|
I can say more, all projects are unpredictable. The fact is that calculating your earnings in a particular project is not a problem, for this you have all the parameters, but what happens in the end is a question. This is more like a lottery. Earlier in 2017, most of the projects justified their conditions and even some of them were surprised by growth, but now everything has changed. Moreover, the promised earnings do not correspond to the final result, and there is still a high probability of seeing a fall in prices for the cryptocurrency of the projects in which we participate. So it turns out that any project is a mystery!
|
|
|
|
|
The fact is that you need to earn now, and not later. The idea of creating and participating in projects during the Altcoin season is certainly good, but where is the guarantee that it will be then that the participants of the bounty will grow? Personally, I stick to my strategy. We need to work now and then, so as not to miss any opportunity to earn. For me, participation in the bounty is an opportunity to find really promising projects, and they can usually appear at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, I believe that nothing much has changed in terms of the use of ICO or IEO by scammers. By itself, IEO certainly gives more likelihood that the project will succeed, but it does not guarantee 100% that there will be no scam or deception. Recently, there was information that the exchanges themselves where IEO was conducted were noticed in fraud. All this makes us understand that the ideal form for raising funds is either ICO or IEO and there can be problems everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that thanks to just the first altcoins, such as Ethereum, the possibility of the appearance of other altcoins appeared. In the process of the development of a crypto market and the emergence of a large number of new altcoins, the price of the same Ethereum will definitely increase, since all these new altcoins will definitely be traded to a pair with ETH. Moreover, we should not forget about the recognition of the crypto community, but as we know it plays one of the main decisive roles. In this case, the leadership for Ethereum is also, and I am sure it will continue in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
When choosing a company to participate, I look at the availability of a product or service, as well as the importance of such, if any. Next, I look at the team, its real people or not. Another criterion is the availability of information on conducting IEO and listing on exchanges. As for earnings, it is not necessary to choose those who offer the most to pay, the main thing is that these are real numbers. I believe that, ideally, companies that carry out bounty, at the end of their program should pay all the promised rewards and launch a buyout of tokens for bounty participants at an ico price for everyone. It is in my opinion that this would guarantee that the participants in the bounty will not be deceived, and it would make participation more productive for both parties.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that IEO play a positive role for ETH and its price. The fact is that, thanks to IEO, more people are attracted to use cryptocurrency, which means that ETH will receive even more new users and the old ones will start using this cryptocurrency more. All this will definitely have a positive effect on the price of ETH. Of course, this will not make a new flight to the moon, but it will still help in recognizing and increasing prices.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that they can hardly be competitors. The fact is that if even the services listed by you launch their own cryptocurrency, then it will only be used to pay for services and goods within these platforms. As for Etherium, it saboy represents the basis for the creation of both new cryptocurrencies, and new platforms, services and Dapps. Even on the basis of this information, we see different directions and applications. In any case, I believe that Etherium will retain leadership, and maybe even become more successful.
|
|
|
|
|
This topic is very important indeed. Earlier, when the ICO market only began to gain momentum, the participants of the bounty were worth their weight in gold, that is, the payment was really decent and timely. Now we see disrespect for the work of the participants of the bounty, both on the part of some bounty menjers and the administrators of the ICO. I personally know a few examples when the administrators themselves answered me that you earned too much, this is wrong. That is, they themselves came up with the conditions and refused them themselves at the time of payment. Also, very often I hear accusations against participants of generosity that it is the participants of generosity who reduce the price of tokens and coins on the stock exchanges, although I myself have already seen many times how early investors and funds did this. All this and more shows the attitude of project administrators and managers to bounty participants and it is not very good. How can you solve this? I think there is one way, is to create a site where to report such problems and talk about those who are deceiving the participants of the bounty.
|
|
|
|
|
The fact is that I did not come across a rating site on bounty, which really would have relevant information. I found tables, pages with information about bounty programs, but there was just general information. Of course, it would be nice to create such a site, but for this you need to highlight important criteria by which bounty will be ranked. Again, this is a very big job and I do not think that someone will do it for the whole audience, unless of course you make paid access to this information. But in any case, even if there is such a site, it will not be able to collect all the information about all the bounty companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
