Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 08:47:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 ... 485 »
3421  Economy / Reputation / Re: Request for permanent ban of user BayAreaCoins on: October 11, 2020, 07:05:39 AM
...

I'm sure quickseller (and any number of other peddlers of accounts) has said the same thing about their own conversations with their own alts.

3422  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN SLOTS] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ | Up to 0.0375 BTC/w on: October 11, 2020, 06:00:44 AM
Username:   Timelord2067
Post Count:   6,391
BTC Address (must be SegWit):   bc1q9see7h5pvdydru0r6mspwe6pdt0a83ydzsw8y3
3423  Economy / Reputation / Re: Request for permanent ban of user BayAreaCoins on: October 11, 2020, 05:14:06 AM
Birds of a feather flock together...

First cab off of the rank is SinbadGuthrie who the OP ( Trade Runner ) quotes in the OP.

Code:
Name: 	SinbadGuthrie
Posts: 0
Activity: 0
Merit: 1
Position: Brand new
Date Registered: 22 October 2019, 01:37:19
Last Active: 21 September 2020, 13:45:12

Trade Runner is trusted by SinbadGuthrie plus two other UID's, bitbottrader and iGO_Tech - all three trust each-other and have also merited each-others work.

Week 86: https://loyce.club/trust/2020-09-12_Sat_05.10h/2312200.html

Quote
Trust list for: Trade Runner (Trust: awaiting update) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-09-12_Sat_05.10h)
Back to index

Trade Runner Trusts these users' judgement:
1. NEW bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW SinbadGuthrie (Trust: awaiting update) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Trade Runner Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

Trade Runner's judgement is Trusted by:
1. NEW bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Trade Runner's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.





An example of their merit abuse can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5255830.0;all Archive [1a], [1b]

Quote







Next we examine their activity dates:

Code:
29 July 2018, 10:18:51 Date Registered: 	Trade Runner

13 May 2019, 01:18:11 Date Registered: bitbottrader

22 October 2019, 01:37:19 Date Registered: SinbadGuthrie
25 October 2019, 22:22:54 Date Registered: iGO_Tech

11/25/2019 9:02:36 AM password reset via email iGO_Tech

3/27/2020 6:33:29 AM Changed to Archived status Inactive for 90 days SinbadGuthrie

5/24/2020 8:19:24 PM Profile woke up New post  SinbadGuthrie

6/3/2020 11:54:50 AM password reset via email iGO_Tech

21 September 2020, 13:45:12 Last Active: SinbadGuthrie

Conclusion:

SinbadGuthrie and iGO_Tech have registered within two-and-a-half days of each-other just happen to choose the same week to DT trust Trade Runner?  I don't think so.

It is my opinion that all four: Trade Runner, bitbottrader, SinbadGuthrie and iGO_Tech are alts of each-other engaging in DT abuse and merit abuse.

Here is how all fours DT lists look in Week 91:

https://loyce.club/trust/2020-10-10_Sat_05.17h/2312200.html

Quote
Trust list for: Trade Runner (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (47 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-10-10_Sat_05.17h)
Back to index

Trade Runner Trusts these users' judgement:

12. bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Trade Runner Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

Trade Runner's judgement is Trusted by:

2. bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Trade Runner's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

https://loyce.club/trust/2020-10-10_Sat_05.17h/2598956.html

Quote
Trust list for: bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-10-10_Sat_05.17h)
Back to index

bitbottrader Trusts these users' judgement:

2. Trade Runner (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (47 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

bitbottrader Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

bitbottrader's judgement is Trusted by:

2. Trade Runner (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (47 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~bitbottrader's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

https://loyce.club/trust/2020-10-10_Sat_05.17h/2701871.html

Quote
Trust list for: iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-10-10_Sat_05.17h)
Back to index

iGO_Tech Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Trade Runner (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (47 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

iGO_Tech Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

iGO_Tech's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Trade Runner (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (47 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~iGO_Tech's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. blurryeyed (Trust: +1 / =5 / -2) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.


... and week 89: https://loyce.club/trust/2020-09-26_Sat_05.08h/2698590.html

Quote
Trust list for: SinbadGuthrie (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-09-26_Sat_05.08h)
Back to index

SinbadGuthrie Trusts these users' judgement:
-

SinbadGuthrie Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

SinbadGuthrie's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Removed Trade Runner (Trust: neutral) (39 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~SinbadGuthrie's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

3424  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Are you a high roller? on: October 11, 2020, 03:53:24 AM
Your minimum is $1, may I know your maximum wagers for roullete?

The bank has to be able to cover a wager, so to roll $1 on any single number (say 13) requires the house to have what they advertise they pay out on that wager - usually 35:1 (plus your wager back) so the bank has to have $ 35 on hand to cover your wager.

A $20 wager = $700 on hand and so on.

I've seen where multiple players will use the "colour" chips of the game table and make a dozen different wagers each roll (usually with three or four chips) - they loose big, but win each roll as well.  Their lost chips cover the wins in the same roll.

Strange stuff to watch.
3425  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 02:46:59 AM
...


Here we go again...

LFC_Bitcoin isn't DT1, so at best they give Trade Runner a leg up, but none of the nine non-DT1 users a leg up.  (and none of those nine are on either of our lists from what I can tell.)

3426  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 02:37:02 AM
Archived for future reference:  [1a], [1b]

~

Trade Runner (trusted by LFC_Bitcoin) is responsible for this.

I accept your apology.

Quote
Trust list for: Trade Runner (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (47 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-10-10_Sat_05.17h)
Back to index

Trade Runner Trusts these users' judgement:
1. Ron~Popeil (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. examplens (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (7) 312 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. nutildah (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 2671 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (2780 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. gembitz (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -4) (119 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. game-protect Banned! (Trust: !!!:  +0 / =3 / -47) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. eCurencies (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. JollyGood (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 775 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. svennnny (Trust: neutral) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. OWZ1337 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. broke_tradah (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -2) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Trade Runner Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


Trade Runner's judgement is Trusted by:
1. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (2780 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. iGO_Tech (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Trade Runner's judgement is Distrusted by:
-



Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.


... even if it doesn't make any sense...
3427  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 02:18:12 AM
...

Oh dear ...  Don't be so impatient Roll Eyes

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote
3428  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 01:55:28 AM
~

Post the list of 83/84/85 users, preferably in a separate thread, if you still can't figure it out. This is not an offer to work on a project, just an attempt to stop the derailment.

What I find puzzling is you want me to remove myself from every thread you attack me in by "suggesting" I start a thread elsewhere.  You won't follow through on your promises to help.  We all know that.

If you can't speak civilly towards me I will have to yet again ask you to stop.
3429  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 01:43:08 AM
...

As I've already explained, it's not anyone I've trusted, or distrusted that's causing this.

Instead of yelling at me you spend Saturday night your time doing something more engaging - clearly the Forum is affecting your health.
3430  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 01:27:34 AM
and stop derailing the thread.

I'll leave that up to the OP to decide - after all it's not your thread. Q.E.D.

In any case I'm not sure why you are so hostile towards me (yet again).

I haven't "trusted" any of those people.  Please *read* what I wrote in my previous posts.  I haven't trusted these users.  This is likely to be similar to what happened to Lauda's trust rating when someone manipulated their trust feedback scores/DT.

For-warned is for-armed.
3431  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 01:05:26 AM
So you're saying the screen grabs are fake?

No, most likely you fucked up your trust list or trust depth or both. Even at DefaultTrust depth 4 I can't see what your screenshots show.

Actually no.  I haven't made any adjustments to my DT trust list since last week. 

These are my last two DT1 adjustments:



My scores (and yours) were unchanged eight hours ago.  I've just had a look at BountyDetective's page for week 91 and they were only trusted by Vispilio, so I'd say you're still targeting Vispilio and their associates ...

... but thanks for making the effort to have a look - perhaps there's another explanation you haven't considered yet.

Quote
And this has nothing to do with DT1/DT2 negative feedback.

Well it does... you're showing as -83 (and you're on DT1 the same as me are you not?)
3432  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 12:43:12 AM
Is anyone else seeing this?

No. Stop posting your hallucinations everywhere.

So you're saying the screen grabs are fake?
3433  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) on: October 11, 2020, 12:06:22 AM
Well this is an interesting thing to wake up to just now:



It's only happened since this happened:



Is anyone else seeing this?




... or this for that matter:



??
3434  Other / Meta / Re: [Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban] on: October 10, 2020, 05:11:03 AM
[Ban Evasion] ( bambarmia / mosprognoz / kulmena )

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.msg55348696#msg55348696 Archive [1a], [1b]
3435  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Ban Evasion] ( bambarmia/mosprognoz/kulmena ) on: October 10, 2020, 05:06:46 AM
I didn't really pay much attention to this thread at the time, however, I believe I may have stumbled upon something and present the evidence here:

There is a suggestion that kulmena u=2656586 is an alt of mosprognoz

Evidence would seem to suggest that is the case::

Code:
7/30/2019 6:48:37 AM 	Changed to Archived status 	Autoban user	mosprognoz
7/30/2019 7:16:35 PM Profile unbanned New post mosprognoz
30 July 2019, 22:11:05 Date Registered: kulmena

I notice mosprognoz used the misspell expression

Code:
unforchinately

My search of the forum uncovered just one other instance by bambarmia who is banned.

  • unforchinately used by mosprognoz in this LINK (Archive [1a], [1b])
  • unforchinately used by bambarmia in this LINK (Archive [2a], [2b])

Code:
04 August 2017, 05:10:42 Date Registered: 	bambarmia
04 August 2017, 05:27:22 Date Registered: mosprognoz

3/19/2018 6:48:54 PM password changed bambarmia
3/19/2018 6:50:36 PM password changed mosprognoz

5/22/2018 12:34:55 PM password changed mosprognoz
5/22/2018 5:10:26 PM password changed bambarmia
5/22/2018 5:51:51 PM password changed bambarmia

Conclusion:

It's my opinion that the three UID's are alts given that they use the same misspelling of a word (the only two instances I can find to do so), two register within fifteen minutes of each-other then twice change their password within two minutes in the first instance, then within about five hours in the second instance.  Then, the third alt registers within three hours of the second alt being banned, then unbanned.




04 August 2017, 05:10:42 Date Registered:    bambarmia
04 August 2017, 05:27:22 Date Registered:    mosprognoz

3/19/2018 6:48:54 PM    password changed   bambarmia
3/19/2018 6:50:36 PM    password changed   mosprognoz

5/22/2018 12:34:55 PM    password changed   mosprognoz
5/22/2018 5:10:26 PM    password changed   bambarmia
5/22/2018 5:51:51 PM    password changed   bambarmia

5/9/2019 4:55:16 PM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   bambarmia

7/30/2019 6:48:37 AM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   mosprognoz
7/30/2019 7:16:35 PM    Profile unbanned    New post      mosprognoz
30 July 2019, 22:11:05 Date Registered:             kulmena

22 August 2020, 22:07:54 Last Active:       mosprognoz

09 September 2020, 05:50:22 Last Active:    bambarmia
3436  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: US 2020 Elections data, polls and bets on: October 10, 2020, 01:26:23 AM
BTW, has anyone used fairlay recently? Thought about betting on US election results but I'm hesitant: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=673475.msg55347187#msg55347187

If I can recommend freebitco.in - they are offering over 2:1 for Trump (and you can also place a near 200:1 bet for Kamala Harris becoming the next US President too) - Freebitcoin has over 39 million registered users and counting.

Link is in my Signature.
3437  Economy / Reputation / Re: [UPDATED] Ban-evasion by user Alamjob239/Bla2kja2k/acemax/RainbowSky [UPDATED] on: October 10, 2020, 12:15:12 AM
acemax was only active for one week before being banned:

Code:
Date Registered: 	14 February 2020, 07:26:27
Last Active: 21 February 2020, 07:40:46

yet managed to put together a trust list, one or two names stand out:

Quote
Trust list for: acemax Banned! (Trust: +0 / =1 / -3) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-10-03_Sat_05.09h)
Back to index

acemax Trusts these users' judgement:

9. Basorexia (Trust: +0 / =2 / -10) (480 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

acemax Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~teeGUMES (Trust: +11 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (2) 641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~owlcatz (Trust: +43 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (21) 395 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~anonymousminer (Trust: +42 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (7) 1022 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

acemax's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~acemax's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

None of the other three; Bla2kja2k (nuked), alamjob239 (inactive) or Rainbowsky appear to have created a DT list of their own.




I don't know that there's a connection between Basorexia and your four alts, but the top four UID's that receive merit from Basorexia ( Dime Per 1 NPXS, Pastrana, Aleksandr_ov (banned) and 6eTxoBeH ) might be worth looking at given their cross sharing of merits and their activity (password / email etc) in March 2020 leading up to Aleksandr_ov being banned at the start of April.
3438  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Proof of pure luck on: October 09, 2020, 10:58:06 AM
...

If an observer is able to view the randomly generated numbers prior to the hashing, then they can tip off an investor to select those specific numbers and win the pot.

That being said, applying something like this to the "random" selection of users who qualify for the DT1 each month would go a long way towards transparency when @theymos is making their selection each month.

=====================

@LoyceV
3439  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: What is House Edge and how it effects gambling on: October 09, 2020, 10:53:24 AM
3 to 5 percent edge are high but this do depend on the game too  .

good games like slots usuall have higher edge but i better play on games or on site that has 1 percent or lower edges than that although this wont mean that i can be a winner now but atleast i have more chance than ever.

  your shared strats to beat the house is okay , i have tried this and seen many gamblers try that but is that all a myth ? because theres that time that we are gonna loose after trying these strats .

House edge is simply the amount the house rakes in to cover their costs and plan for new ventures.  Where the house makes it's real money is where the punters roll their winning back into vet more wagers at whatever game they are playing - even if they have a big win and eventually the gambler looses out.  Always know when to fold/cash in/walk away.
3440  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2020 Q4) on: October 09, 2020, 04:17:59 AM
Still blaming people without any solid proof. Good job Smiley

Take look at my posts again please . This time maybe you can do better Smiley again use the address which was a bitcoin puzzle !

It seems to be a cut and dry case, but let's review it and allow the other investigators another chance to review my original work.

Quote


Quote
3 Accounts Connected: bitkoyun u=142961, sonerbo u=391624, sonerbo1 u=1809617

(first two claiming from the same competition as though they are different accounts)

Ref LINK:  ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg53008178#msg53008178 )




So let's look again at the evidence:

bitkoyun signs a message with the wallet address 17YazJeU4TXkZr6PqCSQGnDbDyQh7baZV8

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz.
Coin Türk Av partisi ile ilgili ilk tahminlerim:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Destekleyici
İlk üçe verilir
Bayıltıcı gaz
Doktordan alınır
İlk kitap
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
17YazJeU4TXkZr6PqCSQGnDbDyQh7baZV8
HPJnG32o2cupob5SRfzy8h+56ora+RfrnWwmm2cFLOBuetPZCCiiYlMAbl7LqT71Rrm/smuaafFQZWAAG+NePXw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE--

Destekleyici = CoinTürk Store = http://store.coin-turk.com/
İlk üçe verilir = Madalya / Kupa (Store da satılan altın, gümüş fiziksel coin olabilir)
Bayıltıcı gaz = Ethereum
Doktordan alınır = Rapor Smiley
İlk kitap = Levent Kurt

bir de bütün ürünlerde sepete ekle butonunun yanında 5KULY6Ehui yazıyor. Bir çeşit şifre galiba.


My first predictions about the Coin Turkish Hunt party:

----- BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE -----
Supporting
is given to the top three Stun
gas is
taken from the doctor
First book
----- BEGIN SIGNATURE -----
17YazJeU4TXkZr6PqCSQGnDbDyQh7baZV8
HPJnG32o2cupob5SRfzy8h+56ora+RfrnWwmm2cFLOBuetPZCCiiYlMAbl7LqT71Rrm/smuaafFQZWAAG+NePXw=
----- END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE--

Supporter = CoinTürk Store = http://store.coin-turk.com/
First three = gold, silver medal / Cup (sold in Store may)
Stun gas = Taken from Ethereum
Doctor = Report Smiley
First book = Levent Kurt

And on all products it says 5KULY6Ehui next to the add to cart button. Some kind of password, I guess.



Six posts later, sonerbo posts the following:

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz.

sonerbo says they received the award and posts the wallet address that bitkoyun posts a signed message from.

It's a common mistake those using alts make, posting one wallet address in a post made by another alt.




I also can't help but notice that your trust feedback posts are retaliatory:


Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 ... 485 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!