My competition entry is:

Fair enough.

Support withdrawn.

You're forgetting your history.

The name was LaudaM originally.

The reasoning is sound and works for me.  Not every account should have a warning attached, but the author them-self suggested hacking or impersonation might occur.

SUPPORTED.

Hopefully "the powers that be" properly lock that account so we don't have a repeat of what went down a couple of months ago...

Archived for future reference: [1a], [1b]


May I quote you on that?

One last screen shot for the moment:

Source:

https://loyce.club/Is...StillOnDT/Lauda.html


http s://i.imgur.com/JUuVzVh.jpg

As with Bruno, it's the trust feedback as you have done, the Default Trust or a Flag.  I'm happy to place a cautionary note on all three.

Either way @theymos should place some sort of "This Account is permanently inactive" cautionary warning across the page (and remove the email used for recovery) and use a 20+ random string to lock the password as well.

I've noticed a few other names go quietly into the dark.  I'm reminded of this episode of the original Star Trek series "Who Mourns For Adonis?"

As I said in a previous post over night:


I've also archived your PGP thread post & am checking if there are any other posts of yours that should be archived before you go.

TL;DR

Why not zap wallet and resend with a lower TX fee?  Scrolling down the thread you keep saying you're going to increase the fees, why not lower the TX fee paid to one satoshi?

I get this:

---

---

Well... if you have a blue wallet, then you have a mnemonic seed that you can user to recreate the wallet via another service - possibly one that enables you to export the priv key of the wallet that contains the funds, then install priv key on a wallet (e.g. core) the zap the transactions and create a new transaction either after the first has slipped from mempool, or with much lower fees.

---

---

Can a negative value be used to pay a TX fee of another TX?  (probably not, but just a suggestion)

Goodbye Lauda.

You had a great innings.

[quote author=icopress link=topic=5282217.msg55401787#msg55401787 date=1603007983]
[quote author=Timelord2067 link=topic=5282217.msg55395893#msg55395893 date=1602918669]

[/quote]
Now I understand why you decided to choose a logo with a beautiful brunette  [/quote]

That's OK.  [size=15pt]suchmoon likes being pegged...[/size] (or not - hard to say)


I talked about the reasons why these people are on your trust list. If you wish, you can also add a brief explanation of why you trust the judgment of one or another user from your trust list. Many users will be interested in your story. [size=7pt](C)[/size]
[/quote]

I did, not that long ago in one of the LoyceV threads - I'll see if I can dig up the post.

Not necessarily, the Eclair wallet provides for buying inbound capacity.  I think the Zap wallet has a similar function.

If part of that purchase was (example) you paid for an inbound 0.05 channel and part of that 0.05 was sent to you (say 0.04) your cost might be (random numbers out of my head) say 10% on top of the 0.04 plus the TX fee to open the channel - rounded up to 0.005.  In the hypothetical example you might pay (in advance) 0.045 and get a 0.05 channel opened to you with 0.01 inbound plus 0.04 outbound capacity which would no doubt be a healthy start to any new node.

Is the OP asking about an additional fee to then pass the payment along to the next wallet address?  There's provision to use part of the amount sent to cover TX fees, so it shouldn't be an issue on sending funds you receive.

Will freebitco.in be enabling users to have a wager on the Australian NRL grand-final to be played this coming week-end?

I'd be delighted to promote it in this gambling thread: [Rugby] - Union / League / Super / Sevens  there's also the "State of Origin" series and the Bledisloe Cup is always a favorite too.

The Melbourne Storm have won 3/4 of the games played against the Panthers, however, the Panthers have been the more dominant team this season and I expect them to win in a close game. Check it out here: https://www.nrl.com/draw/nrl-premiership/2020/grand-final/game-1/

Your post might be better off in one of the "services" sections.  You can move your thread yourself by clicking on the dialogue box at the bottom of the screen and then choosing the "services" thread that best suits your service.  Good luck.

Real live Casinos don't charge a fee to cash in chips at the end of the time you've spent playing at their tables/wheels/machines eaten and drunk beverages.  There's a difference between covering transaction fees and price gouging by picking up even more satoshis to allow a user to claim their own funds.  Casinos should probably just factor TX fees into their house edge.

The easiest analogy is if more than 50% of any given company leaned one way in politics and someone who leaned the other way kept getting turned down for promotions, that user could make a case for bias in the work place for not getting promoted.

It's funny, only a couple of weeks ago I removed you from my distrust list because I couldn't recall why you were on there in the first place. 

---

---

I review my list from time to time and have been reminding a couple of people about this quote:


Hopefully some others will read the above and take note (for example):


Kudos.

Hello, yes I've been waiting (and waiting) for the page to load, but found it hasn't fully loaded. 


I never doubted Jeremy Franklin's link (as such), but was puzzled when following the link they provided found that google itself then said the text couldn't be found so it's good to know that others have been able to corroborate the OP's assertions.