If God has forgiven all of the sins that we have made,who are you not to forgive,words has been spoken and its up to you if you are going to continue the hate. Giving second chances to people who clearly know they're in the wrong is not why people 'forgive'. You wouldn't acquit a thief that has already stolen from many people. You wouldn't 'forgive' a ponzi operator that has already scammed twice before their most recent project. Don't try to appeal to emotion. |
|
|
|
|
I actually do think that these ratings are unwarranted unless there's a suitable reference attached.
When I discovered an alt ring of users that have the prefix 'cripto' I was careful not to tag people who are innocent. There's always the chance of collision with identification via username thus I believe we should give the benefit of the doubt to anyone if there is no sufficient evidence.
|
|
|
|
14.1. Having more than 2 accounts is strictly forbidden(by person/IP/house/family).
Does it make any sense to you now ? I see that you know the rules, but if having 2 accounts is the main problem just check it out:   Just took this printscreen. So if it's a rule to be applied it should be applied to everyone, even more the mods, isn't it? But this is not my complain... More than 2 accounts. Meaning you can have up to two, so the rule doesn't apply to either you or the moderator. |
|
|
|
-snip- Have all aTriz threads had the involvement of another ALU member? If not, then is there not the possibility that they can manage the campaign on their own, separate of ALU?
Your reply seems a little bit like selection bias. |
|
|
|
|
1, a
payment coming shortly
edit: dc397802e630a261a44f6bb0b74717320d072c246ac32aea6a66df8803e4bdf0
|
|
|
|
|
Locking for review. Don't know when I'll be done, but I will post an update once I am.
|
|
|
|
@moderators. -snip- Moderators don't deal with anything in the trust system. Scams are not moderated. Trust is not moderated. The only thing moderators cover is anything that violates the rules (i.e. spam, wrong section, explicitly illegal content). The aTriz case is indirectly linked to Lauda. |
|
|
|
-snip- The secret question is usually the last thing that people will resort to when they have lost their password. With an email, you can retrieve the password through a simple reset. When a user doesn't have an email/loses their email wouldn't it make sense to lock an account for verification if they reset using the secret question? Especially considering the fact that the answer is usually far less secure than passwords. |
|
|
|
I wrote above that I am ready to incur responsibility The consequence was the ban. Why did you ever think that copying and pasting content was good? Plagiarism is a huge deal, everywhere. So why wouldn't it be the same here? |
|
|
|
The information for everyone that has posted all required parts of the report already has been updated on the spreadsheet. Please don't hesitate to let me know if there are any problems.  |
|
|
|
|
The campaign is now closed for new participants*. Any reports by people who are NOT on the spreadsheet will not be paid for!
*if there are any participants with more than 20,000 real followers, please PM me and you may be accepted.
|
|
|
|
 TheFoxBot's Twitter Campaign is on pause!
REQUIREMENTSParticipants must have 10000+ real followers No alt accounts in the campaign No negative trust. You must follow thefoxbot on Twitter Retweet and like three of thefoxbot's tweets every week Post your own tweet linking the website ( http://thefoxbot.com) + your own text Post your own tweet linking the ANN thread ( https://bitly.com/2Ffgkpa) + your own text There is a maximum of two retweet/tweets per 24 hours. Do not spam your tweets.
PAYOUTSBy number of real Twitter followers 10K - 25K: 0.001 BTC / week 25K - 100K: 0.0015 BTC / week 100K+: 0.0020 BTC / week Payouts will be done on Tuesday. The cutoff date for tweets is 23:59 UTC on Monday.I am escrowing this campaign. Spreadsheet: [https://goo.gl/ZYVT2H]Once the campaign is CFNP, only those on the spreadsheet will receive payouts.
REPORT FORMATPlease keep consecutive reports on one post and edit in updates.Twitter Account Link:
Twitter Audit Link:
Followers:
Week # [hr]
Retweet #1:
Retweet #2:
Retweet #3:
Site Tweet:
ANN Tweet:
BTC Address:
Rules are subject to change. I will post a reply if/when they change! |
|
|
|
Good stuff actmyname, hopefully people will see the value that you add if they consider hiring you. I know that I would never hesitate! Thanks! Much appreciated feedback. Bump—up to the top you go.
I am also available on Telegram: @actmyname |
|
|
|
|
If there is no reason associated with the ban then it is possible that you were banned for copying and pasting content. Can you confirm this?
|
|
|
|
|
Do another video, this time with you not having the tab pre-loaded. There can be clientside changes that manipulate the data on the page. By accessing the page after the beginning of the video, it creates more legitimacy.
|
|
|
|
Atriz is on new account, it is confirmed.
People who has details of his new account : 1. hampuz 2. Lauda Confirmed how? Blanket statements are never good. Provide evidence or fuck off. Certainly, if you know this there should be 3. cunicula |
|
|
|
This forum is open for all no restriction on newcomer or a Hero Member. There are no designated sections for high rank members where newbies can't access. Except for Investigations and Ivory Tower, of which the latter was made because of the spam. If there were no spam, the serious discussion board wouldn't have been made. And if people didn't care so much about ranking up (to participate in signature campaigns), the merit system wouldn't have been made. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that merit is not at present a useful instrument for regulating this forum. Why do users want to rank up? To join signature campaigns. Merit limits that. In turn, limiting the number of spammers. I don't see a problem. If someone is going to buy merit then they're wasting their money if they're going to spam and get banned. If they don't spam, then good! Goal accomplished. |
|
|
|
No flashy images or fancy formatting. To those interested in starting a genuine signature/twitter/facebook/etc campaign: I have a zero tolerance policy for spammers. If you're looking for a manager that will only accept the highest-quality members and posts to your campaign, I can offer my services. Users that I have already tagged as a spammer will be barred from all signature campaigns. I check post quality by inspecting both the context and content of the reply to determine if it is satisfactory. This is what I have done in my own merit giveaway thread which had very strict conditions. User counts can range from up to ~100, as an estimate (inquire for details) I have over 50,000 good reports on the forum and I thoroughly determine post quality using various criteria (e.g. context of thread, post times) to ensure the user is not spamming. Please PM or reply below for inquiries. I can also be reached on Telegram via @actmyname | Self-moderated to prevent spam. |
|
|
|
Go to your profile information page. Turn on post count. Now you have merit and the number of posts. Divide.
What's the point of adding this in? It's not a good quantifier of post quality. Though unfortunate, a user may not receive as much merit as they deserve. Or they may receive more merit than they deserve (e.g. peloso meriting me) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
