Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 07:36:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »
341  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER!!?? on: March 23, 2018, 04:42:23 AM
I think that situation will not happen if cryptoworld pass it to the government the sense of being decentralized will vanish.
"IF" this situation happen bitcoin will die government will surely set bitcoin aside because of their corrupt thinking.
342  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY] EOZ.COM GIVING OUT AT LEAST 1M USD WORTH OF COINS IN 5 WEEKS! on: March 23, 2018, 02:23:54 AM
Hi needmoney, can you help me with this?
I didnt notice that I need to register to EOZ website to get my rewards and the problem is Im not sure what E-mail I used in joining your signature campaign can you help me? because the e-mail we used is not visible in the spreadsheet.
343  Other / Meta / Re: Unmerit rule? on: March 22, 2018, 04:37:00 AM
Hi everybody,
I can now see a lot of people with high ranks. A lot of them sometimes seem like they are not willing or ready to provide this potentially huge help to the community, and furthermore, they often aren't even giving very interesting replies.
Lets just accept the fact that they are so lucky being here a long time ago without merit system, the fact that they Invest Time here in forum for a long time they already deserve the rank.

Could and unmerit rule change anything? It could help even the higher ranks to stay more awake and want to mantain/earn more merits like the new users.
For example: If you don't earn one merit (or another form of reward) in a certain time, you lose one. One idea could be that you should earn a certain number of merits per month to maintain the others for example.
As I said they already deserve their ranks except to those farmers, we dont need another system anymore such as Un-merit and De-ranking this is useless.
344  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BEST ALTCOINS 2018 from top Analysts! on: March 19, 2018, 03:15:34 PM
Well, thank you! So I will continue to add little coins, and then we'll see someone will thank someone, I think that Merit is not so much a value, I'm not asking for money  Smiley

Quality posts, this is not an integral part, which I am doing. But I understand that people at this forum do not want to give Merit just for good articles, and 90% and at all speculators who would just earn. After reading on the Internet a lot of information on Merits, I realized that they are simply selling now.  Cry

Begging for merit is not a nice move to get some, dont you feel embarrassed on what you are doing? maybe you may get some merit on this post if you dont ask for it, but you show us that this post is just to earn some merit and not to help, though the topic is useful its better to wait for someone will appreciate you than to beg for it.
345  Other / Meta / Re: Manual Merit and Automatic Activities on: March 19, 2018, 04:12:12 AM
can you make a program that filters post quality, to make this automatic merit system? the purpose of merit system is to increase the quality content of post and eliminate those farmers. yes I agree that its too hard to get merits even you post a high quality content but the thing is no one can make a program that filters the high quality and low quality content.
346  Other / Meta / Re: when my red trust removed? on: March 18, 2018, 02:59:06 AM
In your case I dont think they will remove you negative trust, you have 3 options, 1st you can participate Joe's Signature campaign or any other campaigns accepting members with negative trust, 2nd make a new account but its too hard now to rank up unlike your old days, and 3rd and the very good news here is that you can easily leave the forum and be contented on what you already get here before.
347  Other / Meta / Re: Another way to get merit on: March 17, 2018, 10:18:26 AM
Really? you just wasted 4 merits to this kind of a post and just beg in your Own topic post? first of all begging is a violation 2nd this is an off topic reply to your post but still you give merits to this shit beggars? or this is a try to give some merit to your dummy account?
348  Other / Meta / Re: Two suggestions regarding Merit on: March 17, 2018, 05:06:49 AM
1. The process of sending merit seems a bit annoying. You've to go through another web-page and select number of merit to be sent and then send it. IMO, it'd be better if it could be sent just by clicking "+Merit" button right within the thread.
This will increase the chance of double sending merits. I think its good idea if there is a confirmation first before sending.

2. It'd be much better if you guys allow only one merit by the merit-sender per post. This will reduce fake-merit-exchange or fake-merit-giving. There're people sending tens of their merits to a single post which clearly seems like something fishy.
For me it is not suspicious if they send 10 to a high quality content some sends 20 but if its reasonable I dont find it suspicious, and if they change the rules of merit system to this maybe we cant identify now who abuses the system.
349  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Learn how to invest BTC on: March 17, 2018, 04:20:11 AM
This thread is posted many times by other person, you must read the forums rules and regulations first and then start to study and learn about bitcoin. you can use the search bar to find what you want to know if you dont found a similar question that you needed then you can start posting.
350  Other / Meta / Re: Merit! Why Merit is sold and how to stop it? on: March 17, 2018, 03:47:28 AM
I think this is expected by the admins to happen, that is why we can report them easily to the admins and then soon will be punished, so the only way we can contribute here is to caught and report them, in their way they just put their accounts in a risky situation and possibly get banned.
351  Other / Meta / Re: Sales of merit is gaining momentum on: March 17, 2018, 03:28:53 AM
There's no problem with that if they want to abuse merit system in that way dont mind them their risking their own account soon they will be caught and will get a negative trust, or if you want try to haunt them and report them to admins and if you dont want to help the community by getting them caught you can help the community by posting high quality and useful contents and stop complaining about merit, it's non sense.
352  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY] EOZ.COM GIVING OUT AT LEAST 1M USD WORTH OF COINS IN 5 WEEKS! on: March 14, 2018, 07:04:42 AM
Dear bounty manager, please change my rank to member.
Spreadsheet #: 227
Forum username: jemarleon
thank's for consideration.
353  Other / Archival / Re: sMerit for quality users [ Wednesday Challenge] on: March 14, 2018, 06:50:30 AM
I merited your post for helping other member's to rank up with their quality post, Its a nice and helpful way of distributing your sMerit. Thank you.
354  Other / Archival / Re: sMerit for quality users [ Wednesday Challenge] on: March 14, 2018, 06:11:41 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3117574.msg32224818#msg32224818
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3088399.msg31862655#msg31862655
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3092142.msg31908246#msg31908246
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3061276.msg31525577#msg31525577
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3114287.msg32227055#msg32227055

I just want to try to join this maybe my opportunity to rank up on Member now, hope you find my post useful and helpful. Thank you.
355  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: Raise merit requirements at the lower and highest ranks (@theymos) on: March 13, 2018, 03:36:57 PM
I agree with the Jr. Member and Members rank requirements this will help to reduce this farmers in making account until Jr. Member rank just to join signature campaign, Im sure that our community will be full of this ranks after not getting merits because of their shitposting just to fill the requirements of signature campaign.

On the other side I strongly disagree with that hero-legend merit requirement though I know I cant make it anymore to get at least on hero rank (losing hope) because of merit is not that too easy to earn for us like you, but I think that is too much requirements for other that is near to this ranks.

If the purpose of this suggestion is to make an achievement to yourself maybe all of those hero-legendary member will decrease their rank to prove their selves, and i think many high rank members will cry for sure especially those high rank shitposters and farmers.
356  Other / Meta / Re: Introduce a "Up vote & Down vote" system instead of the "Merit" system on: March 13, 2018, 03:06:42 PM
The intention is noble but i think the effect of the merit system is negative.
The effect of the merit system is very good for our community, I think this is about sMerit that is quite unfair.

1.Most of the scammers who adopted earlier in to the Bitcointalk forum now has higher ranked accounts. They are not being punished by the merit system. Now may be they use their higher rank accounts to farm more accounts by giving smerits.
Yes its true and I think admins know this before they work this system, they cant solve it easily so they create a thread to report those high rank spammer and abusers.

2.I have seen lot of useless posts of higher rank members, which have been received lot of merits. (I think all of you must have noticed that.) .
Most of the people who have smerits give their smerits only to higher rank members (with the hope of getting merits back) without considering the quality of the post.
If you don't believe, Please check past posts of members with many merit points, you will find some of them have received hundreds of merits without sending at least one constructive post.  
Yes all of us notice this shits but we cant do anything about what other people wants to merit.
I think those people are not expecting to get some merits by doing that aside from (if it is their close friend).
As I said we cant control them we cant do anything about it.

3. I've seen many very good posts by Jr.members which haven't received merits. Most people doesn't care about newbies and Jr.members because they have no smerits to give merit back.
I strongly agree with this that there are many good post from lower ranks but I dont agree with that reason that they are expecting a merit back in return.

4. Even if someone post a very good post or a reply if it is not get noticed by a person who gives merits by considering the qulity of the post, the post is not rewarded. ( Some forums are not get noticed well)
Ive seen many good post that is not get merited or some of them get small amount of merits. I agree with this I can suggest that they must have better look on this posts to give merits.

5. There are telegram groups where people share their merits. If you don't believe please do some research.
Yes there are some group like this, just think that those people will not win at the end of the fight.

6. 2 merits = 1 smerit rule is fundamentally slowing down the merit system.
Yes your right the reason of this is to control the merit system, if not the merit system will be useless at the end.

Your solution will just remove all the purpose of merit system, remember that all of this farmers can also make a little good post and they will just spam accounts again and again just to upvote their post.
Also the merit system is already implemented, it not fair again to some people here that works hard for merit and you will just remove it that easy.

I think it is better to improve the merit system, Im good with this system the only thing I see that is unfair in this system is that sMerit system it can also cause a spam of accounts of high rank shitposter and farmers.
357  Other / Meta / Re: THEYMOS , CYRUS = Scammers on: March 13, 2018, 02:39:51 AM
I think you have another problem other than your saying "hacked account", dont expect them to help you now bro, try to think that if you are in their position what will you do? Do you still want to help this people called you a scammer? remember they are people with feelings too. By the way I think you really caught their attention, I suggest you to quit bro they are not going to help you anymore, trust me.
358  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: How do you explain the bounty campaign? on: March 10, 2018, 05:11:22 AM
For me the best and easy explanation for them is telling them that you are advertising companies on the internet, it is easy for them to understand it because we all know about advertising then explain next about cryptocurrency so they will have a little idea what the cryptocurrency is.
359  Other / Meta / Re: PNB looks into use of bitcoin! on: March 10, 2018, 04:32:29 AM
I don't think this is the perfect way to post this topic, I think it should be on Economics or else I'm not sure.
Back to the topic, Its a good new's for cryptoworld that many bank's accept cryptocurrency this past few months it can cause good effect in the price of the coin's but somehow I think there will be bad effect's for the bank's because crypto world is a threat for them I think they are just afraid to cryptocurrency and it is the best way they see how to deal with it.
360  Other / Meta / Re: Does merit really helping the forum. on: March 09, 2018, 11:13:33 AM
accounts with jr - member ratings try hard to improve their posts.
while I see, accounts with full member rankings upwards, they do not care about good posts, they just make a post to make money in the signature campaign.
I think the merit system has not been entirely helpful.
Maybe those accounts that you see are the one's that we call shitposters (but not all of them are like this), there are many full members and up that is high quality posters, that accounts that you see are contented on what they are gaining here in forum and for those people like that I think thats the highest rank they can attain.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!