Look at Bitcoinity
|
|
|
wake up to 98.5 and rising not sure if bitcoinity is trolling me or serious. had to check other places to verify slugs, flashing signs, background images, dancing troll videos
Yes, Bitcoinity is flashy on this April fool's day But I would still believe seeing 100$ on this day
|
|
|
Yup, I just saw the 2K wall-eater buy transaction
|
|
|
I have 20K Freicoins, selling for 2BTC
|
|
|
$126 next week!
Na, I say $124.32 next week! In fact, it will be both... on it's way to 150$
|
|
|
Of course, it would be easier to use Bit-cents, but there already mechanism in place for milli-Bitcoins, in Bitcoin-qt at least. I think we'll get there eventually.
With ordinary stocks, usually, when the issue occur, there is a "split", where each share is split in 10 shares each weighting 10 times less (for example... the number is arbitrary). So, one day, you have 10 shares at 150$, the next you have 100 shares at 15$. You have the same amount, but fur us, puny weekly minded humans, it's easier to "deal" with less-than-100$ shares. So, I guess the same limit does apply for Bitcoins in our minds. We think that >100$ is too high, not worth buying, etc. But let's say tomorrow we have 0.1$/mBTC, then one could easily see the potential of mBTC raising to .15$, .2$, etc.
|
|
|
√(-1) = 1i... But that's probably too "complex" for OP
|
|
|
tormail.org is just a non-working front anyway. The real tormail is only accessible from Tor.
We know that... duh hehe Actually, tormail.org is up, and I can access the .onion site, but the mail database seem to be down.
|
|
|
Are you gonna unstrike them when the price tanks? LOL! Or I would add, are you gonna push the list down, adding single digit prices at the top if it crash?
|
|
|
Down for me too. Seem to get down often lately... That sucks.
|
|
|
Woohoo!
|
|
|
There's one algo for that, it's called scrypt. There are parameters you can tweak that adjust the memory requirement. It is used for Litecoins (LTC). Litecoin use ~128K memory so it can fit easily in the CPU L2 cache. However, memory requirement is small enough that GPU can compete. But one could easily create a coin requiring 1GB of memory, in which case a GPU probably would hardly have more advantage (if any) than CPU.
|
|
|
That would be nice
|
|
|
I have a little over 20,000 FRC to sell @ 3 BTC (that's 0.15BTC per 1000FRC). PM me if interested
|
|
|
73$ wall... swallowed whole... 75$ wall next to be being eaten. After that... Nothing major ahead
|
|
|
I think we'll see gradual increase as those funds are transferred to Mt. Gox. Gox have thousands of accounts waiting for verification. When this is done, people will gradually transfer funds, which will take 1~5 days (depending on funding method). The medias will probably talk more about that this week too. So, gradually over the course of this week and next week, I expect the prices to go up. How far? Well, only time can tell. For sure those 5000+ new accounts are not there just for peekers, and we'll see actual trades, big trades...
|
|
|
Found your problem: - You're playing SatoshiDICE
- You're playing it with small amounts
- For some reason you're playing it with USD instead of BTC
Yes, I know, however, here in Canada, as probably in lot of other country, We have one of the worst gambling regulation. The cut on any lottery ticket is at least 45~55% going to the government. I'm not a compulsive gambler, but I sometime like to have my lottery ticket. Since I'm mining full time, I'm making a lot more than the cost of a ticket. And if I have the chance of having a ticket with 45~55% return, or a "ticket" with 98.1% return, the choice is not hard to make. I play in BTC, but I say I want to bet ~1$ per day (I make about 400$ per months in mining those days, this is after subtracting electricity cost, which is very cheap here in Quebec, and heat up our house during our cold days ). As said, I'm not the kind of player who will play 1000$ on 50%. I like to play "just for fun". 1$ on low probability, maybe 1/1000 to 1/32000. I know I'll lose, but hey, maybe someday I'll win! That's the part where they say that gambling should remain a game... And to respond to the other comment above, SatoshiDICE don't have 'accounts'. It's 1 transaction per bet. So you can't put a big amount over there and use it as you go. Yes I know it's polluting the blockchain, and I do are in favor of cutting the negligible 'return on every lost bet' transactions.
|
|
|
We usually see fees like "0.005" or "0.001". What will happen to those in the future?
Already now, playing SatoshiDICE, putting ~1$ (0.020 BTC, and soon 0.015BTC) and having to pay 0.005BTC does make a substantial difference. The Bitcoin-qt client seem to often want the fees required.
|
|
|
Hmmmm... Transactions in micro-BTC getting the norm Smell lovely!
|
|
|
|