Yeah - cops in the US seem to be doing whatever they want - it's like organized crime; and when something bad happens (and it does) they stick with each other and get off scott free.
Cops are the test that politicians are using to see what the people will do. If an attorney does a good job of twisting a court case against a person, well, the person is convinced that he did wrong and needs to be punished. At least that is the way it looks. But when a cop does violence against you, that's different. It is something that affects you physically in a big way, on the spot. People fight like rats when backed into a corner. There is a way to fight a cop in court and win. But people don't know how. If they did, they would teach the rest of the people, and after a while the cops would back down. Police brutality is so successful that big people in government are realizing that the people don't have a clue about protecting themselves in court, and getting money out of cops when cops do wrong. So, the politicians are ready to screw the people the rest of the way, now.  I'm glad to see that you agree - I was sure that you wouldn't agree with me. It's government approved organized crime. Big government winds up becoming organized crime, even if it had absolutely no crime in it when it started out. |
|
|
|
But 4 wives wouldn't be fun in the States, where there is sexual freedom. Those Muslim men dominate their wives. |
|
|
|
So an atheist is bad for what? Because he/she wants to live a rational life, based on real things, rational things, on things that are part of the objective world, not dreams, and hopes in invisible beings that can do "everything", only that they don't, because they've given us free will. If an atheist is bad, it isn't because of things he wants. It's because he won't step up out of the atheism mistake he is making. Come on. Take your religion, go in the woods, and pray as much as you want - but don't do a show about it to the rest of the people that are not interested in it.
I wish atheists and scientists would do as you have suggested. If they did, they would get their atheism religion out of the schools, and they would treat their scientific theory as theory rather than truth. For example. At http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap160125.html, the NASA website, it says: The hydrogen in your body, present in every molecule of water, came from the Big Bang. Yet Big Bang is an unproven theory. In fact, even if it were proven to be possible (which it hasn't been), it still might not be proven to be the way everything came into existence. But look at what NASA says, "The hydrogen in your body, present in every molecule of water, came from the Big Bang," like it is fact, when it is simply theory. What a crock of religion. Get those NASA people out into the woods away from us, so that we can live our lives in truth rather than fiction. |
|
|
|
Hook-nosed are all evil and should be castrated and them all shot. The state of Texas should take care of this - they have a lot of gun freedom there.
Hooked nose make much dollar for paper mill, if paper mill make tissue - when hooked nose get cold virus.  So what you're saying is that hook-nosed people contribute to the economy by buying more paper tissues? That doesn't seem so bad. They must be good guys in disguise. Only when their nose is running.  |
|
|
|
We are like primitives compared to this advance aliens who may have evolve and build civilization million years ahead of us.
I doubt there are any civilizations that are millions of years ahead of us. They would eventually destroy themselves. How would they get past AI? All AI built must have a weakness. Doesn't matter what, could be beer. Even with quantum neural networks, built from artificially grown diamonds ...? Yeah, maybe... Well of course... since the only practical AI that is around is built by God... namely people. But look at those prices. No wonder I don't drink. |
|
|
|
Somewhere i read regarding number of people having guns in America and I found the amount of guns in america shocking, i think it needs to be reigned it because i have read about several high school massacres involving guns in america and we are yet to have one. its just my opinion but the rest of the world manage to 'protect their property' without such dangerous weapons.
Yes. Shockingly low. |
|
|
|
NASA is to thank for all of that but I'm asking what we got out of SPACE TRAVEL ITSELF.
In those links, nobody said "we found cameras on the moon".
There isn't any real proof that anybody went to the moon. So we can expect that there aren't any cameras on the moon. In your own mind only. It's easy to bounce laser beams off a reflector left on the Moon by Apollo. How did that get there? I suppose you went up there and checked out that those were earth reflectors that reflected laser light? In all likelihood, NASA found 3 spots where laser light could be reflected off the moon's natural surface. Then they built their whole moon landing scam around those 3 spots, just so that they could offer proof later. How about the moon rocks, which any first semester geology student can identify as not having came from Earth? More interestingly though, what did the Saturn rockets actually DO? They were tracked by radar by various countries around the world. So you think all of the possible geology on earth has been discovered examined already, right? So you are ready to get on the stand and swear that you know first-hand that radar rocket tracking wasn't an elaborate hoax set up by covert, joint sciences from nations that had (or suggested that they had) technology to use radar this way?Sure, Russia and the US in the middle of the Cold War were going to do that. Come on, let's hear it. What did the Apollo 8 mission actually DO? I'm picking just this one as an example. Everyone knows the Saturn booster flew off the launch pad at the Cape, now you tell us. Where did it GO? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzCsDVfPQqkI mean, you gotta understand, everyone would really like to know. Let's go back a year or two. Here's Apollo 4, which was unmanned, and flew in 1967. Where did this one go? What did it really do? Just because I don't chase rockets around to see where they go, doesn't mean that anyone else is telling the truth about where they went. |
|
|
|
Of course you don't need to justify in front of me - I just think that that is the case you must have some years behind you.
Well, the pictures I have seen of Halbig look like he is in his 50s or so. So, he probably has a little experience behind him. It seems that people who are trying to say he is wrong, don't consider him to be wrong because he is lying about his experiences in law enforcement or Viet Nam. Rather, they say he is mistaken in his application of what went on in Sandy Hook. However, he does bring up some very good, common sense points. There is a lot of info about the stink he is making floating around the Internet. You can easily research it to develop a reasonable opinion for yourself. |
|
|
|
Just a thought..
If science was able to prove God's existence. Will it seriously inspire faith for everyone? People are very diverse. If you really mean "everyone," probably not. As you can see right in this thread, some people attempt to ignore the proof when it is set right in front of them... which it is in this thread and others. Guess we should really convince ourselves first, ask ourselves first, the need for a god and the idea of having one before we ever even try to prove it. And just perhaps proving won't be the solution to our answers.
The need for a god is universal. The reason for this is that nobody knows for a fact what is going to happen to him in life, even only one minute from now. Nobody knows anything about the future for sure. The idea of a god suggests to people that there is something that is controlling their lives for their benefit... they hope. That's why atheists accept all kinds of science theory as fact when it isn't fact. They are looking for a god even though they don't realize it. They have no other hope. And they need hope to remain outside of despair, so that they don't commit suicide, which thing they are afraid to do, just like they are afraid to formally admit that God exists. You have provided absolutely no proof at all. You've just spouted the same nonsense that any little boy raping Catholic priest vomits out to frighten his victims. You are right that emotionally weak people need something to believe in to keep them off the edge of the building. That's what Voltaire is talking about when he said, if God didn't exist it would be necessary to invent him. Just because you can't think your way through God's existence being proven by combining: 1. Cause and effect; 2. Complex universe; 3. Entropy; doesn't mean that the proof isn't there. You will have even greater trouble understanding the proof, simply because you don't want to understand. |
|
|
|
When you get partners who are on opposite sides of the earth and in contact by phone or Internet, who calculate the distance to the moon by triangulation when the moon is about equidistant from both, the distance figures out to be about 335,000 miles to the moon. The flat-earth idea is about as goofy as you can get. That's funny because when a single person calculates the distance to the Moon using a sextant and plane trigonometry the distance figures out to be about 3,000 miles. Where are you getting those extra zeros from, is your buddy on the other side of the planet wiring them to you via BTC?  I didn't note the location. There are many sites that show similar. Look them up. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sextant: Since the measurement is relative to the horizon, the measuring pointer is a beam of light that reaches to the horizon. The measurement is thus limited by the angular accuracy of the instrument and not the sine error of the length of an alidade, as it is in a mariner's astrolabe or similar older instrument. Like as a sextant is better than some of the instruments in use before its time, even so it is not made to accurately make outer-space measurements. If it were, people would have never started making telescopes for that purpose, or would have stopped making them for that purpose... if a sextant could do the job accurately. |
|
|
|
The so-called rivers on Mars, might resemble rivers. They might have some similarity to water flowing. But they have many differences as well. The thing that the Martian rivers match perfectly is, electric plasma arc channels. NASA isn't telling us the truth. Why? Who knows. Perhaps it has to do with all the scientific theories about Mars that might go down the drain. Perhaps NASA doesn't want people to even start thinking in the direction of an electric cosmos for the same reason extended to astronomy physics in general - http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm. But here is a video that shows clearly that the rivers on Mars were created by electric arc action caused by static electricity dissipation in a near-planet fly-by - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRV1e5_tB6Y. There are other videos that express the same. Oh, Btw, the earth is similar in some geology to Mars. For example, what would the Grand Canyon look like if there had been no erosion? Here is a video that suggests that it would look like an electric arc channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AxjrRl9hAA |
|
|
|
Not everything necessarily has to add to our daily supper. We pay our taxes and most of them are evenly distributed for the countries development in various facets and industries. In terms of space travel, it's more of a long term discovery plan and to learn about the elements in space. It does help explore and identify similar Earth like planets and other habitable places (which of course is a humans dream).
When you go to the grocery store, and you get a gallon of milk, you get a receipt. On the receipt there is information that shows that you paid for a gallon of milk, the particular brand of milk, itemization of any other products you purchased, sales tax (if any), sub-totals and the final "grand" total. Do you ever get any of that for the taxes you pay? Taxes for space development is simply unknown. In addition, you don't know that YOUR taxes helped with any of it... for a fact. Get NASA and everything else out of the taxes. Donate to them directly if you want to. |
|
|
|
The so-called rivers on Mars, might resemble rivers. They might have some similarity to water flowing. But they have many differences as well. The thing that the Martian rivers match perfectly is, electric plasma arc channels. NASA isn't telling us the truth. Why? Who knows. Perhaps it has to do with all the scientific theories about Mars that might go down the drain. Perhaps NASA doesn't want people to even start thinking in the direction of an electric cosmos for the same reason extended to astronomy physics in general - http://electric-cosmos.org/indexOLD.htm. But here is a video that shows clearly that the rivers on Mars were created by electric arc action caused by static electricity dissipation in a near-planet fly-by - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRV1e5_tB6Y. There are other videos that express the same. |
|
|
|
Where have all the birds gone? Birds have wings. They fly. They often fly long distances. Nobody tracks all the birds. Only an eensy teensy tiny fraction of a percent of all the birds are ever tracked. Nobody this side of God knows where all the birds have gone or go. |
|
|
|
Just a thought..
If science was able to prove God's existence. Will it seriously inspire faith for everyone? People are very diverse. If you really mean "everyone," probably not. As you can see right in this thread, some people attempt to ignore the proof when it is set right in front of them... which it is in this thread and others. Guess we should really convince ourselves first, ask ourselves first, the need for a god and the idea of having one before we ever even try to prove it. And just perhaps proving won't be the solution to our answers.
The need for a god is universal. The reason for this is that nobody knows for a fact what is going to happen to him in life, even only one minute from now. Nobody knows anything about the future for sure. The idea of a god suggests to people that there is something that is controlling their lives for their benefit... they hope. That's why atheists accept all kinds of science theory as fact when it isn't fact. They are looking for a god even though they don't realize it. They have no other hope. And they need hope to remain outside of despair, so that they don't commit suicide, which thing they are afraid to do, just like they are afraid to formally admit that God exists. |
|
|
|
When you get partners who are on opposite sides of the earth and in contact by phone or Internet, who calculate the distance to the moon by triangulation when the moon is about equidistant from both, the distance figures out to be about 335,000 miles to the moon. The flat-earth idea is about as goofy as you can get. |
|
|
|
People control is better. A guy with temper and other connected emotions might use it for personal gains.
It's odd to see people wearing guns aside from cops.
All regulation by government is people control. There was a time in American history where people all over the (then small) United States wore guns. |
|
|
|
We are arguing about script now? Upper vs lower case? What's the difference? To me, your god *is* a lower case god.
While we're on the subject, how am I "treacherous"? Treachery implies a betrayal of trust, trust which you have never placed in me. Unless your definition of treachery is also different from everyone else's?
Thank you for admitting your treachery. However, if you are simply ignorant, I apologize. The term "lowercase" is in the definition. Since you try to hide the significance of this, rather than admitting to having missed it, your treachery becomes all the more evident. Treachery. You keep using that word. I don't it means what you think it means. You have said, above, that "treachery" implies a betrayal of trust. When you look at the profile of anyone in this forum, you can find, near the bottom of the first page of their profile, their trust rating. The whole operation of living life with other people has to do with a level of trust. Why do you keep on attempting to move into more treachery? Some of the greatest treachery is found among government people. Are you in, or do you work for, government? You still haven't mentioned why you think you should trust me. You've mentioned that there is a trust system, but you haven't told me how that affected your decision to trust me enough for me to "betray" you. When you walk down the sidewalk, and you pass another person on the same sidewalk going the opposite direction, do you trust him? Generally we do trust in this situation, to some extent. But if the person starts fighting with you, suddenly your trust changes. Now, I understand that people don't realize how big a thing trust is in life. So, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. But you are pushing it. So when this person - who I assume is a complete stranger to you - starts fighting, you feel "betrayed"? Just because that feeling isn't one of the main feelings that you have on the spot, that is a feeling that comes to many. Consider the woman who is trusting people to some extent, and then her purse is snatched. Often such people state that they have been betrayed by society. You are starting to learn what this is about a little. Honestly? You're on a forum devoted to cryptocurrencies and cryptography generally, and for whom the holy grail is to have "trustless" transactions - and yet in your everyday life you trust complete strangers to the point that you feel betrayed when they act against you?
So, you haven't yet realized that you are in the "Politics & Society" forum in Bitcointalk, where you, yourself, have been posting about all kinds of things other than Bitcoin. Wake up. |
|
|
|
LOL who is at the end of the flat earth ? I mean which country , hehe ?
Antarctica isn't a continent it's a ring that surrounds the Earth and holds in the oceans and beyond the ring is the wall of the dome. The Antarctic Ring is governed by the UN and the Antarctic Treaty System that includes almost all countries. The ATS forbids any unsanctioned ventures and anybody who violates it will be met with military force. How do you know? Did you fly a drone there and got shot? Why dont you fly a drone with a cam there? Why wont we build a aircraft to crash into the nickel iron dome? Why are you trying to build your defenses of youtube videos? You didnt understood airys failure experiment as much as you didnt understood the majority of your "proofs". (Which you mostly watched from youtube - like every of your proofs contain watch this youtube/picutre/meme) That is why i adviced you to make something that is more obvious ( crashing an aircraft into your whatever dome, flying to the outer ice ring of antartica ). Instead your are attacking me based on delusional reasons. Human and good faith my ass. try and google for Antarctic Treaty System you will not find much about why every country is part of it and what they actually do its a mystery as noone ever talks about it. ever. Probably the real reason is that archaeologists have found that Antarctica is Atlantis. Youtube search on Graham Hancock's videos. In some of them he speaks of this. If you have to listen to several of them until you find one that speaks about it, the listening will be interesting anyway. Try "Graham Hancock Debunks Mainstream Science" and "Lost Ancient High Technology Of Egypt Before The Pharaohs Pa" and "Magicians of the Gods snapshots of a work in progress." |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
