Remember that James says, at James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. You keep talking about the New testament, I'm talking about the Old Testament. Because of this, and the fact that you have broken at least one command in the Law, you deserve to die right along with the atheists.  " We are all sinners." Best regards. The New Testament of the love and salvation of Jesus overcomes the Old Testament. Since you agree that you are a sinner, and the New Testament shows that you are at least part atheist (see James, above), you deserve to die. |
|
|
|
You have your own personal laws and beliefs. Great. Good: I understand stupidity and prejudices now. If I tell you that atheists need to die because they: 1) Believe in idols (against 1st Commandements) 2) The punishment for idolatry is death (Ex 32:4 - Golden Calf episode, source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_calf) What are you going to say? Best regards. Remember that James says, at James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. Because of this, and the fact that you have broken at least one command in the Law, you deserve to die right along with the atheists. EDIT: And so does your sinner Pope. |
|
|
|
lost 13 years of his life. will the government pay for that?
Shaker Aamer traveled to Afghanistan to join the Taliban / Al Qaeda. Although there is no concrete evidence of any war crimes committed by him, we can safely assume that he fought among the radical Islamists for many months, before his eventual capture by the Northern Alliance. He is quite lucky to be alive now. Had the Russians captured him, then they would have cut off his balls... He probably thought that he was signing up with the United States since it was the U.S. who brought Al Qaeda into existence in the first place. |
|
|
|
Sex is for making babies with the idea of making people, and enjoying the doing of it. Sex in any other way is porn. Like ISIS, we all have a lot of porn mixed right in with out sex. What about raping 4-year old Yazidi and Assyrian children and getting them pregnant? Will that come under the banner of "porn"? These Caliphate guys are a bunch of mentally challenged pedophiles, who needs to be wiped out from the surface of the earth. Thankfully, the Russians are taking care of them, by incinerating them by the dozens.  I think you will find that girls this young will die from such pregnancies. So, you answered your own question. In addition, their are other things in life that rule. The bottom-line rule in life is do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Thus, your prescribed punishment is probably appropriate. |
|
|
|
I think she is not trustworthy at all. Well it is actually no brain to trust any politicians.
If you don't trust any of the politicians and don't participate in the elections, then people such as Hillary Clinton will be able to win. That is because all of her low-IQ supporters will be voting for her, no matter who happens to be the opponent. And indirectly, that makes you one of her supporters, who helped her to win the elections. Who told you to participate in elections? Did you learn it in government schools? Why might government want you to vote? Do you think that maybe they are hiding the way to beat them when they make you into a slave? Get back to the basics and see that we rule by common law. Government is nothing without our support, and if government takes us to court for ANYTHING, they better be prepared to get on the stand and show how they were harmed or damaged and that we were the ones who did it to them. According their own law, the plaintiff government must take the oath, get on the stand, speak with their own mouth into the record the harm or damage they received. Plaintiff government can't do this, because plaintiff government is simply paperwork. Government loses. Of course, if we let them do it their way, they will win or lose as they wish. |
|
|
|
99% of the world's children are vaccinated. If vaccination actually causes Autism, then at least 1% of them should be autistic. But that is not the case. Studies have shown that the rate of Autism is same with both the vaccinated populations and the non-vaccinated ones. Christian religious nuts, who are opposing vaccination are no better than those Islamic radicals who shoot people for taking polio vaccines.
Vaccination is not natural. Many other practices are not natural as well. Let's get back to nature. Why? Because nature does it better than we do, by far. |
|
|
|
We only need a little. But, if denying yourself is bringing you displeasure, why not get more, especially if it isn't harming anyone else? Wouldn't you rather be rich and miserable than poor and miserable?  |
|
|
|
Most chemicals react with oxygen. MMS produces oxygen in such a form, that it is rapidly transferred throughout the body. There it reacts with the drugs that are harming the body. When the drugs are gone, the oxygen reacts in the same ways that breathed oxygen reacts with the body. |
|
|
|
I did not trust Bill so I would not trust her. She is a wolf in sheeps clothing for the naive liberals.
And a lot of the time she is simply a wolf. |
|
|
|
Sex is for making babies with the idea of making people, and enjoying the doing of it. Sex in any other way is porn. Like ISIS, we all have a lot of porn mixed right in with out sex. |
|
|
|
Religion isn't science. But, because of its ignorance and stupidity in many areas, our science is religion. True science - the way things really work - is not religion. Well, you've convinced me -- either I don't know what science is, or I don't know what religion is. Or, possibly, both. That't s the reason because " talking with similarities" is not a good behavior. The Bible doesn't talk about confusion: what is that? Best regards. You have your own personal laws and beliefs. Great. |
|
|
|
Perhaps if you examine both statements you'll see some similarities that may be illuminating to you.
Talking with similarities is not Science. Best regards. Is religion science? Are you a scientific religionist? I don't get you at all. Religion isn't science. But, because of its ignorance and stupidity in many areas, our science is religion. True science - the way things really work - is not religion. Well, you've convinced me -- either I don't know what science is, or I don't know what religion is. Or, possibly, both. You don't sound convinced. Religion involves hanging onto some fact, and basing a lot of unknowns on faith, that they exist in this way. This is exactly the way that our science works in a practical way. Much of the theory of our science is unknown to really be fact, yet it is held by many as such, based on their faith in it. Real science is only the facts. |
|
|
|
The problem with fighting is that someone gets hurt. Bangladesh is a common law nation. It is based on English common law. Theis means that the people can own any property that they want - guns. If the people would wake up and arm themselves, even if it is against the legal law, terrorists would die. Sure, some of the people might get hurt until the fighting dies down, but they are going to get hurt and be under slavery anyway, if they don't fight. Learn the common law. Put down the government when it tries to stop you from owning property - guns and ammo. Defend yourself, since the government won't do it. |
|
|
|
This isn't a matter of "belief" as I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is flat. I am convinced that most flat-earthers are just internet trolls trying to get a rise out of people.
notbatman, sure. Badecker, likely, but Moneyhoney sounds like a believer. This would be absolutely wonderful, except for the fact that there are many folks who can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is round(ish). |
|
|
|
Perhaps if you examine both statements you'll see some similarities that may be illuminating to you.
Talking with similarities is not Science. Best regards. Is religion science? Are you a scientific religionist? I don't get you at all. Religion isn't science. But, because of its ignorance and stupidity in many areas, our science is religion. True science - the way things really work - is not religion. |
|
|
|
Right your god doesn't accept human sacrifices. Only the sacrifices of those who don't believe in him. Or disobey him. Along with their family, livestock, etc. The sacrifice of your children if they disobey you. And in revelations the sacrifice of billions of people. All because he loves you.
That is not a sacrifice: that is an HOLOCAUST. User BADeker keeps confusing the 2 concepts: talk to him.Best regards. Bitnow is so ignorant that she doesn't even recognize the difference between people who are God's people and people who are not. |
|
|
|
I never understood exactly anarchy, but also do not understand the United States and they say it is the freest country in the world...
According to the writings, the Constitution and the Bill of rights, on which all U.S. laws are based, the people have two options. These options are: 1. To follow the legality of the United States Government; 2. To NOT follow the legality of the United States Government. American people think that if they don't obey U.S. laws that they are setting themselves up for punishment. This is true for only one reason. That reason is that the people don't know how to use the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to overcome every law of the United States Government. Nowhere in any of the writings of the United States are people subject to anything in the U.S. Gov. except if they sight a contract to the effect that they are. Because of this, the only way that someone can say that a person did something criminally, is if the person agrees to it. Other than that, if there are civil disagreements, it falls under the common law, except if people decide and agree that they want to do it differently. Common law is where the people use a jury to decide claims of harm or damage against one another or against government. The laws of the government make it impossible for the government to win in a civil claim, because in court, the plaintiff must appear. If the plaintiff is the government, he can't get on the stand and testify as law requires, so government loses. The people are free. But if they are too stupid to learn how to use their freedom, they are making themselves to be slaves. http://voidjudgments.com/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twn96nj0jfw&index=10&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D |
|
|
|
We are not consuming too much. From the standpoint of what exists, the consumption of the people of the whole world is little or nothing. We don't need much. All a person needs is air, water, food, clothing and shelter. An acre of fertile land can supply all the food a person needs for a whole year, physically. But, mentally many of us need a lot more. The only thing that we should maintain as a rule for our consumption is, are we hurting anyone else, or are we damaging his property. Anybody who tells you different than the above, hasn't thought it through, or is trying to take your stuff away to give to the wealthy who always want more. |
|
|
|
I guess they have chemtrails over there, too. |
|
|
|
http://www.gunlaws.com/
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
Revealed for the first time at the Benghazi hearings, America learned that Hillary Clinton had lied all along, because she wrote to the Egyptian prime minister on the night of September 11, 2012: "We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest." This is a direct quote from her email, revealed for the first time at the congressional hearing. She said essentially the same thing to the Libyan prime minister, and even her daughter, in emails revealed at the hearings.
Previously, she claimed for weeks it was all caused spontaneously by a protest and a hysterically funny amateurish video tape on the web.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/10/22/clinton-survives-benghazi-committee-hearing-n2069674
http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/22/hillary-told-daughter-chelsea-that-terrorists-were-behind-benghazi-attack-the-night-it-happened-video/#ixzz3pbEpLP8M
Why is this important?
Six weeks before the presidential election of 2012, when the Benghazi attacks occurred, Obama was campaigning on what turned out to be total myths -- he was strong, he had destroyed al Qaida, Libya was pacified and safe, and the attack in Benghazi was the result of a video on the Internet that sparked a demonstration, for which we would find and prosecute the troublesome film maker.
Hillary Clinton knowingly promoted this baloney. It turns out these were flat out lies, and she knew it.
If it turned out al Qaida was getting stronger, we had not beaten them at all, Libya was not pacified and was on the verge of collapse, about to become an islamist jihadi stronghold, that the video story was a total lie, it was fabricated to coverup the ineptitude and weakness of Obama, that there was no demonstration, and Obama was weaker than we ever imagined and lying about it all -- he would never get elected.
Obama was a fraud, the story was a fraud, the election was based on a fraud. That's why it mattered. Black lies matter.
The Benghazi hearings revealed the truth -- Obama was hopelessly weak, defeated no one, Libya was a basket case, the Benghazi assault was proof, and Hillary Clinton lied about it all.
She knew since the night of the attacks -- her three emails were the smoking gun hidden for years. Indirect proof was everywhere. Now direct physical proof of the truth was out. She had sent the truth to the prime minister of Egypt, Libya, even her own daughter. Her lies to Congress are subjects of interest to the FBI, who is investigating her on other charges.
In cooperation with Obama, to preserve his chances for his re-election, she flat out lied four days later when the bodies of our murdered Americans were returned and said we will hunt down the video stooge, knowing he had nothing to do with it, to preserve the false story.
She and Obama sent out Susan Rice to lie, bald faced, on five Sunday news shows that a funny video (it was funny, I watched it, no way people with an IQ above their shoe size could be bothered) had instigated the attacks. It was Obama's inability to cope and the lies he had fabricated to cover his inept handling of the situation.
It was a disgrace. She was a disgrace, along with him and all their cronies. This all came out, for the world to see, in the long hearing. Why did it run long?
It ran long because she only agreed to appear once -- she ran Congress instead of the other way around. She holds no office. She is a "former" this and that. The fact that she is running for office is superfluous. More than 200 people have filed to run for president (you didn't know that, did you).
So the truth came out. She lied. She helped Obama get elected under false pretenses (again I might add). The "news" media is complicit in the deception. In the presence of a smoking gun, they declared, no smoking gun. And no one gets fired or brought up on charges. Reporters' permits don't get cancelled -- because they don't have any.
With all the smoking guns for her destruction of government property, lying and obstruction of justice with the top-secret emails, if the FBI does indict her, who will run on the democrat ticket? Unlike the Republicans, they have no bench. Just one woman under investigation for multiple felonies, one socialist, and a few nobodies no one has heard of, who are dropping out like flies (and crazy uncle Joe, who has left the game).
Republicans have 9 governors, 5 senators, 2 Hispanics, 2 doctors, 1 CEO, 1 black man, 1 business mogul, and 1 woman running. And they call us the ones lacking diversity. The people calling names are the names they call.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
