any chance you will begin to work on nvidia and cuda? amd is reaching is limit already i don't think it's possible to do high improvement anymore
on the other hand a 1070 is stuggling to have 125 sol and it should be 160 at the very least, and i think it might be higher, up to 180...
|
|
|
you could also do a coin that is first pow and then pos, so asic don't have the time to enter in play pretty much like etheruem, in this way will be by any means asic-proof
|
|
|
i don't think that coin is worth mining, sure perhaps there are hidden gem somewhere(i doubt), but that is not one of them the only one more profitable than zcash and etheruem is still xcn with the pallas miner that do 35MH on a 1070
|
|
|
so does someone else is experiencing memory leak with this build? my system ram start to increase slowly until the system crash
Yes. the same ok glad that i'm not the only one, so sp can you check this issue, has something to do with your build in some environment maybe win 10?
|
|
|
so does someone else is experiencing memory leak with this build? my system ram start to increase slowly until the system crash
|
|
|
SAPPHIRE RX470 8G has a good, fast samsung vram, which is good for ethereum
480 4g has slower vram, so why 480 4G is better?
yeah but they are not cheap like the 4GB one, like 15-20% more expensive
|
|
|
this what happened notice the sol 1800??? the drivers crash and it can not be restored, i must restart
Looks like problems with OC? If you get a crash again check the memory usage of the miner. I run it stable on my rigs, but it could be a hidden mem leak somewhere. no oc on gpu -502 mem and o core, the mem system usage is around 4GB there are 8GB it should be sufficient yeah it seems you are right, the me keep increasing slowly until it reach 8GB...how can i fix this?
|
|
|
done this what happened notice the sol 1800??? the drivers crash and it can not be restored, i must restart
|
|
|
I dont understand , is possible mining ETH and Zcash together ?
If yes , with zcash-spmod1 and claymore 7.3 ? .
I have gtx 1070 on windows x64 .
yeah just run two instances, one clymore and one spmod
|
|
|
there is no such thing as asic resistant or proof, there is only asic-deterrent, you can just delay the asic mining it if your coin will be not popular enough and without a high marketcap
|
|
|
i think it's better to go with the 480 4gb, should be at the same price or at least here i'm finding it at the same price
also i don't think you need at all a 1600w, 1000w is enough just buy a corsair rm or evga 1000/1300(if cheaper some times)
rm 1000i is very cheap can be found at 170-180 euro
rx 480 power draw is 150W, 150 x 6 = 900W + mb +cpu power, so 1000W is at the limit. 1600W i can get at 165 EUR. Less noise from psu i had the same thing 6 x 150w plus cpu ram mobo and 3 fan and it was holding strong with a rm1000i, which can sustain up to 1050/1100 watt actually you will be fine trust me
|
|
|
i think it's better to go with the 480 4gb, should be at the same price or at least here i'm finding it at the same price
also i don't think you need at all a 1600w, 1000w is enough just buy a corsair rm or evga 1000/1300(if cheaper some times)
rm 1000i is very cheap can be found at 170-180 euro
|
|
|
Can somebody please help me what is the exact formula to count ZEC mining profitability?
I know there are many calculators but I want to be sure they tell me the right numbers.
ZECNetwork hashrate: ~22 000 000 Sol/s Your hashrate: 1000 Sol/s Miner reward: 6.23 (current) Blocks per day: 570 Your ZEC amount: 570 * 6.23 * 1000 / 22000000 = ~0.1614 Price: 0.1041 BTC per ZEC In BTC: 0.1614 * 0.1041 = 0.0168 BTC per day. In $: 0.0168 * 750$ = 12.6$ PowerConsumption: 0.800 kWh (for example, rx 470 4GB 1260/1850, 1.05V - about 135 Watt, 1160/1850, 0.95V - about 105 Watt per card) Price: 0.05$ per kW Day cost: 0.800 * 24 * 0.05 = 0.96$ Total12.6 - 0.96 = 11.64 $ per day P.S. You can calculate actual miner reward from block number: min(12.5, 625e-6 * blockNumber * 0.8) P.P.S. You can use: https://explorer.zcha.in/or https://api.zcha.in/v1/mainnet/network for actual data Wow, thank you very much for the step-by-step answer I still don't know how the mining difficulty is related to the calculation. Or I don't need to deal with that? It depends on the network hashrate and I need to count only with that? the diff must be counted if the nethash isn't reflecting it because it has changed before the diff adapted, in fact with that calculation, you may have some wrong result some times, because of this so for example, if the diff is 1000 and net 1000, but then the nethash change to 900 but diff is still 1000 because the diff retarget is not so fast and in any case is not instant then you will not earn more because the nethash(900, before was 1000) is lower, but you will end up with the same profit
|
|
|
assuming that is a amd rig, which can do easily 1000 sol, we have 2000 rig there(now it's showing 2M sol), probably a consortium or a private pool, not a sinlge guy with all those rigs, i can't believe that
|
|
|
yea but still overpriced at 0.15, when bitcoin is worth so much now, and when you have a open source that can do 125 sol already
and also zcash is tanking...
|
|
|
i had a crash during this night, i'm investigating why, but i'm sure it is the miner, display driver stop responding bla bla
never happened before with other build
|
|
|
the only problem i still see is that the hashrate fluctuate too much from 630 sol to 680+, but this was true in any build, so something isn't done properly in the code
|
|
|
your version is good, getting less wattage but higher hash
only 681 wattage and hashrate 680(peak 690), ratio 1:1, better than any other build
also very stable and no throttling
|
|
|
run with -cs
same error, i can't put an url with "stratum etc..." good it work, very good job getting 680 sol on -502 mem and 0 core
|
|
|
something in the command line i guess, "the specified class was not found"
doesn't work with stratum?
|
|
|
|