I think I've only seen it once but they indeed can edit any post if necessary. The case I remember, forum member was supposedly caught plagiarizing and the mod edited/removed part of his message. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093468
|
|
|
Told ya about Bucks winning game 3. There's an overwhelming stat that shows whoever wins game 3 of a given series, ends up advancing. I think it was around 80%, and it was one of the reasons why I had picked them to win. Lol, following that game 3 trend, I wish Rockets win today but I won't place any bets.
Did anyone go for O/U of Blazers and Nuggets last night? It was such a low scoring game, the Over barely came through in the end. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT CAN BE DONE Trust is not moderated on Bitcointalk, meaning the only way that juicy red warning disappears is to all three members who have left negative feedback to cryptomaster99 remove it altogether. I'm not sure that's gonna happen. On a side note, looking at your topic again, it says Bounty but it does look like more of an Airdrop, asking people to complete small tasks in order to receive 20 HUM1 (which is not allowed here).
|
|
|
@ICOEthics I think he is referring to a recently added feature by theymos. It's a warning message displayed above every topic for which the topic starter has received red trust. It looks like this and it shows when you are not logged in: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FQnnPf25%2Fhum.jpg&t=664&c=Prmkvkte51SZVA)
|
|
|
cryptodevil marked my trust in red. I do not understand why he did it? Maybe you've somehow missed his warning message (with big bright red letters) that he will tag anyone who posts in there? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
I still cannot comprehend what just happened last night and I don't think anyone expected a blowout win like that. Raptors were down almost 30pts mid 4th quarter. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Embiid was struggling with a knee injury, last night throwing windmill dunks. Jeez After this performance tonight, it will be difficult to wager versus them on Sunday especially since it is a home game. This game was such a huge momentum swinger...
|
|
|
I get red trust score without proper investigation! There is plenty of evidence here that you've traded merit and abused bounties with alt accounts. coinlocket$ even caught you with ETH transactions. I'm not sure what more do you want and how is that lame justification?
|
|
|
Well, it's Raptors then but I went with the ML instead (passing on -1.5, silly me). ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I really don't trust Embiid right now and his lingering knee injury, Sixers also have their other two bigs - Monroe and Scott battling ankle injuries. That means they have to play Bobby. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Why the title of the article seems to be made to make bitcoin looks worst while the thieve is not asking payment via bitcoin only as the thieves also ask payment via wire bank transfer and prepaid gift cards? You are right on the money with this one. It's nothing more than a clickbait headline, making unsubstantiated assertions. How were thieves called back then, before bitcoin...fiat thieves? Lol By the way, I read a similar article on CCN today about the exact same phone call scams asking for payment in bitcoin with slightly different outlook: NYPD Enlists Bitcoin ATMs to Help Strangle Phone ScamsNYPD & Bitcoin Startups Crack Down on Phone Scams
|
|
|
I would like to request mine vs. ICOEthics if possible. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) We both have similar activity and merit earned (almost), interested to see how are merits reflected/spread in time. edit; wow that was fast, thanks a bunch!
|
|
|
Does anyone have any insight/tips for today's game between the Sixers and Raptors? Slightly leaning towards Toronto, though I think both teams are equally matched. Gasol and Green did not play well in gm2, nor their bench players who only scored 5 points but it's hard to believe that this will happen again. Anyway, looking to tail something here...please help. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Pretty weird, are those bans permanent or are you going to reverse them if they come back and ask nicely? I was going to ask the same thing as I can't seem to find his UID in the seclog. Maybe it's just a temp ban?
|
|
|
I'm not sure if posting links like that in the "open" does any good.
Pretty sure scammers read this type of topics as well. No need to give them any tips.
Photos might seem easy to detect now but once resized and slightly retouched...you won't be able to find shit. (just saying)
|
|
|
are you still having the bucks on game 3, the odds doesn't look tempting enough for me.
I do, ML with odds over 2 is more than enough. I knew Bucks would come out rusty for gm1, they have lots of shooters and not playing for almost a week would get them out of their rhythm. Kyrie and Tatum probably won't struggle at home but at the same time, I don't see how are Celtics going to stop Giannis, and with the rest of the Bucks players heating up...definitely going with MIL in game 3.
|
|
|
GSW have the best advantage now tho, They should just steal 1 win on the road, and end this at game 5 like I predicted, and had a bet on. You're going to end up right about it, being a rather short series. I guess I've put too much hope on Rockets to do something. Both games were close and they could have easily stolen either one. But now with Harden's eye injury, I will be surprised if they even get one at home, unless they make some crazy lineup change or something extraordinary happens. I don't know if I like their shortened rotation either. It's all lost... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
I've seen a lot better examples out of that image generator. @ICOEthics, I don't think h ttp://imageedited.com/ can serve as evidence in this case with fake images. It does not show anything of significance other than to point that image has been edited in Photoshop. Literally, 99% of images goes through some post-processing either being only adjusting brightness levels or some lite skin retouch. I'd rather use https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/. There are some great filters in there.
|
|
|
At what is at at the moment ? My bookies doesn't have the third game available yet. It's just an early prediction I had to share, obviously game odds are not out anywhere yet, they won't be until gm2 is finished... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Hopefully Curry would play better in this game, he was quite off his game the last time and also making unnecessary fouls. He and Klay both didn't look particularly good in gm1, though there is a few days pause between gm2 and gm3 and that's not good news for Houston. I think gm2 for Rockets is a "do or die" situation...interested to see how refs are going to officiate illegal 3pt contests/closeouts.
|
|
|
Just a small timeline correction: I remember working on that case and if my memory serves me well, the first link is their ANN thread (created Feb 17th) and the second one - bounty (created Feb 24th). The scam accusations topic was created on March 5th, ANN was deleted and Bounty locked on the next day March 6th. PS; I'm not trying to defend Wapinter, most of you know where I stand when it comes to managers promoting projects they haven't even checked.
|
|
|
I have MIL winning game 3 on the road despite the outcome of today's game between the two teams. I know it's an early pick, but I feel pretty confident about it. Boston's sweep of Indiana in the first round was nice but both home games were pretty close (except for a few minutes in two quarters where Pacers literally forgot how to play ball). I don't expect MIL in any of the remaining games to shoot the 3pt as poorly as they did in game one (22%).
|
|
|
What are you using to search for those? You can check some of the other search engines out there, they give pretty good results too, like DuckDuckGo for example. Bing is also okay, my point is that Google often has a problem with indexing recently made posts (created within a month or two).
|
|
|
|