There are several people that are actively do Fri bring to the Bitcoin economy July buying BTC and using it for services but don't accumulate coins. With it's volatilitg, Bitcoin isn't the store of wealth for everyone.

The wallet you are using does not support fees big enough to have your transaction picked up by miners in today's market. See if your transaction remains unconfirmed and perhaps you will have to import your private keys to a more modern wallet.

The rates discussed in OP aren't very common but in the mid term are possible as several altcoin went trough great price rises amid the recent bull run with Bitcoin. It's unlikely that all of them will stay at such levels for long though.

This sounds kind of too good to be true for the work required. Does the service in question advertise this somewhere?

It bears quite a bit of risk considering how likely it is that money invested wouldn't have a chance to ROI for quite a bit of time. And even from there on out, a possible scenario would be that it's have no market value sufficient for a return of investment.

It's not like bitmain didn't go trough several design modifications to come to the way they arrange ASICS now. Designs have been pretty similar from the S3 on but what does that have to do when the most important thing is efficiency?

Coins exclusively created for mom scemes are based on a centralized cause and are destined to fail as the platform supporting their use starts losing credibility. Oftentimes such coins are used only for internal consumption and have no market value throughout their existence.

Wouldn't this be more of an anti-feature though? Fool proofing the wallet so all transactions sent with it have some chance to sometime confirm is better IMO. More advanced users can use more advanced wallets.

You better not bother with cloud mining. Most such schemes aren't even holding real hashrate and are just built to rule in funds for the company running it.

There is no such thing as an expired cryprocurrency. If there is any sort of demand it ought to be alive and kicking. Just create a listing and see if anyone'd buy your cousin. If they are not listed in an exchange, you might have some luck in forums like this one.

Δεν αξίζει το 1% load. Απλά κάνε ανάληψη με EUR χρεωστική σε ATM απευθείας. 

Quite the April Fool's joke, I tell you. This goes to show how worthless of a political game signaling really is. Stick to the real thing!

Having >51% miner support for BTU wouldn't mean that a potential fork even with such support would end up being successful in the long run. Miner support doesn't equal market support, so the crypto economy would only get around using the chain with the greatest long term volumes. In my opinion, I don't think that any potential bitcoin fork outside of consensus would ever have the potential to do this.

I hope that funds will be distributed to improve the service because Wirex really showcased that they din not have the right fundations to substantiate such funding. Among all the bitcoin debit card services they had the biggets marketing campaigns and greatest website design but overall the worst service quality and customer support. It'd be interesting to see if those aspects improve.

I think that the connotation of using bitcoin for microtransactions was faulty from the beggining. Bitcoin does have the divisibility but neither the network capacity nor the lack of value to help facilitate such a thing. The only period of time that bitcoin seemed like a valid means of payment for microtransactions was when it didn't receive much use and didn't have a fractions of today's market value.

Kratom is interesting but I don't think that trying to cash into the plants infamy is going to get a cryptocurrency far. Most kratom users were barely aware of bitcoin before the proposed ban in the US, a use specific coin would only make transactions more traceable in the event of another attempted ban or government interference. Not that of a useful content IMO.

How is such a solution going to be implemented in order to protect bitcoin's decentralization and neutrality? In its current state, miners can only act to change bitcoin (without acting against their own financial interest) in consensus. This means that even the most powerful party in the whole process at the moment, have strong incentives to protect bitcoin. What would ensure that such a solution would keep bitcoin's strength in decentralization and not introduce new attack vectors via even the slightest centralization?

The alternative would probably be to day trade if you were after speculative short term profit but that really isn't too convenient or even accessible for people holding bitcoin as a store of value. Holding certainly isn't for everybody but doing so after buying (instead of actively buying and selling) would actually help reduce overall volatility.

Bittrex and poloniex have grown to become the largest altcoin exchanges. But there still are places with grater volumes when it comes to major cryprocurrency. It's natural that certain places dominate markets when it comes to trading volumes of specific coins so only basing your trades one exchange's account isn't that great when it comes to getting the best rates.

If that were to become the case, actual money would have lost it's value against cryprocurrency and Bitcoin wouldn't be that much of amedium of exchange between popular currency any longer. Bitcoin would certainly be different from now but it's uncertain if there's be an economy around it.