can anyone tell me if there is any point in not ignoring odalv?
because he's trolling the troll maybe ? Please donīt quote the troll (Fatman3001), thx. Am I the dumbest troll or am I quoting? Trick self-referential question. The correct answer is "both."
|
|
|
Tonight on 60 Minutes, why holiday shoppers should be worried about getting their credit card info stolen...
Would have been a great time to unveil a Bitcoin commercial. Oh well, maybe one day.
There was a whole series of ads posted by this guy...
|
|
|
^Yes, I remember 2013 real well--great time for Bitcoin. The glory days were glorious, but nao it's time to let go, oda.krell
|
|
|
You can suggest it, though that's not what is being currently discussed. Further, Bitcoin's lifespan is so laughably short, "historical" was probably not the word you were looking for And a year is even more short. Bottom line is the purchasing power of Bitcoin over USD has considerably increased over its lifetime. Yes. At inception, BTC was worth zero, nothing. Any price increase from zero constitutes an infinite appreciation. Nice to know you can math. Maybe you'd like to read gain what Cortex posted : Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.
Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.
We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.
Your perspective is supported by a laughably short sample of time in the context of store of value. I use the past year when discussing yearly inflation. What is it you still find unusual/difficult to understand here?
|
|
|
can anyone tell me if there is any point in not ignoring odalv?
because he's trolling the troll maybe ? Or you can ignore him with your own brain, instead of a button. You can also stop posting about your mad ignore skillz and being an attention whore. ~Hope this helped.
|
|
|
That's cherry picking, absolutely.
Average over the entire time, or break it down by year (starting mid/late 2010)
You trying to arguing such nonsense borders on trolling, oda.krell. I refuse to believe you can't understand how absurd your stance is. When talking about USD yearly inflation, do you average it over the entire life of the dollar? Or do you use the recent year data? Why of course, how silly of me. Here, this should satisfy your high standards of data presentation, I hope: You accused me of cherry picking because I chose year as a time span when discussing yearly inflation. After I explained to you why you were wrong, you came back with some catty line about my high standards. You've finally crossed over into the full-blown troll territory, oda.krell. ~Happy Investing!
|
|
|
someone is very keen on turning todays candle red
Since there is almost no volume, I can only assume that you mean "by not buying."
|
|
|
@Odalv:
|
|
|
@Odalv: 80% approval rating, if such things matter/could be believed BTW, I'm from Russia, not IN Russia. @Pala_00: You should try just doing like a 4 frame choppy/dutch tight zoom past the delicious cupcakes to just the eyes.
|
|
|
...It's like driving with a newly polished car.
...Blindfolded. Edit: Which one of you deviants killed BFX pumpbot? That wasn't a pumpbot. It was an accumulation bot, either for a pump or a dump. ...Because you want to keep buying BTC on an exchange where it's most expensive...
|
|
|
"Bitcoin had rabies, son. Daddy had to put it down. It's with God now..."
|
|
|
You can suggest it, though that's not what is being currently discussed. Further, Bitcoin's lifespan is so laughably short, "historical" was probably not the word you were looking for
|
|
|
...It's like driving with a newly polished car.
...Blindfolded. Edit: Which one of you deviants killed BFX pumpbot?
|
|
|
...I don't have time to go through all this drivel.
I'd say find the time, but hey, you know better... @keewee: Go ahead and relax, you'll enjoy it more...
|
|
|
^There is no such thing as a "subjective timeframe." In logic nerd terms, what you maked thar is an ill-formed statement.
If you wish to suggest the timeframe is random, you're wrong. Nothing random about choosing a year when discussing yearly inflation.
|
|
|
Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.
Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.
We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.
Fiat is a faith based money, anyone with half a brain knows fiat is not tenable in the long term. It's issuance is controlled by a few families who are FAR richer than us, their wealth wasn't accrued through labor.
You should study some history rather than browsing my little pony sites.
Over the past year, holding Bitcoin has provided a 0% risk of being confiscated via negative interest rates. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-29/financial-terrorists-road-krugman-and-rogoff-peddling-toxic-adviceThe increase in purchasing power of fiat relative to Bitcoin over the last year has correspond with an increased amount of risk. Whether or not that makes Bitcoin or fiat a "better" investment depends on one's preferences. @Cortex7: Over the past year, Bitcoin has proven itself to be a horrendous store of value, losing ~65% of its buying power. Your bit about "a few families [controlling fiat]" makes it clear that, with your understanding of economics, all would benefit if you spent your idle time "browsing my little pony sites" instead of posting your ignorant, paranoid drivel in adult fora. @justusranvier: There was no "increase in purchasing power of fiat" over the past year. My dollar doesn't buy any more than it did one year ago. There was a decrease in Bitcoin's buying power, tho. ~65%. Nice going.
|
|
|
... Changing the terms 50% of the way into the policy, by enacting a 50% reduction of the dividend, is a sure fire way to bring about legal action ...
Legal action against a Hong Kong co. selling illegal shares purchased through an [allegedly] Panamanian unlicensed exchange? Best of luck *Would this guy break a non-legally binding contract?
|
|
|
^
|
|
|
How's it going, Bitcoiners? Honest, this time will be different! Willing to keep posting the same gif as long as you investment enthusiasts keep falling for the same gag
|
|
|
... First came the internet to the Western world, next comes smartphones everywhere. That future will be here in the next three years! ...
And people hoarding Bitcoin will be filthy rich, just like everyone who hoarded first-gen smartphones!!1!
|
|
|
|