Real money (that can't be withdrawn) rather than demo actually makes some sense, but I am not sure how trustworthy this is. 
I guess it's trading competition with prizes for 1st, 2nd and 3rd best traders, and the exchange provides "free" real $1000 for each trading participant. 
Registration should be closed by now.

Those^ problems could very well be handled in decentralized structure.
In my opinion, most public things shouldn't be centralized in the first place. Centralization encourages secrecy, corruption,  rule/law breaking, manipulation, etc.
Once your business begins to serve the public, the public has the right to know how things they consume are handled, made or produced. You can't just trust blindly as far as human is concerned.   In an ideal situation, food companies/businesses for example would be very transparent and decentralized. They can't be really transparent if they operate in centralized manner.

Ofcourse. Not sure it's a good idea to keep values longterm in centralized stablecoins. I really think the centralized ones shouldnt exist in isolation as long people's money is involved. They should be well regulated by the government that owns the currency they're backed by or they could exist in well decentralized form and get "regulated or governed" by decentralized communities.

I honestly don't believe in or stick to any particular worldly ideology. What matters to me is what is right. We could find flaws in the above ideologies or others that aren't mentioned here. Whatever works, and is really right/safe is acceptable to me.
However, I think in all the ideologies, there could be some that are abit closer to the truth, but get spoilt by mistake, errors, disadvantages etc.
 We need something very good or close to perfection. I believe we can achieve perfection with the help of our CREATOR.
Truely decentralized system would behave more like a hard-to-kill living thing/being(unless destroyed by GOD)... that's one of the reasons I like it alot.

Not sure I have heard of both coins/tokens before. 
If you have done a proper research on both and not convinced, then it's probably better to just avoid them.
Unfortunately we don't have a generally accepted standards for ranking cryptos yet. An affordable and proper ranking system could make things more difficult for substandard/scam projects. If they don't get reviewed and ranked, people would be more careful using them.

Or the "tricks" shouldn't be allowed in the first place...  should probably be allowed for players/bettors who are experienced and consistently profitable. I guess the casinos could even turn off the tricks for the good bettors to prevent them from feeling too relaxed and winning too much

The Racing sounds Interesting.
I guess you could call that some sort of cryptocurrency trading? Seen similar game on this forum in the past, but in fiat currencies and with virtual horses. I wonder who owns the cryptocoins for fueling the cars? The players or just "fake" cryptocoins depending on real crypto prices?

I think the current systems are not that very efficient and sustainable, but that is what most people keep running to even with the evidence that they are not so reliable.. There has to be systemic/structural changes. People should be able to fend for themselves with farming and creating of other basic things. But you can't easily do this in the current city structures. I honestly wouldn't build cities/towns without taking individual farming in account.

Exactly!
In regards to neutrality, I think it is technically correct, though anyone who takes advantage of the network neutrality or permissionless/trustless feature by consistently and deliberately breaking network rules could
be suspended, avoided by many due to bad reputation or even banned. I think the suspension could be lifted(automatically/manually) once the user gains adequate positive reputation or something. Such reputation system has to be fool-proof though for safety reasons.


In regards to Trustlessness...
One of my favorite definition of trustless (trust-is-less or trust-minimized):

A truely decentralized system is basically built to handle or solve trust issue between transacting/trading users in safe manner without preventing them to trade based on their reputations (for example). In my opinion, trust could be further minimized (better automatically) if what is being traded is harmless or safe.

That could be prevented if the right people are put in the right places, and things are done right.
I also think using world economics metrics to guage your success doesn't help much. In my opinion, there tend to be conflicts/confusions when strange economic systems that make no sense to people or are against good norms/culture are adopted. What matters in my opinion is that people are happy, satisfied, contented, healthy, moral, good, productive, efficient, etc... And our economic activities basically have to be good for us, the environments, animals, world etc,.
There is also these theories or rumors that some deliberately destroy economies through policies and other immoral/unethical means for selfish reasons. I never believed this in the past.
I believe proper decentralization(through decentralized tech) can solve alot of the above issues.

Interesting.


I wonder why this^ is so.
I guess it doesn't apply in all countries. I don't know much about guidelines for casinos/bettings where I live. People are given most of the things they win from what I can remember.

Funny!

•Probably part of what makes people addicted
•And this
.

Interesting partnership.

But I just wish clubs do this through well decentralized Blockchain companies, or even ask the current one to properly decentralized (if it hasn't done so already) without compromising on speed and efficiency. In my opinion, the clubs stand to gain more by using well decentralized and efficient Blockchain-based companies.

Guess you should include your sample(made by your company) of blockchain-based casinos and what they are capable of, for interested people to go through. Or did you provide them already?
If the samples work to the satisfaction and according to the taste of interested people, they will be more willing to patronize you.

There is a transparent shield or barrier surrounding earth. It completely covers earth. It's like a bubble, and earth is inside the bubble.  It expands like a bubble or pregnancy, and weakens as it expands.
I was made to understand (in vision) that the purpose of the shield is protect humanity against evil force(spiritual satan) up there, but the enemy(satan) seems to be gaining more control of earth as the shield expands and weakens.

 The real reason why it expands and weakens is due to the growing sin on earth. The enemy encourages sin on earth so that it can fully penetrate the shield as it keeps expanding and weakening.


Interestingly, lots of humans(not everyone) are also covered with the shield or bubbles and ours expand and weakens as well as we keep sinning. Anyone with a strong shield is protected from the enemy.



Note: the humans on earth are purposefully being decieved in order to help burst the shield themselves and let the enemy in. The more we sin, the more vulnerable we become.

You sure they are triple six? Currently showing 664(Tokens: 664). I guess something happened to two tokens or i/you got the figure wrong?

In regards to Op automated payment suggestion, guess this is abit close:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SablierHQ
https://sablier.finance

Not sure how safe it's though as I haven't used or properly researched it.

Well, you could suddenly become rich if you win a lottery, sell your inheritance, someone gives you lots of money for free etc. The problem with becoming rich in such manner is whether you deserve it or not, and whether you can grow your new wealth or squander it on things that won't earn you adequate & consistent profits/benefits, things like expensive shoes, cloth, gold chains, house,  cars, phones, watch, etc
Hardwork pays if you work right and are disciplined with your money/business.

Depends on what you mean by quality token. There aren't any decentralized crypto-communities agreed standard for ranking coins/tokens.
Quality tokens in my opinion have to be well decentralized and safe. That should be part of the standard true crypto communities should adopt. Unfortunately very few seem to understand this


I think token listing should be permissionless/trustless. You can then have a different section for decentrally selecting truely quality tokens. There have to be coded community-agreed listing standards that have to be met by a token to get to the section meant for quality tokens.

How about going to places that offer that kind of service with the right VR/AR equipments and pay to bet online instead of the upgrade to expensive hardware? I guess such service are rare or don't exist atall.
Hope the increase level of adrenaline translates to profit so it doesn't turn into something unpleasant

Things are safer in the open spaces like open stadiums.
You could actually control the spectators effectively and in safe manner without them noticing or feeling it. You could use "crowd control stanchions" or "demarcating tapes" around the stadiums. I think those kind of things will have to be put in place and proven to work before matches are approved

In my opinion, it's better to have a seperate phone specifically for storing such values. You just make sure the phone is very secured in different ways, have few apps (secured/trusted ones specifically), I'd uninstal/disable lots of apps I don't trust, and use the phone for accessing just the values(no browsing, chatting, etc). This is a fair and inexpensive way to keep things safe for storing values, I think.
Smart phones aren't that expensive these days.