
• https://blockchain.info/pushtx - Code: -26, Error: non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit)
• https://www.mocacinno.com/push.php - unsuccesfull, probably because some of the inputs for this tx were removed from the UTXO set (used in a confirmed transaction)
• https://www.smartbit.com.au/txs/pushtx - PUSH TRANSACTION ERROR: 64: NON-MANDATORY-SCRIPT-VERIFY-FLAG (USING NON-COMPRESSED KEYS IN SEGWIT)
• BitCoin Core (V16) - 64: non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit) (code -26)
• BitCoin Core Ver 20.1 - bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent (code -25) Perhaps it's detecting the original TX ??
• https://btc.bitaps.com/broadcast - Broadcast transaction failed: non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Using non-compressed keys in segwit) Having said that however, the page DID show the actual transaction which the others don't...

7th Nov - another edit...

I've found yet more broadcast raw transaction sites (will add to the above list later)

blockcypher seems perfectly ok re-accepting the TX - confidence 48.3 % (watch this space)

---

---

Original TX with high fee: https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5274/52740059.html

That's the "old" transaction (with the higher transaction fee) that gets rejected for a variety of fees (such as too high fee).


I've already tried posting that TX (see post from about a week ago which includes screen grabs of various nodes rejecting that TX)


I don't mind trying to broadcast the newer (lower fee paid) given there has been reports that the first TX has fallen out of the mempool and/or was never accepted in the first place.


#Persistence

Until that occurs, may I have the RAW transaction so that I can try broadcasting it in various places please?

LBJ said he wouldn't re-nominate, nore accept his parties nomination whilst Ford IIRC lost to Carter who then lost to Regan.

Given you've woken up twice this year, what collateral are you offering to cover your proposed loan?

I see they are using a kind-of equal ranking for users who have the same scores - will this be applied across the board to other equal ranked members in the MATR score cards?

I received a PM as well.  Not sure what I'm supposed to say in response that hasn't already been said here in this thread.

Trump did that before the election along with the US Postal Service and a plethora of other people, groups and organizations etc.

Associated Press and Fox news have just given Arizona to Biden, so assuming Biden picks up Wisconsin and Michigan Trump won't win even if he picks up Pennsylvania. (and Georgia, South Carolina & Alaska)

---

---

And all counting has now finalised for the evening.

Might be a long night:  I don't know if it's called flipping, but Nebraska has (from what I can tell) a foot in each camp with one vote going to the Democrats.



The figures - Biden 227 to Trump 213 haven't changed in over an hour.  Not sure which states are still counting (east to west) so we may have to wait overnight.

Interesting that Trump's odds have tightened in the last six to eight hours.

Agreed.  I've been contacted via PM and have made corrections - SFR10 is one example where I have gone from giving them negative trust feedback to they are now on my DT trust list.

There are a number of DT who say that I am wrong, but have never actually taken that first step in giving even one example where they perceive that I am wrong much less making a case for another user.

Those ones, (that is to say DT1/ones) have peddled in trading in Forum accounts, hence I consider them to be DT Trolls having lost trade.  This thread is non-moderated ^{(Lauda wanted to make this a moderated thread and look where he is now)} so any person can come to this thread and make their case without being dismissed as just an alt with a gripe.

If you post the RAW transaction I'll rebroadcast it where I can and I'm sure I'm not the only one who would given there are already ?? 150+ nodes still holding it in their mempool.

[quote author=aesma link=topic=5279076.msg55514751#msg55514751 date=1604463424]
Trump can't do anything (directly) about vote counting. Each state counts its votes, it's 50 elections in 50 states managed by local authorities.

Now if there is something fishy, or if Trump/GOP wants to make something fishy, they can sue, in fact they've been doing that for weeks now. In the end it could end up at the Supreme Court, where of course the conservatives have now a big majority. But even then, they're judges, not politicians, they can't totally change election rules.
[/quote]

Anthony Green has been just discussing the likely-hood of a "Hung Parliament" with one vote in Maine going to the GOP and all four in Nebraska giving 269 each:



We here in Australia are governed by preferential voting whereas the U.S. on the whole doesn't if my understanding of their initial voting is correct.

Perhaps - I've just checked in again, it's looking at 4pm AEST (GMT +10) Biden 226 to Trump 175:  (not sure where the two count difference is unless it's a different State being counted i.e. 5 not 3)



Might be a few more hours before we know for certain.  The gap is definitely closing, but over-take ??

[quote author=mindrust link=topic=320959.msg55511962#msg55511962 date=1604422401]
Pence is a good possibility (a win is also very likely) because I think Donald is going to win tonight also but I am not sure about Kamala... If dems make her a candidate, then it'll mean they are dumber than I thought. No fucking chance she'll win 2024. If the dems want to lose again, yes Harris would be the perfect candidate.
[/quote]

A little while ago the ABC News Network in Australia have Biden 203 to Trump's 103 Electoral Votes, so in all likely-hood with under three hours until the West Coast voting closes that Biden will get over the line.  If that happens, then it's very likely that Kamala Harris will become the next president (after Biden) - I'll be putting money on that wager.



Having said all of the above it'd be another interesting wager to see if Pence became the Presidential nomination in 4 years time if Trump looses today.

I just hit the screen grab button too quickly, Anthony Green (ABC News - Australia) is giving Indiana to Trump taking the tally Biden 190 to Trump 88 with three hours before the polling booths close on the West Coast.

The Australian ABC is saying Biden has 190 college votes to Trumps 77 votes, but it's "too close to call" given the West Coast polls don't close for another three hours.



(The two compares are discussion Florida in the screen grab)

I have BPIP installed on both my home PC and android device which makes me think the actual number of users of the extension might only be about ⅔^rds of that number.