.....
You are saying this as if I would like to sell you something , but I don't have anything to sell  Wake up. Apart from the rather obvious fact that you don't have anything of substance to say, and that everybody here should just ignore you because of that, you seem to be suffering from amnesia. You have implied that my "mantra" is not true, which is what dibley8899 prompted to ask you to come up with some facts. Result: You are not interested in facts, and you openly admit it. This is why dibley8899 is quite correctly describing your behavior as "posting your hoping wishful posts". You should create your own cult with your Armstrong advocacy forum. This is the wrong place for you, because this one here is for intelligent, critical people. These people have come to a conclusion obviously. That is why it is rather quiet here now. Except for a couple of diehards like you. You just don't get it, even under most favorable conditions. So there is no other way - these diehards need to be ridiculed. So here you get it again: Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
I have discovered a large number of these issues. These after-the fact reversals I called "phantom reversals". The most important thing I learned however, even under the hypothetical assumption that all these issues are fixed, and even totally adhering to all rules, then there is still no way for this system to be profitable. It is a hindsight system, and as many others have pointed out, one will definitely lose money using this as a trading system, because it simply does not work, even under the best conditions, i.e. all bugs taken care of. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
...
So what exactly is the forecast from him. Totally confused
No forecast, no prediction here. The prediction will come, if at all, in hindsight, after the fact. Armstrong never predicts anything with any verifiable level of accuracy. Armstrong does not have any original ideas. For example, it is common knowledge that capital has to flow into equities when interest rates decline and governments become over-indebted. Armstrong bolts his crazy ECM onto these stolen concepts. His strength is re-publishing, wrapping things up as if they were predicted by his so-called Global Artificial Intelligence Computer which does not exist. Check his assertions and predictions against the facts and actual events. He usually modifies the facts to fit his narrative. What some observers call predictions are mostly stories produced in hindsight. His ECM is a rigid time machinery constructed around some factors derived from a small series of historical economic events, assuming that history will repeat like a clockwork. If it does not fit, which usually is the case, then he uses mental constructs like cycle inversions and superposition events to fit the failing model to reality. Most importantly, this model cannot be used for trading purposes. That is because if you want to trade, the first obvious problem to deal with is that his fixed time frame boundaries cannot be aligned with the actual timing of any real world events. Real word events like highs and lows do not align themselves with end of day, end of week , end of quarter, end of year which is what would be required to make Socrates work. On failure, the system (which in fact is not a system because there is no code that executes the myriad of rules that are made up on the fly) always provides alternative paths of fitting reality in hindsight. The most glaring workarounds are shifting from one time frame to another until finally something lines up with reality in hindsight. If even that does not work, then a cycle inversion is employed - and the system was right again. So it is no wonder that people who are trying to make sense out of this get confused. Confusion is the inevitable result. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
...
Would you like me to continue?
Please don't. It is sad to see that you are still taking the bait and show us the futility of Socrates. Socrtates is a scam. For those who haven't come to this conclusion: Socrates is ambiguous. It creates signals in opposite directions on different time frames AND other signals in seemingly different dimensions like forecast arrays without resolving the conflicts. That creates the opportunity for you guys to ALWAYS claim that the system was right. It is pointless to argue about reversals and such. The Socrates contraption works only in hindsight, by means of cherry-picking. Martin Armstrong never posts any statistics about the overall performance of the system because that would be devastating. And besides, if the system would actually work, he would take it offline and trade based on it. Armstrong re-publishes facts that are easy to see such as this political divide, corruption etc. and claims that his clockwork universe ECM model predicted it all, again using his hindsight methods. Boring. As dibley8899 just pointed out - everybody can see it. We don't need Martin Armstrong to tell us that many politicians and some governments are corrupt. Or do we? After reviewing all the facts presented here, one needs to be fairly stupid to believe that the ECM works, even more so to believe that Martin Armstrong is a genius. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
DanB1, thanks for your effort to get the facts out. For those who haven't come to this conclusion: Socrates is ambiguous. It creates signals in opposite directions on different time frames AND other signals in seemingly different dimensions like forecast arrays without resolving the conflicts. That creates the opportunity for Martin Armstrong to ALWAYS claim that the system was right. It is pointless to argue about reversals and such. His contraption works only in hindsight, by means of cherry-picking. Martin Armstrong never posts any statistics about the overall performance of the system because that would be devastating. And besides, if the system would actually work, he would take it offline and trade based on it. Armstrong re-publishes facts that are easy to see such as this political divide, corruption etc. and claims that his clockwork universe ECM model predicted it all, again using his hindsight methods. Boring. As dibley8899 just pointed out - everybody can see it. We don't need Martin Armstrong to tell us that many politicians and some governments are corrupt. Or do we? After reviewing all the facts presented here, one needs to be fairly stupid to believe that the ECM works, even more so to believe that Martin Armstrong is a genius. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Well, that's wrong. The text is still there, but the arrays have been fixed lately.
After years of being online, Socrates numbers still don't add up: You may experience delays and discrepanciesThat is the original text as of today - nothing as changed. And Gumbi and Alex11, you are still making claims about the accuracy of this system back in June? Don't be surprised if you are ridiculed.  You better get a computer programmer to fix Socrates before you raise your heads here. Nobody is interested in your meaningless talk. Did you not notice? Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
After years of being online, Socrates numbers still don't add up: You may experience delays and discrepanciesThat is the original text as of today - nothing as changed. And Gumbi and Alex11, you are still making claims about the accuracy of this system back in June? Don't be surprised if you are ridiculed. You better get a computer programmer to fix Socrates before you raise your heads here. Nobody is interested in your meaningless talk. Did you not notice? Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
The 1% rule is just an excuse for the fact that Socrates period end is rarely aligned with the actual wave of the market. So when you have some volatility that is actually worth trading, then the reversal system just gets in the way. The system is so rigid and stupid! At the end of the day, the user is the system and there is no way that one cold build a robot that trades based on this Socrates contraption. That alone is the proof that there is no value in it. Armstrong supporters are discussing these things as if they were some kind of science. Ridiculous. These rules are just gimmicks. Try to trade based on it a hundred times. You will be broke whether you follow the rules strictly or not. Because there is no accuracy in the rules. Nobody here has been able to prove that it works. The majority of people confirm that it doesn't work. The discussion is dead. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. . |
|
|
|
This is a forum where Martin Armstrong and Socrates have been discredited thoroughly. With facts. The chapter is closed. In the process, Alex-11, Gumbi, over45, Strike Eagle 26, Jason100, these diehard fact-free Martin Armstrong supporters have been discredited as well, ridiculed, and as a consequence, almost none of them are posting here any more. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Alex-11 are you getting paid by Martin Armstrong? Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Well for spx500 I see armstrongs Socrates it is saying
For the daily "entering crash mode" and for the weekly "losing momentum"
Will be interesting to see if that plays out this week
I mean here we are in the most famous month for volatility or downside price potential
Thanks for posting. Lets some interested people compare notes. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Maybe it has been posted already, but on MAs: "Could We Ever Eliminate Fossil Fuels?" he lets some idiot post: "and IF they all are electric ones assume consumption of 48kWh per km" https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/we-can-never-eliminate-fossil-fuels/Electric cars spend on average 0,2kWh pr km. The idiots 48 is not 240% too much, but a FACTOR of 240 times to much. I let MA know this, in a suggestion for his blog, that the contributor was off by x240 or 24 000%. MA did not change the article, did not apologise, he din do nuffin. What serious guy anywhere else in the world will let a mistake this big stand next to his name, but Martin Armstrong? So instead of cars in MAs agenda using 17169TWh, that's 26 times more than total production of 652, with a reasonable use, 17169:240=71,5T, they use 11% of total production. It's a lot, but its not enough for MAs agenda. Im CALLING YOU OUT ON FAKE NEWS, MARTIN ARMSTRONG. Its right there on your blog for everyone to see. Anyone see 48 anywhere? He must have grabbed it from where the sun dont shine. And MA is this fools loudspeaker. https://ev-database.org/cheatsheet/energy-consumption-electric-carPerfect deniability by design. He does not need to change the content. Why? Most likely he created this post to himself as he usually does. 1) These post always suit his agenda. Most often he gives himself (steals) credit for 3rd party discoveries / observations via the fake poster of the question. 2) He does not need to change anything because he can imply that the mistake is made by someone else. 3) He does not even have a basic understanding of Physics. 4) This is not the first time. He is absolutely reckless when giving Economic Advice. 5) We have to assume that this guy is a total fraud. With this assumption it is easier to see what he does. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Some entertaining material: Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
I have noticed that Armstrongs TIMING of his conferences are usually associated with big moves in the stock market. - So next week we may start to see a mini crash in the DJIA... it looks just like 1929 peak in October
Alright, because you said so, let's all go short the stock market, go long volatility (as you suggested here before)! We are so excited! And to make it palatable for everybody, we just add some backup from cycle theory: What goes up must come down and because we are up, then we are in a high reward / low risk scenario so nothing can go wrong. Add the 1929 forecast array analysis as a cross-check for some scientific backup! Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
The tide has simply turned except some diehard Armstrong supporters still don't get it. Nobody here is desperate debunking Armstrong. The chapter is closed. Job done. Nothing left to do. Very few people left supporting this moron. Look at the traffic of this forum compared with only a few months ago! Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
regarding that chart he was saying that it's raw data, that is available everywhere. This is not a forecast chart. .... I have included the raw data,... Thanks Marty for keeping me right And thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated. We are not getting paid by anyone. It is a community effort. Martin Armstrong does not even have original ideas. He steals from others, re-publishes and manufactures fan emails on his public blog giving himself credit indirectly for whatever. Disgusting ... His Socrates contraption cannot predict anything. He just takes any information that others predicted, or events that already happened, as it suits him, and then desperately changes his own forecasts in hindsight to fit his narrative. To make it appear that he is always right. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
? ? ? ?"WRITTEN VIEW PER THE CLOSE OF ",
great, now are attacking the sentence structure of the reports. That is certainly very relevant for trading. hahaha. Who said that Socrates can be used for trading? I certainly did not say that. It is used to extract money from subscribers. No other purpose. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
