You are delusional lol.
This is not helpful. Instead, state your case with reference material so we all learn. |
|
|
|
You appear to be a typical deluded Marxist.
This is exactly what I mean. Everyone is a Marxist to you. Doesn't make your long cryptic posts any more sympathetic. Care to tailor your message to the world for the 'stupid people' or not? That's the question. I certainly hope so. I learn more from people who think outside the box (even if a bit crazy or 'off the path') than people that stick to common wisdom. I just wish you drop the superiority thing. |
|
|
|
What's your obsession with Marxism?
Thanks for exemplifying my point about diligence. You're hiding. |
|
|
|
If FTC is recovering then all coins will  I noticed that major alts are really slipping now (LTC, Peercoin, etc). This is the time to be bold and brave. |
|
|
|
Plan still moving ahead.  From Feb 2015  Nothing changed. The waiting is the hardest part  |
|
|
|
|
What's your obsession with Marxism?
|
|
|
|
|
PPC is a bit weak vs LTC lately. I take it as an opportunity to load up some extra PPC.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope to see Guldencoin on the streets tomorrow. If so, I will make sure to upload a few photos.
|
|
|
|
Vircurex doesnt work for me. They froze my balance since last year.
I have more than 10+ BTC on their website which are frozen. If I were you, I would be very careful when dealing with Vircurex.
I remember that this was about a BTC hack that cost Vircurex some Bitcoins. Other currencies were not affected and only Bitcoin accounts were frozen. |
|
|
|
|
This is becoming HyperTiger.
|
|
|
|
Sitting tight is the thing you need, which most lack.
"The waiting is the hardest part" - Tom Petty |
|
|
|
Amazing how some people think they understand economics & monetary systems by reading a little bit about Austrian economics.
Perhaps because it makes sense. |
|
|
|
Someone please send my rebuttal to that obnoxious, pompous, Dunning-Kruger boomer Denninger. I sure as hell won't register on his board since I like a 'free' environment. Nevertheless, I am intrigued by the debate insofar it regards the creation of non-backed credit. I have not seen this point refuted or disassembled by either you or Armstrong. I find that strange, since the point is very easy to grasp. If someone can create unbacked credit that (i) functions as money but (ii) does nothing to enhance society (Denninger uses the example of using credit to either build productive assets or not), why allow for it? If I understand Denninger correctly, he merely opposes banks creating credit that is not backed by either collateral or the bank's own capital. The rebuttal of Armstong is, well ... let's stay honest .... appalling. I Iearned nothing from Armstrong on this point. Can't he write a simple rebuttal that makes sense? In the end, you can't argue maths. The only question is which maths apply But I won't burn my fingers on this topic and let the Behemoths fight it out. |
|
|
|
The Dutch go for Guldencoin But seriously, mobile payments have yet to arrive big time in the Netherlands. Most payments are done by PIN or (online) iDeal. There is not much friction that would have people rush to the solution of GuldencoinBitcoin. A catalyst could be a major bank failure with depositor losses or loss of faith in fiat (NIRP?). |
|
|
|
This is weird. Where is the volume? We should be troll central by now as well. Instead ChartBuddy is ruling Da House.
We are slowly getting to desperation. Best time to buy is when Chart Buddy rules the pages. |
|
|
|
Popper (Karl, that is) has some amazing quotes attributed to him: Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve.
Our knowledge can only be finite, while our ignorance must necessarily be infinite.
Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification.
Litmus test: the book mentioning bitcointalk.org or not....  |
|
|
|
|
It is pretty normal to have a system of law providing for protection of parties that acquired rights to an asset before that asset was transferred to an acquiror and, as a deviation, rule out such protection in case of paper money. However, also bearer paper could be excluded from protection, thus not hindering ordinary commerce and the exchange of certain paper promises that require absolute faith in their value to function. I would think all sophisticated law systems provide for this in a certain manner.
Perhaps Bitcoin can qualify as a bearer right (the owner is unknown until the owner identifies himself as 'owner' and the user needs to know for sure that he can access/use his Bitcoins for the system to work). It would make absolute sense to deem Bitcoin included in a definition or bearer paper.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
