Someone tell me,,, I looked online but it is VERY confusing. So people voting in the elections do not necessarily mean they are voting for Trump or Biden, but for the parties right? And each electoral counts as one vote for Trump/Biden right?
So you can still win without majority vote by individuals? I always thought it was different in US but seems same as many parts of Asia:)
As the image in the next post to yours shows - Florida has 29 or the College Votes, so Trump just has to smooch that one state and he doesn't have to do anywhere near as much work as ten other states with just three votes a piece, same goes for some of the other states on the east coast (especially the north eastern corner) with double digit college votes. Texas, Illinois, NY etc are all golden states to win. |
|
|
|
|
Some other users are probably going to suggest that you switch to Tor Browser which is based on Firefox (which is based on Netscape)...
From the looks of the screen shot, it looks like you don't have Java enabled to complete the captcha puzzle which is the 2FA you have when you can't be bothered enabling 2FA. (Captcha's can be bypassed if you know where to look too).
|
|
|
|
|
@suchmoon:
Now do you understand how harmful the trade in accounts (no matter how noble you personally perceive the cause to be Bruno) here in this Forum is?
If a user has an equal number of people who are DT1 trust them and distrust them (as was the case with Lauda just recently) shouldn't they then be DT2 (0) - (as was the case with Lauda) and their trust feedback (both positive and negative show up alongside other DT1/2 trust feedback (as was the case with Lauda)?
|
|
|
|
Starting Wednesday, will there be odds for Pence Vs Harris to be the NEXT president after the one elected this week?
Why would there be? Is it certain that either Pence or Harris will be running for president? Maybe some other people would become the dem/rep candidates instead of these 2 people... Someone must have thought the same thing about Bernie Sanders - although he's not a candidate someone has dropped some money on him winning in about 24 hours time. They're the two most obvious candidates for next time don't you think? |
|
|
|
Update: 9 more than last week:
This shit snowball that the DT network has turned into rolls on... I may have double counted one positive trust feedback, however, there looks to be six users OgNasty has given negative (distrust) feedback to and seven (positive) trust feed-backs to in the above group of twenty-seven UID's listed this week. Disclaimer: I haven't looked at any other users' trust feed-backs, just Og's |
|
|
|
Informative as always:
I see you have a page for this user: mosprognoz - It is my opinion that they have two alts and that one of those alts has been banned, hence they are guilty of ban evasion. I would appreciate it if someone could review my findings and give an appraisal in that thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.msg55348696#msg55348696 I concede there isn't much to go on, but I feel there is a case there. Thanks. |
|
|
|
What's the "real" proof of a connection?
That's where we are lacking and I believe for this reason the account is not banned yet. The shoe's on the other foot - I've been accused of having little or no evidence by a handful of multi-account owners and or others who investigate scammers, now I'm paying it forward. But if you were following game-protect and was familiar with posting style/habit then I would say you would not have 2nd doubt about this account to be handed by the same user. Sadly I wasn't, every time I looked in there appeared to be two groups of trolls lined up playing whack-a- moleTroll while having a circle jerk. (I wasn't meaning you, just a general observation) It's the same with the Cry-to-cunters/H8bussesandwhatever/Thule/(insert UID/name that pops up for a game of whack-a-troll) most times it may be very likely they are one and the same, but other than similar M.O.'s they're just Troll of the moment which is why I no longer say " this is probably an alt of X/Y/Z" in my trust feedback, rather, I just speak the facts e.g. " this person is manipulating the trust network which I find untrustworthy" IMHO that would be a better way to approach these *cough* people. I get you buddy but don't you see some unusually in his bumps? I do use "bumps", in fact an hour ago I bumped some of my posts. Do you see the same abnormality in my bumps too?
Actually no I haven't been that active the last few weeks but am hoping to read up on some threads/sections in the next few days. Thanks for reading. |
|
|
|
|
I have some test-net bitcoins that LoyceV gifted to me (can't recall, let's say it was 0.1 until I'm reminded what it was) - I can send them to you if you would like to distribute them to the needy instead of actual bitcoins?
Side question to @LoyceV - the Roulette Game you posted a link for, does it retain the details, or, do you recommend withdrawing all funds at the end of a session?
|
|
|
|
|
The Bledisloe Cup was a safe bet for the Kiwi's to win retain...
Another pseudo "safe" bet will be the upcoming State of Origin Rugby League series with the Brisbane Broncos attaining the wooden spoon this year (and the rest of the Queensland Cup Sides excluded from selection) it makes for a very one sided three match series.
|
|
|
|
Considering that Lauda retired from the forum I'd advise to remove her list from OP as it is impossible now for her to review the members listed there, in case they'd like to appeal the blacklist. Besides, I think it would be wise to make this topic more popular and to attract more campaign managers to use it. CryptopreneurBrainBoss also has a blacklist so maybe he would be interested in adhering to this topic.
You may not have noticed, but this thread was last posted in on 24 April 2020, 07:54:55 and the lack of a response from any of the participants shows they have probably "moved on" (wink wink) |
|
|
|
This proves that the account is game-protect. By using the word "Bump" ?? Bump Bump Bump... I vote to ban this user. Not a temporary ban but a permanent one please.
Frequency of bumps along with reputation (or lack there of) might invoke a deluge of requests for others to be banned. This thread needs substance rather than someone doesn't like something. What's the "real" proof of a connection? |
|
|
|
So I have a lightning node with 0 funds, I want to open a couple of channels but would 1st have to send funds to the node wallet.
Can I just run importprivkey in wallet that my node uses and then open channels with those funds? I don't see why it would not work but I'm not sure.
If you need to recharge a node I've got ~ $1,000 in a half dozen channels and would be willing to do a 1:1 swap for on-chain funds. Since the mempool is still pretty full I figure it would save me some tx fees. We could discuss a deferred "repayment" via the block-chain at a later date when the TX fees stop mooning. |
|
|
|
|
Starting Wednesday, will there be odds for Pence Vs Harris to be the NEXT president after the one elected this week?
|
|
|
|
Hi and many thanks for the payment which already has one confirmation - cost to send worked out to be over $1 per wallet address. While it's great that bitcoin's price is on the rise, it's a double edged sword with ever increasing fees and 200+ MB in the mempool at the moment. |
|
|
|
So each merit source has about seven or eight merits they can give out per day No, you're talking about the average per Merit source. Some get only 10 per month, others gets hundreds to 1000+. I wasn't aware of that - it puts into perspective why some merit sources seem to get rid of their merits more liberally than others. (and yes, I did do a quick calculation of the numbers to give an average) Were I giving out merits (no thank you - just speaking hypothetically) I wouldn't gift Legendary at all, Brand New no more than one once only, no Newbies, probably Jr. Member through Hero member perhaps two (allowing them to pass it on down the ranks). If I did find a post of merit, I'd probably read back through their recent posts over the last fortnight to see if there were any other meritorious posts (not more than five posts X 2 merits each) |
|
|
|
They say they got 9 petahashes but it is probably outdated information.
Right now slow withdrawals take 9k sats, and instant withdrawals are 38k sats which is not cheap. If I am not mistaken it was a few hundred sats for slow withdrawals few days ago.
According to https://mempool.space/ the price is in the range 250 sats to 300 sats per vB - not sure if that's ten times the per byte price, but in any event, it's sky high at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
If people can gamble one satoshi then they will. if 1sat is worth the equivalent of $1 then they are wagering $1 - if 1 sat is currently worth 1/100th of one cent, then that is what they are wagering. Some will wager the lowest amoun they can while others will have a set value (be it $1, $5, $25 etc) that they wager. Bitcoin is just the tool to facilitate that wager.
|
|
|
|
|
The same question was probably asked when bitcoin was $1 and the hypothetical benchmark was set at $ 100 or even $ 10,000. People will gamble and they will gamble with the funds they have. (regardless of what those funds are worth)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
