This new thread is self moderated
Are you sure?
|
|
|
Screw it. People liked the coin (somewhat), and the dev is abandoning it. I guess I'll take it over...
Nice, I can offer 500 coin for starters. Well, first thing's first, I'm going to need to get the node syncing. Anyone have the block files? Roaming/Tecoin folder with peers.dat: http://www.mediafire.com/download/i2rgeh5tuomaaub/Tecoin.zip
|
|
|
Screw it. People liked the coin (somewhat), and the dev is abandoning it. I guess I'll take it over...
Nice, I can offer 500 coin for starters.
|
|
|
Nice design.
sigh 50% ICO/IPO/IEO.
|
|
|
Dear users and customer is sad for us to see those comments realative to our exchange. We are NOT in any way correlated with betasharex or any other exchange ever existed. We are a brand new platform and we aim to give you the best security ever and a nice place to trade in. We are also aware that FUDders are always present but the time and our commitment will give you the trust necessary to join our exchange platform. In the meanwhile feel free to trade #TRICK on https://cryptotrade.exchangeRegards. It's not personal but a lot of exchanges burned people one way or the other so new exchanges are frowned upon naturally and a lot of users (me included) don't trust new exchanges. It must be hard for new exchanges but if you stick around long enough I'm sure your exchange will be recognized.
|
|
|
A few more: Burst, Jackpot, Nist5, Myr-Groestl, Diamond-Groestl, Quark, Cryptonight, M7, M7M, Pentablake, Deep, S3, Mjollnir, ZR5, Spread, Pluck, Lyra2RE.
Added to List. Nice. But what if we prefer more than one.. or two or three?
|
|
|
A few more: Burst, Jackpot, Nist5, Myr-Groestl, Diamond-Groestl, Quark, Cryptonight, M7, M7M, Pentablake, Deep, S3, Mjollnir, ZR5, Spread, Pluck, Lyra2RE.
|
|
|
Single choice polls are almost always useless even with much fewer options.
|
|
|
GH/s in what algo?
Edit: I guess it's scrypt-chacha based on your post history.
|
|
|
What determines which masternode gets paid for a certain block (assuming only one gets paid for each block)?
|
|
|
Unlike dead coins, cars have utility and value regardless of brand.
You didn't get the idea. I was not talking about dead coins, but technology behind it. If there is Bitcoin with which you can buy anything, why not to have DonationCoin (just an example) and use it for donations? If there is a good idea it can always be developed. Btw that is why features in some of the latest coins are dazzling people (which are mostly not coders). You add 2 lines of code and there it is - $100/coin. Why? They are forgetting that the most important thing for a coin to build its network and community, be widely adopted and just stick around... nothing more. Alright, that makes sense. But to me when Bitcoin already does everything and DonationCoin is tied to Bitcoin anyway (because it can only be traded to FIAT through Bitcoin first) I don't see the benefit. DonationCoin doesn't offer any benefit over Bitcoin, quite the opposite in fact because you not just need to account for Bitcoin's volatility but also DonationCoin's own volatility. And small markets can be easily manipulated so it will likely have huge volatility on its own. And the person or company or whatever entity you're donating to also has to accept DonationCoin for it to work. Sure it's just one example of a coin but it works similarily for other coins. I think if you have a great idea or utility for a coin you're better off joinning an existing, living coin's team and help them instead.
|
|
|
I think dead coins are dead for a reason. Be it lack of interest or purpose or whatever. If the community didn't care enough to take it over then I don't see why others should bother. And if the community was small to begin with, chances are the coin distribution was terrible and even if you resurrect them there's always a danger of an early bagholder dumping it to oblivion. And it's not like any of the dead coins excel at something. Virtually every one of them are just generic copy-paste forks.
Then let us all buy Mercedes-Benz, because all cars are copy/paste of it. Unlike dead coins, cars have utility and value regardless of brand.
|
|
|
I think dead coins are dead for a reason. Be it lack of interest or purpose or whatever. If the community didn't care enough to take it over then I don't see why others should bother. And if the community was small to begin with, chances are the coin distribution was terrible and even if you resurrect them there's always a danger of an early bagholder dumping it to oblivion. And it's not like any of the dead coins excel at something. Virtually every one of them are just generic copy-paste forks.
|
|
|
if(pindexBest->nHeight < 100) { nSubsidy = 800 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2501) { nSubsidy = 1 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5002) { nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7503) { nSubsidy = 1 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 13004) { nSubsidy = 50 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 20001) { nSubsidy = 1008 * COIN; }
|
|
|
I'm done with soloing too. Quite funny though.
|
|
|
It keeps finding blocks, then losing synch, then all blocks orphan. Over and over.
That's what happens when there's only one node to connect to and the dev is mining too. I have like 90% orphan rate.
|
|
|
 { "blocks" : 18, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 0.00178082, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414, "search-interval" : 0 }, "blockvalue" : 80000000000, "netmhashps" : 0.00431147, "netstakeweight" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "", "pooledtx" : 0, "stakeweight" : { "minimum" : 0, "maximum" : 0, "combined" : 0 }, "stakeinterest" : 23000000, "testnet" : false }
|
|
|
Tricky
You misspelled amateur.
|
|
|
|