Matt,
The 50 sat/byte is mixed with the "over 10 sat/byte"?
That makes 50 sat/byte look a bit spammy.
And it means it does not show what I am talking to Lauda about.
Would it be better 50 sat/bite and over (not 51 as now?)
10 - 49 sat/byte
The 50 sat/byte is mixed with the "over 10 sat/byte"?
That makes 50 sat/byte look a bit spammy.
And it means it does not show what I am talking to Lauda about.
Would it be better 50 sat/bite and over (not 51 as now?)
10 - 49 sat/byte
It's a stacked chart, meaning you can either read partitions or total.
I have arbitrarily chosen to make fee groups like this:
(1) 50 satoshi / byte or greater,
(2) 10 satoshi / byte or greater,
(3) all transactions
Obviously (2) contains (1), and (3) contains both (1) and (2). But you can easily use the difference to figure out the number of transactions / queue size with less than 10 satoshi / byte, over 50 satoshi / byte, between 10 and 50, etc.