Yes, I got the message on the Hugo series as well, but luckily the majority of best selling games don't have this problem.

Mate, the ability to wager 0.1$ on 96%-RTP PnG slots is a big deal IMO. I immediately rank up my account to be a VIP lol.

The wealth series is still missing btw, but I'm happy enough at the moment

I think the built-in exchange is not yet needed on this platform. Yes it is beneficial if you are an altcoin holder that is not listed on the platform (e.g., XLM, BNB, ADA, etc.) and wants to play without all the hassle going in and out the trading platform. The rate was okay, well a fair trade-off between convenience and x% fees. As long as the output is cheap/instant coins, the costs will be minimal.

IMO casineos need to attract gamers to play there first before thinking about such feature.

Promotion is one crucial thing, but Roobet also has its strong "reason to use" the product. I note the platform simplicity is impressive for a newbie user in gambling. It's soo straightforward that users don't have to go through headaches to play. No vault, no built-in exchange, no performance issue, no "fillers," etc., just deposit and play

Awesome! I'm really excited to play the Play'nGo slots here!
Yo anyone, kindly fix the "GraphQL error: an unknown error xxxxxx has happened" issue

Finally... Almost... Can't wait any longer...

Edited: After, I cleared my cookies and browser cache the PnG games can launch.

Checked the RTP:
Very nice!

Yeah, links on the footer (promotion, blog, and privacy policy) don't work.

Which "deposit now"? Confirmed, from homepage-slideshow, it works properly from my side if I log in, but nothing happens from the guess perspective. It should be redirected to a registration page or something.

Admin, you have some bug fixing works to do

I believe they planned to do a partnership with VISA as stated on WP:
Source.

Basically, this kind of project has to choose one of the payment processor VISA, MasterCard, UnionPay, etc. since building their proprietary payment network is an impossible task for a startup CMIIW.

524,666,777
AnonymousPig

Mate, you should mention the "self-proclaimed" words
Way before the internet and stuff, I did play for fun, wasted my pocket money on arcades, shady slots, local counter strike (PvP) betting, etc., but never in my mind I'll get profit from these activities. However, we should note several important things:
- Nowadays, it's easy to access the internet and play at more reputable operators;
- The majority of people don't have the "for fun" attitude;
- Probably (especially in my country), the cops are more aggressive to eradicate this insignificant "crime" compared to the 90s era.

So, I think the stay-away attitude is more beneficial. To answer "nothing is better than anything," well it depends

Oh wow, yesterday cumpetition seems easy, I should have joined the party. Or perhaps I already did, but no one knows

What I meant by soft-scam is the one who uses unacceptable RTP, like below 94% for PnG slots. Suppose you want to buy a bottle of mineral water, soft-scam is like when you tried to buy it at the hotel since it can cost more than 10x. But if you buy it at some random store with a 2x price, then it's acceptable when you desperately need it.

I know some popular casinos use ~ -2% RTPs, but it can be acceptable if they give rakebacks, raffles, etc. In other words, the 2% (and perhaps more) will be materialized into other forms of benefits. Nevertheless, it needs users to commit to play there long term which I don't like. Sometimes, switching casinos can give you better luck lol.

It was unchanged like @roycilik said, perhaps you were thinking about Golden Beauty.

Bronco:


Golden Beauty:

---

Yesterday I tried these slots:
- Legacy of Ra Megaways
- Aztec Gold Megaways

By the way, iSoftBet sucks! I haven't won anything on that provider.

519,272,250
AnonymousPig

The answer should be simple: Get the real thing, not the ERC20 token!

Lol unlike the title, it's so difficult to get the wild symbol.
What's more challenging? Use image that only appears in the feature/free spins lmao

Congrats to the winners!

Just like any goods, it goes back to supply and demand analysis:
- limited supply -> price high -> some people don't want to buy or cannot afford to buy Bitcoin/crypto with the current rate;
- the slowdown in the economy -> less buying power -> some people don't want to buy or cannot afford to buy Bitcoin/crypto with the current rate;
- some people don't need Bitcoin/crypto, what is the reason to buy (RTB)? We need more use case other than for gambling purposes since not all people is a gambler.

AnonymousPig

I think the problem with all the accusations is about the wrong understanding of provably fair. Let's say there is no HE so that the odds would be 50:50. People like to think that after ten bets, the result would be five highs and five lows. That's not the case. People should think that every bet is an independent event.

Provably fair guaranteed after users change the seeds, the outcome of the next bet would be unknown (even to the casino operator if users use their own client seed). It doesn't matter if the result would be ten consecutive highs or lows.

But that's not true right? We can play as low as 0.1$ per bet in a game with more reputation, or we can play even lower than 0.1$ in provably fair slots.

Yea but perhaps they already have access to legit casinos, so there's no need to play these shady machines. I mean human is still human no matter what IQ or education level, slot is always appealing. But once the availability is not there, these machines would appear like a mold.

Mourinho would say "Important backup" who brings different options to the team, lul.
He would say, "I need people who comfortable playing with his back facing the goal," meaning as a target man. Son, Moura, Bale, etc., aren't a target man.

*just my imagination

As long as Bitcoin is neutral, like it doesn't have anonymizer built into the protocol, the government doesn't have the reason to crackdown the network. Suppose this is the case for Monero et al., then yes. It was proven by the delisting of privacy coins in some regulated exchanges.

I'm not saying enhancing privacy = supporting criminals according to my belief, but that's the government's view about it. Criminals can use whatever MoE they want, but it is important not to encourage/promote such activities by tweaking the protocol to support them if we don't want any trouble with governments.