I hope that you're allowed to unleash hell on that section, because that is definitely necessary. Congratulations.
No comment on the drama.   |
|
|
|
Wait, now is this 2FA or not? How can you tell the difference? I hope that it isn't, because I want it.  The funds cannot be redeemed by anyone except the original owner. You are going to need to contact them bud   |
|
|
|
@DT members, what if atriz is on other account will that account too get the negative trust?
That's usually how it goes, so yes. What if someone from DT2 knows his new account and have told him to kick start a new from that account??
Who exactly is this DT2 member and how exactly can you, objectively, prove that they know which account is it? Something smells. Will that other account of atriz and that DT2 member will be red painted?
You've already asked half of this question. I'll let ib comment on the second part, but I'm inclined on a 'yes' but it really depends on the case. You can't force someone to share what they know (e.g. someone might know more of Quickscammer's alts, or doxx). They can be untrustworthy if they blatantly lie about it though.
Though I doubt that a certain individual are going to let this go ever. This is pretty sad for the forum but hey, this too shall pass.
You like to be a rational thinker, aren't you? This, like many other things that are even remotely related to me, will never be let go. |
|
|
|
People like yourselves are a plague on this forum... I wish someone would just create bountyhuntertalk.org.  What is wrong with you It is very clear that Lauda is the witch here and OP isn't abusing anything. Just ask my friend of a friend reliable source. |
|
|
|
Taken from OP's sent ratings: The Pharmacist
whore mothers like you
bastards like you
your mother prostitute
Sounds nice. Can I get a poem too?
* Lauda awaits the retaliation. |
|
|
|
I forgot that both badges only apparently show up in Dev&Tech. achow101 is the best nominee to this list, he can accurately point out and correct mistakes from the member's replies and posts in the D&TD Board. Shouldn't he then also get the Bitcoin Core developer badge? |
|
|
|
As of the last trust dump, roughly twice the number of people have excluded lauda from their trust lists as have included him in their trust lists.
Now if we were to follow your strategy, then we could make these numbers reversed[1] in a few days. Any numerical stat is meaningless given that you're an account farmer. So you are saying you have sufficient accounts to reverse this figure?  Quickscammer in a nutshell. |
|
|
|
As of the last trust dump, roughly twice the number of people have excluded lauda from their trust lists as have included him in their trust lists.
Now if we were to follow your strategy, then we could make these numbers reversed[1] in a few days. Any numerical stat is meaningless given that you're an account farmer. ...
and the said sold account had a fairly large number of red flags that should have indicated ownership of the account being sold.
Hindsight 5/7. Intellect 0/0. I'm still butthurt because my account trading business is seriously damaged.
FTFY, once again. Strong desperation, I sense.
[1] It would not surprise me if someone attempted to do this now and blame me later for it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
That thread raises a better question. Why doesn't gmaxwell have that badge? We should award it to the people that have superior knowledge first; that is, if you want to remain fair. |
|
|
|
No, way too early. Maybe. His Wikipedia page has nothing to do with the Badge that is being talked about here.
Both of these don't deserve a badge. |
|
|
|
Didn't know about his problems and that he is not in DT anymore.
I didn't know that either. Wouldn't surprise me, though. The politics on bitcointalk are crazy, but I'd be interested to know who excluded me. You are still here with 2 exclusions and 2 inclusions. Obviously you are greatly inferior to my 3 exclusions!  |
|
|
|
-snip-
Sounds like a pretty bad excuse.or might be pure dumbness.No idea.
Don't be so sure that it isn't outright incompetence/ignorance. You have absolutely no idea how inefficient and insecure the setups are, even of the top exchanges such as Coinbase. This is especially the case with exchanges that list half-centralized and bloated chains such as ETH (generating several million deposit addresses using Core is relatively easy, ETH you can't even sync without fast-sync within reasonable time let alone do something else). Yup, sounds pretty stupid to claim BTG from an active address.
That should be a common sense thing, but it ain't. Plenty of people did it that way.
As you can see hacker sent all funds to above BTC address then from 2018-04-11 06:00:56 he/she started sending BTC funds to P2SH BTC (Pay to Script Hash addresses are more secure in many ways) addresses and regular BTC addresses starting with letter '1' also.
When you got your degree for 5 bucks in some dodgy alley. |
|
|
|
It the project would have sold ALL ico tokens, why not give 15 mil to bounty, or actually 5% of the ICO pool, which is again not 15mil.
-snip-
The whitepaper clearly stated '15 million tokens (0.5% of the overall ico pool)', regardless of how many got sold. If the project failed to sell as much as they had hoped for, that is their own problem. They have committed fraud by arbitrarily, extremely[1] changing the amount distributed.
[1] I find small changes on the go acceptable[2], as people can just quit in the middle of the process. However, optimally the changes that get announced should only apply for the upcoming (not past) weeks of the campaign. It seems suspicious that someone with just 5 posts has come in so invested in this topic.
This forum is infested with sockpuppets, don't take their words very seriously.
[2] Things move extremely fast in crypto, although I can already predict people complaining about any changes. Lack of understanding begets nothing. |
|
|
|
Accounts Connected:fearthebeard, seanavery11Proof:Entered into the Truegame Bounty with the same address: 0x20C2Eb7064334d959AacBc50f87a990dac6f79b5 - line 266 and 267. Related Addresses:0x20C2Eb7064334d959AacBc50f87a990dac6f79b5
|
|
|
|
What does ACK mean in terms of this subject?
Confirmation that it is tag worthy. Also, isn't this ban evading? I've heard that if you get permabanned on the forum, you cannot make new account as per rules right?
You are not allowed to make a second account and post except in your own ban appeal. Edit: And if ban evasion is forbidden, where and whom to should i report such actions?
hilariousandco and mprep. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone willing to ACK this tag? Seems tag-worthy.
I randomly checked a few people that applied for that campaign. While waiting for someone else to review the case, I'll be heading to the market to buy bleach and cleanse my (witch) eyes.
|
|
|
|
Where is my right to not having to see your shitposts everywhere? Just go away with these bullshit complaints.
There, right to not-be-nice speech. No. Equal rights don’t work on a forum where anyone can create an unlimited number of sock puppet alts.
Correct. Liberalists will go into screeching mode upon reading the first part of your sentence though. |
|
|
|
What did you expect by joining a campaign "managed" by someone with: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming."? |
|
|
|
|
You forgot to include a link to his profile.
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a problem with the merit system, this is a problem with the quality of the content and the sockpuppets. For reference: I have around 300 sMerit right now and nobody to give them to, nor do I plan to look through garbage to find someone. I'm still waiting for a destroy merit option.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
] than the "book" bitcoin expert badge.
