Adding "a load of Scrypt hash" should not dramatically change the amount of time it takes get to the fork unless something is wrong with the difficulty algorithm.

I'll take your gridseeds! My custom case has room for a few more

Interested but will wait until they ship and some reviews have been released.

How about the Warp 3?

Dang, I want one

Willing to pay $1,200  

BTW, I hear these don't work well with fast coins/p2pool. If you can try setting -q 0 to see if that helps.

How about we take over production as a community. If they were almost ready to ship then I imagine it wouldn't take much more to complete the project.

Zeus should "give" the community the ability to produce these miners on their own. Release the schematics for the chip/board design. I could take that and maybe call upon some of my old contact in the IC manufacturing world.

Better yet put us in touch with your manufacturing contacts so we can fund and continue the project.

(used to be part owner of a memory manufacturing company back when it was incredibly lucrative...luckily sold it before the floor dropped out of the market)

A block should not need to be found. Which p2pool is this for? Link?

No, was just curious
Super nice job overall. Reliable block explorers are rare so your efforts are appreciated.

Commonly known exploit/attack/bug/whatever-you-want-to-call-it of KGW. Most other coins that use KGW have patched/fixed. Think I mentioned this before sometime earlier in this thread. Have lived through it on other coins...search the forums for description/fix.

Hint: look for Heartbleed and TimeWarp vulnerabilities.
One possible solution is to add the digishield diff retarget:
https://github.com/casinocoin/casinocoin/commit/1f0b80e20aa13b8aa9146b61344131c5d555c709

Hehehe, ok more than a hint

Check to make sure port 8850 is not blocked. Here is the direct link:

http://xpool.net:8850

Wow, truly impressive. Loving the power supply case!

Just wondering how your identifying p2pool blocks?

Thanks newbie ahmed 

Should be interesting. Good to hear you've thought about equaling out the different algo's. Sounds like a lot of work brother 

Does any one algo have a benefit over another for miners? If one algo has a much lower hashrate than another wouldn't it be easier to get more coins on that algo if you have a significant amount of hashrate for that particular algo?

Truten, I do not believe this thread is the right place to discuss altcoin p2pools as it is focused on Bitcoin.

Having said that I believe Rav removed dogecoin from his repository since he believes running a dedicated dogecoin pool is no longer a good idea due to doge now supporting auxPOW.

Added to that it appears that a number of nodes never updated their dogecoind so the dogecoin p2pool is finding blocks in both chains.

For the most part I would say that the dogecoin p2pool is dead.

If they are 2000 blocks behind I would guess there is a problem with their wallet daemon. The fix could be as simple as restarting the process. Of course I would direct any miners I had there somewhere else in the mean time.

Is there a non-setup version of 8.6.2 available? I hate wallet installers....   

Thanks. It's setup to dual mine DOGE but the chance of getting one of those blocks is low. If a DOGE block is found it will be exchanged for BTM and distributed to all p2pool miners as a bonus.

New Bitmark p2pool node at xpool.net


Mining Port:
stratum+tcp://xpool.net:9268

Stats:
http://xpool.net:9268

Example Connection String:
cgminer  --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://xpool.net:9268 -u YourBitmarkAddress -p password


Run your own node
https://github.com/CartmanSPC/p2pool

I hope this post doesn't get deleted..guess I'll add more than just a happy face this time

I like tracking posts I follow using the "Show new replies to your posts" link. Wonder if there is a better way.

We could always fork to increase the spread if necessary