Just look at all these nodes with different chain heights:
Where do I look? Startingheight? Yeah, there are starting heights of more than 100,000 blocks which means people have been mining on there own forks. Even the block explorer he has linked to in this forum is wrong Current latest block should be 72312. |
|
|
|
Is the giveaway still active?
Not sure, but something does not seem right about this coin. Looks like the consensus was quietly changed at some point or someone is doing something nasty. 2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Just look at all these nodes with different chain heights: Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[addr] => 85.25.196.115:14333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200490
[lastrecv] => 1420200260
[bytessent] => 5218573
[bytesrecv] => 775772
[blocksrequested] => 6757
[conntime] => 1419916221
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.1/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 17544
[banscore] => 0
)
[1] => Array
(
[addr] => 75.129.82.163:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200474
[lastrecv] => 1420200474
[bytessent] => 2307139
[bytesrecv] => 4850800
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1419996092
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.7.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 703580
[banscore] => 0
[syncnode] => 1
)
[2] => Array
(
[addr] => 107.170.170.56:7559
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200493
[lastrecv] => 1420200478
[bytessent] => 472003
[bytesrecv] => 154702
[blocksrequested] => 1
[conntime] => 1420111408
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.9.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 164223
[banscore] => 0
)
[3] => Array
(
[addr] => 148.100.32.54:9027
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200462
[lastrecv] => 1420200289
[bytessent] => 1479040
[bytesrecv] => 270202
[blocksrequested] => 2217
[conntime] => 1420114678
[version] => 70003
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 47082
[banscore] => 10
)
[4] => Array
(
[addr] => 193.109.128.156:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200399
[lastrecv] => 1420200168
[bytessent] => 1358582
[bytesrecv] => 250503
[blocksrequested] => 2237
[conntime] => 1420121323
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.7.4/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 0
[banscore] => 0
)
[5] => Array
(
[addr] => 2.121.15.15:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200493
[lastrecv] => 1420200397
[bytessent] => 114369
[bytesrecv] => 105387
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1420171564
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 580787
[banscore] => 0
)
[6] => Array
(
[addr] => 91.226.172.8:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200490
[lastrecv] => 1420200492
[bytessent] => 12797
[bytesrecv] => 78721
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1420189381
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 682986
[banscore] => 0
)
[7] => Array
(
[addr] => 54.178.177.173:9999
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200481
[lastrecv] => 1420200490
[bytessent] => 2594
[bytesrecv] => 77076
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1420194556
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.9.1.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 75201
[banscore] => 0
)
)
The developer really needs to fix this by creating a new check point at block 70,000 with block hash: 48c1ea33b1b3fcdf599b8fb7438ce73263ac7d4c6195812ecc5678b24da78696 |
|
|
|
|
Looks like there are several forks.
The developer needs to add a check point to the codebase.
Block #70,000 should be:
48c1ea33b1b3fcdf599b8fb7438ce73263ac7d4c6195812ecc5678b24da78696
|
|
|
|
zet network is not very strong right now. Uno is looking for coins to merge. Zet is being discussed on the uno thread. Is merging ZET with UNO an option for ZET-community? Would probably need to sacrifice the 30s-blocks but would ensure survival and increase network security. I thought i start a little discussion. What's your take on it? Any thoughts on merge mining with Unobtanium?
haha - same moment  It could be a win for both coins. I don't think Uno supports AuxPow for merge mining at the moment, is this being planned? I'm okay for merged mining as long as the Zetacoin consensus does not change. (no hard forking Zetacoin). This would require Uno to hard fork. |
|
|
|
|
Appears that it forked at Block #64615
|
|
|
|
Something fishy here... Tetcoin developer released a minor update to the wallet no hard forking or consensus change. He blocks older clients from connecting to his new one. // network protocol versioning
//
-static const int PROTOCOL_VERSION = 70003;
+static const int PROTOCOL_VERSION = 12870003;
// intial proto version, to be increased after version/verack negotiation
-static const int INIT_PROTO_VERSION = 209;
+static const int INIT_PROTO_VERSION = 128209;
// disconnect from peers older than this proto version
-static const int MIN_PEER_PROTO_VERSION = 70003;
+static const int MIN_PEER_PROTO_VERSION = 12870003;
// nTime field added to CAddress, starting with this version;
// if possible, avoid requesting addresses nodes older than this
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ static const int NOBLKS_VERSION_START = 32000;
static const int NOBLKS_VERSION_END = 32400;
// BIP 0031, pong message, is enabled for all versions AFTER this one
-static const int BIP0031_VERSION = 60000;
+static const int BIP0031_VERSION = 12860000;
// "mempool" command, enhanced "getdata" behavior starts with this version:
-static const int MEMPOOL_GD_VERSION = 60002;
+static const int MEMPOOL_GD_VERSION = 12860002;
#endif
He fails to mention this on the forum thread. Months go by, several users continue using the 'older' client and now there are two block chains.
2015-01-02 11:26:20 received block 178a051007c33c93cf98ddbe837fe30c1b6b3499f5687f39246be3aa8f46b197
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-01-02 11:26:20 Misbehaving: 93.118.178.241:59288 (0 -> 50)
2015-01-02 11:26:43 stored orphan tx b620433a2c2db2b7a3ef2caa15b66b071a582a71b432b495de411a5be205f86d (mapsz 10001)
2015-01-02 11:26:43 mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx
2015-01-02 11:26:47 stored orphan tx 5089fd1831481bf760827773e563ffc3e934013a534047ecfc9c9e7255953693 (mapsz 10001)
2015-01-02 11:26:47 mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx
2015-01-02 11:26:48 received block 26d9dbf22c30cfd05c2f538d2e8709dea2467650d0792c16ba1eaaeee73cc73a
2015-01-02 11:26:48 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits
2015-01-02 11:26:48 ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
2015-01-02 11:26:48 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2015-01-02 11:26:48 Misbehaving: 93.118.178.241:59288 (50 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
2015-01-02 11:26:48 disconnecting node 93.118.178.241:59288
2015-01-02 11:26:48 socket select error 9
2015-01-02 11:26:53 stored orphan tx d075597f90dc372d1044929deeb6f9e693f1851f4e5f7f5278f0a6e38748fb22 (mapsz 10001)
2015-01-02 11:26:53 mapOrphan overflow, removed 1 tx
|
|
|
|
|
There seem to be two block chains.
|
|
|
|
|
I know it would require a hard fork, but I am open to the option of adding merge mining against DOGE and LTC to KittehCoin.
|
|
|
|
|
'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 0acdea70-0d78-4be0-8937-5bc7688809c5'
|
|
|
|
Can anyone recommend someone to rebuild the coin?
And someone to make a website with a block explorer?
I will pay them, thank you.
I can provide a Drupal hosting in exchange for some BTC or Fireflycoins. |
|
|
|
Sorry Peercoin  There were 3 peercoin blocks found in the last few days. Here are the latest payment logs for the three blocks: 29/12/2014 09:00:38 Checking: PMCUZQYMmgUEHVtMA3xaNXBCRzU8VjW5Jy
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Valid address: PMCUZQYMmgUEHVtMA3xaNXBCRzU8VjW5Jy
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Getting Pending Blocks...
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Checking Block: 000000000000000b275219fc52e887984f99d8786062f7d33b02d6e7d0e641bc
29/12/2014 09:00:38 No conformations field, attempting to get from coinbase
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Block 000000000000000b275219fc52e887984f99d8786062f7d33b02d6e7d0e641bc (#150915): 62 Conformations, Block #150915 Is Not Mature Yet. 739 Conformations remain.
29/12/2014 09:00:38
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Checking: PPkDk7oxpxus8rPSRkMdiPhEm6SyaEJvbL
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Valid address: PPkDk7oxpxus8rPSRkMdiPhEm6SyaEJvbL
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Getting Pending Blocks...
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Checking Block: 000000000000000085e0215cc706096607b07f23113d46178d3e739d63e60fdd
29/12/2014 09:00:38 No conformations field, attempting to get from coinbase
29/12/2014 09:00:38 Block 000000000000000085e0215cc706096607b07f23113d46178d3e739d63e60fdd (#150489): 488 Conformations, Block #150489 Is Not Mature Yet. 313 Conformations remain.
29/12/2014 09:00:38
29/12/2014 09:00:39 Checking: PLVX8iYqxq3nnQRH7iGDw6xxeU1hbocsJG
29/12/2014 09:00:39 Valid address: PLVX8iYqxq3nnQRH7iGDw6xxeU1hbocsJG
29/12/2014 09:00:39 Getting Pending Blocks...
29/12/2014 09:00:39 Checking Block: 0000000000000000fcf7eac5465f20b6ffa091e53e702e80c4ab27805d54cc01
29/12/2014 09:00:39 No conformations field, attempting to get from coinbase
29/12/2014 09:00:39 Block 0000000000000000fcf7eac5465f20b6ffa091e53e702e80c4ab27805d54cc01 (#150505): 472 Conformations, Block #150505 Is Not Mature Yet. 329 Conformations remain.
29/12/2014 09:00:39
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know how long it takes to be paid out i found a block on the 26-12-2014 and still waiting for payment ?
For which coin? Most questions can be answered on the FAQ regarding payments: http://mining.securepayment.cc/help.php |
|
|
|
Ok, so no this wallet I have is apparently not on the same blockchain. Downloaded it again today from the main site and still wrong chain. Not sure how this can be fixed but it does effect whether i will chance wasting more hash time at one of your pools. Sorry for that but I can't afford hits like this.
Sorry your still having trouble. You may want to post in the TekCoin thread for assistance with getting on the correct chain. Your hash power was not wasted since the payment has been sent to your address. The coins are yours so long as you have the private key to them. It doesn't matter if you mine at my pool or any other pool if your on the wrong chain. Coinwarz.com and the block explorer I link to have the correct block chain. |
|
|
|
I am running the new 2.2.0.o version of tekcoin wallet and yes it is fully synched. Atleast it says it is and shows 10 active connections. This was first time I ever mined tek so there is nothing in my wallet record wise other than the original addy.
I am re-installing it now and it is redownloading the blockchain. When it gets done I will try my wallet.dat to see if maybe it was just a glitch on my end.
Once you get it re-downloaded, check that you are on the correct chain. As of now, the latest block is #715,629 => http://tek.blockchain.lt/block/000000000000a38cd8e9561fc7eb6e2e57685ae233faf493010f01992034d707 |
|
|
|
I mined for awhile on tekcoin at your site. Kinda funny that it shows I was paid for all the blocks I found yet i never received a single coin. Yes, I checked my addy to make sure it was correct, "BrVwzEWjrjGdWsk9vB52ECiCAQbRzcPCkt". Not a single transaction ever came thru. Hopefully someone can look at this and explain to me what happened please.
I updated the block chain link (the old one does not work any more). The transaction appear to have been successful. Example: http://tek.blockchain.lt/tx/0f8b9036fa7f6bb64007f95c65c3b41aec38f9c81bc43861f01eeaaffe875824To help troubleshoot, can you check the following: - Is your client fully synced?
- Are you on version v2.1.1.0?
|
|
|
|
VERY IMPORTANT NOTE:After several months I must now fully move on to my core project - Syscoin. That being the case many properties related to Kittehcoin (Block explorer, main website, forums, blog, etc) are going to be coming down unless a member of the community contacts me and is willing to take over this responsibility. I am also going to be removing myself from the Kittehcoin github repository and would like the new community lead to take over that as well. I will be ensuring the key sites continue to operate for the next 10 days, then I will let them expire naturally. Please email me dan@syscoin.org to workout a handoff- I don't want these boxes to just die but I can't keep hosting them. To who ever takes over, don't change the consensus (algorithm, fundamentals, etc..) Kittehcoin only needs marketing. Anything else is just a gimmick that will offer nothing more than a short lived tiny boost in price. Also, danosphere. You mind sending me the MEOW you have left? KPPjzVxr2RDmmXruamcMkJQQbuaYbzNeVt Thank You for the work you did on getting it this far and good luck on Syscoin. |
|
|
|
Donated 20 blocks (700k) to the B1bl3 faucet.
Updated. |
|
|
|
|
BTCD faucet has been refilled.
|
|
|
|
The reference implementation of the RPC payout script has been updated to include a 'grouped' payment feature using the RPC function 'sendmany'. https://github.com/tuaris/FaucetRPCMinumim Payout/Transaction Grouping
Transaction grouping allows you send send all pending payments in a single transaction thus allowing you to reduce transaction fees.
When enabled, if the sum of pending payments is less than 'FAUCET_MIN_PAYOUT', payments will not be sent in the current run. Set 'FAUCET_MIN_PAYOUT' to '0' to disable this feature and always use individual transactions. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
