Never been dead and never will be you piece of shit

Video: Reality Check: CDC Scientist Admits Data of Vaccines and Autism Was Trashed

CDC Scientist Admits Destroying Evidence Linking Vaccines To Autism

"Over 100 people gathered outside the CDC in Atlanta demanding transparency when it comes to vaccines. Is there anything to what these people are saying? How about the facts that no one else will share? This is a Reality Check you won’t see anywhere else...."

notbatman, sure. Badecker, likely, but Moneyhoney sounds like a believer.

I'm not focusing on anybody "my friend".

You got it all wrong.


Best regards.

No need to say sorry: focus on the real opponent (user Beliathon) and don't lose force in fighting the wrong enemy.


Best regards.

You keep confusing your opponents.

Go to say that to user Beliathon.


Best regards

OK, if this is about logic, then it must be a type of debate; let us carefully examine your unfortunate errors together...

OK, I agree. Now I am going to write in large paragraphs because each of the following paragraphs (5 total) is a succinct rebuttal/antithesis that I would like you to address; I will continue to summarize, simplify, and shorten points so that they are more succinct and organized as our discussion goes on, just like we have done before; most of the items below which are in quotes are from the Bible, but I have omitted the citations; to those who are not familiar with the Bible, and to you, BADecker, I think it would help to look up these phrases and read the whole chapter containing them... Now, let us see the result of this "logical debate" right here and now:
Why do you think it is possible to make another God when you are God? When God Creates, the result is Creation. When you realize "I and my father are one" in your own life, then you will "have just a little faith and be able to move a mountain into the ocean". See, it always comes down to being responsible. God gave this gift to YOU, and if you try to return God's gift to the one he sent as a messenger, well that is no different from trying to go to the bank and instead thinking the bank is at the post office; that is no different from disputing an escrowed transaction with the third party instead of "settling with thy adversary", no different from "being a servant of your Master and hiding your (Master's) gifts/talents in the ground" (Matt. 25). God's Kingdom is within you, so those "riches stored up in heaven" are probably within you as well, you just have to "access your inheritance" as a "joint-heir" (brother) with 'the Christ' ("cosmic Christ" or energy, and YES, ESU IS AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL, HOW ELSE DO YOU THINK HE CAN COME? and his name is Sananda (ONE WITH GOD); HE describes in some of the Journals his past experiences as one named Emmanuel, but Esu doesn't object to being called "Jesus" if the intent be toward Christ being). You don't need a co-redemptress (Virgin Mary) and you should not worship the messenger because he said that "God's kindgom is not here" and it is "not of this world", but it is "inside of you" (and by the way, this part is detailed in the Gnostic gospels that were conveniently left out of your studies), I can only point you to the truth, but you must study it and "see the logic" for yourself; if you protest about "Biblical authority", I can only think that your authority comes from a very NARROW and TAMPERED perspective that does not fit in with a holistic (whole) view of the life of JESUS.

This part of your "logic" is quite funny to me; you say that it is in the Bible that "you are a God" and that this is so "at least" "according to" my logic? Are you not the one who claims that the Bible is complete truth and supreme? I am the one who claims it is Holey as in "full of holes" and that you need to use a proper understanding in filling it in, like in understanding WHO God is and that you are the one who works miracles "greater than these". That book has been used to teach evil (e.g. story of Isaac) and the enemy has had a long time to corrupt a great many things in that book, the "interpretation" of the churches (and this includes you, BADecker) is based on a VERY NARROW set of Gospels, obviously excluding PJ #2, which is THE ONLY COMPLETELY VALID GOSPEL. So obviously the KING JAMES Bible, Book of Mormon, and other "BIBLES" are not the best one(s) to look at if you are trying to understand God, and that Biblical "WORD" is not inerrant for it is tampered and made from the hands of many men, it is not the true WORD for GOD IS THE WORD, the "talk of the town" is that GOD'S KINGDOM IS WITHIN YOU and “Jesus Christ knew he was God. So wake up and find out eventually who you really are. In our culture, of course, they’ll say you’re crazy and you’re blasphemous, and they’ll either put you in jail or in a nut house (which is pretty much the same thing). However if you wake up in India and tell your friends and relations, ‘My goodness, I’ve just discovered that I’m God,’ they’ll laugh and say, ‘Oh, congratulations, at last you found out'.” (Alan Watts, The Essential Alan Watts) Well, then INDEED you are GOD so YOU are supreme, or at least you will "be blessed" with GRACE if you wisely use your supreme power to "seriously understand and be responsible to Heavenly Father's Laws" (Psalms 1). That is the plain-spoken message of the OT; at least according to these two quotes I discern thusly, so what is wrong with my logic HERE? Your interpretation matters not a bit if it is not LOGICAL; that OT says that we are CHILDREN OF GOD... HE IS THE FATHER, WE ARE THE "SONS"; only through "THE SON" can GOD'S KINGDOM COME; that means all of humanity and it also means YOU, so who are you to designate one member of humanity ("Jesus") as GOD if that ONE is not YOU (ONE WITH YOU)? That ONE (Sananda) who bears a new name is ONE WITH GOD because he has had to learn his own lessons and grow into his ONENESS by understanding... HIS ONENESS!... SO THESE THREE ALL MEAN THE SAME THING: "I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE" AND "THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS WITHIN YOU" AND "YOU ARE ALL CHILDREN OF GOD". GOD GAVE YOU SOVEREIGNTY, BUT YOU SHALL NOT GIVE IT UP UNTO ANOTHER NOR SHALL YOU DUMP YOUR EVIL ACTIONS UPON ONE YOU LABEL "GOD" OR "CHRIST", FOR EACH ONE MUST BE RESPONSIBLE TO FATHER AND "ONLY THROUGH THE CHRIST PATH (I.E. PURENESS IN HEART) SHALL YOU SEE THE FATHER" AND YOU CAN ONLY BE A "SON OF GOD" IF YOU ARE A "PEACEMAKER", NOT ONE WHO "MAKES A GROUP" (CULT) TO DIVIDE SELF FROM ALL; YOU SHOULD NOT FORGET THAT JESUS WAS YOUR BROTHER BECAUSE YOU BOTH CAME FROM THE FATHER.

Well, in "making" that you are making a CULT; that is YOUR CREATION. I strongly suggest you go back and read PJ #29 about cults.

That is a mistake because "Jesus" is NOT YOUR GOD, HE IS YOUR BROTHER, as STATED PLAINLY in the quote that you misunderstood, and this is ALSO understood by the above three famous quotes from the OT and NT; it is very saddening to me that you are not aware of more of the Journals, especially that you have so far refused to read the only valid Gospel despite being such a big "follower of Jesus"; I hope to open your eyes just a bit, my brother and that you can see why my intentions are honest, but to be TOTALLY honest I don't want to waste much time in the discussion for I have "beams that I need to pull out of my own eye"; I pray and act upon my hope that you come to the light, my brother; I have heart and I am just glad that we can continue our discussion until mutual satisfaction, for you are not my adversary, and I wish you the best, I pity your confusion and hope you "come to your senses", and get on board with the truth as taught by that Teacher, of grace, or God-consciousness, or enlightenment.

I hope there is no "trouble", my friend; I am always happy to discuss my perspective with you; I hope you will see that my opinions here are logical and that the message of these two books are not only similar but also fairly different; I think the difference is most clearly apparent to anyone who even reads this one post of mine on our discussion, but especially for those who can realize their own sovereignty and who will refuse to surrender that power to a book, even if it is from God's Messenger. I am not sure about what the Bible says about it but I think God has sent MANY Messengers, but I doubt that only God's Messengers were involved in creating the Bible; it seems to me that man does a lot more bad than good on this planet, and that the society we have now is in danger of collapse as a direct result of the moral collapse that has gone on, but the solution is not "old time religion"; we need to realize our power, so let us reach out to truth and God; after all, to be a Christian means that you follow Christ's Jesus's example and his Law (teaching; Christ path); to be Christian means you know how to move a mountain, and you can also "do greater things" (and if there is any confusion, you can just "seek out the truth and find it"!), and this is because you will know that "I and the Father are one", but you do not need to identify "Christ Jesus" as your "savior" to be a PEACEMAKER, for behold, he never did ONCE suggest that he was your "savior"; he plainly told us that we are all Gods and brothers, and that we needed to repent for our wicked deeds, he never said that we could dump those wicked deeds onto him and get mercy by his deed or his death or anything like that; why don't you read PJ #2 and tell me where in THAT Gospel you can find support for such an interpretation?? I hope to make peace with you, my brother, I want to help you and convince you that I am a follower of the Christ Way, BROTHER; I wish to mention again that you should read Journal #27 about "GOD'S INSTRUCTION MANUAL" and that if you have any disagreement with the rules in that book then we can easily discuss what is essential to "being blessed and understanding God's Law" (Psalms 1), for I think you will not get such a deep understanding of the Journals (LET ALONE THE BIBLE) from what little I have posted here about them.

Nice try kid.


Best regards.

BADecker, you are the one who is being illogical. You have claimed:
your Phoenix Journals express the Bible to be supreme
BUT that quote above does not even use the world "Bible", as you have claimed. You cannot idly conclude that these books say something that they do not really say. So where is the logic??

Please, carefully observe my use of reason to correct your false claim, and tell me where I am wrong in case I am not being logical.

You are claiming that there is a "God of the Bible".
I am not so sure that all of the stories in the Bible are true depictions of God; in fact, I think your claim that the Bible is "supreme" (as in supremely true) is very obviously false, and I will make 2 points in this regard:
1) There were over 28 full gospels written and known. A scholar from South Germany chose the four which were placed into your New Testament--need I say more? How can you continue to be so narrow?
2) It has been tampered with on numerous occasions.

This discussion is not about what your NAME is for GOD, it is about the BIBLE; when you say "God of the Bible", you have to realize the logical comments 1 and 2 above; in fact these 2 points are straight out of the Phoenix Journals, so how can the Bible be "supreme"??

Is it not logical that an obvious instance of tampering is the story in the Bible where God terrorizes a child (Isaac) in order to teach the child's father "a lesson"? Anyone can see that there is no way that a God who is good would do this. Maybe that is why atheists "hate religion" and one of the famous atheists wrote a book titled "God is not Great" to make that very point. I don't think man needs books and I think you are misled by that Bible because it has been perverted by the enemy (antichrist). Instead of trying to address how the story is talking about a God of goodness, you should realize what has really happened to that book; your claim that it is "supreme" is simply not logical!

Unfotunately BADecker, 1auguar is right: you cannot make accusations without showing proofs of what you are saying.

"Affirmanti incumbit probatio"
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence


Best regards.

Since you won't quote the text that validates your point, I will assume that your claim is false.

Another false claim relates to the story in the Bible where God terrorizes a child (Isaac) in order to teach the child's father "a lesson". Anyone can see that there is no way that a God who is good would do this. Maybe that is why atheists "hate religion" and one of the famous atheists wrote a book titled "God is not Great" to make that very point. I don't think man needs books and I think you are misled by that Bible because it has been perverted by the enemy (antichrist).

The problem with this kind of thinking is, the gods (people) that believe that Jesus of the Bible is God, are making it to be this way. Jesus is God because the gods are making Him to be God by believing Him to be such. Thus, Jesus is God above and beyond all gods, because the gods are making it to be like this.

The fight between the gods who are making the various "super-gods" to be the one great god has, as its failure, the fact that there really IS a One Great God, without the thinking or deeming of mankind, or the god-like delegating of Godness to a certain being. God exists in His own capacity, without (outside of) mankind, and even without the angels and aliens.

This God is what the God of the Bible is. It is only when you allow yourself to be attached to Him that you can be considered to be a god. He is willing to so attach you, but you need to do it through the truth written in His Bible.

Quote it, please.

The problem with this kind of thinking is, the gods (people) that believe that Jesus of the Bible is God, are making it to be this way. Jesus is God because the gods are making Him to be God by believing Him to be such. Thus, Jesus is God above and beyond all gods, because the gods are making it to be like this.

The fight between the gods who are making the various "super-gods" to be the one great god has, as its failure, the fact that there really IS a One Great God, without the thinking or deeming of mankind, or the god-like delegating of Godness to a certain being. God exists in His own capacity, without (outside of) mankind, and even without the angels and aliens.

This God is what the God of the Bible is. It is only when you allow yourself to be attached to Him that you can be considered to be a god. He is willing to so attach you, but you need to do it through the truth written in His Bible.

After thirteen years held without charges at the offshore U.S. prison at Guantanamo, 48-year-old British citizen Shaker Aamer was put on a private jet just after midnight on Friday and sent back to the UK.

According to reporting by Carol Rosenberg at the Miami Herald:

[Aamer] was one of Guantánamo's best known prisoners because some Britons, including his wife and four children living in London, turned his case into a cause célèbre. In May, a bipartisan delegation of British members of parliament stumped for his release in meetings with Obama administration officials as well as members of Congress.

The transfer left 112 detainees at the Pentagon prison, 52 of them approved for transfer to other countries.

The transfer, the second release from the prison in 42 hours, left the detention center population at 112 captives. Of them, 52 are like Aamer was on the eve of his flight off this remote U.S. Navy base: Approved for release with security arrangements that satisfy Secretary of Defense Ash Carter.

Top Comments

One day, when former "detainees" like Mr. Shaker commit to putting their experiences down on paper, their stories will read like modern versions of the 19th century slave narrative. So many people in the Empire's gulags are folk who were swept up in the madness of war, and then kept prisoner for no other reason than they were "military-age" Muslim men, who came into the purview of invading American forces. Even if these people were under arms, resisting the American invaders, this does not make them "unlawful combatants." How does the invading army in an illegal war get to describe those who resist as "unlawful" belligerents? I never accepted the framing of the Guantanamo detention policy as the only way of dealing with the "worst of the worst." Guantanamo operates beyond any real measure of law; the US government is more or less unaccountable there. Guantanamo is a concentration-camp, analogous to a Stalinist prison. Many people have died there. Even the criminal US government admits that innocent people are being held there--some have been there for over a decade. This is nothing other than a policy of enslaving a certain class of people, who are stripped of all protections of the law. Guantanamo is a crime against humanity.

The facile "debate" that "detainees" must be held at Guantanamo because it is too dangerous to imprison them in the United States disguises the bigger question: by what right does the United States hold territory in a foreign country? Guantanamo is a crime against the Cuban people.

If we arrive at the day that Muslim people are rounded up and killed in the name of "national security," Guantanamo will be seen as a crucial part of the process of softening up the American people (both morally and politically) so that they are prepared to accept another holocaust. Some people will say that a genocide of Muslims will never happen, but these people are blind to reality: in some respects, it is already happening, as so many Muslim countries are literally falling apart, and nobody knows with any certainty what the future holds. I'm sure if you were alive in 1930, you never would have thought that Auschwitz was looming up ahead....

i only believe in chemtrails!

Video: Military Scientists Spray Spider Webs With Ebola And The PLAGUE

Forget the Black Widow, these cobwebs are much more deadly! Military scientists spray spider webs with Ebola and the PLAGUE

"...Cobwebs tend to take on a particular menace at this time of year, but military scientists have been conducting research that turns them into something deadly.

Researchers working for the UK's Ministry of Defence have been spraying spider webs with diseases including Ebola and the Black Death.

The research is being conducted to test the lifespan of the bacteria and viruses that cause the diseases while in the environment...."



Makes me think of the cobwebs from chemtrails...

Fallout polymer fiber 1/3 - fluorescent cobwebs from Chemtrail sky

There's proof it's flat you know. Looking at the perfectly flat horizon the vanishing point extends well beyond what Earth's curvature should allow us to see if it's a globe. This fact can be documented with a telephoto lens and infrared camera. GAME OVER

I don't think vaccines cause autism. I believe it is legendary speculation.
Also vaccines are not very needed options. You can prefer not to use vaccines.

22 ain't gonna work for that, unless you want to go tracking.