people mine on deepbit the same reason anikin skywalker joined up with the emperor..
Deepbit has cool uniforms? I haven't gotten one yet.  Sam |
|
|
|
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
My 24 hour rewards haven't updated in the last 24 hours. Sam Should be fixed now, was sorting the log records from earliest to latest instead of latest to earlier when calculating your shares in the last 24 hours. Yep, it changed. I'll check it again in about an hour. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
Why do you mine on deepbit? I don't. See avatar. Which one? The one with Sigourney Weaver? Or the Avatar: The Last Airbender. The latter, the animated series, is far and away the better choice. But I don't see what that has to do mining at deepbit. Sam |
|
|
|
24 Hour rewards will be shown on the My Account page later today, now that the extra logging has had a chance to run for a full day.
My 24 hour rewards haven't updated in the last 24 hours. Sam |
|
|
|
Yep, I'm currently a Windoze user for mining. What's the CLI command for setting processor affinity? c:\windows\system32\cmd.exe /C start [b]/affinity 8 [/b] /d c:\bitcoin\cgminer\ c:\bitcoin\cgminer\cgminer.exe <cgminer options here> The affinity flag is binary CPU core 1 = 1 CPU core 2 = 2 CPU core 3 = 4 CPU core 4 = 8 It is that way in case you wanted (which we don't) to restrict an app to multiple cores (i.e. affinity 6 would restrict process to 2nd & 3rd core). I took notes and will make use of them when I fire up my Win7 install again for testing. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
I believe it's different for XP and Win7. Hit up Google for specific examples...that's where I got mine from  Will do. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
Thanks for your thoughts, there are more than 30 boxes behind than router, no special firewall rules, only nat.
All of them failing only with pit.deepbit.net
Maybe ddos filtering at deepbit does not like traffic from that specific public ip.
All are failing on pit.deepbit.net?? I thought your original message said that only one machine out of your farm was having problems and the rest were OK? Confused, Sam yes, only pit.deepbit.net are failing from 30 different boxes with same public ip address no problem on other locations Ah, that is different from my previous understanding. I guess I would Wireshark the connection between my router and ISP equipment and filter the traffic for the pit.deepbit.net IP to see what is happening, if your local to that installation. And/Or wait for Tycho to chime in. Sam |
|
|
|
Thanks for your thoughts, there are more than 30 boxes behind than router, no special firewall rules, only nat.
All of them failing only with pit.deepbit.net
Maybe ddos filtering at deepbit does not like traffic from that specific public ip.
All are failing on pit.deepbit.net?? I thought your original message said that only one machine out of your farm was having problems and the rest were OK? Confused, Sam |
|
|
|
I am currently running 11.8 across the board and yes, still 100% CPU issue, but mainly (only) on 5xxx multi-card rigs from what I can tell..
And 5xxx cards is what I have. Does the 100% CPU utilization cause much extra heat and electricity usage? I currently have two hard drives setup for this system. One with Win7 32bit and the other with WinXP, which is what I currently running. Maybe I should revisit the Win7 config with the newer Catalyst. Thanks for the input guys. Sam I've never really monitored it much......but I am sure that heat and additional power consumption would be a result. If you want to 'solve' this (somewhat), simply launch CGMiner with a bat file, in which you can also assign CPU affinity, overclock/underclock core & mem, set fan speeds etc, all at the same time.....it's a decent solution to the problem and you won't have to worry about it on any of your muti-thread/core machines once setup in the bat file. Throw a shortcut to the bat file into your 'All users' startup folder (assuming you are a Windows user, like myself...lol), set the machine to auto-login.... and have everything fire up at bootup and call it a day. DONE & DONE. Yep, I'm currently a Windoze user for mining. What's the CLI command for setting processor affinity? Didn't know that could be done from the command line. Thanks again, Sam |
|
|
|
Yes, very weird, maybe they have problems with their filtering service.
These is complete stats :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics ---
38 packets transmitted, 14 received, 63% packet loss, time 37165ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.573/272.675/400.994/50.707 ms
while from same box :
--- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
32 packets transmitted, 32 received, 0% packet loss, time 31007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.581/234.843/307.661/24.113 ms
and from a different box :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.558/127.979/128.352/0.459 ms
Any clues ?
I would be curious to see your Yahoo pings on Box2. I assume they'd also be lower. I would suspect there is something wrong locally. I.e., network adapter, cable length to router, etc, etc. The issue is that failing box is only failing with pit.deepbit.net I suspect a filtering problem on their side. Hmm, I don't see how it could be a filtering problem on their side. Deepbit is going to see all of your traffic coming from your router as the one public IP. It is up to your router to route the traffic back to the correct box. I would think it is a filtering problem on your firewall/router. Unless, of course, each of your mining box's have a public IP, which would be undesirable. Then it could still be a firewall rule on that box. Just rambling thoughts, Sam |
|
|
|
I am currently running 11.8 across the board and yes, still 100% CPU issue, but mainly (only) on 5xxx multi-card rigs from what I can tell..
And 5xxx cards is what I have. Does the 100% CPU utilization cause much extra heat and electricity usage? I currently have two hard drives setup for this system. One with Win7 32bit and the other with WinXP, which is what I currently running. Maybe I should revisit the Win7 config with the newer Catalyst. Thanks for the input guys. Sam |
|
|
|
I was just about to post the same thing...lol
No 'extending' required since 11.7
One GPU shows up in display properties, but all 4 are seen and used by CGMiner in my quad-card setups.
No more dummy plugs either.....
So, is your CPU utilization high with 11.7? Sam |
|
|
|
If you have more than one GPU and all your monitors hooked up to a single GPU you can set the "monitor" GPU to dynamic and all other cards to a high I value. For example my 3x5970 workstation has 1 GPU set to D and the other 5 set to I=9. If you have multiple monitors hook them all up to the same GPU to minimze the number of GPU which need to be set to dynamic.
That doesn't hold true for Windoze does it? Since I have to extend the desktop to the GPU without the monitor to enable it. Whatever I do to that GPU seems to have an effect on the desktop GUI as well. Sam With new(er) drivers you shouldn't need to do any tricks like extending desktops or using dummy plugs. My Win7 workstations has 3 monitors all on a single GPU. None of the other GPU have any desktops extended to them. I can't remember which driver version got rid of the need for that but it has been a long time. Hmm, I'm using Catalyst 11.6 and tried it with that version and also 11.7 and neither could do it, plus the 11.7 has the high CPU utilization issue. If you get a chance take a peek at which version Catalyst your using drop me a note and I'll give it a whirl. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
If you have more than one GPU and all your monitors hooked up to a single GPU you can set the "monitor" GPU to dynamic and all other cards to a high I value. For example my 3x5970 workstation has 1 GPU set to D and the other 5 set to I=9. If you have multiple monitors hook them all up to the same GPU to minimze the number of GPU which need to be set to dynamic.
That doesn't hold true for Windoze does it? Since I have to extend the desktop to the GPU without the monitor to enable it. Whatever I do to that GPU seems to have an effect on the desktop GUI as well. Sam |
|
|
|
They drove a dumptruck full of money and unloaded it on my front lawn. I'm not made of stone. It's not quite true, but some people are still donating (thanks!!), and the alleged other uses for longpoll on the same block were valid.
I'm using --donate 5 right now. Please don't confuse that with supporting Merged Mining, because I don't. Thanks for your great work. Sam |
|
|
|
Any chance of having the 'Private 26th row' return to the Hall of Fame, for those of us who want to still see how we measure up, even if we do not make the 'Public' Top 25 ?
And where do those User ID numbers come from? I can't find any reference/correlation between my user name and what my User ID may be. Sam They used to be highlighted in light yellow (on my crappy monitor anyways....lol). I used to have a user-specific 26th row, because I wasn't fast enough or share count high enough to be top 25. When I was top-25 (beta-PPS), my user ID# rows were still highlighted in light yellow. This should tell you what your user# is Also, the API link will tell you what your current user ID is.....the first part of the first line, mine looking like: {"user":{"user_id":xxxx https://www.btcguild.com/api.php?api_key= {your API key value} Hope that helps, Allan Yep, found it. I looked for it yesterday and missed, don't know how. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
Any chance of having the 'Private 26th row' return to the Hall of Fame, for those of us who want to still see how we measure up, even if we do not make the 'Public' Top 25 ?
And where do those User ID numbers come from? I can't find any reference/correlation between my user name and what my User ID may be. Sam |
|
|
|
Hi there
All went well, but for some reason, it mines at 4MHASH/s on my 5830.
it used to produce 300Ghash/s when overclocked to 975, and it still does it on phoenix.
Wow, If you can tell me how I can get 300GHash/s out of my 5830 I'll give you all my bitcoins.  Sam i have 6 of them in 1 machine mining and all producing 296-304 Mh/s have the core clocked up to 950, on the 304 MH/s ones, 930 for the 296 MHs one memory clocked at 310 Yep, Mega Hash's not Giga Hash's. I was just being a smart a--. Sorry, not really productive. Sam |
|
|
|
Hi there
All went well, but for some reason, it mines at 4MHASH/s on my 5830.
it used to produce 300Ghash/s when overclocked to 975, and it still does it on phoenix.
Wow, If you can tell me how I can get 300GHash/s out of my 5830 I'll give you all my bitcoins. Sam |
|
|
|
Thanks, I've got it bookmarked. Sam |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
