Some CDC studies are known fraudulent.  The thing about science is that once a producer has issued fraudulent or incomplete information, nothing they did before or since can be trusted.  That's why they should not do it, but if you have a 7 figure job waiting for you at Merck when you get done with 'public service', I guess it was to much for the CDC chairwoman to resist.

Themirosal was removed mostly because the danger was to obvious.  The last (and only) safety study here in the U.S. was done like 75 years ago.  They injected like 12 people who were dying of encephalitis as a test.  They all died of encephalitis and none due to mercury poisoning, thus themirosal was deemed 'safe'.  It _is_ super effective as a preservative since it kills every living cell it comes in contact with.  Unfortunately that includes living neurons in the brain.

Even now you cannot walk into a grocery store without hearing over the loudspeaker about 'get your flu shot today!', and see banners and flyers all over the place about it.  At least in my area.  These multi-use vials DO still contain themirosal, and they are highly recommended for pregnant women especially.  (When I was a kid pregant women were not allowed to take so much as an aspirin.)  I would note that in my nephews 4 grade class of maybe 25, a few of the kids are totally zombified.  No hope for them.  That's a pretty high percentage in my opinion.

Something weird is going on here my friends.  The 'affluent' are picking up on it and that is where the resistance is coming from.  The poor and the immigrants are not.

Here is a doctor/professor from a panel which happened to have a lot of known (((chosen people))) on it talking about vaccines:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sttSh4FDgB0

It's actually not terribly easy to find this clip on youtube any more.  Lots of stuff is going AWOL on that platform within the last few years.  Go figure.   They talk a lot about needing very high vaccine uptake rates to protect 'our' children.  It's actually a little ambiguous.  Could easily be read (((our))) children by someone who has researched this subject in detail.  Or by people who are in the 'chosen' group and can understand certain lingo.

Whatever the case, the U.S. is becoming less and less of a potential future competitor as more and more of the younger generations turn into zombies.  This could pay huge dividends to up-n-coming world powers including those who dream of a world of goyim living under the 'Noahide laws' directed from the 'third temple'.

I know for a fact that 'uncorrelated financial asset' was in play before it shows up on the chart.

In 2008 things were very close to locking up, and one of the cause/effect feedback loops were that 'letters of credit' upon which much of the global commerce system operates were about to fail.  Should that happen today, Bitcoin (or more generally crypto-currency) could rapidly take over in that role.  I would guess that values could go insane under such a scenario.  Of course crypto would be attacked mercilessly by some, but some of the would-be attackers would also be heavy users.  Not clear how things would play out, but it could be a spectacular fireworks show.

Stupid people cannot really be 'evil' in my humble opinion.  Evil is the domain of the highly intelligent.

As for political parties in the U.S., it's a joke.  There is one party.  Might as well call it the Evil Party as far as I can tell.  They play the two fake parties like a finger-puppet show.  The two parties respectively pick up both 'stupid' and 'evil' followers.  The ratios may differ slightly, but not a lot as far as I can tell.

The U.S. (and the people who control the U.S.) are interested in lower populations in the developing world for one reason only.  We want to extract resources for our own economic 'efficiency', and high populations make it more costly and difficult to prop up the puppet leaders who we install.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200

When the U.N. and a variety other so-called 'NGO's seem fixated on 'helping' with widespread vaccination programs, the local people need to run for the hills because something bad is about to happen to them.  Better yet, ambush and hack the preps to pieces with a machete as some of the tribes did in Africa not long ago.  The main problem is that the nurses running around injecting the 'useless eaters' have no idea what's going on.  All they know is what they learned in their training courses and are for the most part well meaning people.

When there is a 'vaccine program' that targets females of childbearing age such as the 'tetanus' or 'HPV' programs, don't be surprised if it is executed in a mysterious way and if the locals (who tend to be even more brainwashed than first-worlders about the miracle of vaccine science) report some 'problems.'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1307z5xltrU

Sick evil stuff going on.  It makes sense mostly to those who've been 'illuminated' by 'the Light-bearer' I think.  The U.N. is filled with such people because those are the people who are most useful to the sponsors of that organization.

That is simply not true.  Vaccines do not have to undergo the kinds of safety testing as do other types of medications.

On top of that, the CDC who have a healthy revolving door with the giant pharma companies are know through whistleblowers to literally throw negative results into the trashcan and destroy all the records (except those stored in a office safe in the one guy on the team who had a conscience.)  Watch the movie 'Vaxxed' for a good expose on just one such incident.

If you watch the movie, pay attention what happens to real doctors when they actually read the studies of vaccine safety which are even allowed to be published.

Yes I do.  Among them, the presentations of hundreds of doctors, scientists, etc.

Only in rare occasions can a doctor or scientist maintain their career if they question the 'official' stance on vaccination as dictated by corp/gov.  Academia is highly reliant on support from governments, corporations, and so-called 'non-profit' entities (which are places where the wealthy can spend their money on their pet projects without paying taxes.)  Thus, it is inevitably a terminal career move to study the 'science' unless one is prepared to come up with the 'right answer' by any means necessary.

Even so, the damage is so threatening and the ethical considerations so awful to a minority of people that some small fraction will speak out.  Even this small fraction makes a huge number of people.

As far as I can tell Bill Gates is among the most evil men to have ever lived.  Hard-core eugenicist from a family of the same (his father headed up planned parenthood who's roots trace right back to the early 20th century eugenicists who changed their marketing once the Nazis gave the movement a bad name.)

Gates is a cheap fucker to.  He'll happily sterilize and cut the branches off the trees of 'useless eater' family lines so his class can more safely make more money, but won't then shoulder the burden of taking care of people who have no support when they get old because they were covertly sterilized and have no children to take care of them.

Gates and people like him want the population to be about 1/10 of what it is now.  And they want to make sure that people like themselves maintain an advantage over the remaining population so that they can properly 'manage' the planet.

Gates has enough money to buy the best PR which works wonders on the weak of mind...as evidenced by posts like yours.

Good points, and I agree with most of them to some extend after the research I've done into the topic.

I don't think that vaccines and the technology is inherently bad, but I think that when corp/gov wants to save money on a cost-per-goyim basis they definitely cut corners (to give them the benefit of the doubt vis-a-vis more nefarious purposes.)  They also weasel out of responsibility for any harm they cause and shove to costs onto the victim's family.

Looks to me as though 'adjuvated' technology is where  a lot of the auto-immunity problems and general individual immune system dysfunction comes from.  'Modified Live' and 'recombinate' technologies seem more promising to me with the hope of getting rid of some of the problems associated with adjuvated vaccines.  Again though, sick and weak people are not really 'problem' for the pharmaceutical companies.  They are in fact a cash-cow.

Like you say, rabies is a no-brainer.  Used as needed.  Seems to me that vaccines could be used sparingly and in a targetted manner to deal with risks as needed ecologically.  It's as plain as the nose on one's face that the understanding of 'herd immunity' on the part of the (pseudo?-)scientific community is very poor as evidenced by the changes in vaccination rates that are supposed to achieve it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6A0OFFWThs

Dude is in some part a fraud for sure.  Also at least under the thumb of Zionists if not a hard-core one himself.  This, and gun control, seem to be of high interest to both the Zionists and the United Nations for some reason.

In spite of my harsh critiques of my country (the U.S.) there are a lot of things about it which I have respect for and love dearly (and don't wish to see fade away.)  One of these is the principle of 'separation of church and state.'

Some church-centric people believe that by merging their religion into the state apparatus they will gain advantage.  Conversely, many political leaders believe that by leveraging the power of religion they can gain advantage to steer society in the direction of their choosing.

A very wise religions leader who I heard a while ago pointed out that the separation of church and state is more of a help the church defend against the state than anything else.  He seemed to see things with unusual clarity.

At this point I favor 'Christianity' over the other two Abrahamic schools because it seems the least political in it's core doctrine.  That's what my research seems to indicate at least.  I also suspect that a lot of the so-called 'Christian' churches are actually anything but.  Looks to me as though they have been infiltrated at the highest levels to turn normal 'Christians' into foot-soldiers who will do the bidding of a whole different religion.  Mostly political Zionism (and/or Lucifarianism to use the most appropriate technical term I know for it.)

Several of the largest genocides were undertaken by the U.S.S.R and the Communist Chinese.  Both were devoutly anti-religious (although there is some evidence to suggest that certain of the communist leadership in Russia, at least, were into certain esoteric forms of spirituality with a roots in Kabbalah.)

Lemme clue you in to what is going on here:

If you own (usually through a multi-national corporation and via shell companies) a pineapple plantation in SE Asia, and it takes 200 locals to do the labor, it is 'inefficient' to support a population of, say, 2000 to a level where they won't cause problems.  Further, it is 'inefficient' to have the mean IQ be much above what is necessary to swing a machete.  Natural variation will give you enough of the 200 to actually run things, and paying such people and extra $1/day will make them your dedicated servants for life.

If you've traveled around at all, even just using Google Earth, you will see vast areas where there are few or no people.  The planet is NOT in danger of much harm due to humans.  And in places where it is, humans are more and more willing to put up with 'preservation' even when it means some sacrifice.  Lots of places are actually 'going back to nature' for simple economic reasons.  Most of the fear stories are well funded propaganda designed to bring in a 'technocracy' where the very people who control much of the worlds wealth today via monetary systems control even more and to a much finer level of detail.

If you read much of the background documentation from earlier in the formation of these plans, you find novels like 'Brave New World' and texts like Bertrand Russell from his "The Impact of Science on Society' of 1953:


You simply cannot miss that what is happening with IQ, and a lot of other things which people like Russell describe, is a direct match.  Yes, 'environmental factors' are resulting in declining IQ scorse I am sure of it.  The only real question is how carefully engineered these 'environmental factors' happen to be.  The more I research things, the more I conclude that it is a lot.  There are a lot of plans right out there in the open for anyone who chooses to look...which is probably the biggest reason for dumbing down the population so fewer and fewer people will do just that.

I've heard that in the UK they are trying to figure out how to make knifes illegal because, as is completely predictable, criminals use whatever weapon they need to do crime and the choices are countless.  Use of knives by criminals is relatively uncommon in the U.S., or at least in the areas where the gun-grabbers have not worked their magic.  Why?  Because the would-be victim could well have a gun.

I would also say that in many parts of the rest of the world people have to deal with armed criminal and terrorist groups.  So you have some village who bands together as best they can, but are always at risk of so band coming into the village to rape and loot.  Denying these people a means of self defense is very unethical in my opinion, and most of these countries don't have anywhere near the resources to protect civilians.

Even in the U.S. where I live there is not 1/100 of the police presence to properly protect civilians against criminals and no budget for it.  We as a responsible citizens take on the duty of protecting our communities.  It is as easy as having a cheap shotgun in the closet, and 9/10ths of these are never used.  No need.  Criminals just find some other way to make a living, and those who don't don't live long.

In my area our solution of wide-spread gun ownership works.  We are also an area which is out in front in protecting the 2nd amendment because we know it is a cost-effective way to have a good quality of life for normal people.  If it drives the United Nations crazy, to bad.

The problem is that on rare occasion it can make sense to do very long strings of quotes.

One solution may be to (programmatically) allow all users a quota of high-percentage-quoted material and when exceeded an auto-trim occurs.

Another family of solutions would incur some degree of inconvenience to the person doing blind-quoting.  The problem here is that threads of conversation tend to benefit a lot by targeted and contentually relevant quotes.  The threads which do this tend to be the ones with more high-value content in my observation (and IMHO.)

I live out here in the rural area drinking from my own well and I make a modicum of effort to avoid some of the most well known packaged food problems.  In the 5 years or so I've been watching this very board I can see the rates of idiocy swell by leaps and bounds.  Of course it could be all or in part a different cohort who sign up and post and their issues may have nothing to do with environmental toxicity.  Who knows?

If someone want to kill another person or themselves, there are many ways to do it.  Even now it is very often not with the use of guns.  A hammer was involved in the last homicide I know of in my area.

If you have the ability to kill a person who is trying to kill or harm you, there is a very good chance that the attacker will just not bother in the first place.  Then there will be no death or violence at all.  It is especially relevant to the weak among us who are targeted by criminals (who don't give a shit about gun laws anyway,)   The basic idea is actually pretty common-sense and it is age-old.  That's why the right of self defense is pretty universal.  The right is only fairly recently rejected by brainwashed gun-grabbers here in the U.S. by pouring money on the propaganda.  (Why the sudden explosive push, I have to wonder?  Who's behind it?  Hmmm.)

Taking away a person's means of self-defense ensures that the innocent and weak will be the majority of those who die, and that criminals who target them will increase their activities because they have nothing to fear.

I have no problem with you choosing to get any vaccines you want.  If it works for you, what's the problem?  It's sad if you treat your kid like a wheel-of-fortune game just to be part of a big-brother loving crowd, but at the end of the day that's your choice and none of my business.

I've studied the science and I know all of the 500 million scare tactics are utter horse-shit propaganda, but I know that not everyone has the aptitude to do the same.  Even fewer will as vaccine 'uptake' rates continue to climb.

A slightly more tangible problem in my eyes is that as a taxpayer and someone who live in a society, it's going to be hugely problematic for me when half the kids are on meds and 1 out of three are non-functional.  I can mitigate the problem by getting the hell out of the U.S. before its engineered collapse though.

At the end of the day, from an 'illuminated' frame of reference, if the masses are stupified zombies I can take advantage of them just the same as the vaccine pushers like Bill Gates.  But I don't want to do this and hope that I never will.  I'd rather just have a good life and have everyone else exposed to the same opportunities I have had...even if they were not born into elite wealth.

You do one if you are a minority.  You do the other when you get a chance.  Doesn't seem to matter which religion.

If you are a (((certain))) other third Abrahamic religion, you have a lot of money because you practice usury, and your numbers are small since you don't allow goyim blood to contaminate the pure blood.  You fund scumbags in both other religions to get fights and killing going.  Doesn't matter which side wins because you bet on both.  If engineered correctly, both other religions fight eachother to exhaustion and you gain even more power.

God chose (((this))) third Abrahamic religion to be the 'smart' people.  The 'apple of His eye' according to them.  Some suspect that their God is they guy commonly known as 'Satan', and claim that Jesus said as much.  As an atheist, I can see what Jesus was saying here and why he may have suspected as much.

My thoughts exactly.  I'll even toss you a few merit points for beating me to it.

When one knows the game, one can use bullshit propaganda from the mainstream media to hypothesis test.  Because I believe that 'global warming' is a fraud aimed at having the plebs grant full control of weather manipulation to a small handful of 'leaders', I would expect to see all kinds of hooks, backdoors, limitations, history editing, etc, in Google's 'platform' for tracking 'climate change'.

If Google does provides an honest and useful method of fully tracking what is really going on I'll be totally shocked.  IMHO, Google is totally 'in bed' with the 'global technocratic world order', and a good candidate to even be the major driving force behind the project.  Control of the weather has been a timeless desire of those who dream of power and control, and this has not diminished in modern technological age.  At all.

https://weathermodificationhistory.com/

Assad has been busing the irredeemable mostly foreign mercenaries known as 'ISIS' up to Idlib for a while now.  Pretty obviously it is a consolidation to save barrel bombs when the hammer falls.

I suspect that the UN will bend over backward to get these 'refugees' a home in Europe for some more of that good old 'multiculturalism'.  It will be interesting to see how the UN and EU will be marketing these desperate fighters and their families to the local population.

Lots of these folks moved themselves and their families to Syria which was marketed as the new caliphate where they could do all the things radical Muslims have been trained (by the U.S. state department mostly) to love.  Stoning women who show their face, throwing queers off buildings, beheading apostates, etc, etc.  A true paradise in their twisted view of the world.