Looks like this is his BF address no? 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr I hope so as I send funds there.
|
|
|
first pick
-1.2 = philipma1957 this has my -1.11% included within. if I win i roll it over.
|
|
|
My miners have been frequently dropping off of the pool. It seems to be happening more and more since the pool went over 20PH.... along with the blocks being very slow .... I'm kinda wondering if the mining servers cannot handle the load of over 20PH
Playing with pool management with a private test pool to learn how things work, I get the same effects when I overload the hardware.
just my thoughts, we will have to wait for the official cause.
Well, considering the pool has only dropped to 20PH today, but been running 25PH avg, and often up to 30PH for quite a while now ... ... how did you determine "blocks being very slow" ? well very slow is 90 to 99% not your usual 106%
|
|
|
I understand, but this is an international board directed to a global audience. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_nice is not the prevailing dialect of English here. I guess its time to refresh the "hamburger theory of management". When an American manager has to discipline a subordinate he will make that scolding will be both prefaced and post scripted by some faint praise. Very much like hamburger patty is typically delivered between two halves of a bun. The German manager in the same situation will deliver just the meat patty. The Japanese manager will only give two bun halves and the Japanese employee is supposed to infer the patty in the middle. I like that example as there are a lot of different styles here. best regards, phil
|
|
|
For industrial-scale mining, you want a different project and you want someone other than me to design it because I really don't care one bit about industrial-scale miners. And this project will not use CAN, this project will use USB because specifically-non-industrial miners will probably get along better with it. Also because the point of the framework is to be generic, and I don't really see the use-case for stickminers or pods or a single S1 using CAN instead of USB and those are the use cases I do care about.
I have a feeling that you are getting upset. I can't understand why? This is just a discussion. I fully support your decision to go with point-to-point USB. I'm engaging people to explain why other solutions are not competitive for a hobby miner. And some aren't even competitive for an industrial miner. Like daisy-chaining will be a loss no matter how one would implement it. Maybe because I use "you" more in the sense "y'all" or "youse", a plural "you", not "you" sidehack in particular? remember internet posting always has a bit of: fuck you, you are a moron as it is built into the typing aspect and the delay of talking. I am looking at the posts and reading from a different viewpoint then you or sidehack or anyone else posting here. I find when one wants to really post precisely perfectly what they mean the posts get too long like sloopy's posts tend to do. (@ sloopy not an insult I admire you for efforting to write correctly) Then they get skipped over or skimmed. Like this post will be and some may just see : fuck you, you are a moron So many posts seem short and nastly even when they are not meant to be that. Note this is a sincere post attempting to calm the waters on the thread. No tricky techniques here.
|
|
|
https://blockchain.info/tx/df60741e004f63c13d07eb422f89b3fbc1a2b270cccd35c05d0daeb35af5f20fnow 10 blocks have skipped the .0013 fee transaction due to it having 52 small parts of coin and 3 big parts. thus 55 parts of coin which takes up space so it gets skipped. even though the fee is .0013 I got skipped here for this block. These funds were sent to me and there are 3 big parts in the send about 7.5 and 52 small parts around 0.05 This is tough as small payments take up space and the large fee of .0013 is not big enough. I know you understand all of the following, and your comment is about daily vs. blockly payouts, but even in this case (55 inputs) the fee is really reasonable: Your transaction was over 11KB -- suggested fee for inclusion in next 0-1 blocks is sat50/byte, or 0.0057 for your transaction. That's about 0.07% of the transaction amount. Your included fee of 0.0013 is sat11/byte, which 21.co currently estimates means a delay of around 14 blocks. It's a change from the past, I agree -- and I am a 2MB HF now supporter, running a Classic node since 3 Feb, but I think your original fee was too low for the market conditions. So I got caught on sends due to this more then once. So I know to send high fees when the coin in my wallet is 35 or 50 x .01 from mining here. A lot of of people sending to me don't know this issue so they send decent coin and think it is enough. Then everything bogs down for hours or worse sends just fail.
|
|
|
what about the ability to run them with a nic on each miner
or run 1 nic to a switch then the others would connect via usb to miner 1 and make a usb hub style where they could daisy chain down the line with less clutter of going mass into a switch with alot of cat 5 cables ? just a idea i had kinda like the old firewire days where you could keep chaining devices down the line till u needed another hub to boost the power
I would like to see the actual error statistics from those daisy-chained Firewires. I saw some stats from high-end MacIntoshes driving stacks of 5-6 external disks each through Firewire 400. This wasn't anything good and they did run in very clean offices not garages, like the mining farms. i had a lot of firewire 400 fire wire 800 they were a bit more reliable then usb2. but the cables are costly. usb2 I have run 121 usb2 sticks off 1 pc. but truth be told it was a pita but 40 usb sticks easy. 17 gridseed blades on 1 pc a pita but 12 blades on 1 pc was easy. I have 4 or 5 pcs so putting 1 on the side to mine a dozen pcbs in the solar array should be a piece of cake
|
|
|
https://blockchain.info/tx/df60741e004f63c13d07eb422f89b3fbc1a2b270cccd35c05d0daeb35af5f20fnow 10 blocks have skipped the .0013 fee transaction due to it having 52 small parts of coin and 3 big parts. thus 55 parts of coin which takes up space so it gets skipped. even though the fee is .0013 I got skipped here for this block. These funds were sent to me and there are 3 big parts in the send about 7.5 and 52 small parts around 0.05 This is tough as small payments take up space and the large fee of .0013 is not big enough. 55 pennies is large fee to send $4,400 ? Last week I spent $46.00 to wire $1,700 at the bank. Sticking to .0001 per kb should still assure relatively fast acceptance. First off I understand the fee mechanism, but many don't.. Many people think 0.0001 or 0.0002 just works. From your post I am inclined to think you realize BTC size means nothing kb size means everything.So a 1 btc send consisting of 75 x 0.02 is expensive to send. 0.0013 is too small While a 25.2 btc send consisting of a confirmed virgin block is cheap to send. 0.0004 will do the trick almost everytime The problem is a lot of people don't understand this. Most people do not understand that btc amount means nothing. Here is one of my kano.is payment addresses: it has .20453225 in it https://blockchain.info/address/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJrthat is from 1 avalon6 and is the last 20 rewards from kano.is pool to empty this and send to someone will cost 0.0004 to 0.0006 due to the fact it is 20 payments or so. .204 is under 90 bucks and this is why I would like 1 payment a day since it would be 6 payments not 20 plus and sending the coins out would be 0.0002 or 0.0003 tops.
|
|
|
But then you'd be building an ethernet controller or dual USB hub onto each board. Or some other setup requiring either an additional adapter or adaption built onto each board. The point is to do exactly not that. I know USB isn't great, but it's flexible and it's standard and it's freakin' everywhere. So if I want to use this framework to build a rack machine or a stickminer, I can.
Trust me on one thing - you're not going to change my mind. I've heard all the reasons for the last year.
So usb2 will be the standard correct? Btw I would prefer it. Since I am pretty sure I can mange ten to thirty five boards via a pc
|
|
|
nice to get a block https://blockchain.info/block-height/399738not nice to have my transaction miss this block https://blockchain.info/tx/df60741e004f63c13d07eb422f89b3fbc1a2b270cccd35c05d0daeb35af5f20fnow 10 blocks have skipped the .0013 fee transaction due to it having 52 small parts of coin and 3 big parts. thus 55 parts of coin which takes up space so it gets skipped. even though the fee is .0013 I got skipped here for this block. These funds were sent to me and there are 3 big parts in the send about 7.5 and 52 small parts around 0.05 This is tough as small payments take up space and the large fee of .0013 is not big enough. This is fund sent to me so I can not control the fee. and the sender did a large fee .0013 This post rambles but there is a point. If kano pool send out 2 to 4 payments a day to my address in 20 days it is 40 to 80 payments vs 20 payments. When I go to pay from that wallet all 80 payments will need a big fee to clear. So I rather 1 daily payment.
|
|
|
So we are here: https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficultyBitcoin Difficulty: 163,491,654,909 Estimated Next Difficulty: 165,334,057,582 (+1.13%) diff is pretty low Adjust time: After 1447 Blocks, About 10.6 days >>>>>>> picks will start in 31 blocks.Hashrate(?): 1,107,952,554 GH/s Block Generation Time(?): 1 block: 10.5 minutes 3 blocks: 31.6 minutes 6 blocks: 1.1 hours Updated: 12:10 (4.7 minutes ago) even lower below http://bitcoincharts.com/Blocks 399737 Total BTC 15.243M Difficulty 163491654909 Estimated 159126615319 in 1447 blks this is (-2.67%) that is amazing ! Network total 1132713.091 Thash/s Blocks/hour 5.81 / 620 s
|
|
|
well if it will happen i will wait before to convert to ethereum.. honestly i bought some ethereum because of fast increase value of ethereum.. But i still believe in bitcoin.. And it will never die..
here is btc's problem a hefty fee of .0013 and this has been skipped by the last 9 blocks made
|
|
|
No issues if things are send with some extra $$ behind it. I always use 8 confirmations at the slowest 10 and haven't had a 'lost' transaction yet.
For testing I sent one with 20 confirmations and it took about 14 hours to finally confirm.
yeah but even extra cash for the fees still does not help all of the time. look at this this is a hefty fee, and I now need to wait to finish business as those coins are not clearing. This is not just a kano.is issue.
|
|
|
The only 2000BB breakout boards I have are made by sidehack, and those work perfectly with the 2500BBs that I have. I'm 100% certain anything that works with the 2000BB will work on it's younger brother, the 2500BB. The pinouts are the same. The only question is, can the breakout boards handle the power? I know sidehack's overbuilt (I also love overbuilt stuff ) boards can handle it no problem, and it looks like these would too. I'd be hesitant with the j4bber board if they're hitting 104c at full load on the 2000BBs. In fact, I probably wouldn't even use them up to 2000w if they're really hitting those temps. I ran j4bberwock dual 2000/4000 at 17 amps or 4080 watts for 24 to 48 hours multiple times. There is no way the breakboard I had was 104c or 220f Maybe 105 f to 115 f Not sure where the 104c temps are picked up from . That's not the board in question, not to mention 4080w AC is only ~ 3630w DC which isn't full load so not relevant. It would be nice to have that board tested as well, though. After all the testing I did with the 2980 the 2880 the dual 2000/4000 I go with the 2980s with my fan mod. I would be really interested in a board for them as they are more efficient psus then the 2000. Also the fans blow air directly onto the back of the breakout boards so they never overheat. What would be nice to see is direct 24 hour tests. With ops board vs other boards. A s-7 pulling 1300 watts on this board would pull 1339 watts on j4bberwock board if there is a three percent difference on the boards running the 2000 psu. And if sidehack has more copper then. He should be under the ops. It is pretty easy to do the testing. You need 1 s-7 the three 2000 watts break out boards the psu and a meter
|
|
|
runs over 300 new. Amazing but every search I have done does not turn a manual up. I do not know if it is fused> Would be nice if it was. I was wondering if i just didnt know how to go about it. I paid 55$ for it tho so. Hmm. I'll guess i'll try to search harder. Maybe someone else knows a better way to get the data...Edit; Actually dug through HP pdf list and found the manual i think; http://www8.hp.com/h20195/v2/GetPDF.aspx/c04123438.pdfIt says it has overload protection per load group. Is that what we want, and its per 15A outlet? Kinda sound like it just prevent each outlet of running more than 15A? yeah but surges are less important then you think running this gear. you are running s-7's correct?
|
|
|
you are not going to like this but here goes it won't work for you unless you find it address.
so this one won't let you steal from the uni.
|
|
|
. So I will never see the 150 usd they owe me on batch 1.
What is this? The compensation for Batch 1 problems. They said they would properly compensate and they never did. Bitmain lies. All the time. Not surprising. I had to fight tooth and nail to get my promised S4 B1 PSU compensation. In the end, it wasn't even bitmain who compensated me, it was Yoshi directly from his own BTC wallet. Still waiting on compensation from my batch 1. What is sad is I have a guy that wants to me to order some for him. Once again proper service from them would make my order for four more units easier to do. I have 150 usd coming to me. Frankly It is obvious ordering from bitmaintech is more risky then it has ever been, maybe yoshi would read this and send some btc to my wallet. As for placing an order for four unit today my heart is not in it. Even though I am not paying for them and will get a tip from the person I buy for. This tells you how badly bitmaintech has slipped over the last year.
|
|
|
|