You are right. That's the problem
|
|
|
The main issue with default client is it merges wallet w/ back end.
IMHO bitcoind should exist as a silent headless service running 24/7 acting as node. A client (satoshi client or any client) would simply launch on demand, decrypt wallet (as needed), and get balance/confirmation updates from bitcoind or submit new transactions to bitcoind with no lag or delay.
The tight coupling of blockchain functionality and wallet functionality is not optimal.
+1
|
|
|
Lol vatican surviving without banks? They HAVE a bank, they aren't simply an entity, they own a tons of buildings, lands etc etc in Italy and as i said they receive like 1 billion euro each year from Italy (no, not joking), add all the private things they have (hotels, restaurants, private schools etc etc) and you have a huge organization very rich. And with tons of reduced tax advantages cause "but it's a religious thing, why we should pay taxes?" I suppose that god is indeed very powerful if such things happen
|
|
|
alright thanks.
about the payment, is it send directly to my wallet? i mean, i didnt put an address for it anyway, like on deepbit or other pools. Thats what im unsure about.
Yuo, p2pool get the address from the bitcoin client. If you notice when you start p2pool it tell you an address As for shares, 1 p2pool share is like 600 difficulty 1 shares, so, be patient.
|
|
|
Lol, ethic of solidariety and the vatican
Vatican is rich and selfish, of course they want to focus the power in their hands. And if you don't do what they say, you go to hell
|
|
|
But it's like in some videogames, if you are big you have high inefficiency cost and new units and researches cost more!!!
|
|
|
We know that a gpu client exist and now everyone has it. This means that someone made it and chances are he (and maybe an inner circle) used it for himself before releasing it. So of course i am not sure it's ArtForz, maybe someone else. When discussions about litecoin, scrypt and gpu appeared, the reason about why it would sucks on gpu was about memory too slow but it's clear that the reason was happily false. Now, the scrypt thing wasn't topsecret, everyone had access to it, but of course almost no one cared about making a GPU client But someone did and someone kept telling us that "nono don't worry, there is no gpu client, it's impossible" Then we have someone telling us like "a gpu client? oh it would give like 9khash" Meanwhile someone was happily GPU mining. Sure, it was our fault, after all there is a sticky thread in the newbie forum that says TRUST NO ONE. Next time we will better try to make our gpu client instead of relying on others There is no GPU client
|
|
|
You simply leave a core free. Nothing more to do. Just leave a core free, if you have 8 core then tell the CPU miner to use 7 cores. If you run BOINC, well, same, tell it to use 7 cores.
|
|
|
Seeing that a GPU client for Litecoin indeed exist and work perfectly, i think that yes, someone made that client and kept it in an inner circle and mined shitload of litecoins with GPU before the client went public. I dunno if it's ArtForz or someone else, probably him given his knowledge and relation with Litecoin.
So i suppose that scenario 2 is what really happened.
But saying that Litecoin is a scam? No. The truth is that we have all been idiots mining with CPU and trusting someone. So yes, ArtForz or someone else lied and we happily believed him like sheeps.
|
|
|
Abort abort!
There is a GPU client on Litecoin now too, CPU mining on it is pretty much pointless now
|
|
|
It works!
With my 6950 i make like 390khash/s
Problem: computer is more or less unusable, like 0.1 FPS. But it works.
|
|
|
I use BOINC and having a quadcore i give 3 cores to BOINC and leave one free for mining. Otherwise the same problem happens
Of course 1 core is enough to feed every GPU you have, even if you have 8 GPU 1 core is more than enough
|
|
|
http://pool-x.eu/gettingstartedJust download the 64bit version and run it. And if you want use Pool-x as a pool. @nothing: that is a bitcoin miner. And, indeed, 13Mhash/s using 8 core is wasting power...
|
|
|
Nothing wrong, just the CPU miner use the CPU that, being busy, can't feed the GPU the data to make GPU miner work
So, GPU miner mhash happily drop.
Solution? Leave a free core for the GPU miner. Are they multi-core CPU? If for example you have a quadcore you can use 3 core for cpu mining and leave the fourth one idle, so the GPU miner will have a free core able to feed him
Sure, the fourth core will always be at like 0-1% of activity, but well, as you noticed, if you use it for CPU mining, it simply can't feed the GPU
|
|
|
Mining with CPU is, as i said, just wasting time and power.
You can try mining Litecoins with CPU and trade them for bitcoins, it's a much better way to use your CPU.
|
|
|
No GPU Excuse me but with what do you want to mine? Miners run on GPU, no GPU=you can't mine Of course they say no OpenCL.dll, you have no GPU Sure, you "can" mine with your CPU but it is just wasting power and time
|
|
|
|