|
Block reward changed from 5k to 277 coins.
|
|
|
|
Block reward is controlled by: 2222222/(((Difficulty+2600)/9)^2)
Block generation: 2.5 minutes
Difficulty Retargets using Dark Gravity Wave
Yeah, those are definitely not true. |
|
|
|
|
Nice diff readjust bro

{
"blocks" : 400,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : -1,
"networkhashps" : 3495306,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false,
"generate" : false,
"hashespersec" : 0
}
|
|
|
|
Welcome.
At the beginning i want to match that i looking only for ppl interested in this kind of group. If you are not, please dont spam.
I was member of 2 pumping groups, but leaders didnt meet my expecations.
My group was created 1 month ago. We have 10 organized and enthusiastic people who want to earn money.
Permanent membership cost 1 BTC. Its a lot, duo to profits that we can make.
We have active irc.
For more informations feel free to ask on private message.
Peace!
Holy shit! What a fucking deal! For the ultra low price of 1BTC I can follow your calls and get my money torn from me from your shit pump and dumps? I'll take 10 PLEASE! Damn, that trust rating is almost admireable. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe I'm missing something crucial here but I don't get the fees for pumping groups. I mean if your pumping group is any good then I'd guess that you don't need any upfront fees, participants should pay from their earnings. Unless your pump group is all about dumping on your own members, or maybe I'm just missing something.
|
|
|
|
Just to clear things up.
Earlz is an excellent coder, he is preparing something big. This is a "test" coin.
A test coin made by a pro. This just means it's better than 99,5 % of of the coins in the market.
Moreover Earlz said he may incorporate some new features to the coin, plus the coin has limited supply.
These are the data, decide if you are in or out and don't rant...
what the hell makes u think he can make some big coin? he cant manage even this one. look what darkcoin did, they did not need any testcoins dev is just a kid learning to code because he has no skills keep coin forked as darkcoin did. we dont need any more shit coins, mining just and only btc for now. altcoins are dead. Any other even remotely decent altcoin could have blew up just as much as darkcoin or dogecoin or others did. And Earlz knows he's not very good at PR so I'd imagine if he were to launch a serious coin then he'd do so with a selected team to cover every aspect of managing a coin. If wallets and blockchain technologies wouldn't be open source we'd have like 10 coins total but as it stands everyone can copy paste and launch their useless coins in a matter of minutes. Besides, if a guy launches a testcoin (which even gets traded btw) you know that guy won't just going to release a coin half-cocked. |
|
|
|
This coin launch this in ANN ALERT: This is a prototype coin. Feel free to test,mine,stake or not. There is no guarantee it work. We haven't tested it on -testnet. Feel free to hash some at your own risk. Thanks Three hour later then this Welcome to C-CEX! https://c-cex.com/?p=pty-btchttps://c-cex.com/?p=pty-usdThree hour later it on exchange. It untested prototype. No block explorer. Says maybe not work. Why c-cex list this coin? Someone with c-cex launch this coin to dump on c-cex. c-cex list many bad coins quick. c-cex people are ones launching coins and list on own exchange. Adding coins without a block explorer is just silly. |
|
|
|
Need help on DGB coin Qubit algo Theblocksfactory I think needs a setting that I don't understand and he doesn't, all other pools on this algorithm work fine.
On Qubit algo... before #33 we needed a -f 236 and now we don't. Now on this pool since 6 months ago I never got ccminer to work properly. With the older versions I needed to restart the program every 60 seconds to get the pool at my true hashrate. With #39 , no -f 236 needed , it works fine except it only excepts exactly 1/2 my hashrate. I think its a setting the pool owner needs to make. Again I tried this on another pools and it works fine. Any thoughts on this please? Please. ps The other pools have so little hash rate they only hit a block once in awhile.
Thx
If a pool is showing half the hashrate chances are you're doing twice the expected work so doubling your difficulty divide factor (--diff or -f) is what's probably missing. The default is 1 so you should try 2. Conversely, if it only accepts half the shares then you're sending smaller chunks of work then what the pool expects in which case halving the diff helps (-f 0.5). If there are still rejected shares try lowering the values to like -f 0.0078125 or -f 0.00390625 to offset the default 128/256 multipliers while checking the pool's reported hashrate. -f 0.5 divides it in half so total= 1/4 hash rate. I did try on another pool and its fine but this amd pool is s***. theblocksfactory I tried 2 but over shares. So I come to the conclusion that it theblocksfactory pool. I'm in http://digihash.co very good no problems.  Theblocksfactory is weird. When their vardiff starts climbing it throws rejects so it goes back and repeats. Anyway, you can use a fixed minimum vardiff and it seems for a 6 card 750 Ti rig 4 (.workername_diff4) works fine with -f 256 with release 39. |
|
|
|
my gtx-750ti wont work...
using ccminer on windows, driver crashes after 5 seconds...
i have the same problem  Don't use use --throughput 4. Use something like 1.8 or just don't include it. |
|
|
|
Need help on DGB coin Qubit algo Theblocksfactory I think needs a setting that I don't understand and he doesn't, all other pools on this algorithm work fine.
On Qubit algo... before #33 we needed a -f 236 and now we don't. Now on this pool since 6 months ago I never got ccminer to work properly. With the older versions I needed to restart the program every 60 seconds to get the pool at my true hashrate. With #39 , no -f 236 needed , it works fine except it only excepts exactly 1/2 my hashrate. I think its a setting the pool owner needs to make. Again I tried this on another pools and it works fine. Any thoughts on this please? Please. ps The other pools have so little hash rate they only hit a block once in awhile.
Thx
If a pool is showing half the hashrate chances are you're doing twice the expected work so doubling your difficulty divide factor (--diff or -f) is what's probably missing. The default is 1 so you should try 2. Conversely, if it only accepts half the shares then you're sending smaller chunks of work then what the pool expects in which case halving the diff helps (-f 0.5). If there are still rejected shares try lowering the values to like -f 0.0078125 or -f 0.00390625 to offset the default 128/256 multipliers while checking the pool's reported hashrate. |
|
|
|
sure, lets make more shit coins to test new features..
People got so used to gambling with shitcoins that even testcoins can make their way onto exchanges. Even if this coin is a testcoin, and with its lack of PR it still beats copy-paste shitcoins by a large margin. |
|
|
|
I seriously hope the Dev or a Dev fixes this, I feel like I wasted my rented hash when I could of been Multipool mining instead...
Did you read the OP?  From all the crazy crap that made it to exchanges or even blew up for a few days with decent volume I think at this point everyone is mining everything. |
|
|
|
Is there a way to run sgminer with 6 cards (750 Ti)? Whatever I do I can only run it if I disable a card. With 6 cards I get Error -6: Creating Context. (clCreateContectFromType), failed to init GPU thread 5, disabling device 5.
I had to move 1 of my r9 270x's to my test rig cause I could only get 5 to work per rig and 2 of them still run slower than the other 3 for some reason. Apparently error -6 is a CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY error. |
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to run sgminer with 6 cards (750 Ti)? Whatever I do I can only run it if I disable a card. With 6 cards I get Error -6: Creating Context. (clCreateContectFromType), failed to init GPU thread 5, disabling device 5.
|
|
|
|
There's no pluck there. DJM34 made a fork which runs at around 2.3kh/s per 750 Ti while sgminer does ~3.7kh/s. |
|
|
|
sp - is pluck part of this fork? ...
if not - will it be? ...
#crysx
Not yet but I hope soon. For the time being sgminer is much faster than ccminer for nvidia cards which pretty much screams for optimizations. |
|
|
|
Sup! Lets make sure that we thank djm34 and Wolf0 for the hard work they have done with getting miners available for everyone to mine with. Also please spread the hash rate around. +1 dat dump  Cost of production is still below the price so I think we will see a dip below 0.0009 or so depending on how many big rig owners are out there that will join the mining party in the next few hours/days. After things settle in I think we should see a price increase though, depending on the followup. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
