|
i think the miner crash and had some reject and bug overall because it's still not officially released yet, they are tuning it i guess
i'll wait for the official release
|
|
|
|
|
i can reach 1200 sol with 6 gpu with oc on the mem +550 and +100 on core, otherwise 180 sol as you, for 216 it seems that you need crazy mem oc as usual like ethereum
|
|
|
|
All of a sudden, things became crystal-clear to me. No worries.
you figured ou to achieve 200 sol? so we can get rid of that nicehash miner that is doomed on their pool, i like to accumulate zcash instead of dumping them...i smell a pump one who smelt it, dealt it.  On a more serious note Claymore has said he will have a new miner out in a day or two. Do you think SA will be able to keep pace? How much do you think may be able to achieve with the 470/480 cards? they are not motivated enough, because clymore is charging a fee that keep him busy and working hard, the other guy are just releasing friendly release... i'm more interested about nvidia though... |
|
|
|
All of a sudden, things became crystal-clear to me. No worries.
you figured ou to achieve 200 sol? so we can get rid of that nicehash miner that is doomed on their pool, i like to accumulate zcash instead of dumping them...i smell a pump |
|
|
|
is that zip secure? i don't trust newbie so easily here
This download is from official nicehash site via https, so my newbie status doesn't matter. i can't find this version in their website |
|
|
|
|
is that zip secure? i don't trust newbie so easily here
|
|
|
|
we are already sure that a 1070 can do 180sol, because nicehash has a work in progress miner that reach that speed, still unreleased, but it will be for their pool only, so i'm not really interested
but this mean that 200 is achievable
214Sols/s POSSIBLE-- The coder djeZo just posted, on another thread, a screencap of a GTX 1070 achieving 214Sols/s. He says that more is possoble. --scryptr interesting he said that the consumption is 145w, that is more efficient than clymore, which is 0.75 at best, here is 0.65 watt/hash ratio |
|
|
|
|
we are already sure that a 1070 can do 180sol, because nicehash has a work in progress miner that reach that speed, still unreleased, but it will be for their pool only, so i'm not really interested
but this mean that 200 is achievable
|
|
|
|
nerdralph put the fly and disappeared  Any news for 130+? 130 is not actual and not profitable Well...its better than 100 it's 120 currently, and with some oc you can do 125-130 Is that profitable? it's not bad, but etheruem is better currently if you have a 1070, we need a 200 sol to be on track with zcash, for nvidia, sp said that he can mod it to 170 sol, let's see... |
|
|
|
nerdralph put the fly and disappeared Any news for 130+? 130 is not actual and not profitable Well...its better than 100 it's 120 currently, and with some oc you can do 125-130 |
|
|
|
why so? memory bus and bandwith are the same, what are the limited factors here? |
|
|
|
|
600 sol and 1250w? doesn't look really efficient, normally sol/watt ratio should be 1:1 and with clymore is even lower 0.8-0.75
|
|
|
|
The opensource NVIDIA developers have quit. But Nicehash will release a new miner that does 180SOl/s on the gtx 1070 soon. (zcash)
yeah but it will be closed and tied to their pool so useless, unless you can reverse engineering it |
|
|
|
krnlx commited to github 3 hours ago: (opencl code) Performance 6x1070, Linux, +1600mem (it seems that on Linux +1600 = +800 on win), samsung memory Total 836.0 sol/s [dev0 129.0, dev1 141.0, dev2 143.6, dev3 141.2, dev4 147.7, dev5 135.7] 55 shares Total 835.5 sol/s [dev0 131.4, dev1 139.4, dev2 143.6, dev3 139.7, dev4 145.0, dev5 136.8] 56 shares Total 833.7 sol/s [dev0 130.6, dev1 139.1, dev2 143.9, dev3 140.1, dev4 143.3, dev5 137.6] 56 shares Total 837.0 sol/s [dev0 129.5, dev1 138.2, dev2 146.0, dev3 139.7, dev4 139.6, dev5 137.6] 57 shares Total 837.9 sol/s [dev0 130.3, dev1 138.1, dev2 144.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 136.6, dev5 136.6] 58 shares Total 841.4 sol/s [dev0 132.3, dev1 138.8, dev2 145.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 137.9, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.2 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 137.9, dev2 145.3, dev3 139.6, dev4 138.0, dev5 137.6] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 136.2, dev2 145.7, dev3 141.7, dev4 135.8, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.2, dev1 139.2, dev2 144.0, dev3 143.0, dev4 135.0, dev5 137.5] 61 shares Total 841.0 sol/s [dev0 136.9, dev1 139.6, dev2 145.3, dev3 142.0, dev4 137.3, dev5 136.6] 61 shares Total 840.1 sol/s [dev0 134.9, dev1 137.7, dev2 145.6, dev3 140.3, dev4 137.2, dev5 138.4] 61 shares Total 837.2 sol/s [dev0 133.5, dev1 138.6, dev2 145.7, dev3 139.5, dev4 137.7, dev5 138.9] 61 shares Total 832.4 sol/s [dev0 134.0, dev1 136.4, dev2 148.5, dev3 138.0, dev4 130.7, dev5 130.8] 62 shares https://github.com/krnlx/silentarmy-nvmod/blob/e608e829f309cc7992134e89e3161206420612e8/README.mdI think if merge the latest code I can do 170Sol/s (gtx 1070) because I modded different parts of the code. I still think I can do a free miner that does 170sol/s on the gtx 1070 that works on all pools. Sp-mod #2. But I don't have time right now. You are about a month too late anyway so don't bother. ZCASH IS PROFITABLE-- The algorithm uses little energy, and Zcash (ZEC) is currently peaking in price. The block reward is rising. It is worth $10/day more (with my rigs) than mining Ethereum (ETH) with the same rigs. FeatherCoin (FTC) is a distant third. If SilentArmy were optimized more, I would mine with it. --scryptr only good thing is that there are chance of a pump after the block hit the maximum, i can see this coming, but currently zcash is producing too many btc per day this is the reason why it can not be pumped higher enough |
|
|
|
Its weeks ago before all these optimizations have been taken place.
For me its working and give me 10sols more :-D
@AMPH: Did you noticed less power consumption too?
yeah only 650 watt or around that, but still without 200 sol per gpu is not competitive enough against amd...sadly |
|
|
|
|
that is a good boost over the sp one, getting 120 sol per gpu(1070), with my -502 mem setting and zero core, in my cose ocing it give very small boost over underclocking not worth it
|
|
|
|
|
newport work for me too, no more 0 sol
|
|
|
|
The problem is that there are WAY TOO MANY Tom, Dick, and Harrys that are getting involved with mining.
First they start off with 1 GPU and make money, and then next month they get an entire rig, and in 3 months they max out their house's power by filling it up with 30-40 GPUs.
All this causes the difficulty to rise, and makes mining very unprofitable for everybody.
Right now ETH + ZEC miners revenue daily is slightly below $600,000. Which means for constant profit with constant difficulty there needs to be $600,000 of buyers of ZEC + ETH to keep everything stable.
I also think if BTC breaks the all time barrier of ~$1100 or so then it will be a great time for mining in general. But I am worried like most here and that 2017 will become like 2015 with mining being hardly profitable.
It's just part of the game, I've been mining for a few months only myself, but in the process I've learned quite a few things in trading and hardware optimization, it's been really fun. Also, most home miners don't have immense budgets and end up with maybe 2-3 rigs max, I doubt that this really makes that much of a difference against farms with hundreds of rigs. i think you are wrong, those average joe, are not 1-2 person, they are hundred/thousand, so thounsand of random guys with 1-3 rig, will make a difference for sure |
|
|
|
you could also do a coin that is first pow and then pos, so asic don't have the time to enter in play pretty much like etheruem, in this way will be by any means asic-proof
I think this is even worser, i don't like coins which have 5 days of mining and then are going to be completely pos, think it's fishy. not 5 days, i said like etheruem, you can do 1 month at least or 1 years, so you give time to enter the pos stage and meanwhile miner are happy to mine it |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
