I heard an opinion piece on the BBC World Service overnight, the Republicans (who normally predominantly vote postal) are voting early in person while the Democrats (who normally vote early in person) are lodging postal votes so it will be interesting what kinds of voter turn out there are on the day - especially given each state has it's own laws on how ballots are conducted in their states.  (That and the threat of challenges to the postal voting via the courts) 


Agreed - people might be saying they're not voting Trump, but will do so anyway.

As I said just above I think in 1-2 weeks time the price will come off of the boil (ten days 'till the US election) - People are going to hodl their coins for about the next 2-3 weeks after the election then the price will move again around the 20^th of December before dropping in the new year like it did the last time it reached these levels.

(Do people wait until 23:50 and then make a certain bet on the price of BitCoin I wonder??)

The two posters before me have hit the nail on the head why children (not even teenagers) should be allowed to gamble.  It may sound a cliche but becoming an adult means you have a little of the maturity needed to decide if you are going to gamble and indeed how much to gamble when you do.  Even socially much-less professionally.  Many people who have a gambling addiction have it because of character flaws that have made them weak to the point they rely on a quick fix when they have a win (no matter how fleeting).

Interesting timeline those six UID's have:

07 October 2018, 06:43:45 Date Registered:    colvis22

6/14/2020 9:10:51 PM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user    colvis22
16 June 2020, 07:30:07 Date Registered:    See22
16 June 2020, 08:05:08 Date Registered:    Youngemrys22
17 June 2020, 19:49:32 Date Registered:    Epi22

19 August 2020, 00:58:40 Date Registered:    Big22

30 August 2020, 15:51:37 Last Active:       colvis22
9/3/2020 3:07:18 PM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   Youngemrys22
04 September 2020, 22:15:45 Date Registered:    Vine ekegwu

07 October 2020, 20:18:06 Last Active:       See22

18 October 2020, 05:20:56 Last Active:       Youngemrys22

24 October 2020, 19:48:57 Last Active:       Big22

First identity gets banned, three UID's created.  A second UID gets banned and two more UID's are created around the same time.

There's probably more connections to this user who doesn't seem too concerned with their alts being banned.

Yep, I get that - I'm talking about re-creating the wallet as it was (hopefully) before that TX occurred and (for want of a better description) creating a double spend via a TX that the nodes WILL process.

Worth a shot.

My reasoning in suggesting it was perhaps the unconfirmed transaction *might* not get restored and hence the funds are freed-up enabling you to create a new transaction that hopefully works given the previous one seems to have slipped out of the mem-pool.

Thanks for the suggestion Vod, it would certainly help when posting batches of information.

I found this a while ago, it helps explain the metric date presentation:

Reserved #2

TBA

Reserved #1

Let's just look at something:


Are any, or all of these extra UID's connected to our four in the first post?

Trust feedback on the 29th of June, 2019.

• xocel gives Crypt0ptimus, sambiohazard, Sicarious, stickiest, xEleven, jyap positive trust feedback 2019-06-29
  
  
  • • Crypt0ptimus gives jyap positive trust feedback 2019-04-30
    • Crypt0ptimus receives 2 merit from jyap and gives jyap 1 merit
    
    
  • • Sicarious gives positive trust feedback to an otherwise unrelated user yakpimp on 2017-02-23
    • stickiest DT trusts yakpimp in week 16 then removes their trust in week 25.
      
      
      
      
    
    
  
  
• sambiohazard gives jyap positive trust feedback 2019-06-29
  
  
• stickiest gives krislester, xEleven, xocel, sambiohazard 2019-06-29 and jyap positive trust feedback 2019-04-30
  
  
  • krislester gives jyap positive trust feedback on the 2019-04-30
  • xEleven gives jyap positive trust feedback on the 2019-05-01 (probably within 24 hours of krislester)
  
  
  • krislester receives 2 merit from jyap and jyap gives krislester 1 merit
  • xEleven - 10/16/2018 5:45:33 AM    woke up
  
  Week 25 both ( krislester and xEleven ) are trusted by our core four in purple:
  
  
• jyap gives sambiohazard, xocel, weifa and StDragomir positive trust feedback 2019-06-29 and krislester, coldman, Crypt0ptimus, stickiest, halop22k and xEleven on the    2019-04-30
  
  
  • weifa gives jyap positive trust feedback on the 2019-06-28
    
    weifa gives jyap eight merits in one transaction.
  • StDragomir gives jyap positive trust feedback on the 2019-06-28
    
    Week 25 both ( weifa and StDragomir ) are trusted by our core four in purple:
  
  
  • • coldman is DT trusted by jyap in week 25.
    • coldman receives 2 merit from jyap and gives jyap 1 merit.
    • coldman receives and gives positive trust feedback to jyap on the 2019-04-30
    
    
  • • halop22k gives jyap positive trust feedback on the    2019-05-01
    • Week 25 halop22k is trusted by our core four in purple:
    
    
  
  

---

---

Registration Date:4/30/2011 12:23:46 PM (Active 180 days ago)    coldman

Registration Date:12/8/2013 2:21:38 AM (Active 482 days ago)    xocel

Registration Date:1/6/2014 6:12:02 PM (Active 435 days ago)    sambiohazard

Registration Date:5/17/2014 11:15:37 AM (Active 4 days ago)    jyap

Registration Date:6/14/2014 7:27:07 AM (Active 11 days ago)    weifa
Registration Date:6/19/2014 3:17:08 PM (Active 482 days ago)    stickiest  <-- 5 days apart

Registration Date:7/6/2014 5:08:54 AM (Active 1011 days ago)    yakpimp

Registration Date:3/5/2016 9:03:08 PM (Active 1111 days ago)    Sicarious
Registration Date:3/10/2016 9:46:12 PM (Active 225 days ago)    xEleven  <-- 5 days apart

Registration Date:12/2/2017 8:38:47 PM (Active 482 days ago)    StDragomir

Registration Date:7/6/2018 5:34:41 AM (Active 95 days ago)    Crypt0ptimus

10/16/2018 5:45:33 AM    woke up      xEleven
Registration Date:10/21/2018 4:15:43 PM (Active 444 days ago)    krislester  <-- 5days apart
Registration Date:10/23/2018 2:08:46 AM (Active 542 days ago)    halop22k  <-- 2 days apart

3/3/2019 6:04:18 PM    password reset via email       sambiohazard
3/3/2019 6:05:35 PM    woke up               sambiohazard

2019-04-30   Various trust feedbacks given to each-other
5/1/2019 4:42:20 AM    password reset via email      halop22k
5/1/2019 4:42:44 AM    woke up               halop22k

6/29/2019 4:53:19 AM    woke up               xocel
6/29/2019 6:13:17 AM    password reset via email      sambiohazard
2019-06-29   Various trust feedbacks given to each-other

12/14/2019 7:50:05 PM    password reset via email      weifa

4/25/2020 8:28:30 PM    password reset via email      weifa
4/26/2020 2:03:12 PM    woke up               coldman

7/8/2020 10:46:25 AM    woke up               Crypt0ptimus

---

---

Conclusion:

halop22k, Crypt0ptimus, coldman, Sicarious, yakpimp, krislester and xEleven have either colluded with our core four alts, or are alts used to improve jyap's trust rating via positive trust feedback and some merit swapping.

TL;DR:

Four core UID's that DT distrusted pooya87 on or around the 30^th June 2019 are alts with the main alt, jyap having built up in two instances alts for trust abuse via DT, merit and feedback with two main dates being 2019-04-30 and again on the 2019-06-29  (+/- 1 day in each instance).  Most of these alts receive and then give merit two-for-one from jyap as well as trust feedback and DT trust.

Background:

In week 25, four users distrust pooya87, ndnh, gembitz, btpowers, rapidleech, bathrobehero, bbcoin, aliashraf, Chol_gol, ARTISTCOLONY, hrh_fourtyseven and a-zimmerer.

Example:

https://loyce.club/trust/2019-07-06_Sat_10.00h/379147.html

---

---

Although their registration dates differ, two UID's were last active 485 days ago (info via BPIP)


Two users have activity within a 90 minute time frame:


That same day 29th of June 2019, all four users give others (including the four in this investigation) positive trust feedback:

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

.

.

.

---

---

Merit:

xocel sends jyap 3 merits (in 2 transactions)
sambiohazard sends jyap 1 merit
jyap sends stickiest 2 merits and stickiest sends jyap 1 merit.

---

---

Trust feedback on the 29th of June, 2019.

• xocel gives Crypt0ptimus, sambiohazard, Sicarious, stickiest, xEleven, jyap positive trust feedback
• sambiohazard gives jyap positive trust feedback
• stickiest gives krislester, xEleven, xocel, sambiohazard and jyap positive trust feedback
• jyap gives sambiohazard, xocel, weifa and StDragomir positive trust feedback

---

---

DT Trust of each-other.

So I had a look at their DT trust and found all four created near identical DT trust / distrust that same week including all four trusting each-other.

---

---

Conclusion:

It is my opinion that all four UID's ( xocel, sambiohazard, jyap and stickiest ) are alts who have built up "Trust" via every avenue available to then simultaneously place distrust on pooya87, ndnh, gembitz, btpowers, rapidleech, bathrobehero, bbcoin, aliashraf, Chol_gol, ARTISTCOLONY, hrh_fourtyseven and a-zimmerer on or around the 30^th June 2019

If they did accept the TX in the first place, then they don't now:


Did you try recreating the wallet on another platform as I suggested?

I've had some posts deleted recently with ref links in them and then other posts (with ref links in them) go through...  Each admin/mod has their own opinion and agenda on what you can and cannot do.

As @Cryptoababe suggests, have a read of the *cough* unofficial guidelines then check out similar posts in the section you want to post in and see what is Carte Blanche.

@LoyceV:

You might want to check this thread out as well.  The OP is creating Flags (four so far) against people who "might" be scammers.

What scam has occurred?

@LoyceV

The odds for one candidate over the other are one indication of who might win an election, but the amount of money actually wagered is a better indication.  If one or two put hefty lump sums on a candidate they still only count as one or two "votes" but hundreds or even thousands of wagers give a truer indication of who is likely to win.

Hello again.

I doubt it - activity zero... [1a], [1b]

What's your previous alts??

---

---

It's unlikely to be Monbux - they have logged in a couple of times, but people have posted similar questions which go unanswered.

... and the great leveler (GREEN) will come and clean your dreams and aspirations away ...  (i.e. the house edge) 

I called it as sub $ 14k at the start of September in my interview (which you can read in full by following the link):


I'm still leaning towards it nudging over $ 14,000 in about two to three weeks time and then settling down to below $ 14k, probably around the $13,250 mark.  Thereabouts.

Yes.

Your self moderated thread (which you have admitted deleting my posts that I defend myself) that you use as a platform to attack me, is a form of intimidation with it's "vote" to seek justification to (again) give me trust feedback distrust.