I am trading cryptocurrency in Korea,and I am using two different exchange platforms: a exchange called Dove Wallet and Binance, due to liquidity and also a price difference called Kimchi Premium. Is it common to use two or more exchanges?

Not just the effectivity but also their funds that is reserved for the signature campaign, what I mean by that is that they should have a fund for starters because they are just starting and the only time that you will get results in your campaigns is around a month or two.

Do you agree with this idea? Example: X coin has 100M max supply and there are 50M supply circulating on it's network. They sell 50M+ coins year by year to people who wants to buy it. Imagine a bank gives credit (more money than the bank has) to costumers.

All my devices show the same time zone and I haven't moved out of this time zone.  Gemini uses Authy, but I thought Coinbase/Coinbase Pro used Google Authenticator.  I pretty sure that is asked for an Authenticator code not an Authy code.

snip~~

I am not sure if there is a rule about creating fake conversations by the same group for the sole purpose of bumping threads. But if not, that should be added. If an entire thread page is covered with posts of the same group of users and that same group dominates the entire thread with unnecessary comments, admins should react to it.   

Are there lot of ppl doing this as in selling btc for a higher markup price right now?

It's unbelievable that you put a link to a thread whose content you didn't check at all - the OP contacted cabalism13 on February 27, but only now has received an answer (at least as far as public announcements are concerned).

Given the number of negative reviews that can be read on various websites, about 60% of Paxful users are apparently scammers whose account has been frozen. It is only strange to me that the OP claims that his account has been blocked.

can anyone helping me please I cannot lose my money like this (

in any case, a certain Attitude for work, as well as a certain Atmosphere, is present only in the workplace. Of course, there are quite a few professions where a person takes his job home, but he still spends the bulk of his work at the workplace. I believe that such work is more effective. As an example, we can cite the current schooling of schoolchildren at home due to the pandemic, and many experts express their opinion that student performance has decreased because in the classroom they are more focused and more accepting of new knowledge than in online lessons. The situation is the same with adults when it comes to their work and their respective schedules.

Exactly, NFTs are collectible which means that depending on who created it and how people perceive its value like paintings which is not that different with bitcoin as it is still considered more as an asset rather than a currency. That is another topic in it as well, the utility of NFT and I think that the one that will grow are those that have utilities like digital arts and anything related to it. Like what Metakovan did with the 70 million USD art that he bought from Beeple, he plans to display it in his Metaverse which is a virtual space and in a way make it a gallery for Beeple's artwork for the people to marvel at.

You have to ask yourself the same thing about spending so much on online money to you know, I mean what you people are doing right now, being skeptic and ridiculing NFT because they pay a lot of money for an art or anything that is tokenized is the same as the people back then who laughed and ridiculed bitcoin during its 0.1 USD days, why ask as to why they spend so much on NFT? I mean you are not the people that are buying the piece so how does it affect your life if they buy it if you find it stupid, you people that are skeptic are going to be left behind.

It is difficult for people to accept that the forum has taken such an attitude towards scammers, because in real life such people are prosecuted by the police and the judiciary, and they are punished in accordance with the law. Here, the greatest possible punishment for a proven scam is to give someone the opportunity to leave negative feedback or create a flag - which does not prevent scammers from continuing what they have done before.

In a nutshell scams survive in the online world because no one wants to be an online police and try to punish them - I wrote once long ago that I could compare it to the real world in the following example : A man scam, say, 10 000 people and steals a total of $1 million - instead of being punished and imprisoned, he gets a T-shirt that says scammer as a warning to others - we all know that T-shirts are the same as tags or flags, throw away a T-shirt or create a new account, you are free to scam again.

Everyone has their own understanding of the quality of posts. I agreed that messages with 2-3 words should be deleted. It seems to me that sometimes the moderators take too much upon themselves.