Like genital mutilation?  Or just genital mutilation when a Rabbi infects a kid with herpes by sucking it's bleeding cock?

May be more applicable to the meta board, but...

I wonder if in an algorithmic manner it would work to require initial posts to be lengthy, complex, and coherent.  A genuine and interested user could take the time to produce a couple of these even if he/she were limited to cell phone or whatever.

The goal would be to reduce some of the 10 word no-quote content from new users.  I've been trying for years to determine if some of these are AI bots or not and have not come to any conclusion.  One way or another the value they add seems negligible at best and the effort to police them up must be significant.

A mortal with a broom will not keep up with a bot-farm, or even vast swarms of ankle-bitter bio-bots.  Will eventually lose intterest and walk away in frustration.  Would be nice to figure out an automated way of dealing with this surface level crust.

'Full spectrum domination' of what us goyim say on the internet is not yet a thing.  Not on this site.  Yet.

--- Again:

May be true, but how many of those attacks were organized in some manner by Zionist centric entities and funded by global banking cartels and/or American tax dollars?  I'd estimate upwards of 90% off-hand.

  "By way of deception thou shalt do war."

The above is supposed to be the motto of the Israeli Mossad for those who do not know.

I think when brand new members come to this thread, which is obviously geared toward fomenting anti-Muslim sentiment, there is a good chance that they are bots and/or part of a pretty common family of psychological operations.  Most such operations are 'Jewish' in nature.  'Jews' being so clever and all.

May be true, but how many of those attacks were organized in some manner by Zionist centric entities and funded by global banking cartels and/or American tax dollars?  I'd estimate upwards of 90% off-hand.

  "By way of deception thou shalt do war."

Yet another primitive AI bot???

We in America learn how to 'hold and direct', and other common sense things, from our older family members most of the time.  When that is not possible, the basics of using a firearm are not exactly rocket science.  The mechanics of operating an automobile are quite a lot more complex, and failures to follow common-sense guidelines are every bit as lethal.  Demonstrably.

Total bull.  If anything they'll develop even less 'empathy' than the vestigial amount of empathy that they might have.  The 'game' of managing the 'useless eater' classes for maximum exploitation will be even more of a 'virtual world' for these creeps.

Far down the pyramid there will be middle managers who may have a typical amount of empathy, but this type of 'normal' degrees of humanity is totally incompatible with performance in the higher ranks of power.  Again, 'technology' will make the situation worse not better.

Some research I've been reading describes the methods whereby the 'elite' put a great deal of effort into well honed methods of killing off empathy in their own children's very early years when the mind is still quite malleable.  Nasty stuff, but I'm only 50/50 on whether there is substance to some of these tales.  Some circumstantial evidence indicates to me that there could be, and it does seem to be the case that leadership placements do have a fairly strong familial basis even to this day in supposedly 'democratic' forms of government.

Limiting civilian ownership of guns is motivated almost exclusively by very powerful people who long ago obtained immense wealth and have only grown it since.  Money being no object, the operation is well funded through their media holdings, control of education, etc and don't lack for resources.  One of the most visible organs of these people is the United Nations, and this entity is front and center in a lot of the active push to dis-arm all civilians in all nations although in order to see it clearly it takes enough effort to lift a very thin curtain.

99% of the gun-grabbers are nothing more than well-meaning (and innumerate) dups who've been adequatly conditioned...and in some cases over-conditioned.  Not bad people; just brainwashed.

The links from ~local_flow are classic propaganda from the aforementioned.  I've seen it time and time again.  Almost every other post on this thread sounds the same and comes right out of prescribed curriculum.

I quoted ~swami74' because this is one flavor of propaganda I hear from some who claim to be Aussies.  Others tell a very different story.  A fair number of them warn Americans to not let what happened to them happen to us.  I take their warnings to heart.

With the resources at the disposal of the gun-grabbers at the top of the pyramid, they know for sure that they will end up in control of the paramilitaries.  Consequently the opposite 'messaging' is promoted for this group (often labeled 'police and military' although private security firms also will be included.)  Police and other government operators are to have a monopoly on the use of force so they not only have as many guns as they want, but also increasingly military technology to employ against civilians.  Most alarming to me, things are being set up such that the police forces in particular 'self-fund' through 'civil asset forfeiture' which is simply flat out robbery through armed force.  There are a variety of examples of this happening fairly blatantly already which can be seen on youtube and the like.

As a 'sanity check', I often ask myself:

  "OK, a decade or two on we see a pretty awful scenario as some anticipate (in this case, 'authorities' abusing their
  monopoly on use of force.)  In looking back, were there warning signs?  Could we have seen this coming?"

My answer here is "Oh hell yeah!"  In fact it would be hard to miss, especially when observing how authorities tend to operate in most other countries around the world where monopolization of force in the hands of 'leadership' is more well developed.

In my area where there is only a tiny police presence and a great majority of households are armed, we see nearly no violent crime.  We have a ton of meth-heads and kids running around looking for targets of opportunity to steal from (e.g., people on vacation, at church, etc) but it's unusual to have a confrontational robbery and it's usually and accident on the part of the perp when it does happen.  The net impact of property crime in my area is that neighbors get to know one another and look out for one another.  That makes for a more enjoyable life generally in my experience.

In my area a vast majority of the creepy murders and what-not are tweaker-on-tweaker crime (not many ethnic minorities here.)  These people generally cannot legally own firearms but of course that doesn't stop them.  And they do one another in with a hammer half the time anyway.  The benefit of being an atheist rather than a Christian is that I don't have to feel bad when some semi-homeless addict gets high and bashes his friend's head in then stuffs his body in a dumpster around the corner.  And in truth it really doesn't bother me that much.

In contrast to the Bay Area where I lived off and on for a decade and a half, and which has very strict gun control laws making a criminal feel safe that he wasn't going to get his ass shot by the would-be victim, there were a lot more problems with confrontational crime.  Of course the population density was a lot higher so it's apples-n-oranges to a degree,  Whatever the case, I like life vastly better in the place where law abiding citizens can protect themselves without a lot of government interference.

Not sure if you are being sarcastic and playing to my various demonstrated paranoia or not.  Whatever the case, I am currently of the opinion that certain of the dynamics you describe are 'a thing', but in somewhat more nuanced ways.  I would council to people of my basic mindset to keep their mouths shut more than I am willing to do, and keep their thoughts and plans to themselves more.  It's to late for me.

If there is anything to the suggestion about the 'parasitic classes', and again I believe that there is and that it is a strong hypothesis about the driving force behind such operations as dis-arming the general citizenry worldwide, then it's a ginger operation to bring the hammer down.  As Yuri Bezmenov says, 'when to boot crushes their balls _then_ they will understand, but not before.'  When everyone knows someone who knows someone who's been fucked over there will be an awakening and then a new phase of the games begin.  That's my prophesy.


In my current research of history, the 'red army' started out on the wrong side (under Trotsky (born 'Bronstein')) and were more of the problem than the solution throughout their existence.  Seems to me that NATO took over for them in their original role.

Sweet!

For my part, I've now got pretty much every piece I need and want at the moment.  The only thing I have interest in any more would be for 'investment' purposes.  Good trading stock under some potential future scenarios.  If so, I'd focus on the types of weapons that average people would need for basic defense of home and family.

People who want to protect their families but got shut out by the gun-grabber's manipulation of the markets could need these types of weapons (and ammo) badly and it could mean the difference between life and death for them.  If my whole community has defensive weapons (and for the most part they do) then I personally am more safe.

Trump may be making it 'rain gold' in Israel, but it ain't happening at my place here in the good old USA.  Frankly, except for the very welcome screwing of the EPA, I've not seen much of anything change.  Lot of talk and a lot of excuses about the mean old 'deep state' while he stuffs his cabinet full of them.

Ya, just like the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto kept 'initiating the attacks' on those poor poor Nazis who just wanted peace and tranquility and justice for all.

What I have realized is that "The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you".  Actually, I didn't realize it.  Have run across it time and time again on the internets.  Supposedly it's an old Polish proverb, but man-o-man does it fit.

'Burnt offerings 2.0'(tm)?

Here is a unique perspective which I will relate although it is simply in the 'interesting hypothesis' category for me until much further information comes in:

The so-called 'Jews' were supposed to have been 'banished' to Babylon as a punishment in way-back times, but some of them took a liking to it and to the customs of the locals.  In the end, more of the current dogma of modern-day Judaism developed in that part of the world than in Judea, and indeed, there have been long-running power and philosophical struggles between the Jews from Babylon and those of Judea (Israel area.)

The Jews today have almost universally adopted the 'Babylonian Talmud.'  Why?  I suggest flexibility.

The Judea-ish Talmud was boring (in the Christian model.)  It was of the style 'Don't rape your daughter.  Period.'

The Babylonian Talmud was more of the style 'What would happen if one raped his daughter???'  Then there was a ton of discussion about the pros and cons of raping your daughter.  Different 'rabbinical scholars' can pick and choose which arguments make sense to them, and a practitioner of Judaism can pick and choose his Rabbi and/or interpretation of the assorted texts.  Handy for a guy like Woody Allen to would like to rape his daughter so much that he did so.  Or a guy who just entertains the thought as Trump hinted at.

When the Khazars of Central Asia decided to adopt Judaism as the state religion, the Babylonian variant was the most accessible.  So, from the start, the Judea variant was a distant fork which were at best a source of lingering hassles.  These people were to become the Ashkenazi who formed the State of Israel in the wake of WW-II and dominate it's politics.  The 'Sephardi' are considered stupid quasi-goyim and second-class citizens.  Mostly useful for blaming problems on.

Is it possible that the Likudnics view Judea as just a stepping stone back to Babylon?  Could that be why Iran, and it's destruction, is such a source of interest to them and why they had their vassal state of the U.S. do Iraq first?  Would the 'biblical' destruction of Palestine yet again kill two birds with one stone for these folks?

A basic thesis that I am working on is that there are two basic power groups of critical importance over the last half century.  They are related in certain core philosophical under-pinnings which inform some of their behaviors.  Some of these are esoteric and could be called 'Luciferian', but that confuses the issue more than it helps.

Group-1 would be variously known as 'communists' in short-hand, though Marxism is just a marketing term for totalitarian monetary system control which is not necessarily based on usury as long as more effective and fined grained control is practicable.  This group is most visibly represented by the United Nations these days.

Group-2 would be Zionists and included the Nazi regime when there was a battle against the commies for the soul of post WW-! Germany.  These people are more fixated on usury as the foundation of their power and favor monetary systems built upon it.  This group is most visibly represented by the Rothschild banking cabal these days.

These two basic groups are more friends than enemies and scratch one-another's backs more than they duke it out.  For example, Group-1 is happy to supply wars which are the source of immense profits for group-2,...though of course group-1 takes a healthy cut of the proceeds.

Group-1 has been one winning streak due in part to the inherent failure modes which are profitable to group-2 such as the great depression.  Plus, the communist marketing material is a good seller in most 'natural' distribution-of-wealth states.

The struggles between group-1 and group-2 are likely to get more serious as we reach the end of the USD monetary system and need a re-set of some sort.

With Trump, group-2 has the reigns.

A favorable outcome for the U.S. would be to use the Trump period to cause real damage to our relationship with group-1.  To this end, any real damage to the United Nations and NATO would be a great thing as long as it isn't just a stage show.  It is key, though, that Americans develop an understanding of what the United Nations is all about and don't 'spring back' when Trump is gone.

Part-B of a favorable move would be the American people also gaining and understanding of Group-2.  One cannot help but be shocked and disgusted by what this group stands for which makes me consider them a weaker enemy.

I'd like to see a more walled off United States which focuses on our own problems and creating a good society for our people.  One where we serve a useful purpose as a model that others may try to emulate if they wish, and we 'help' others outside of our country only when asked and only in a genuine way not driven by a goal of exploitation.

Of all of the monetary system choices, I like the 'usurous debt-backed' system the best in spite of it's multitude of problems BUT one with 'extreme transparency' and with the profits accruing to a (much smaller) state rather than to a handful of private banking interests.  With such a thing, and without massive military expenditures to try to rule over an empire and 'support' our supposed 'friends' in the promised land, we may well find that taxes and/or deficit spending are not even necessary in order to support a healthy and pleasant society.


edit: minor correction in group specifiers.

Ya, but as I always said, I never gave the guy more than even odds of being 'for real' and serious about any of his rhetoric.

I did get genuinely chumped in a certain way and it is this:  Almost without exception, the complaints against Trump from my friends and family and lots of people on this board were maddeningly inane.  The simple reason for this is that most people have access only to the mainstream media and all they can do is repeat whatever nonsense is spewed there.  These are not bad people in some sinister plot.  Just 'tarded.  The trouble is that idiocy is like a red flag to a bull for a guy like me who cannot keep his mouth shut.  I was repeated baited into 'defending' Trump.

I also mis-calculated how much the media was on Trump's side.  I thought the hatred was genuine.  It probably is was from the middle and lower classes in the MSM, and that is one of the reasons why I was in error in my estimates.  But these middle echelon folks don't matter.  They have higher up editors and owners above them who guide their work product.  In retrospect (thanks to the work of former Trump tentative supporters largely) we now see how Wilbur Ross of Rothschild & Cie is the guy who bailed Trump out to the tune of a $B and now own his ass.  Any 'journalist' could have dug up this actual real info during the time when they were hammering Trump for stupid things.  If they did, it didn't get through.

Funny thing is that even had I know via documented research about Trumps bailout by the Rothschilds I still would have supported the guy over Clinton.  The debt-based monetary system owners are going to be possible to beat for a few reasons  Hillary was more aligned with the U.N.-ish crowd who want to switch to a totalitarian technocracy as a monetary system (marketed as Socialism and/or Communism.)  That group is more camouflaged and psychologically embedded (having run the educational system for 50+ years now.)  A much tougher enemy...though they are certain to be back stirring up trouble.

Trump is regarded as the reincarnation of King Cyrus by some in Israel and other Jews not currently residing in 'the promised land'.  Especially the religious fundamentalist of which there are plenty.  It's perfectly possible that being regarded as the 'greatest leader' by this class is what is most important to him.  His daughter and son-in-law are of this sect.

I keep meaning to buy one of the coins with Trump merged with King Cyrus.  They are sold to support setup for the Third Temple in Jerusalem from which God's Chosen are supposed to rule the world.  Cost $50 per coin.  I'd like to have one as a soveneer in much the same way as I'd like to have a $1x10^9 Zimbabwe bill.

Trump has a very steep hill to climb to get back in my good graces...and I actually supported him with money during the election (when shit-head Zionist shill and liar Alex Jones falsely reported that Trump had rejected Adelson's money...and when he was running against baby-eater Clinton...)

If I were asked in the poll, my response would be a strong-negative.  It's hard to climb back from falsely claiming that Assad did a gas attack and launching missiles based on this lie.  Similarly, the depressingly few decent people he actually hired have been dismissed and replaced by Israel-first traitors like Bolton.  Trump would have to do a 180 and stay the course for several years before I could develop any confidence in him.

The depressing thing is that Trump handlers have an absurd strategy which is actually working.  They pump this propaganda that Trump is trying to do the right thing, but the 'deep state' is just to strong.  What a load of bullshit.

Here's what I expect Trump to do slowly over time...all the while getting millions of idiots believing he is trying soooo hard to do the opposite:  By happenstance these are all programs spearheaded by the (((chosen people))).

  - Plenty of 'migrants' from the genuinely harmful elements from around the world, but mostly from central and South America in our case.  Europe gets the scum chased out of the Middle East and Africa.

  - More gun restrictions making it more difficult for citizens to defend themselves.

  - More vaccinations keeping the rates of autism and costly medical conditions high and growing.

  - A fucked-up medical system geared toward making sure that people lose anything they've accumulated over their life either before they die or immediately afterwards.

  - More wars (and in some cases like Yemen actual genocide) all over the world, but especially in areas that are important to Israel.

  - Anything Israel demands.

The goal for these people is to saddle the U.S. with so many internal problems that we won't be a competitor on the global stage when the next major power shift happens.  We are nearly milked dry and hopelessly in debt at this time and our days of useful service to our masters in Jerusalem are nearing the end anyway so it's no loss.  And when peeps open their eyes and see how we've been used like a bitch there will be some strong resentment.  Some in Israel are hoping that the backlash is so strong that many Jews will be compelled 'make Aliya' and 'return home'...but mostly just the rich ones.  To the ovens for the poor ones just like in Nazi Germany.  Zionists could not care less about those jews and never have.

Israel invade Iran?  Lol!  They got creamed by Hezbollah last time they strapped on a pair of boots.  They may try to get their other major client state (the U.S.) to invade, but more and more "the goy know" what's up with these slimy creeps.

As for nuclear weapons, Israel has whatever the U.S. has since we have so many dual-loyalty Israel-first traitors running the country.  With a 'Samson Option' size doesn't matter all that much.  Israel just need to be able target London, Paris, Washington, Moscow, etc, and their 200-300 in their direct control is good enough for that.


Iran knows they'll get nuked by USRael at the first convenience.  The only realistic counter-play is retaliatory.  They need to split up and disperse themselves across Lebanon and Syria.  That way when Tehran disappears in a tactical nuke strike there will be enough left over forces to bum-rush Israel and get some pay-back.

I wish the Iranian people luck, but I don't really trust their government.  They have their fair of Zionist crypto-jews infecting their leadership as well I would suspect.  I don't rule out that Israel, the U.S., Russia, and Iran are actors playing a stage show under the same director.  Turkey and Saudi are to nauseating to think about.

If Iran (or any other country) comes up with a hard-money system, and especially one which combines 'real' crypt-currency such as Bitcoin with gold or resource backing, I'd look toward investing in it.  I'm not holding my breath.  I expect all governments to 'embrace crypto', but variants from Goldman-Sachs where the user's key is escrowed (to fight terrorism you know) and/or where it can only be supported by large corporate entities (like Hearn and Andressen tried to arrange for Bitcoin.)

Finally got around to getting and installing a gun safe.  Upon gathering all of my guns and ammo from here and there, I'm thinking "Damn...maybe I am a gun loon!"

What actually happened mostly is that there have been various efforts to dis-arm the population and it's annoyed me and 'triggered' me to buy certain guns just to give the gun-grabbers the finger.  This was a big factor in getting a 5.56 recently.  I also have legacy firearms obtained as gifts in my childhood and inherited from deceased family and what-not.

Also, various kinds of ammo have gone through extended periods of shortage.  Notably 357 mag and 22 lr.  When they did become available I bought some.  Then I forgot that I had and bought some more.  Rinse/repeat.  Only when collecting it all to one place did I realize how much I had.  Anyway, it's actually a fairly good performing speculative play although that was not my intention.  Not as good of a speculative play as Bitcoin though.