I'll buy 4 @ .90, for local pick up or delivered to southern, ontario.
HT xD
|
|
|
Yup.. If you succeed, IFC will eventually become one giant loan payment. Even if you eliminate interest, the credits, fees and the hoarding will destroy IFC before it has a chance to show its true potential. Next you'll want to call it the CMF, Crypto Monetary Fund, and use it to impose austerity measures on the miners and pools that do not comply with your standards. HT xD firstly if loans are considered it will be a totally different website ( I don't really want to do loans snaz31 does ) the most we would be encouraging to save would be 1 blocks worth that's not really hording it ( we will lower that amount as the block size gets smaller ) the savings part is only the first of many projects that will be for IFC once there are quality services for IFC they can only help it the start of this project will be up and running very soon Have fun trying. It will surely fail as anyone willing to trust ANY bank in this day and age, is a fool. snaz31 also says its ok to sell cheap trust votes and/or forum accounts... What would his price be on some or all of your savings ? HT xD
|
|
|
Yup.. If you succeed, IFC will eventually become one giant loan payment. Even if you eliminate interest, the credits, fees and the hoarding will destroy IFC before it has a chance to show its true potential. Next you'll want to call it the CMF, Crypto Monetary Fund, and use it to impose austerity measures on the miners and pools that do not comply with your standards. HT xD
|
|
|
Don't rename the coin! We are going to loose much, our freedom! +1, Agreed. +2 There is NOTHING wrong with the name. Thanks for chiming in, Mr. Winkler. Say NO to teen porn ! HT xD
|
|
|
Then why does SD claim that bets are "provably trustworthy" ?
Or is SD only implying the provfair standard is in effect ?
I don't really understand your point. I think "trustworthy" and "fair" are being used interchangeably here. It's nothing to do with blocks or confirmations. It's to do with SD being unable to decide who wins and who loses in an unfair manner. Thanks for making things clear guys. HT xD
|
|
|
Hey! its all manwin content just don't go there.....
Teen section is hot, really they got much better legs for doing the bouncing than the milfs or older ladies, and it shows when in the action.
Teens are children. If that is what this coin is about, I will delete/destroy my coins and be done with it. HT xD i'm lost what u r on about actually? Something we all need to be cognizant of, especially in this thread, is that this is NOT silk road. Sexcoin should NEVER in any way support illegal activities. Personally I don't, and really I would pull MY support of this coin if I found that it suddenly was a favorite conduit for many of the potential pitfalls that surrounds the "Adult Entertainment Industry". Safe, Sane, Consensual is a rule of thumb. Be mindful of all the stigma that Bitcoin has had to overcome when posting here. 100% agree. i think i missed what started Hippie Tech comments Your website did ! uugh.. Why you do not understand that watching child-like teens, will only give those against the crypto movement, more ammunition. Don't get me started on sites like RKings and how they prey on the drunken, drugged, young and impressionable. If you are not a mormon, look into it because they also like them young. You'll fit right in. HT xD Who's website? I have no idea what the hell ur on about in here and as far as I am aware sxcoin has no association with any illegal websites? I think the coin's name will be a good novelty when it starts trading (after it has usefulness aswell), longterm it could do well, and the average users will think of it more in a fun way as fun thing. Pardon my brain fart but I meant fendlesitck's porn site. And, I never said it was illegal, but it should be. 21+ all the way !! HT xD
|
|
|
Hey! its all manwin content just don't go there.....
Teen section is hot, really they got much better legs for doing the bouncing than the milfs or older ladies, and it shows when in the action.
Teens are children. If that is what this coin is about, I will delete/destroy my coins and be done with it. HT xD i'm lost what u r on about actually? Something we all need to be cognizant of, especially in this thread, is that this is NOT silk road. Sexcoin should NEVER in any way support illegal activities. Personally I don't, and really I would pull MY support of this coin if I found that it suddenly was a favorite conduit for many of the potential pitfalls that surrounds the "Adult Entertainment Industry". Safe, Sane, Consensual is a rule of thumb. Be mindful of all the stigma that Bitcoin has had to overcome when posting here. 100% agree. i think i missed what started Hippie Tech comments Your website did ! uugh.. Why you do not understand that watching child-like teens, will only give those against the crypto movement, more ammunition. Don't get me started on sites like RKings and how they prey on the drunken, drugged, young and impressionable. If you are not a mormon, look into it because they also like them young. You'll fit right in. HT xD
|
|
|
LMAO.. the stats are on the psu...
|
|
|
How many +12v rails/combined amps and what is it's rating ? eg. 80+ gold.. ect..
If its a budget like psu, I wouldn't push it too hard.
|
|
|
What make/model and how old is the psu ?
Sounds like the 5830s are using the same rail.
HT xD
|
|
|
Just scroll 30 cm higher- 5 posts above Thx for the 12.6 driver tip as it might help smooth some edges on my 2x 7870xt, and a Pitcairn 7870. If this stops the 13.4's excessive cpu load issue with sha-256, I will shower you with junk coins ! HT xD
|
|
|
Hey! its all manwin content just don't go there.....
Teen section is hot, really they got much better legs for doing the bouncing than the milfs or older ladies, and it shows when in the action.
Teens are children. If that is what this coin is about, I will delete/destroy my coins and be done with it. HT xD
|
|
|
Sadly it's only getting worse. We are beyond a 24 hour retarget at this point. Even 24 hours is bad, because in reality all that means is that only 480 blocks are mined for each retarget period (~2 days right now). That's quite a bit shy of the target 1440 blocks that are supposed to be created each day.
Yes, some action is required here. I am researching the best retarget times now. So not to introduce other undesired side effects. I am thinking now of 5 - 10 min retarget intervals. So we will do a hard fork in the near future to break this feedback cycle. Titan See if you can re-target based on time rather than block count, it should be pretty easy to do as each block has a timestamp so an "if greater than timestamp = x then adjust". Most devs take the easy way out and just change the block count parameter because it's easier to calculate when the last change occured, but just look at all the coins that have been high diff locked by the flash mining crowd to see that's pretty hopeless. I think an elapsed time diff adjustment, like 10min, 30min, 1hr or more should be good, just depends on how long you are prepared to leave the block rate out of range. If you adjust frequently, say every 10min, then you could set a limit like no more than +/- 10% change every 10min. So the ups and downs are a bit more graceful. If you went time based adjustments ask people to nominate the interval and the percentage to see whats prefered. You could even run a poll with some choices to see what miners want. eg. Interval Max diff adjustment 10min 10% 30min 50% 60min unlimited ... I see your point now. This is an interesting idea. There might be a problem if consecutive block numbers do not have consecutive time stamps. I have to think a bit about it. Certainly I am open to new ideas from the community to make the network more robust and secure and give a fair share to all miners. Titan You may want to look at Mincoin's diff adjustment. It handles the hashrate bursts rather well. Or.. you could.. as a courtesy, to each coin's core movement, decide that coin hopping is BAD BUSINESS. HT xD
|
|
|
Some of those models look young.
How about we keep the teen/college crap out of this ?
HT xD
|
|
|
Smart people will use this instead of your bank. WTG Slush and friends. --> http://www.bitcointrezor.com/?ref=poolThose same people will also realize that you think its ok to sell votes for cheap favors. iDr414eHs2TNCAPmDQifhZ7AyhdJvL1Ln5
Thanks bud, great promotion!
Edit, have given you your trust feedback (first person I ever did that for)...
Selling trust ratings for a few pennies of IFC is not cool. Happy to have some coins and check out his website but I won't be helping set him up with cheap false trust for scams. yes trust is for 2 way transactions not one way transactions Then why exactly did it let me do it? Go talk to the site admin, not me! There is a comment section, nowhere on my trust rating did I say I put up any money! But the guy promised to send the coins and came through! Jesus christ! People can always READ the comments in the trust section and see what exactly happened, okay bud??? Next time I choose to do something, should I run it by you all first? LMAO i was speaking to the OP, you are obviously free to give trust to whomever you wish Well that is awful funny because you seem to commenting regarding mine and the other chaps comments as shown by the little sub thread above... But hey so glad to have your blessing there even if it contradicts your original comment. Lol You should read ELiOt's comments again as both are valid. Selling merit points IS SKETCHY (especially when done under the false pretences of a give-away) and those that choose to vote for the OP are free to do so. Those that do sell or fake votes should be aware that this will cast them under a similar light. This also a huge dis-service to Bitcointalk and their efforts to provide us with a viable rating system. HT xD Once and for all and this is the last thing I will say about it: I was NOT selling trust points or doing something remotely sketchy, and I feel terrible if things came out that way. Everybody is free to use his or her favorite block explorer and verify that I indeed did give away 47 million IFC as promised. My intention with this thread was to broaden the number of IFC users, and I feel those goals were met. If a receiver wishes to thank me by using the trust point system, it is completely his or her call. Peace out. You did nothing wrong mate some people are far too up there own arse to be honest! You did a good thing and I appreciated that hence the trust rating. I saw your good intentions and if others couldn't that is their problem not yours or mine. Again thank you for the great promotion. HT xD
|
|
|
Great service and the nicest bunch of hosers you'll ever meet ! I'm saying that even though my request to have the inbred queen's head stamped with a BTC, on all the bills, had gone unanswered. Thanks again to James and the staff at CanadianBitcoins. pEACe HT xD
|
|
|
I am honestly wondering how soon we'll see a Gox thread in the Scam Accusations forum.
Let the first exchange with insider trading cast the first junk coin. Since there are none.. lets line them all up... and... BOYCOTT ! The asic companies.. the exchanges and anyone else that deserves it. Is there anything this so called revolution is doing right atm ? HT xD
|
|
|
Hios If this is provfair, then why am I seeing results before the next block is found ? HT xD The result is derived entirely from three things: 1) the site's daily secret 2) your bet's txid 3) your bet's output id within the tx It doesn't matter which block your bet gets included in - that doesn't change the result. Then why does SD claim that bets are "provably trustworthy" ? Or is SD only implying the provfair standard is in effect ? HT xD
|
|
|
|