If your site depends directly on obtaining data from sites such as CMC, I advise you to change the idea completely and start relying on several sources.

The interface is beautiful and the way to update the data is interactive, but it does not provide a different model from traditional currency tracking sites.

I hope to focus on better currency rankings, more charts, and more technical analysis.

In general, your site provides the basics, so I think it is good, but you need a lot to be able to compete.

I don't know, but money laundering is not that easy. You move half a million dollars in an "easy to monitor" network like the Ethereum network, and therefore all these services that track currencies will notice your movements.

Secondly, monetizing cryptocurrencies is difficult if you decide to do so without verifying identity, and therefore when you provide them with your data, the issue is a matter of time before you are arrested.

In general, all of these discussions are not related to Bitcoin, so the appropriate place is Altcoins board.

What do you mean by physical assets? Do you mean to represent the traditional assets in a physical form? If this is the case then many assets have digital encoding and you can create this as the example of gold.
But if you mean scanning physical objects and selling them digitally, it is possible, but we take advantage of the value of physical objects.

In general, the concept of NFT tokens in itself is controversial and will open a lot of these discussions if it succeeds.

Most of the negative reviews obtained by CoinGate payment processor^[1] are because of KYC, either because it takes a long time or because the company is registered in Europe, in general, if you are patient and want to bear the trouble of identity verification, it is suitable, especially if your store is large and does not have technical knowledge Sufficient to use BTCpayserver.

you can follow this link for more info.

[1] https://www.g2.com/products/coingate/reviews?utf8=%E2%9C%93&filters%5Bnps_score%5D%5B%5D=1&filters%5Bkeyphrases%5D=&order=g2_default&filters%5Bcomment_answer_values%5D=

If no one provides financial advice to anyone, we will not develop. The problem lies in giving investment advice and you do not have the sufficient knowledge background for that, or that the other party does not have sufficient knowledge experience, or blind investment “just investing without a clear plan in the hope of getting rich quickly.”

Always tell your friends that high-risk investments mean good profit, but good loss, the time factor is also important, so invest money that you do not need at the moment.
After that stop being greedy and learn more.

I don't know, but if the site gave you the private key, a file or any means to "own bitcoin", you actually did not buy bitcoin because there is another party who knows your key and may have withdrawn those coins "if they exist" at some point.

the best what you can do if to search for bitcoin address which start with 1.

after that you can search for how to get those coins.

You are trying to make a project succeed and it depends on several departments, for example, you need to develop the currency, market it, create a platform for exchange, list it in other platforms, if you can guarantee the success of the casino and therefore for one developer it is almost impossible to do so.

I advise you to build a team, develop a strategy and then start a project instead of a casino due to the increased regulatory restrictions on cryptocurrencies, such markets will cause you a lot of legal problems in the future and most of the profits will be lost in taxes.

Why measure the success of a coin by “listing it in exchange”? Those platforms demanded the identity of the primary Bitcoin developer? Or will ask for it in the future?
All of these projects are centralized and considered as an investment, not a truly decentralized cryptocurrency.

In short, whoever asks about developers to buy or list it, he is talking about economic aspects by accepting quick money, but it is not "cryptocurrency" and will not have value in the future (long term.)


as for rearson beacuse there is no new update that coins can provide in the code base (all of them is just a copy of others)

If a currency is affected by the death or disappearance of the founder, it is not decentralized and does not deserve long-term investment.

Overall, models like Shiba were and still are more harmful to the crypto community, this currency was a precursor to an era of very excessive cryptocurrency printing and therefore they are deliberately trying to show their currency has a high market capacity which means that they depend on hot money.

If all of these indicators above are not enough to avoid investing in them, I think that with the disappearance of the founder, you have got enough reasons.

You cannot improve your investments in the long term by dividing them on the same market, meaning that what you are doing is not diversifying your investments, but rather weakening their value in the long term.

In short, your solution is to buy more Bitcoin in the long term.

In the short term you can invest in Ethereum, and Polygon (MATIC) (considering the failure of Ethereum to reach POS)

Other than that, all investments in altcoins should be based on a reason, for example, an update, soft-fork, hard-fork, good news, a listing, and so on.

Rearranging replies according to a specific mechanism, for example merits, account rank, and others may be good and useful in some boards such as technical one, but the best answer mechanism is against the nature of the discussions followed by the forum.

Getting the best answer does not mean that the user's problem has been resolved, and therefore even in technical discussions, it will not be very useful.

Rearranging replies  according to a given option or letting the user choose that would be a convenient solution, I think you can rearrange it in reverse (last replies first,) so I think adding "highest merits first" wouldn't be difficult.

all free earn models are either a fraud or you pay a little limit that may be meaningless if the price fluctuates, so it is better to learn and try to benefit others. For example, if you have some knowledge, creating videos on YouTube may bring you some income, writing specialized articles or trying to help others.

In general, solving questions and others is not a profitable model, and therefore honest sites do not give a rewarding return on it.

Frankly, I did not live in Japan, but through my superficial knowledge of them, I did not think that the elderly have economic problems? I mean, you force a person to "euthanize" for some money?

The problem of reverse population density is being solved by solutions that go beyond the issue of "euthanasia." I think that Japan's main problem is in the population area.

I'm sorry to hear that governments can enact such legislation but I think we don't understand what's going on so all of our comments will be from the perspective of our societies which are completely different from mine.

Mass adoption will only happen if governments recognize Bitcoin as an official currency, then many people will think about buying for nothing but that it is legal.
Therefore, it is currently difficult to help someone understand Bitcoin and he does not want to.

Currently, all you can do is guide people who definitely want to invest, teach them the basics of saving your currencies, and then we can talk about Bitcoin as an investment.

For El Salvador, I expect it will happen much faster once more middle-class people use Bitcoin, which is something that takes more time and patience than an educational culture.

The reason for this is continuous development, as there is no point in which you can say that Bitcoin as a "project" has become completed or Roadmap end, and Bitcoin extends to have a relationship with money, and therefore we can say that it is a disclaimer for each person to review the code himself instead of trusting that the project is complete.

you can read this ---> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20223

https://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2020/bitcoin-core-dev.2020-10-22-18.59.log.html#l-122

It is an attempt by them to evade all the problems related to UST, which was the cause of the price collapse, but in another way, most of us did not know the Terra Blockchain until after they promoted that stable currency.

Problem solving is not like this and therefore you will find that soon they may lose even the confidence that they may have in the coming days.

Advice for any new investor, it is better to think several times before investing, and for old investors, it is better to consider that the value of this currency is zero and not to think about any serious increases.

A bear market is an opportunity for long-term investment, which means that currencies with good market capacities will hold up in the long term in addition to being unique and problem-solving, in other words it is better not to invest in new currencies during this period.

When the matter turns into a bull market, the investment changes due to the ease of money flow into the market and thus the ease of obtaining rapid fluctuations.

In general, most altcoins fail in the long run.

Through my reading of this page ---> https://4k.com/unisocks, I got some negative indicators that will push me not to invest, for example, but not limited to:

 - Trying to rely on a successful name like Hayden Adams and the Uniswap team without real marketing of the idea.
 - Some common words like NFTs are exploited without really telling how to solve the problem.
 - An idea is not addressed, but ideas are put forward that may not be realized.
 - Socks does not bring about a new innovation or solve a previous problem, but rather it makes a lot of promises.

Therefore, without delving into the details of the project, it is better to avoid it, or at least unless the developer team gives more convincing reasons. It is better not to invest in it.

If your question is related to a company, meaning that you mean a normal company that wants to invest people's money, it will need a lot of trust, which is difficult to gain for the following reasons:

 - Investing in Bitcoin is not difficult, you can buy from any platform and keep it.
 - Most altcoins are difficult to predict, and it is impossible to guarantee profits to users.
 - Most countries have a lot of laws regarding such investments and therefore the company may not be registered.
 - As a simple company and in the short term this idea will not work.
 

That's why rich people and institutional investors turn to something more trusted like trust fund or ETFs.

Is SQUID2  from squidgame that scam coin^[1]?

There are a lot of negative indicators that will make you stay away from this currency:

 - It is listed into a suspicious platform.
 - It bears a suspicious name.
 - It is promoted by an unknown account.
 - It does not provide any additional benefit.

In short, avoid it.



[1] How a Squid Game Crypto Scam Got Away With Millions