|
Well after all Trump isn't really a Christian.
He never goes to church, he's just a random guy full of money.
No faith, only greed and ambition.
|
|
|
|
Except for Germany having a debt of 2.2 trillion € That is not the full picture. Germany is very close to becoming a net debt-holder nation. They own federal debt from nations such as Greece and Portugal. I am not quite sure about the amount, but it might be close to € 2 trillion. You're talking about Germany as if it was an example we should follow :-/ |
|
|
|
They deserve it. And it proves the US has a flawed system that doesn't work. It's the american dream.
Unfortunately most of americans dont realize this fact :7 I just don't think this way! No one deserve this! US people is just in their great dream..Freedom and security.. But they must wake up before it's too late. Many Americans are without homes now i wonder when will the rest of them realise where are they going? They're responsible for letting a shitty government ruining such a great opportunity! |
|
|
|
But the next president of the United States, Donald Trump, said he'd bring back 'a hell of a lot worse  Stop BS. If Trump becomes the next POTUS, then a world war could be avoided in the near future. He is having good relations with Russia and Israel. Only the Arabs and the Brits dislike him. On the other hand, if Hillary becomes the POTUS, she is likely to invade Iran, DPRK, Cuba, and at least 50 other third world nations during her term. And whole EU. EU hates him |
|
|
|
Well well well...
Seems like I was a bit too pessimestic. Shouldn't have close the short so soon.
Well just put a limit on 415 cause of high resistance, and only thing we can do is waiting for the rise now.
I agree with you here, this seems like a great opportunity to get in for low risk. I'm long @420 with a stop at 414.99. Gonna hold out and see what comes of this, not much to lose compared to possibly getting in on the next price raise. Yeah it's a great moment to get in. The 414.99 stop is maybe a bit too much sensitive though, 410 was broken but for an instant nothing more. I'm still bullish! |
|
|
|
Ok we gonna retake this upper trend now  |
|
|
|
|
100$ ? Oo
Whaou! Damn guy, I hope you get the whole Russia to visit you! It's a large amount xD
|
|
|
|
The idea in itself isn't exactly bad. But it seems like mutliple persons tried this and it didn't work. I can relate to that, no matter the lottery I would have no intention to participate |
|
|
|
|
Well well well...
Seems like I was a bit too pessimestic. Shouldn't have close the short so soon.
Well just put a limit on 415 cause of high resistance, and only thing we can do is waiting for the rise now.
|
|
|
|
years ago there was a manipulator with ~500,000Coins, he got #rect and so will this guy.
they rekt billyjoe shorts... i mean they killed kenny again . No, they didn't rek my hedge yet. A hedge is a bet you want to lose, like buying life insurance. Well, they killed mine :-/ |
|
|
|
If its really a world war, then I think its overwhelmingly likely we will see the collapse of civilization as we know it, if not the end of human life on the planet. Start with the disruption of world oil traffic and world food traffic and knock down the energy grid ... where do you think it will go from there?
War is not about rational behavior, and if history teaches us about war it teaches us that the consequences are usually worse than we expect and that it is very hard to limit and control.
There are no winners, we all loose.
Please mate, don't tell such bullshit ! The USA won the WW2, there's a winner. And their will be one here too. There's always a winner in a war. For sure USA won WWII... The lost nearly no soldier or ressources and fought only at the very end after earning lots of money by selling weapons but when you see how they totally destroyed the European economic and culture... C'mon! Why is that sarcasm? Of course USA did not win the WW2 alone on their own but they did make a huge contribution in the victory. And how exactly did they destroy the European culture? ... and the European economic  Man, I don't follow you, sorry. Historically false sorry. USA engaged very small amount of human and material resources especially compares to Russia for example. And they get INCREDIBLE BENEFITS!!! They asked for monetary suppremacy and the Marshall plan is nothing but the begining of EU being controled by USA. The American culture destroyed socialism, destroyed the benefits people manages to get from WWII victory. Didn't help EU, USA came and invaded EU. Different. |
|
|
|
|
Ahahah!
We broke the 430 I knew it!
Short closed with +10 profits, now a fucking long that I won't close before we reach 450 ^^
|
|
|
|
Well, as expected the price dropped at 430, even a little under. Short closed by a +10 profits and long opened at 429. First guess correct  |
|
|
|
Sure but in the end they would lose their support and then a good old siege would finish them and starve them to death :-/
Oh your talking about that. It's really different. My grandfather was in the Resistance and told me a lot of things about the Liberation. Imagine a country that suffered for 5 years and without any Justice instituion working. There was no justice, so the people made it themselves, and the people Justice is mostly revenge.
I don't think it was a mistake, it was a necessity. It was to purge the hate and the pain of France. It was not glorious, but it couldn't be avoided. For a few days there was no police, no army, how could have De Gaulle be able to enforce the law in the whole country while crushing the last German ligns?
I don't see what you're refering to by "other mistakes". De Gaulle was not perfect, but he was by far the best leader France had since Napoleon.
I didn't know where you lived, but where my grand-father grew up, all was cool. Even if he didn't agree with the actual government, it was the legitimate government chose by the people. If I killed Flamby, and stupid neo-collabo pro-socialist, I would go to jail, but what's good is that I would maybe left it after 7 months  ... Our Justice institutions aren't working. If someone enter in my house with a gun, I can't kill him if it did not shot on me before ! What the fuck ?! Policemen are frightened to use their weapons against savage ZUP racailles. Firefighters receive rocks on their head and then they got blamed because they did not helped them. de Gaulle, the best since Napoléon ?! Tu rigoles j'espère ! What de Gaulle did so far : creation of the Vème République, which is the worst, and the lose of all our colonies ! I wouldn't call him a great president then  ... Our Justice institution are perfectly fine and in the case your giving you wouldn't go to prison, you would be judged innocent because of legitime defense, some cases like this already happened and there was no jailtime. The law is here to protect the citizen in broad cases but very perticular cases like the one you're giving are judged by a citizen jury which wouldn't find you guilty Ok seems like I see the problem, you're an old conservateur and I'm a progressist Socialist (a real socialist, me confonds pas avec ces sous merdes du PS qui se disent de Gauche alors qu'ils sont encore plus à droite que Sarkozy qui est pourtant quasiment aussi à droite que Marine!!!) De Gaulle created the V which was the best that could be done given current technology (though it's totally shit now and should be replace) he was a visionnaire and gave us energy independance but also fought to regain our political status and independance. He gave us enough power to be side by side with USA and refuse OTAN. He built the EU and hence the century of peace that followed. He lost the colonies? The colonies were already lost since WWI!!! We used the colonies in WWI like fresh meat without ever rewarding them. If we wanted to keep the colonies we should have let them as French official regions after WWI giving French citizenship and same rights after. After all, they had the duties, why not giving them the rights? Like you will be suprised to I don't dislike your side. I only hate two parties, the Front National and the PS. I still see the PS as a leftist party, but more center-left than true leftist. The same goes for the UMP (quel nom à la con Les Républicains, ils n'auraient pas pu prendre un truc du genre Parti Républicain, ce que je dis ne veux rien dire pour quelqu'un qui n'est pas français), Les Républicains, which is a center-right party. Front National is a right party, and there's no real far-right party. In the case of the thief, if you have a weapon, you're already a rebel, since this sould be avoided at any cost to let our unefficient Police Municipale protect us ! Now let's say that the guy who came to stole you is black, and wasn't armed, like you. He takes a chair to protect himself against you and you think that he'll beat you, and this is you who beat him and you pop his eye. Then YOU go to jail because you're a bad racist that injuried the poor hungry thief. You can't give the colonies the same statut as a French region, because then they could emmigrate to France, where the life is by far better, and then we're screwed up again ... Ah ooooooooooooooooooook! You're an American in fact ^^ So you would dominate a region and use the people and the ressources in there without giving them the same right as the metropolitan citizens? And you think that immigration is a real threat I bet xD |
|
|
|
Sure but in the end they would lose their support and then a good old siege would finish them and starve them to death :-/
Oh your talking about that. It's really different. My grandfather was in the Resistance and told me a lot of things about the Liberation. Imagine a country that suffered for 5 years and without any Justice instituion working. There was no justice, so the people made it themselves, and the people Justice is mostly revenge.
I don't think it was a mistake, it was a necessity. It was to purge the hate and the pain of France. It was not glorious, but it couldn't be avoided. For a few days there was no police, no army, how could have De Gaulle be able to enforce the law in the whole country while crushing the last German ligns?
I don't see what you're refering to by "other mistakes". De Gaulle was not perfect, but he was by far the best leader France had since Napoleon.
I didn't know where you lived, but where my grand-father grew up, all was cool. Even if he didn't agree with the actual government, it was the legitimate government chose by the people. If I killed Flamby, and stupid neo-collabo pro-socialist, I would go to jail, but what's good is that I would maybe left it after 7 months ... Our Justice institutions aren't working. If someone enter in my house with a gun, I can't kill him if it did not shot on me before ! What the fuck ?! Policemen are frightened to use their weapons against savage ZUP racailles. Firefighters receive rocks on their head and then they got blamed because they did not helped them. de Gaulle, the best since Napoléon ?! Tu rigoles j'espère ! What de Gaulle did so far : creation of the Vème République, which is the worst, and the lose of all our colonies ! I wouldn't call him a great president then ... Our Justice institution are perfectly fine and in the case your giving you wouldn't go to prison, you would be judged innocent because of legitime defense, some cases like this already happened and there was no jailtime. The law is here to protect the citizen in broad cases but very perticular cases like the one you're giving are judged by a citizen jury which wouldn't find you guilty Ok seems like I see the problem, you're an old conservateur and I'm a progressist Socialist (a real socialist, me confonds pas avec ces sous merdes du PS qui se disent de Gauche alors qu'ils sont encore plus à droite que Sarkozy qui est pourtant quasiment aussi à droite que Marine!!!) De Gaulle created the V which was the best that could be done given current technology (though it's totally shit now and should be replace) he was a visionnaire and gave us energy independance but also fought to regain our political status and independance. He gave us enough power to be side by side with USA and refuse OTAN. He built the EU and hence the century of peace that followed. He lost the colonies? The colonies were already lost since WWI!!! We used the colonies in WWI like fresh meat without ever rewarding them. If we wanted to keep the colonies we should have let them as French official regions after WWI giving French citizenship and same rights after. After all, they had the duties, why not giving them the rights? |
|
|
|
well you can win big sometimes but then you need to cash out and not continue playing so you won't lose it
Problem is that if you win big, you should NEVER play again EVER to be sure to keep your gains, which is nearly impossible ^^ |
|
|
|
Well sometimes you just feel very, very lucky so you bet more money, and if you loose, you want to gamble to get money back, so often person looses all of his money like that
True, that's the worst problem I ever had... Sometimes when I lost on dice, I used to gamble more to recover at least what I lost, and in those regards, I lost even more than what I lost before... Well the idea is that the more you win, the more you'll play, the more you'll lose in the end ^^ |
|
|
|
Pretty sure it was said already but nobody reacted to this it seems.
I know the only winner of a WW3 and it would be Europe. Europe is protected by France nuclear weapons, able to nuke any country in the world. And Europe isn't an interesting target because there is absolutely no natural ressources of interest here. It means it's fucking dangerous and you wouldn't earn anything important. So nobody will attack Europe =)
That's an interesting idea that you bring us here ! But what if France and the other europeans countries were not on the same side ? Also, let's remember that the evil Americans bombed Japan while they had no interest to do it. This was a pure terrorism, like they're the best at. Well the side with France inside would win :p Difference is that by bombing Japan USA ended the war without any possible counter attack. No country could do that because France own 7 nuclear submarines, each of it being able to launch around 80 H-bombs anywhere in the world. Even if the USA would bomb France, they would be totally nuked in return. So why doing it? What about several France ? I'm sure that within the 15 newt years there will be a civil war that will split the country in several sides. I see a kind of coup d'État defying State's authority and finally win because of more power and no fear to do war. Then can either have a far-right government, created by the same people as bedhind the coup d'État taking over France or keep splitting it. Japan wanted to end war, but not at no condition like the USA wanted, so they killed 200 000+ innocent civilians to don't have to agree with the Japanese. This is what is called terrorism, or killing civilians in order to exerce political pressure, like the General de Gaulle did during the WW2, or like they did for the 11/9. This time, this was even worst, because this was against their own people. But nothing stop the American devils... De Gaulle did this? I'm interested please tell me more. Well if France is divided it'll be all a question of which part gets the army. But there is 0chance something like this happens. People are too lazy. French live an easy life without even knowing their luck. And they get raped by capital and banks without saying anything. No, the people will be too glad to be manipulated again and spit on terrorism (which is an insignificant threat) and migrants (which are no threat at all). People are too dumb. They won't fight for what is right. I see something like a coalition of far-right people from all the Europe uniting themselves and taking a city by night, in an isolated part of France, like the Jura. The army would never fire on it's own people, because they will seduct them, and they will surely keep hostages. de Gaulle, with his call to the Resistance, gave to some crazy communists all the rights. They killed a lot of people, but not so much Germans, who were as innocent as the others by the way, mostly collabos. That's not his biggest mistake, he did a lot worst, but that's not what is being discussed here. Sure but in the end they would lose their support and then a good old siege would finish them and starve them to death :-/ Oh your talking about that. It's really different. My grandfather was in the Resistance and told me a lot of things about the Liberation. Imagine a country that suffered for 5 years and without any Justice instituion working. There was no justice, so the people made it themselves, and the people Justice is mostly revenge. I don't think it was a mistake, it was a necessity. It was to purge the hate and the pain of France. It was not glorious, but it couldn't be avoided. For a few days there was no police, no army, how could have De Gaulle be able to enforce the law in the whole country while crushing the last German ligns? I don't see what you're refering to by "other mistakes". De Gaulle was not perfect, but he was by far the best leader France had since Napoleon. |
|
|
|
|
And an important point: it can't really be worse than the shit we have now which is nothing but a big fat oligarchy as the Harvard study proved :-/
|
|
|
|
I find a lots of people here saying things like "Socialism is the worst thing ever, it doesn't work and it's why the government have so much debt".
Well clearly it is not and socialism is the only way to go.
I'm French, I'm from a socialist country and solidarity is extremely important here.
Here is a common example given by people saying socialism is the worst thing ever: Healthcare costs around 2 billions of debt every year to the country.
So people are saying that we shouldn't give so much. That we shouldn't help each other so much.
I say bullshit nothing more.
The private sector of health is 36 billions every year. Just nationalize this shit and you'll get enough money to repay the health debt, triple the employment, repay part of national debt and lower the taxes!
It's the same for all sectors! What is profitable has been privatised by corrupted politician and only what costs money is left for the state! Another example? Yeah the Highways were sold to private companies! Just after they were repayed by tolls.
The only thing killing socialism is greed. Greed and corruption.
How do you fight it? By creating a democracy. but a true one not one of our shitty Western false democracies! One using the blockchain to make people vote for every law and every constitution modification! That's what should be done! Then you would see that we have far enough money, we're just letting private investors keeping it.
The one criticism I have of socialism is that majority rule and moral rule are not the same thing. Just because something is undertaken with the will of the majority does not make the action just. In your post, you seem to advocate that the crucial missing piece to a successful socialist government is simply a strong democratic element. My answer to this notion is that a tyranny of the majority is still tyranny, and socialism is more prone to justifying tyranny because it is popular. This doesn't make things better necessarily, it just makes people more certain that they can't possibly be doing harm when in fact they are, or worse, that the harm they are doing is creating a greater good. Historically, a group acting with the certainty that they are morally superior generally doesn't lead to a decrease in the level of violence they commit or are willing to commit. In America, we don't believe the ends justify the means. That's why we instituted the Constitution, to limit the potentially destructive means the majority could otherwise inflict simply because they have the popularity to do so. Interesting comment, thanks for your constructive answer. Well it is true that by giving the absolute power to the majority, you hence take the risk of the majority being wrong. But a few things allow me to have faith in such a situation: -First majority doesn't mean 51%. Majority can be higher. It would seem rather logical to write in the first constitution of such a democracy that any law needs 65% of the people vote to get approved. Being hence sure that the people really wants that and not that it's close to civil war with a big 50/50. We can also ensure some stability by saying that changing the consitution needs 80% of approval, hence only crucial changes can be written in the constitution. -Second, I strongly believe in transformation under responsability. Indirect democracy made people weak and stupid. They're not interested in politics and easily manipulated, because they all know they can't change anything. But if tomorrow they know they have the faith of the country in their hand, I do believe they'll get much more involved on politics. Exactly as the Greeks citizens did thousands of years ago. -Third, moral is subjective. If more than 70% of the population wants something, who are you to say it's bad? What kind of moral absolute value could you take? -Fourth, developped countries have a high education hence strong history knowledge and shouldn't tend to repeat mistakes. Of course I can't guarantee anything, but it's still what I believe. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
