theymos ~Foxpup 2run Deathwing ~Timelord2067 EFS xzone by rallier ~2double0 teramit ~stompix Lydian ziya1453 techman GrinZ hiburak ~suchmoon ~examplens Zz Danslip ~tmfp peloso varanvaran mhanbostanci muslol67 The Young Turk ~LoyceV Kalemder ~The Pharmacist cabsav DarkStar_ dannybrown BitcoinTurk ~JaredKaragen bileq ~TryNinja Halmater ekiller Muhtaixa tekno ~marlboroza sammys ~IconFirm ~blurryeyed Aceeakell Bitcoin-Turkiye ophyrim TaliskerDarkStorm onurgozupek otto_diesel bobita Vispilio ~JollyGood enfarktus Blacknavy AlyattesLydia PHI1618 lossnet ~Steamtyme gumusi ~o_e_l_e_o jopen vycl87 El-Cezeri gospodin SkyLords trendcoin ~rehberistan anonymous3x Hovarda cryptobaro ~morvillz7z Bthd Cryptorianx ~Coolcryptovator ismend ~DireWolfM14 ~psycodad kartepe kriptobaron KursatAelf mandown Tom Bombadil Lachrymose forumalacali ~LFC_Bitcoin ~Lauda
son liste bu şekilde benim
|
|
|
+ Does not need a campaign manager to approve you to enroll in it + Pays you every single day (except the days when you cannot send your money to your balance due to wallet not refilled) + Needs just 5 shitposts every day to earn you 0.001 BTC + You can use alt accounts as well without having to worry about being caught, and even if caught, you can still continue with others, I think there must have been some account deals went through after this campaign showed up. These qualities made them look trustworthy in the eyes of spammers /s for which they won't hesitate to advertise even the shittiest content that these Yobit guys may write in their signatures Why not have a separate campaign for each one of them and not force their existing Cryptotalk participants to change their signature to Investbox? I don't think they needed a separate campaign because they are keeping the source of the campaign as their website only, so it doesn't matter a lot. It should still be like, they should have discussed this shit with Yahoo and the members in their cryptotalk signature campaign to have a mutuality and an agreement of everyone. what kind of creature are you? you see yourself superior to people. fuck the mind in the mixer
|
|
|
yau bu ay da DT1 seçilmişiz ya niye söylemiyonuz by rallier otto_diesel bobita Vispilio wolwoo AlyattesLydia PHI1618 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg52960804#msg52960804listeyi güncelledim-şimdilik şu şekilde, disrtustları eklemedim, bildirim alıp gelmesinler diye hiç de fena liste değil sanki.....unuttuklarımı ekleyebilirim sonradan... theymos-TECSHARE-OgNasty-2run-Deathwing-EFS-xzone-yussuf89-byrallier-teramit-MorpheWQ-Lydian-ziya1453-techman-hiburak-teeGUMES-Zz-varanvaran-mhanbostanci-LoyceV-Kalemder-cabsav-DarkStar_-dannybrown-BitcoinTurk-bileq-Halmater-ekiller-Muhtaixa-tekno-Aceeakell-Bitcoin-Turkiye-ophyrim-TaliskerDarkStorm-onurgozupek-otto_diesel-bobita-Vispilio-enfarktus-Blacknavy-AlyattesLydia-PHI1618-lossnet-gumusi-jopen-vycl87-El-Cezeri-gospodin-SkyLords-trendcoin-anonymous3x-Hovarda-cryptobaro-Bthd-Cryptorianx-ismend-kartepe-kriptobaron-KursatAelf-mandown-Tom Bombadil-Lachrymose-The Young Turk-muslol67-Danslip-sammys Theymos, cyrus ve DarkStar dışında bütün yabancıları şutladım. Şu kadar adam var ama heriflere bayram ettirdik Yoldayım eve gidiyim baya bi adamı distrust ekleyeceğim
|
|
|
You'il never shut me up. Great! I love freedom of speech, and you should be allowed to say anything you want. That's one of the things that makes Bitcointalk so unique! Excluding you from my Trust list doesn't mean I want to shut you up. I didn't put you on Ignore either. All it means is that your use of the Trust list and feedback is incompatible with what I think is right. And the fact that you don't seem to know this, proves my point. You, your gang, your thoughts and your design in the forum... EDİT: Take your filthy merit I owe one i am not merit rich like you
|
|
|
You'il never shut me up. You can either close my account or go fuck you
|
|
|
I've always tried to be very conservative when leaving feedback and when including/excluding users from my Trust list. Today, I made my first DT1-exclusion: Currently excluded~ wolwoo1. In one week, this DT1-member added 24 users to his Trust list. Most of those users never left any feedback and don't have a custom Trust list. Therefore, they don't belong on DT2, and the user who adds them doesn't belong on DT1. 2. 4 months ago, this user left positive feedback to 16 users, all without reference link. The only thing they seem to have in common is their nationality, just like the users on his Trust list. That shouldn't be a reason to give them positive feedback and/or DT2-powers. 3. This user leaves retaliation feedback. For the above reason, I ask all other users to consider excluding ~wolwoo too. As a reference: this is what I consider correct use of the Trust system: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.Haha, someone who started his own trust system started to give me advice. Who are you? Member! Happiness with the big gang you created Tüm forumu yardıma çağırmış qavat😂😎 biliydim böyle olcağını üstad ;d uyardıydım. şimdi durup dururken senin gibi güvenilir birini kaybedeceğiz. bu kadar kişi ekleyen birini asla dt1'de tutmazlar.. Aga tam tersi bence, eğer forum trust konusunda inisiyatif kullansaydı bunların alayı vız gelir tırıs giderdi. Kimi üşendi kimi araya soğukluk girdi vs Neyse sorun değil hayırlısı olsun Sorun değil kardeşim hesap da gitse bu onun bunun çocuklarına boyun eğmeyeceğim
|
|
|
I've always tried to be very conservative when leaving feedback and when including/excluding users from my Trust list. Today, I made my first DT1-exclusion: Currently excluded~ wolwoo1. In one week, this DT1-member added 24 users to his Trust list. Most of those users never left any feedback and don't have a custom Trust list. Therefore, they don't belong on DT2, and the user who adds them doesn't belong on DT1. 2. 4 months ago, this user left positive feedback to 16 users, all without reference link. The only thing they seem to have in common is their nationality, just like the users on his Trust list. That shouldn't be a reason to give them positive feedback and/or DT2-powers. 3. This user leaves retaliation feedback. For the above reason, I ask all other users to consider excluding ~wolwoo too. As a reference: this is what I consider correct use of the Trust system: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.Haha, someone who started his own trust system started to give me advice. Who are you? Member! Happiness with the big gang you created Tüm forumu yardıma çağırmış qavat😂😎
|
|
|
Ya abi bu feedback niye çalışmıyor? Herifin birine red verdim, önce o bana verdi, baktım şimdi suchmoon da neutral vermiş, ben de iade edecem, kodumun submit tuşu kayboluyor. Mobilim ondan mı? Hah telefonu yan çevirince geliyor 20-30 kişiye üşenmeden tek tek feedback vermiş. bu kişiler şu an yenilenmiş imzayı taşıyanlar mı yoksa gözüne kestirdiklerine mi vermiş? Bakmadım üstad köpek gibi üşüştüler üstüme Yazana yazıyorum aq😂😎👍🏻basıyorum kırmızıyı acı biberi
|
|
|
Every member who gives negative to people for crap reasons deserves to get negative. When someone gives you a negative, you give a rose?
What empty people are there among us
Nope, they simply get excluded from users trust list. That's how the trust system is suppose to work. i m tired of lynch culture in this forum.
I normally don't like how other users don't give others chances, and admit everyone makes mistakes. However, this isn't the case here. No one is going around painting the forum red. Instead, they are giving their input into the situation, and trying to prevent users for falling for this. Which unfortunately does not seem like its working. I'm gonna turn red, nothing's gonna happen to him. I'il be back, it's my style I wrote this in the first post.
|
|
|
Ya abi bu feedback niye çalışmıyor? Herifin birine red verdim, önce o bana verdi, baktım şimdi suchmoon da neutral vermiş, ben de iade edecem, kodumun submit tuşu kayboluyor. Mobilim ondan mı? Hah telefonu yan çevirince geliyor
|
|
|
I didn't think it was possible to top the immaturity of this new crop of DT1 members but you have surprised me again.
That dude is DT1? Jaaay-zus. He's not the only one who shouldn't be on DT1. I had a threatening PM from another one who's promoting this garbage: My reply, which I also posted on his "self moderated" Yobit lov'in thread: Posted for for transparency, my reply to OP's threatening PM: i m a DT 1member,
So what? That only makes it worse. i warned the people about yobit.
Yet you still prostitute your profile for them. delete your negative trust, or i can give you a negative for witch hunting.
Stop promoting scams & remove your Yobit sig campaign & I might think about it - seeing as you asked me so kindly. You won't be the first scam promoter to leave me retaliatory feedback & I'm sure you won't be the last. Nice to see DT1 members threatening other members...... It was quickly deleted of course, which is why I'm posting it here. The fact that there are DT1 members getting involved with & defending this scam Yobit outfit (for payment, of course) is bad enough, but for them to abuse their DT1 status with PM's like this goes to show how bad the situation is on BCT. I don't care if someone is DT1, DT2 or whatever - a scam is a scam & anyone who promotes scams for payment should learn to live with the consequences. Thank you blurryeyed for the post and highlighting what is a growing pattern of behaviour from some members of our forum. It has to be said it is absolutely despicable conduct from any DT1 trying any means whatsoever in an attempt to either promote, attack or bully another user. Every member who gives negative to people for crap reasons deserves to get negative. When someone gives you a negative, you give a rose? What empty people are there among us
|
|
|
I didn't think it was possible to top the immaturity of this new crop of DT1 members but you have surprised me again.
That dude is DT1? Jaaay-zus. I'm not at Chipmixer, you're surprised at him? Foxpop merit doesn't too. There's a word around here or whatever.
|
|
|
similarly Chipmixer service can be used for illicit activites Cash can be used for illicit activities. So can the internet. So can mobile phones. So can cars. Why don't we rally against all these things too? There is a massive difference between a legitimate service which is used by some for illicit activities (such as a mixer), and a service which is by its very nature illicit (such as a Ponzi or other HYIP scam). and, there is no difference between Yoshit ans Bitcoin mixers. Both are part of the Bitcoin/Crypto ecosystem.
Similarly, this argument is complete nonsense. Buying groceries and human trafficking are both part of the cash ecosystem. Does that make them equal? Such a comparison is meaningless. What did the bitcointalk.org management make? Scams are not moderated, so they are unlikely to make a decision. Stop looking for an excuse you can use to justify promoting a scam. No one else can change your signature for you - this is your responsibility. Ok 👌 👍🏻👋🏻
|
|
|
Are you kidding? 30 satoshi will almost! You're advertising more than us! Do you receive a secret payment from Yobit? Yobit and X10 token are spoken everywhere!
|
|
|
Are you kidding Morning 22 satoshi now 28 satoshi What is happening to you? buys, sells. Post elsewhere
|
|
|
Gambling project is not forbidden because no risk wins everyone Airdrop made "forbidden-ponzi-morality"😂 The Vite 240 I bought last week went down to 140 satoshi. Extra didn't give anything. Tron gives regular btt and wink every month. Yobit not counting my messages now. Because I didn't use the new signature. Thank you to Yahoo for your efforts ... PLEASE SAY AN AUTHORIZED IN THE FORUM Is this a penalty for the new signature? Hundreds of members who share the same fate as me are waiting for your reply. Do not leave the members who respect the rules unanswered Thank u I cannot really give a good answer currently. Waiting on responses to a few more questions I sent the Admin. The biggest of those being are they willing to change the sigs and The investbox if I invest 1btc and buy 10x tokens. If I collect my % daily for a week will my tokens still be worth 1btc when I sell them? Or will my tokens lose value and I lose a big chunk of the invested btc? I have changed their thread to what they asked for now. Users have to make their own choice at this time. I cannot say 1 way or the other if participants will be tagged. I will say I don't agree with tagging them at this point due to the fact that we are all ignorant on how it works. I watched the video and there was not a real explanation of how things work. Just an FYI on how to make the investment. No answer on the actions that need performed to collect your % nor no info on if you lose your ass on your initial investment. No matter what users are going to say Yobit is a scam exchange. They should also include every other exchange in that assessment, but nothing I can do about that. If yobit decides to switch up the sigs a bit I will likely continue looking over the campaign. This is all I can say until I get some answers Thanks Master for answering -------------------------------------------------- With all due respect STAFF-ADMIN-MOD Is this signature forbidden?
Yes? or No?If it's not forbidden, I'il use the new signature. Nobody can do a dick. I'm not asking fake moral guards, Introducing the gambling project etc... I mean, writings, words, paragraphs, pages... What's the result, friends? What did the bitcointalk.org management make?
Prohibited or not If it's not forbidden, I'il keep wearing the signature. If not, I will accept the decision
|
|
|
Valla ortalık karıştı, Wolwoo'yu dik duruşu için kutluyorum,
işin ticari boyutuna gelirsek, şimdi mesajlar gözüküyor ama bir BTC kazanımı olmamış gibi görünüyor Yobit panelinde,
acaba sistemde bir hata mı var, şu anda yeni imzayı takıp da ödeme alabilen var mı acaba ?..
Üstad yeni imzayı giyersen veriliyor bounty Yalnız 5 mesaja 1 vermişler, galiba dün giymedim diye. O 5 mesaj sayılırken giymiş olman gerekiyor, ben öyle anladım Yeni imzayı giyenler yarın tam ödeme alır. kimseyi zor durumda bırakmak istemem. Dileyen katılır dilemeyen uzak durur ama herkes katılırsa hiç bir şey yapamazlar. Parayı veren düdüğü çalar, riski alan da parayı alır. Öpüyorum hepinizi 😘😎
|
|
|
- I don't see a 15%/week plan on BTC It's (currently) on the third page of InvestBox: You forgot to say, 15%/week plan, the minimum investment is 50BTC. I'm very curious who is so brave to send that amount of money to Yobit. I'm sick of the hypocrisy of people. Let them see what they have. But I want to put hypocrisy in their faces. Don't let the gambler, the sex site, the mixer come and teach me morals. I have one suggestion for you. Invest your weekly profit from Yobit signature in his InvestBox and write here your personal experience. Did I tell you to gamble the money you made?
|
|
|
So you wanna express your DT1 power for support Yobit campaign? A DT1 mentality should not be retaliatory, should not attack someone without valid reason. If you are thinking you will tag someone if they tag Yobit participants then it's like a attack and retaliatory feedback. Of course you can show your power and leave feedback as you want, but DT system is quite different from before. Community and other DT1's have power to remove you from DT1 instantly. So you will show your power they will show their power. So it will become a game which should not happen IMO.
Everyone have freedom here to express their opinions, but it doesn't mean you will have to tag them if there opinions are against you. No one have tagged for Yobit yet, so what is the meaning calling all Yobit participants and supporters? You wanna make group? You wanna create different and new trust network? Is it really necessary? I don't think so. Users are discussing each other and leaving their opinions. That's all and nothing going to change I know. Yobit will continue signature campaign either by yahoo62278 or some other else.
Admin will not moderate scam, and you can't expect any decisions from him about Yobit. He would take action against spam like before. So please don't give argumentative statements which would create more problems.
I serve myself. For free. Look at this multi account and feedback. Who is going on is also declaring half of the forum scammers. I declare this guy insecure.
|
|
|
I'm sick of the hypocrisy of people. Let them see what they have. But I want to put hypocrisy in their faces. Don't let the gambler, the sex site, the mixer come and teach me morals.
|
|
|
|