Hey Ich bin nicht neu im Forum (technisch gesehen bin ich es immer noch, aber nicht *völlig* neu ), aber ich bin neu bei eurem Board und ich habe ne Frage. Mein Team und ich betreiben ein Krypto Casino und ich wollte einen AMA-Thread in den Deutschen sub starten, in dem die Leute mir offene Fragen zum Geschäft stellen können. Wäre der "Projektentwicklung" sub der richtige Ort für so einen Thread?

Evo i ANN je ažuriran tko želi bacit pogled na novi dizajn priče: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432857

Jayće je napravio super posao.

Čekam devove da odrade svoj dio i launchaju novi sajt, ali jučer je bilo nekih problema kao, danas je petak i petkom se ne launcha, vrlo vjerojatno ponedjeljak ili utorak - užas

I agree with you, but from what I saw so far it's rarely the owner or CEO who is on this forum, it's mostly a lower acquisition specialist or manager that is testing the forum as a new channel to drive value, with some exceptions with the larger brands that are having a significant spend on the forum.

Even in my case the owners didn't know that bitcointalk even existed until I brought it up 5 months ago, but luckily I'm a bit higher up so I can move things quicker.

Nevertheless, the reason I'm active in this thread is because I'm curious, but at the same time it's sad to see how other operators are managing their brand, and then smaller guys like us get pulled down with them.

Danke für das Kompliment.  :3

Als Kind habe ich (zu) viel zeit mit RTL2, Super RTL und Pro7 verbracht, von Sailor Moon, Gargoyles und Gummibären bis zum Galileo und verschiedene Dokufilmen. Danach wollte ich es in der Schule richtig lernen, aber dan die meiste Zeit damit verbracht, Bücher zu lesen, anstatt die Grammatikstruktur zu lernen Ich habe auch drei Jahre in Berlin verbracht, aber das würde ich nicht als ne Deutsche Erfahrung zählen, die meisten Leute haben Englisch oder Dinglish gesprochen

It's a peculiar situation, Coinplay isn't responsive, and I haven nothing smart to say anymore.

You've already did all the steps that you could, you could eventually lawyer up and go against them and their license holder if you like, as I already mentioned a few posts before, but be 100% sure that the claim is truthful before you enter that field.

Mein Hauptproblem mit lobby und CRM content ist, dass das meiste nur übersetzter Bullshit ist. In den meisten Fällen mit einen "Sie" approach, und dadurch verlieret der content die persönliche Note. Mein Ziel ist es, ein bisschen zu duzen und eine entspannte Atmosphäre zu schaffen

Da da thread mu rula, zahvaljujući njemu mi je i palo na pamet da se ide na German board, tak da ak će se Cro2 jebat s tim taskom znate na koga bacat rajcice

Thank you! It's still a great tool that solved a huge headache, I've rounded up $100 from the team and sent it over to your BTC address as a thanks

If you do manage to get the group thing rolling in do let me know!

I'm not defending Coinplay, in my eyes this ended up as a good lesson for both sides. Coinplay got slapped by the internet for not dealing with the issue, the player got their deposit back (regardless if they did or did not try to play the system)

What I'm trying to do though is figure out for my self what actually happened here, and it seems there's more to it.

#1. We have a Dutch player, who shouldn't be playing outside of his country, actively playing on several brands outside of his country.  
#2. That player won a larger amount through activity on several accounts, and triggered the abuser matrix.
#3. That same player got reported that he was playing with different accounts, arbitrage and so on.
#4. The operator didn't want to argue, refunded his deposit and closed his account.
#5. Even if the player could manage to somehow prove that he wasn't abusing the operator and remove all the smoke surrounding him, if KYC would be asked for, he would fail it and again only get the deposit back.

In my eyes this is not a scam situation, since the deposit was refunded, and the wins (operators money) was confiscated because of irregularities.

On the other side we have the operator, Coinplay, who just doesn't want to deal with this thing and assign resources to argue with the player publicly, so they kinda do deserve the flag as a lesson and I would definitely keep this thread alive.

At the same time, I want to note that operators sometimes get numb on this type of situations, just open up TrustPilot and type in any reputable casino, you'll see tons of 1 star reviews claiming "scam", and no one responds to them because it just costs too much resources to explain to TrustPilot how the scam went, especially when you're dealing with a user that aims to destroy you in any way possible. We had these situations on brands like Betsafe and Bet365 on a daily basis and it was hard to deal with it individually.


My experience is different, and if there wouldn't be for regulators, you would be playing rouge games with rouge payment providers, with scams going left and right. I am not familiar with what happened with 1xbit though, but I'll research it.


You're allowed to say whatever you want, but the way you say it will either go in to your favor or against it. If you look at all my posts in your thread you'll see that I was just looking to discuss the situation, I'm not personally attacking you or claim that Coinplay did the right thing.

Hey Cygan, vielen Dank für die Förderung

Ich bin kein großer Fan des traditionellen Ansatzes, den andere Casino-Betreiber im Forum verfolgen, also wollte ich mit Cro2 (Trofo und Frka) etwas unique machen.

In meiner letzten Recherche war der DE Board in unter den Top 3 (in Aktivität), daher wollte ich einige der aktiven DE usern zur Kampagne hinzufügen. Wir haben auch eine deutsche Version von coinslotty.com das du hier finden kanst:  Coinslotty Deutschland

Mit dem Inhalt bin ich noch nicht zufrieden - wir aktualisieren es bald mit einem Muttersprachler

Kundensupport ist auch in deutscher Sprache verfügbar, mit den damen dort bin ich recht zufrieden

Hey Thanks for this, such a great feature!

I have a question, I'm trying to create a group telegram chat for me and my team and use the bot to report all activity for coinslotty related keywords, but I'm having an issue adding @BTTSuperNotifier_bot to a group chat.

If I go and create a group directly from the bot chat, it just removes the bot soon after the group is created.

 
If I go ahead and create a fresh group, it doesn't display the bot at all.


What am I doing wrong here?

Samo da javim da smo službeno startali sa Coinslotty sig kampanjom i da se zahvalim Trofćetu i Frkiju :3

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5451232

Za ovaj puta je Cro Board pun, imamo već četvoro ljudi u kampanji, sad mi treba nešto švaba i ostale ekipe koja se malo više mingla po gamblingu. Ako sve prođe super, a ne vidim zašto ne bi, za dva mjeseca uzimamo još 10 ljudi, pa ću opet ubacit par iz našeg boarda

Držite fige da sve prođe kak treba!

I know you're angry about the whole situation, but you can't just throw around sentences like this. Every Curacao license holder will stop dealing with an operator that has constant issues with players, and Antillephone is not an exception. 

I also see that your default location is in Netherlands, were you KYC verified and are your documents german or dutch?

Thank you! We'll definitely need it Rebranding a whole site that has thousands of internal and external elements that need to be updated will be a process, but we're confident that we'll sort it out. The reason I didn't bump the thread yet is because we're still waiting on the developers to update the site with the new branding.

I'll keep you guys posted ^^

Just a heads-up in case you see Trofo editing his first post here and there - we are still sorting out some smaller issues with the BB code of the new signature. When designing the logo we didn't had the BB Code in mind, and it's a pain in the ass to get the circle right

Best of luck to everyone, looking forward to expanding the team

Yes, that's how it went. I edited my sentence in the above post to reflect it.

Trofo voted for Jayce and Rat03
Cryptofrka voted for Jayce
Efialtis voted for Jayce
JooBra voted for Jayce
Loyce was afk
Dkbit was afk
Lastly, I voted for Jayce as well.

As mentioned before, we're on a tight schedule and have to launch the project today, but for next time I'll have the voting open for everyone There will be more stuff coming soon!

This is the winner signature from the last competition: https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSEBNJTS.png&t=649&c=L8dqxjjtEriKLQ

Thank you all for the comments, I didn't manage to get Loyce's and Dkbit98's opinion in, but the majority of the current sig holders voted for Jayce's ANN design.

Because of that, I would like to announce Jayce as the winner of our second design competition

I would just like to point out that Jayce managed this competition very professionally, communication was on point, he replied in a timely manner, provided sketches beforehand and went out of his way with the HTML version of some elements. Because of that we will also move on to some other projects with him.

I just now released the remaining bonus of $75 to his account.

I'll close this thread soon Thank you everyone!

I second this. It's a common practice, but only if you know you can't get a higher score.

E.g. if someone would give Stake a 10/10 and me a 7/10 because I don't have a specific service or provider, then that's cool, I know I can't compete with Stake.
But if someone would intentionally give me 2/10 although we both know that I'm a 7/10, and then asking for more money to get me up, then I would complain.

Additionally, if the person had previous scam accusations then I would lean more on to the "ok I'm getting scammed here" side.

It's not that I don't care, it's because I didn't plan it and we're on a tight schedule But I can tell you 100% that the designers care what you think of their work, so if anyone has an opinion feel free to leave it