Guys, does anyone have a working link for today's Blackjack? [I hope I did not rush to the question, since I see a couple of deleted messages.] Edited: 20 minutes before the start of the match, and there is no news ... sad / Acceptance of bets ended before it started ..   |
|
|
|
[...]
Speaking of rebranding, the name change is the last thing that would interest me ... and it’s not the first time I’ve seen you place a lack of momentum on the shoulders of the community. As for the "wall of pessimism" you are talking about, I think any reasonable person should agree that this is much better than a wall of spam, or even worse, complete silence, (you should be aware that everyone here appreciates your presence and that of tonych). However, something is wrong .. |
|
|
|
Because the linuxfoundation mailing list and IRC are much easier to communicate in for avoiding non-devs making irrelevant comments about Github patches which they otherwise have no stake in.
It was a rhetorical question in the spirit of the openness of our community ... and as for me, LML is an outdated way of communication that has not been suitable for modern realities for a long time, so either something needs to be changed or in the end we will have a gang of old school b'developers. |
|
|
|
I guess it's more on the supply of this coin, it's only 11,007,978.84 BGL circulating supply and the price is currently at 0.04 USD.. if Elon could pump DOge with billions of supply, then at least BGL could get $1 at a very minimum anytime, and more so once it's listed in bigger exchanges.
I'm pretty sure that making such conclusions based on a comparison of the total/circulating supply and the current price is a crappy decision, (especially considering that the cmc displays thousands of the same shitty coins with the same parameters). Therefore, my first question remains valid ... and by the way, since when is HotBit a top exchange? |
|
|
|
I really think this is a good project and the merits of the project will speak for itself
Many people here feel the same way, and although the technical implementation of Obyte is beyond praise, there are those who think that their marketing strategy is dead. In the end, after rethinking the mistakes and realizing that the existing marketing concept does not work there is nothing wrong with rebranding. There won't be a good exchange, either, until the Obyte team is on the path to fix it ... and I really feel like someone is hiding the setbacks. Btw, since conventional strategies don't work, maybe in this case Obyte team will contact Tether and agree on the launch of USDT on the Obyte Network? [tether/transparency] |
|
|
|
All the developers moved on to other forums for discussion because Bitcointalk is full of spam and nonsense.
I honestly do not quite agree with your statement ... since spam can be anywhere, but not in the Development & Technical Discussion sections, Mining, Bitcoin Technical Support. In addition, just don't say that you, as a pretty influential person, have no influence on other developers .. I mean, why don't you and gmaxwell just create a public but private section (section for developers only). |
|
|
|
Really loving this match to hit our Blackjack. Last fixture of these teams was on May 3 and if my counting skill is correct, they got 22 combined goals, corners and cards. I'm expecting them to repeat that performance today and give us the needed lucky number here.
Two points in the first half is what really upset me today ... today I had just one of those days when I did not look at anything but statistics, (and until the end of the match, I thought exactly the same as you) given the aggressiveness of past matches. This might alleviate the pain that I felt from the recent "crash".  You need to ask DS what he does in such situations, since the strength of his pain at one of the moments reached 0.3 BTC. |
|
|
|
[...]
Can someone fill me in on the details of the hype? Since recently quite a lot of people have become interested in this little-known coin, (apparently I'm missing something). |
|
|
|
As far as I know, only Admin can see who voted what.
As far as I know, before could only make one choice ... and, judging by the fact that I was able to vote for several points at once, it can be assumed that Theymos slightly updated the voting function. Given that any changes to the current version of the forum are immediately duplicated in Epochtalk, we can assume that the development continues. I was leading the monologue to the fact that Pmalek needs to add one more reason ... someone might say, "I am leaving the forum forever because tomorrow we are switching to Epochtalk". 1. Choice Voting and PublicityCurrently, during public voting, users can only make one choice, known as "bullet voting", which is not very convenient for some counting scenarios. - Proposal: To enable users to give preference to any number of items or candidates during voting.
- Poll Options: Public, Identification of users participating in the survey, (As below).
 |
|
|
|
О, напомнило мою старую тему [...]
Я тоже кое-что вспомнил ... админ Bitsler пополняя баланс для sig, допустил стократную ошибку в пользу yahoo62278, (это конечно не 700 битков а лишь 40 BTC но на секундочку, биток тогда стоил $6200). Я думаю что тогда, что сейчас yahoo не располагает такой суммой в крипте ... по этой причине можно с уверенностью сказать, на сколько этот случай подчеркивает степень его порядочности. |
|
|
|
|
Correct me if I am wrong, but accepting any of the options will suspend a long-standing provision in the US tax code, according to which, according to which, the tax on income on investments should be lower than on wages. In addition, the Biden administration's claims that the tax code update will ultimately bring trillions of dollars into the budget ... are wrong, (in the sense that in reality it will only increase the public debt). I immediately recall one well-known saying "everyone enjoys the rights in the constitution, but few people want to be responsible for paying taxes." One way or another, I still do not understand how a person who has worked in public service all his life can talk about social inequality ... (after all, the essence of these tax changes is precisely in this).
|
|
|
|
I didn't vote because I didn't find an acceptable option for myself ... in the end, maybe hilariousandco is really right. Although I doubt his ability to rise from the dead, at least until LoyceV uploads his consciousness to the network and explains how to do it.  Death. Though I may still haunt the forum after I die. Haven't decided yet.
|
|
|
|
It shocked me because the mistake I made while I was a newbie and become banned while I was sr. member means while I have received 250+ merit. Oh, I remember a couple of months ago I saw information about your account and a couple of other accounts in bpip ... but for some reason it seemed to me that the restrictions imposed on your account should have expired in April .. In any case, it doesn't matter anymore, so I congratulations on unlocking! |
|
|
|
Risk ? There is never a risk for Sheffield. The amount of money from finishing in the top spot in Championship is much lower than finishing 20th in EPL and by getting into EPL this season, Sheffield has banked quite some good amount. This is the reason why some of the newly promoted teams dont take this thing seriously by improving the teams because all they ever want are slices of money from EPL sponsorship
Wow, I really didn't know that ... but digging deeper I was just stunned by the numbers of the Premier League. I admit, I did not find data for 2020/2021, but given that every year, apparently, the budget is increasing by 10%, then we can assume what amounts are in question. "The amount of remuneration is formed from three sources": [1] an equal share, which is distributed among all teams, [2] bonus for a place in the final table, [3] money from sold TV broadcasts. Let me know if someone has a similar table for 2021.  |
|
|
|
But good idea
Then I have the next question ... can our names be marked in red? So that no one else comes close to our four) Lol  53,082 ETFbitcoin
53,210 bitmover*
53,333 icopress*
53,458 malevolent* |
|
|
|
Not that it bothers me much, but maybe the BPIP Extension developers should consider adding a new feature? In the context of hiding topics by keywords. Although, maybe I'm wrong and the guys have more important tasks ... for example, the implementation of the previous proposal. I'm not aware of any feature on Bitcointalk that allows you to filter out topics by title name. As for the userscript, enjoy (may contain bugs, use at your own risk, license: MIT license): // ==UserScript==
// @name Bitcointalk Board De-Musk-ifier
// @namespace mprep
// @version 0.2
// @description Attempts to filter out topics related to Elon Musk (or any other terms in the blacklist)
// @author mprep
// @match https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=*
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
(function() {
'use strict';
////////////////////////////////////////////// Blacklisted terms //////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// (add or remove terms to update blacklist; save the userscript after doing so) //
// (must be lowercased, only letters, numbers and underscore) //
let blacklist = ["elon", "musk", "tesla"];
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
let allTopics = document.querySelectorAll("[id^='topic_'] [id^='msg_'] a");
for (let i = 0; i < allTopics.length; i++)
{
let topicTitleWords = allTopics[i].innerText.replace(/[^\w\s]/gi, '').toLowerCase().split(' ');
for (let u = 0; u < blacklist.length; u++)
{
if (topicTitleWords.includes(blacklist[u]))
{
allTopics[i].closest("tr").remove();
break;
}
}
}
})(); |
|
|
|
I have a very big problem because I sent a large amount of USDT from Binance to an exchange.
I was about to correct you ... considering that CoinList was previously registered with the SEC only as an investment consultant firm [https://reports.adviserinfo.sec.gov/reports/ADV/291553/PDF/291553.pdf]. But I realized that I haven't followed the news for a long time ... (although the transformation of the business, it was a predictable step, considering that they enlisted the support of Filecoin and Dfinity).Well, of course, in addition to all of the above, try to contact these people (by clicking on the links, you will find all their details, including email addresses). In theory, depending on the amount you mistakenly lost, you still have ways to put pressure on CoinLis, good luck. [1] https://angel.co/p/joshuaxls (Founder CoinList) [2] https://angel.co/p/ab (Co-founder CoinList) [3] https://angel.co/p/paul (CTO CoilList) |
|
|
|
После окончания подписной Yobit прям резкий спад активности и многие постеры пропали в одночасье и не заходят сюда до сих пор, а если и заходят, то почти ничего не пишут. Это событие стало отправной точкой в падении активности.
Будь добр напомни ... Sig Yobit много платили? (как собственно говоря люди вообще присоединялись к этой сиге если это откровенно мошенническая биржа).Формат форума просто практически мертв в современных реалиях [...]
Да, это определенно одна из причин, но я бы так-же добавил и то, что маркетологи стоящие за прøектами прекрасно понимают что мы находимся лишь на начальном этапе ... В том смысле, что помимо своей сферы деятельности лидеры рынка работают еще и над созданием инфраструктуры в масштабе, (тот же coinmarketcap, который после поглощения был реструктуризирован до такой степени что стал напоминать своего рода crypto google). |
|
|
|
My 2 cents ... I see that some users publish their forecasts without looking at the concentration of the price range .. I have nothing against, but in my opinion, by doing so, they reduce both their own and other people's chances of winning. 48,777 theymos*
48,779 casperBGD Maybe it is worth making this event two-round? For example, if the price of bitcoin reaches $ 71,000 on June 21, then everyone whose predictions are in the $ 500-700 range (70300-71700) go to the second round. Well, in the second round everything is the same ... only with a difference in time. |
|
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the set of rules is just a cheat sheet for mods, therefore, unquestioningly "adhering to the letter of the law" may not always be justified and objective. I just want to say that formally yes, El duderino_ allegedly violated several rules ... but given that the moments when the whole forum gathers in one place are extremely rare, the moderators probably should have shown more flexibility in making decisions.
Btw, speaking of "unfairness towards other threads", I would also say that drawing such an analogy is pointless, since I see a colossal difference between El duderino_'s thread and the threads of the "Game and Rounds" section. And the point is not at all about the declared remuneration, but about the strengthening of bitcoin culture and the value of opinions, (in fact, this is another reason why I believe that the place of thread X in the section of speculation). In any case, no matter what decision the mod made, I sense that El duderino_ is justifiably outraged as I think he is one of the last people on this forum to pursue pragmatic goals.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
