1.13 BTC
|
|
|
-snip-
Can you provide (undeniable) proof that you haven't sold your account? You can not. Should we tag you? No. Case closed.
Concern trolling is not welcome these days.
|
|
|
hello sir, I have been removed from the signature campaign. do I still get paid for the stake I get? if I still get paid for it, can I change my signature?
You will receive the amount that you have earned so far. You can remove your signature right now as you have been kicked.
|
|
|
no problem,, this is my family suggestion and after this they will blame me again. so decision is not matter. at least i will not get blame again from my family
There should obviously be an "internet fitness" test before people are allowed access to it. Sigh. Based on the connection and the post quality (i.e. nonexistent) of the connected accounts, I would not recommend any ratings to be removed.
|
|
|
I gave the Pharmacist a merit for his post. I hate scammers, thieves and beggars, and those who seek to prey on the new and/or inexperienced members of this forum. I can't think of any reason for buying an account, other than to cheat or steal, or to exploit the years of work that established members have put into building the forum into a valuable resource.
Exactly. Since the introduction of the Copper Membership, which allows you to bypass some initial restrictions, there is zero ethical reason for which you would buy an account today. Anyone who claims otherwise is either delusional, ignorant, involved in this or outright dishonest.
[1] Alt account use cases still exist. E.g., if you want to voice controversial opinions, you can create a new account (which is an acceptable use case).
|
|
|
-snip-
You are crazy if you are willing to DOXX the whole family for a few pennies. Not only will this not work here, you are now at a high risk of identity theft and whatnot.
|
|
|
I just want to apologize and I will not repeat my mistake again.
You sure did invest a lot of time into this apology, especially given that the thread is useless and is placed in the wrong section.
|
|
|
I think clear rules are needed, so parents can let their kids play the ball freely.
There are no specific rules, and liberal policies are self-destructing. Thus, no. ...because for him it is only what he can do in his life...
... Probably Lauda and Thepharmacist is one person, why when Lauda is online and Thepharmacist is not? After Lauda posted here, I received negative from Thepharmacist, is that accident? Big joke these moderators here.
You should visit a specialist as you're clearly delusional if you truly believe in either one of these statements.
The primary reason for which you are not getting even more ratings is that users have begun self-censoring themselves due to fear of wrongly being excluded.
|
|
|
may God always give you happiness Why don't you ask him to forgive you and undo the rating himself? Oh right, you believe in the wrong God. Where is Vod?
A tad more seriously: No.
|
|
|
As usual, in cat we trust (without trout)
The trout master is suspiciously quiet; he must be up to something! Bitcointalk Username: Welsh Rank: Legendary Merit: 1066 Current post count: 3340 BTC Address (SegWit): bc1q9va3tj3us6s8uuak7s6hcgj7e2wrm37m24y7rq
Enrolled as per our agreement. 🐈
What is this magic
|
|
|
Lauda has 2 negative ratings, doesn't that mean he is not to be trusted? Yet his is still in DT2, it goes to show how stupid the system really is.
I can have 100 ratings, and it wouldn't change a thing. Accounts will continue to be tagged, with or without my name. The latter part of the statement does not show the stupidity of the system, but rather your own ignorance. I agree that selling highly trusted accounts would be bad but only highly trusted ones which by the way, in the recent past they were being sold too and no one was marking anyone red.
Liar or intentionally deceptive. Surprise, surprise.
Even if Lauda is removed from DT, other people will take their place and continue marking them with red.
This. At least someone around here deserves a merit or two (or 7).
|
|
|
Hello Bounty Manager. Good day. I participate on Twitter Campaign with twitter Username @Makhe23. I got a problem reporting on my week 7 as I noticed today that it was counted on week 6. Maybe I am careless on reporting and its my fault but you can see on the date that I reported it on April 6, 2018. I hope that you will count on it for Week 7 respectively. Thank you very much.
It will not. The entries will not be moved between weeks. If you've entered in Week X, then your entry will remain in the Week X sheet.
|
|
|
And for the OP, accusing people based on wallet transactions is kinda silly.
Making up stories while shamelessly milking the forum and bounties is equally, kinda, silly.
|
|
|
If you guys want to stop campaigns from being ran by the team its self, or want to stop worrying about the horrid rates, THEN STOP JOINING THE DAMN CAMPAIGNS THAT ARE DOING THIS.
If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything. -snip-
Well, those two statements contradict each other to some extent. If the people that are aware of this *issue* don't join the campaign(s), it will have next to no effect on it anyways. There are thousands of farmed accounts waiting in line.
|
|
|
I am not meeting the merit requirements of this campaign. Am I allowed to join here...
(I had been part of rollin camp for more than a year. Rollin campaign's manager @guitarplinker was the first manager to enforce the "no post in mega spam threads" rule. After rollin, I was part of crypto-news campaign from beginning to end.)
Thanks....
I've already offered someone a deal. However, if they do not accept it then I will consider your application and PM you.
|
|
|
The people who respond (mostly nonsense) without reading anything are just horrible. Thanks, handled. P.S. : I'm surprised people are not aware of this. BMs must have had a hard time changing so many accounts. I even found the AmaZix team instituting a no-wallet change policy after this.
I don't usually follow the smartShitcoin news. I'm surprised OP didn't find this when he was doing his 'investigation'.
|
|
|
|