Muslims in America unite! Become bona-fide Christians. Then, when least expected, strike. Trump will cause the above to happen.  |
|
|
|
Ancient Unsolved Mysteries Of Siberia - A Place Full Of Secrets Тысячи лет легенды и мифы от Уральских гор и древней Сибири говорят что Аркаим не любой обычным местом, где люди живут.
Напротив четыре тысячи лет назад, внезапно, местные жители покинули Аркаим и пустой поселение сожжены.
Что случилось с этими людьми? Были ли идти?
Теперь мы можем добавить загадочные мегалитов, обнаружил Георгий Сидоров в список нераскрытых тайн. Возможно, это было когда-то сайт большое значение для древних потерянных цивилизация, который использовал его для шамана или другие неизвестные цели.
Сколько еще тайн мы будет выявить в Сибири? Только время покажет... Сибирь остается земля, полная тайн. Thousands of years old legends and myths from the region of Ural Mountains and ancient Siberia say that Arkaim is not any ordinary place where people live.
On the contrary, four thousand years ago, the local inhabitants suddenly abandoned Arkaim and the empty settlement burnt.
What happened to these people? Were did the go?
Now, we can add the enigmatic megaliths discovered by Georgy Sidorov to the list of unsolved mysteries. Perhaps this was once a site of great importance to an ancient lost civilization that used it for shamanistic or other unknown purpose.
How many more secrets will we uncover in Siberia? Only time will tell… Siberia remains a land full of secrets. Read more: http://www.messagetoeagle.com/shoriamegaliths.php#ixzz3tfLa9Jk7. Other mysteries there as well.
|
|
|
|
You choose your friends, not the family you're born in.
How do you know you didn't choose the family that you were born into?... just because you forgot it. |
|
|
|
Fuck that, no more westerners should die for these ignorant barbarians.
Nuke the Middle East, start with the House of Saud.
Nuking them would spread radioactivity around all of Europe. Send in the CIA to cause internal conflicts, so that they all destroy themselves. |
|
|
|
Some people can use guns for protections for me opinion or for hunting or other entertaiming things.
But is just stupid that they are people who have gun and do it for bad things.
Yes, I think that sums up the point of this post. The question is, when do we limit guns in government and the military, since it is they who do more bad things to people, using guns, than anyone else does? And who does the limiting of government and the military? There is no answer to these questions... at least not an answer that works. The best idea is to give everyone big, powerful guns and lots of ammo, so that people can all protect themselves, and let nature take its course. People without guns become slaves to people with guns. |
|
|
|
The Last ReelThe Ural Mountains.  The film deals with the mysterious Dyatlov Pass incident in Febuary 1959, when nine experienced hikers were found dead. The story will follows contemporary students on a trip to investigate the mystery.
|
|
|
|
and that is the truth regarding the scriptures. why should we divide people by religion, we are humans . whats in the bible's old testament is copied in quran and only difference they are claiming is that jesus is a prophet and jesus never died on the cross and jesus will come back during the final judgement
This "only difference" is the difference between Heaven and Hell. All people die. The things of this life are useless in themselves, except that one should enjoy the joy (not perverse pleasure) he can get out of them. One loses all of this at death. The point is, how does a person make it into Heaven - eternal life in joy - rather than Hell - eternal death? The difference between Islam and Christianity is, Islam says you do it by good works, Christianity says you receive it as a gift of God through the good works that Jesus did. Big difference there. You do it, as opposed to, Jesus did it for you. You absolutely can't combine these two basics. They are diametrically opposed. |
|
|
|
You forgot to mention liberals an the entertainment industry who are the main filth pushing this decay forward.
While it is true that many liberals have a poor understanding of the real reasons why their "platform" struggles like it does... And most liberals are simple, reasonably humble people in their hearts... The liberal base and core exists to tear down God in the hearts and minds of people. If God can be removed from the hearts and minds of Americans, America will fall... and then the whole world will fall to the devil. Second Thessalonians 2:7 says: For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. I suggest that the "one who now holds it back" is the Constitution of the USA, thereby being the author of the main portions of the Constitution. Was this the writer Thomas Jefferson? When the Constitution of the USA falls, be it caused by evil from within America or without, then the world will fall to evil, moving toward rapid destruction. Second Thessalonians goes on to say: 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming.
9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with the work of Satan displayed in all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders,
10 and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.
11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie
12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness. We are seeing this happen already, all over the world. |
|
|
|
Yes, the new age, third eye stuff, will lead you away from Jesus. It's demonic. Sry guys that I miss so many post here, but now I am here and I would love to rejoin the discussion! The Third Eye is demonic and it's going to lead me away from Jesus? - Mate, please next time before you wrote something, try to buy advise from Google or some book who will explain you what is Yoga, chakras and meditation! Did you ever ask yourself how those people (the Prophets) have a visions about the past and the future? - It's because their 6-th chakra was opened. And do you know what you should do if you want clear and open your chakra? - Pure consciousness, mate!  The prophets of God received info from God without 3rd eye, 6th chakra stuff. They didn't need it. However, if it was involved in any way, it was because God temporarily opened it for them so they could receive messages from Him more clearly. It didn't happen through anything that the prophets, themselves, did. People who practice meditation techniques, and who eat foods to soften and "un-calcify" their pineal gland, so that they can spiritually absorb various vibrations from without, unwittingly open themselves up to demonic control, if they don't have a good foundation in the God of the Bible, and understanding about Him. First, found yourself on God. Next, fill yourself with the understandings in the Bible about God and Jesus salvation. I mean, FILL YOURSELF FULLY AND DEEPLY. Then, if you must monkey with 3rd eye stuff, you might be ready. But realize this. You are opening up yourself to a great struggle where the demons will be constantly trying to drag your soul away from God, into the realms of darkness. And the deeper you go into 3rd eye, the greater will be their tug on you. The struggle won't be fun. It will be very subtle at times. And the only way you will be able to shut it off will be to allow your pineal gland to re-calcify... a thing that you will instinctively know how to keep from happening at that stage, so you won't do it. Your only hope will be through prayer to the God of the Bible, and to Jesus, His Son, that they will hold you and keep you from being taken by the forces of evil. Yoga will only serve to reinforce the demon-strength. Why? Because God-strength comes from outside of you. It isn't within you waiting to be tapped. Since the fall into sin, the strength inside of you tends toward demonism. Using it will not help you against demons. The point? Don't get involved with 3rd eye meditation stuff if you don't want to lose your eternal soul/self. |
|
|
|
Obama is a sleeper cell... Obama is a sleeper cell who's intent is the deliberate destruction of America's culture, economy and national defense. When President Obama speaks, he's speaking not as an American, but as a radical communist Muslim pretending to be an American.
The New York Times, meanwhile, has now chosen to side with ISIS by calling for the complete disarmament of law-abiding American citizens while refusing to call for disarming ISIS terrorists. Between the New York Times, the Washington Post and President Obama, America is now an occupied nation being run by communists and Islamists who continue their insidious push for open borders, race-baited culture wars, transplanting ISIS terrorists into U.S. cities across the nation and destroying the national economy via Obamacare and other punitive mandates that crush small businesses and destroy jobs.
To ultimate goal is the complete destruction of America, replacing democracy and Christianity with communism and radical Islam, where every citizen is a disarmed, propagandized, obedient slave to the state. This is the clear objective of Obama, the mainstream media and the radical left.
"Pay close attention to the closet Muslim in the White House and his speech at 8 pm tonight. Obama's Taqiyya speech will be 110% propaganda to provide cover for his darling religion of bloodthirsty terrorism and hate, Islam," reports the Red Planet Dispatch Blog. "Do you remember not too long ago when he told us all with a straight face that ISIS,ISIL, Islamic State was not Islam?"
Hear the full podcast: Obama is a sleeper cell for radical Islam
To clarify this in great detail, I've recorded a podcast discussing the larger points of why Obama is a sleeper cell:
• Destruction of the U.S. economy and deliberate causing of mass unemployment.
• Destruction of the national defense and the purging of the most capable U.S. military commanders and officers.
• Handing Iran the capability to develop nuclear weapons which will be used for massive destruction in the Middle East (most likely against Israel).
• Attempts by the Obama administration to demonize and criminalize real Americans... the patriots who are the last line of defense against tyranny.
• The ongoing gun confiscation effort by Obama and the mainstream media, all of whom wish to see guns monopolized in the hands of government (and a disarmed, obedient citizenry).
Read more at http://www.naturalnews.com/052221_Obama_sleeper_cell_radical_Islam.html and http://html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/3998371/height/45/width/300/theme/standard/direction/no/autoplay/no/autonext/no/thumbnail/no/preload/no/no_addthis/no/#http://healthrangerreport.com/
|
|
|
|
Criminals are far too clever and still will get hold of guns. There is still too much profit involved in drugs fro the gangs to give up guns. This gun issue has been going on for a long time and it requires a huge change in americas gun loving culture. On a per capita basis the US still has far too many deaths compared to other developed countries. I dont know how this will be solved because people on both sides are not budging? I support regulation on firearms but you can't impose gun control on criminals coz they will always find ways to get guns no matter what. Guns should be banned to an extent to civilians but gun bans won't just work to criminals.
Other developed countries have far too much violent crime compared to America when you exclude exercises of human rights from America's gun deaths (suicide, self-defense). And...the point would be? It actually further supports the right to bear arms. Criminals are criminals for a reason. They don't follow the law. So the left's answer is what here? Make it harder for law abiding citizens to have the ability to defend themselves because the criminals are still going to have the guns. Would have been interesting if they discussed how many of those would have not happened if the victim had a gun to defend themselves. Again the anti gun people prove how failed their logic is. Further, what do smart criminals do? They figure out safe ways to steal from the people. One of the safest ways is to get into government and limit the methods that people can use to protect themselves. Freedom of speech is a great weapon. Government is trying to limit it. But it is very difficult to limit something that people can do easily, all the time. It is much easier trying to limit guns. The difficult thing for us is to keep the criminals in government so that they are all bunched together in one place. Then we need to limit their ability to limit us, without seeming like we are doing such. This way they will think that they are making progress in stealing from us, and we will be able to live our lives reasonably peacefully. |
|
|
|
Theory in science is a by-model and peer-review proved hypothesis... in common language it is "an hypothesis".  My proposal is to be used as a way to simplify the communication and isn't quite new, ancient peoples used "Gods" to explain phenomenons, however those Gods were attached to their scientific knowledge, once we get Zeus or Thor as thunder, Hephaestus for fire and craftsmanship, and so on, which groups too wide areas in a single character, if not putting scientific and unscientific under the same roof. Simplify the communication between the scientific community and the common world is a needed feature, way too many people come up with "that's just a theory" argument exactly due to that communication barrier. In order for a scientist to examine some of the aspects of a theory, he almost needs to treat it as though it were real and factual. This is not a problem as long as the scientist keeps the theory in a fantasy world, detaching it from himself when he is done for the day. However, you can see from the way the media promotes theory among the people, and the way that some scientists have embedded theory into their everyday lives, that it is often the other way around. These scientists live their fantasy as though it were real. They even promote it as reality. As far as using the term "god" to describe certain aspects of nature, why? There are many other terms that can be used. Or, science can invent terms that are new, like they do for all kinds of scientific phenomena already. Why NOT use the word/term god? For the simple reason that it might offend the real God in such a way that He destroys (or at least greatly limits) scientific advancement, like He did for the Romans and Greeks and other nations that made gods out of their science. If you want to keep science, don't align it with the word/term "god," and certainly not "God." |
|
|
|
Tsar BombaSnipped Водородная бомба, также известный как термоядерная бомба, это сильнейшие и наиболее смертоносное оружие когда-либо созданных. Октября 1961 года Советский Союз взорвал Bomba царя, который является самым мощным ядерное оружие когда-либо взорваны с выходом взрыв 50 до 58 мегатонн ТНТ. Во время "холодной войны" атомная гонка вооружений был в полном спринт с обеих сверхдержав разработки достаточно термоядерного оружия уничтожить мир два раза над. Накопление атомного оружия и твердую веру взаимного гарантированного уничтожения стал краеугольным камнем, на котором было сделано все политические и экономические решения. Таким образом можно легко сказать, что атомная гонка вооружений является определяющей краеугольным камнем "холодной войны". The H-bomb, also known as a thermonuclear bomb, is the strongest and most lethal weapon ever created. On October 1961 the Soviet Union detonated the Tsar Bomba which is the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated with a blast yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. During the Cold War the atomic arms race was in full sprint with both super powers developing enough thermonuclear weapons to destroy the world two times over. The buildup of atomic weapons and the firm belief of Mutual Assured destruction became the cornerstone on which every political and economic decision was made. Thus one could easily say the atomic arms race was the defining cornerstone of the Cold War. Нажмите на картинку. Click the Picture. From link.
The nuclear arms race was a truly harrowing experience for both superpowers. Each claimed self-defense as the reason for their continuous buildup of nuclear weapons. The amount of destructive yield increased exponentially, making the threat of nuclear war even more frightening. It would be interesting to see what kind of nuclear arms tests were done on both sides, and compare the “one-upmanship” of the U.S. and the USSR.
Today the the threat comes from NATO encroaching on all fronts with military bases in Europe. Those who tow the USA line, bunch of mofos Just be glad that you can get some of the American freedom that you wouldn't have had otherwise. |
|
|
|
Only a retard would post in this thread. That said, anybody here know when the next Special Olympics is scheduled to take place?
That makes 5 of us, now... retards, I mean.  |
|
|
|
Most but not all who are serious about science show little or no desire for religion.
This is an interesting thought. Before we can look for statistics to back it up, we need to know what a serious scientist thinks about, and the attitude he has as he does his scientific investigation. For example, Stephen Hawking put together the theory for the Big Bang. Among the questions about his attitude, and the attitudes of other scientists, regarding the BB are: 1. Do they consider it a theory? 2. Do they actually believe that this is what happened? 3. Have they missed anything, and do they know it? 4. Could the Beginning have happened another way? 5. What facts do they have that the Beginning could not have happened any other way? 6. Are they really reasonably certain or the age of the universe for a fact? Even though a scientist can postulate a Beginning for the Universe like the Big Bang, until we have a working time viewer that shows what really happened, the BB is a fictional possibility, only. There can be any number of theories postulated for the way the Beginning happened. The point is, science is full of theories, but few facts about those theories that make the theories really probable, and fewer still that make them close to fact. Thus, the theories are fictional regarding reality. Yet, often the theories are so employed among scientists and laymen who follow them, that they seem to come into the position of reality in the minds of these people. What is it called when someone believes something to be fact, when it has not been proven to be fact? Seems to me this approaches the idea of religion, albeit regarding science, often a religion without a god. And, certainly, scientists like Stephen Hawking are very serious about the things they believe. Until we define what a serious scientist is like, and defined what serious science is, how do we know that religion isn't the basis for science? even though it may not be formally called a religion, or even though it may not be similar to religion that exists except among scientists? |
|
|
|
This might be true but we don't talk any more about ''cold war'' and ideological conflict between East and West but we have religious and civilization conflict between Christian and Islam world. There is an ideological conflict. But it is not strictly one between the Muslims and the Christians. For example, the Sunni Muslims are fighting against the Shiite Muslims (Lebanon, Syria, Yemen.etc). Then you have the Catholics and the Evangelicals fighting against the Orthodox Christians (Ukraine, Serbia, Bosnia.etc). And a Catholic-Sunni-Protestant-Jewish axis is being formed, to counter the Shiite-Orthodox Christian axis. Yet these are not religious conflicts. The religions themselves stand aloof and do not fighting. These are fights between people who think that they interpret the religions correctly, even though their interpretations are different. You can tell because, nobody has exactly the same interpretation that anybody else has... from every single person to the next. Yet there are groups of people who get together because they think that they have the same understanding of their religion. So, it is retarded people who fight, not retarded religions. |
|
|
|
I hope it becomes legal in philippiness
Smoke weed everyday dude
Don't legalize weed. Get government out of it altogether, not making it legal or illegal. Let the people be free. Legalization of all kinds of things is a trick governments are covertly using to place the people under their control more and more to take their freedom away. |
|
|
|
Insurrection was specifically what arms were considered for at the time of our nation's founding and it is specifically why the right to bear them was specified in the 2nd. In studying some of their work, I think that it is fair to say that many of the most brilliant of those setting up the republic had both a deep and rounded understanding of government theory and history, and significant concerns about what they were setting up. Were it to go sour they would have rather seen it fold than continue to it's conclusion. That is how I read things at least. At the same time, it wasn't the 2nd that gave that right. The right is inherent in people, by common law (not governmentally defined common law, rather natural common law). The reason why the 2nd, and the whole Bill of Rights exist, is to simply lay it out clearly in the open for government people to see some of their limitations. All rights are inherent in the people. Government doesn't give, and can't take away any rights except in the case of where one person harms another, or damages his property. In fact, property protection for the individual is the only reason for government to exist at all. The absolute ONLY reason. |
|
|
|
As an atheist too I couldn't care less of what books wrote by people who think Earth is flat wrote, but I acknowledge their influence in some nowadays human behavior.
That's quite a healthy and rare stance. It does influence the lives of billions of people. I don't mind religions at all unless certain people try forcing their beliefs on me. That's the main issue here. Makes sense to me. I'll still hold they have the right to say anything they want, and to hold any beliefs they wish. But that works two ways. It means there is also a right to draw cartoons of Mohammed, to say things against Islam, so forth and so on. Apparently there are quite a few people with a medieval mindset who don't get it. But they don't want to stay in the countries that are total shitholes because most of the other people there believe similar stuff and it retards all progress. Well duh.... People in the west somehow became used to the statement, "Might makes right." I don't see how it can literally, necessarily be true. Is it right for Muslim men to have such authority over their women that they can punish them in extreme ways for little or nothing? It might be might. And Islam might suggest that it is right. But when you stand a man and a woman side by side, they are both people. As far as having the essential "I am" that makes people to be people, both are the same. Both feel pain. Both recognize ownership of property, even if that property is only their self. "Right" would be for the man and the woman to be under the same set of laws regarding their "peopleness." Islam makes all kinds of "might" rules and laws. But are they really right and just and fair to all people? The women don't have the right to say anything that they want, even thought they might have the ability. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}